These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Skill Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Proposed Destroyer/Battlecrusier Changes and Purists

Author
Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat
Working Stiffs
#21 - 2012-03-20 23:14:24 UTC
Ellendras Silver wrote:
what the hell is the problem? you got all the time to train everything needed so you get the max reward, if you dont ok but dont nag about what others get while you could also get it.

what i like to know is when will the change be ? dont say before the summer that is a WIDE window i like to know a date like june 1 then i know how to adjust my plans
when we have all frigites at 4 and cruisers at 3 and destroyers 5 and battlecruisers 5 do we get the SPs free to distribute how we want or do we get all the racial destroyers at 5 and the racial battlecruisers at 5?

Off your meds again?

I personally don't care, as I don't use BC or destroyers very often, though I will be training them to 5 just in case.

However, just as I am concerned about ship balance in EVE, I'm also concerned about balance when it comes to awarding something as important as skill points in EVE.
Maximillian Dragonard
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#22 - 2012-03-21 09:53:52 UTC
Ireland VonVicious wrote:
You'd think they'd make it far more simple then this.

Give everyone all racial destroyers/battlecruisers to 4 or equivalent sp based on what pre reqs have or have not been met.

This is far less sp given away then the other options since L5 takes the most of the sp.

Then reinburse the sp used in generic destroyer and Battlecruiser so people can respend it as they see fit.

What this would do is allow everyone to still fly the ships they already own since they could train a BC back to 5 with the reinbursement if they were a command ship pilot. All while not stopping players from piloting ships they already could before.

Roll



I fly all 4 races command ships... without BC V in each race, I would immediately loose access to 3/4 of that ship class. That violates CCP's stated position that "if you fly it now, you'll be able to fly it later". I don't see your idea happening for this very reason. (thankfully!)Cool

Wut?!

Spc One
The Chodak
Void Alliance
#23 - 2012-03-21 15:23:40 UTC
So if you have Destroyers level 5 and Battlecruisers level 5 then you get all destroyers to 5 and all battlecruisers to 5 ?
Question
Ellendras Silver
CrashCat Corporation
#24 - 2012-03-21 16:38:43 UTC
Spc One wrote:
So if you have Destroyers level 5 and Battlecruisers level 5 then you get all destroyers to 5 and all battlecruisers to 5 ?
Question


how they going to do it exactly is not known but that is the idea in general

[u]Carpe noctem[/u]

Ellendras Silver
CrashCat Corporation
#25 - 2012-03-21 17:44:04 UTC
Tau Cabalander wrote:
Ellendras Silver wrote:
what the hell is the problem? you got all the time to train everything needed so you get the max reward, if you dont ok but dont nag about what others get while you could also get it.

what i like to know is when will the change be ? dont say before the summer that is a WIDE window i like to know a date like june 1 then i know how to adjust my plans
when we have all frigites at 4 and cruisers at 3 and destroyers 5 and battlecruisers 5 do we get the SPs free to distribute how we want or do we get all the racial destroyers at 5 and the racial battlecruisers at 5?

Off your meds again?

I personally don't care, as I don't use BC or destroyers very often, though I will be training them to 5 just in case.

However, just as I am concerned about ship balance in EVE, I'm also concerned about balance when it comes to awarding something as important as skill points in EVE.


i tried your meds and well what can i say Sad it had a effect i did not anticipated Shocked

[u]Carpe noctem[/u]

Drew Solaert
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#26 - 2012-03-22 01:41:19 UTC
I always knew I was going to by a minority but I didn't guess to this extent, always thought there were more of us purist / RP types out there.

I can see Tau's point, about the huge skill shift.

Honestly? I don't see why CCP can't keep the current character with their catch all Destroyer/BC skill, and only have new characters needing the racial BC skills. Surely that would be the least work, everyone happy option.

I lied :o

Ireland VonVicious
Vicious Trading Company
#27 - 2012-03-22 02:59:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Ireland VonVicious
Maximillian Dragonard wrote:
Ireland VonVicious wrote:
You'd think they'd make it far more simple then this.

Give everyone all racial destroyers/battlecruisers to 4 or equivalent sp based on what pre reqs have or have not been met.

This is far less sp given away then the other options since L5 takes the most of the sp.

Then reinburse the sp used in generic destroyer and Battlecruiser so people can respend it as they see fit.

What this would do is allow everyone to still fly the ships they already own since they could train a BC back to 5 with the reinbursement if they were a command ship pilot. All while not stopping players from piloting ships they already could before.

Roll



I fly all 4 races command ships... without BC V in each race, I would immediately loose access to 3/4 of that ship class. That violates CCP's stated position that "if you fly it now, you'll be able to fly it later". I don't see your idea happening for this very reason. (thankfully!)Cool



Try this on for size: They don't have to have the same multiplier! The SP given could cover all 4 races to 5 if they do it right.

Currently BC's have 6x multiplier. They could give away enough sp to make it = to 8x mulitplier then make each racial BC a 2x.

Still cuts back on sp give out while allowing those who have L5 trained to get all L5 racials to 5 with thier sp instead. Big smile
Lunkwill Khashour
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#28 - 2012-03-22 08:01:42 UTC
Ireland VonVicious wrote:



Try this on for size: They don't have to have the same multiplier! The SP given could cover all 4 races to 5 if they do it right.

Currently BC's have 6x multiplier. They could give away enough sp to make it = to 8x mulitplier then make each racial BC a 2x.

Still cuts back on sp give out while allowing those who have L5 trained to get all L5 racials to 5 with thier sp instead. Big smile


Cruisers are rank 5 so BC's ain't gonna be lower. What they could go for:
frigs rank 2
dessies rank 2
cruisers rank 4
bc's rank 4
(bs rank 6???)
This would be a sp gain for current users of bc skill yet make the game more accessible for low sp/new players.
Blatant Forum Alt
Doomheim
#29 - 2012-03-22 08:33:15 UTC
Tau Cabalander wrote:
Ellendras Silver wrote:
what the hell is the problem? you got all the time to train everything needed so you get the max reward, if you dont ok but dont nag about what others get while you could also get it.

what i like to know is when will the change be ? dont say before the summer that is a WIDE window i like to know a date like june 1 then i know how to adjust my plans
when we have all frigites at 4 and cruisers at 3 and destroyers 5 and battlecruisers 5 do we get the SPs free to distribute how we want or do we get all the racial destroyers at 5 and the racial battlecruisers at 5?

Off your meds again?

I personally don't care, as I don't use BC or destroyers very often, though I will be training them to 5 just in case.

However, just as I am concerned about ship balance in EVE, I'm also concerned about balance when it comes to awarding something as important as skill points in EVE.


So you think it is right for players to LOSE the ability to fly ships they could already be sitting in? wtf?

I can understand why you dont want SP awarded, but this is a FAR better option than stripping players of the ability to fly ships they can already fly. Surely you can agree with that. So unless CCP go back on the skill restructuring, this is their only option.

Unless you have a better idea?
Pvc Pipe
#30 - 2012-03-23 03:33:38 UTC
Meh

I am not a purist and I planned to train those skills anyway, but damned if I am not annoyed that I have to get them all trained right away or face loosing potential sp. Pretty much eats up the next month of my skill training time where I would be otherwise training immediately useful things.

I can see what CCP are trying to do here making BC less of a giant training target while balancing other ship classes, but I don't agree with them using skillpoint inflation to help accomplish that goal. It is a direct harm to incoming players and the only way to make it not so is to screw over older players who would no longer be able to fly their command ships, interdictors, etc.
Ajita al Tchar
Doomheim
#31 - 2012-03-23 09:06:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Ajita al Tchar
Maximillian Dragonard wrote:


I fly all 4 races command ships... without BC V in each race, I would immediately loose access to 3/4 of that ship class. That violates CCP's stated position that "if you fly it now, you'll be able to fly it later". I don't see your idea happening for this very reason. (thankfully!)Cool


Roll Really? Who do people keep repeating this thing about not being able to fly all their command ships if they suddenly lost [racial] BC V? It's not even correct.

This isn't how ships and skills work in EVE. Take a look at prereqs for, say, Sleipniers:

Minmatar Cruiser V
Command Ships I
Heavy Assault Ships IV

This is what you need to sit in a Sleip. Now, you need other skills to be able to inject the required skills, but this is not at all the same thing as actually requiring BC V (that is, having it listed as the root the tree for either a primary, secondary or tertiary skill required). If you lost BC 5 right now, you'd still be able to fly it because you would still have Minmatar Cruiser V, Command Ships I and Heavy Assault Ships IV. Obviously in order to gain the ability to inject Command Ships you needed BC V. There's a big difference between "The ship's Primary Skill required is Battlecruisers V" and "To inject the skill Command Ships I need Battlecruisers V". Remember, there was no mention of the idea that losing BC V "untrains" the skills that depend on it. In fact, CCP even said that "because of how nested skills work", people would still be able to fly their all their CSs and whatnot even if they were to lose the BC V skill for some races. It should be clear by now why that is so.

HOWEVER, if the change were implemented in some way that doesn't give [racial] BC V to all the people who currently have the generic BC V skill trained, suddenly one of the ship skill bonuses for command ships becomes more interesting. For example, Sleip:
"Battlecruiser Skill Bonus: 5% bonus to Medium Projectile Turret rate of fire and 7.5% bonus to Shield Booster effectiveness per level"

So, people would still be able to fly all 4 races' command ships because see above, but the command ships in the race for which they don't have BC V suddenly become worse than they were. Currently these T1 ship skill bonuses for T2 ships are kind of odd because you already have them at V due to needing V to inject the T2 skillbook (might be better with wording like "ship type bonus" or something and have a flat value), and suddenly they do make a difference for some people (because you're in a ship for which you shouldn't have been able to inject one of the required skills given your current skill set). The difference between "able to fly" and "able to fly as before" becomes a non-zero value.

NB: The last two paragraphs are based on the idea that you will not get all racial BC V's even if you already have the generic BC V skill; it is unlikely to be the case. It seems to not be the plan CCP is likely to go with, nor do they have any concrete plans at all.
Ellendras Silver
CrashCat Corporation
#32 - 2012-03-24 00:28:36 UTC
Pvc Pipe wrote:
Meh

I am not a purist and I planned to train those skills anyway, but damned if I am not annoyed that I have to get them all trained right away or face loosing potential sp. Pretty much eats up the next month of my skill training time where I would be otherwise training immediately useful things.

I can see what CCP are trying to do here making BC less of a giant training target while balancing other ship classes, but I don't agree with them using skillpoint inflation to help accomplish that goal. It is a direct harm to incoming players and the only way to make it not so is to screw over older players who would no longer be able to fly their command ships, interdictors, etc.


i have the same issue but i dont mind it that much (tho a bit as i realy need some other **** but well that is all delayed for 30 days Sad but the gain is worth it. i hope they will give us the SPs for all destroyer and BCs so we can spend them diffrently to compensate. then i will be uber happy Big smile

[u]Carpe noctem[/u]

Ellendras Silver
CrashCat Corporation
#33 - 2012-03-24 00:30:44 UTC
Ajita al Tchar wrote:
[quote=Maximillian Dragonard]
very long story and making decent points


tho you are not completly wrong and about the command ships you are right funny as i never checked that . i just checked preq and then you need BC 5

tho he will miss out on ships he could fly ofc if they dont reimburse as he cant fly all races BCs and destroyers.

[u]Carpe noctem[/u]

Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat
Working Stiffs
#34 - 2012-03-24 02:01:09 UTC
Blatant Forum Alt wrote:
So you think it is right for players to LOSE the ability to fly ships they could already be sitting in? wtf?

I can understand why you dont want SP awarded, but this is a FAR better option than stripping players of the ability to fly ships they can already fly. Surely you can agree with that. So unless CCP go back on the skill restructuring, this is their only option.

Unless you have a better idea?

Well, BC is a rank 6 skill, so how about making the racial BC skills rank 1 and refunding the SP difference.

Destroyers is harder as it is rank 2. No ideas on that one.
Ellendras Silver
CrashCat Corporation
#35 - 2012-03-24 02:15:27 UTC
Tau Cabalander wrote:
Blatant Forum Alt wrote:
So you think it is right for players to LOSE the ability to fly ships they could already be sitting in? wtf?

I can understand why you dont want SP awarded, but this is a FAR better option than stripping players of the ability to fly ships they can already fly. Surely you can agree with that. So unless CCP go back on the skill restructuring, this is their only option.

Unless you have a better idea?

Well, BC is a rank 6 skill, so how about making the racial BC skills rank 1 and refunding the SP difference.

Destroyers is harder as it is rank 2. No ideas on that one.


that is completly ridiculous! its rank 6 skill for a reason... would not make sense that its easier to learn how to fly a frigite or cruiser then the BC. suck it up there is no other way to do this proper for all persons then to:

1. give the players the SPs to train all the racial BCs and destroyers for as much as they could before
2. give them the racial skills accordingly what they could fly before the change

tho there are 2 options both gibving the same amount of SPs

[u]Carpe noctem[/u]

Torak Dakos
The Reckless Masquerade
#36 - 2012-03-24 11:01:36 UTC
why complain about giving free SP away, yes the number next to SP will grow but the pilot have exact same ability's as before -.-

i
Togrockz
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#37 - 2012-03-24 13:31:03 UTC
Ajita al Tchar wrote:
Maximillian Dragonard wrote:


I fly all 4 races command ships... without BC V in each race, I would immediately loose access to 3/4 of that ship class. That violates CCP's stated position that "if you fly it now, you'll be able to fly it later". I don't see your idea happening for this very reason. (thankfully!)Cool


Roll Really? Who do people keep repeating this thing about not being able to fly all their command ships if they suddenly lost [racial] BC V? It's not even correct.

This isn't how ships and skills work in EVE. Take a look at prereqs for, say, Sleipniers:

Minmatar Cruiser V
Command Ships I
Heavy Assault Ships IV

This is what you need to sit in a Sleip. Now, you need other skills to be able to inject the required skills, but this is not at all the same thing as actually requiring BC V (that is, having it listed as the root the tree for either a primary, secondary or tertiary skill required). If you lost BC 5 right now, you'd still be able to fly it because you would still have Minmatar Cruiser V, Command Ships I and Heavy Assault Ships IV. Obviously in order to gain the ability to inject Command Ships you needed BC V. There's a big difference between "The ship's Primary Skill required is Battlecruisers V" and "To inject the skill Command Ships I need Battlecruisers V". Remember, there was no mention of the idea that losing BC V "untrains" the skills that depend on it. In fact, CCP even said that "because of how nested skills work", people would still be able to fly their all their CSs and whatnot even if they were to lose the BC V skill for some races. It should be clear by now why that is so.

HOWEVER, if the change were implemented in some way that doesn't give [racial] BC V to all the people who currently have the generic BC V skill trained, suddenly one of the ship skill bonuses for command ships becomes more interesting. For example, Sleip:
"Battlecruiser Skill Bonus: 5% bonus to Medium Projectile Turret rate of fire and 7.5% bonus to Shield Booster effectiveness per level"

So, people would still be able to fly all 4 races' command ships because see above, but the command ships in the race for which they don't have BC V suddenly become worse than they were. Currently these T1 ship skill bonuses for T2 ships are kind of odd because you already have them at V due to needing V to inject the T2 skillbook (might be better with wording like "ship type bonus" or something and have a flat value), and suddenly they do make a difference for some people (because you're in a ship for which you shouldn't have been able to inject one of the required skills given your current skill set). The difference between "able to fly" and "able to fly as before" becomes a non-zero value.

NB: The last two paragraphs are based on the idea that you will not get all racial BC V's even if you already have the generic BC V skill; it is unlikely to be the case. It seems to not be the plan CCP is likely to go with, nor do they have any concrete plans at all.




u kinda got this wrong in your sleipnir example.With the new ship progression ccp considers, sleipnir will require bc 5 and It wont require any cruiser skill or any heavy assault ship skill.So this is kinda of a mess here.They say you wont "loose the ability" to fly the ships u already fly.What does this exactly means thoug
Here are a few questions i would really like to see some answers o

1) Suppose i have min cruisers 3, caldari cruisers 5(which i only trained for lets say tengu) and bc
a)Now with that setup i could fly a nighthawk (with some extra skills as well), but lets say the real reason i trained bc 5 was -lest say- to fly a perfect hurricane and a perfect drak
So after patch i still get min bc 5 and caldari bc5? If so i get for free another ship i previously couldnt fly and thats sleipnir(which i dont care about).They also let me fly nighthawk based on my previous skills which i also dont care abou
They give me caldari bc 5 which i do care about since it concerns the drake.How about min bc though?What are they going to give me? If they give me min bc 5 ill be happy.They can however give me min bc 2, which will still "give me the ability" to fly the hurricane(but not the sleipnir, which i couldnt fly before) but thats not the reason why i did train bc to lvl 5...

b)Also after the change you will need bc to 4 to train for bs.In my previous example i cannot fly min bs because i have min cruiser 3.So what happens now? i stay with min cruiser 3 and battlecruiser 5? Isnt this kinda hard since bc will require cruiser 4?And even so, i will still be able to inject the bs skill because ill have the bc skill at the correct re

c)lets say i trained amar bs 5 a few months ago, and i still have a lot to go for carrier.What will happen now? do i get the skill reimbersed? Surely you can say that the toon can still use it but thats obviously not the reason why someone would spend 30days training it.After all eve is all about specialization right?So if i had trained some navigation skills first, i get to win those 30days, if not, i get ccp and my friends to laugh down on me? Same goes for the command ships and dictors.If i trained for a sleipnir or a sabre do i get the cruiser and frigate skills reimbursed after the patc
Lunkwill Khashour
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#38 - 2012-03-24 13:58:19 UTC
On c., you'll almost definately will NOT get the skill reimbursed. Amarr BS5 still has it uses, same as before.
Kyr Evotorin
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#39 - 2012-03-24 14:58:10 UTC
It's like reading the same three different views on the subject a hundred times over in three hundred different formats. Thanks.

In any case... One thing I would like to announce: If you don't already have Battlecruisers V, you're doing it wrong. amiright?
Recknin
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#40 - 2012-03-25 04:24:03 UTC
So once this change is implemented, will the Command Ships skill itself remain generic? Or will it also be split into 4? Just noticing that although the command ships themselves don't require BC5, learning the skill does. How will that play out?