These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Incursions are not the biggest ISK faucet in the game???

Author
Farang Lo
Doomheim
#81 - 2012-03-19 04:42:16 UTC
last I check, isk from incursion all go into individuals' wallet. while to hold moon goo and profit from it, big alliance need to attract ppl with ship reimbursement program and ****. and as I know -A- has a reimbursement program for T3
YuuKnow
The Scope
#82 - 2012-03-19 05:05:31 UTC  |  Edited by: YuuKnow
The fact of the matter is that Incursions were a boost to the PvE gameplay of Eve, fostered more cooperative gameplay, and promoted more social interaction. In regards to MMOs in general PvE and cooperate PvE has been, is, and will be a rather sizeable part of any successful MMO, Eve included. Those that like to minimize the importance to Eve's success that PvE has been, forget that those that PvE pay the same subscription cost as those that PvP do.

yk
Xorv
Questionable Acquisitions
#83 - 2012-03-19 06:24:27 UTC
YuuKnow wrote:
In regards to MMOs in general PvE and cooperate PvE has been, is, and will be a rather sizeable part of any successful MMO, Eve included.


PvE driven Themepark MMORPGs yes, but PvP driven Sandbox MMORPGs no, you're wrong!
Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
#84 - 2012-03-19 06:39:56 UTC
Mai Khumm wrote:
According to the latest devblog. (Correct me if I'm wrong here) More ISK came from bounties then incursions.

http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=9115

Mainly this quote...

"There‘s certainly a lot of money coming from Incursions.  Incursion rewards in December amounted to 9.6 trillion ISK, which is an all time high, while the rewards in January and February were 9.0 and 8.7 trillion ISK respectively.  That‘s quite a bit of money entering the economy.  However, Incursions are not the biggest ISK faucet, bounties are.  Bounty prizes paid out in February totalled 33 trillion ISK."

So Apperantly incursions are not the biggest ISK faucet, but then how come I keep on reading posts stating that it is and how it should be stopped...

Oh wait, only null alliances are saying that, while having the bigger ISK faucet...


You:

Uninstall the client.

Now.

Star Wars: the Old Republic may not be EVE. But I'll take the sound of dual blaster-pistols over "NURVV CLAOKING NAOW!!!11oneone!!" any day of the week.

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#85 - 2012-03-19 07:32:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
DarthNefarius wrote:
Correct the moon goo faucet. Don't tell me it is not a faucet that is not lining the wallets of a very few .
Again, nice straw man. The issue isn't that a few people are getting rich — the issue is that a massive amount of ISK is injected by a low number of participants.

Quote:
You are telling me there are not considerable investments in man hours devoted to incursion running?
Compared to keeping a profitable moon? Nope.

Quote:
YOU ARE TELLING ME MOON GOO IS NOT AN ISSUE FOR THE ECONOMY?!?!?!
What economical issues are there with moon goo (aside from being a deflationary materials faucet)?

Cipher Jones wrote:
Incursions are done everywhere but wormhole space, and wormhole space injects more ISK than Incursions.
First of all, no, it doesn't. It injects about ⅔ the amount. Wspace is also 0.0, and thus deserve a higher payout, so even if it did, that would be kind of expected. More the to point, though, since you seem to be missing it, just like Darth here: how many people are running those wspace sweeps?
Ottersmacker
Genos Occidere
HYDRA RELOADED
#86 - 2012-03-19 08:45:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Ottersmacker
DarthNefarius wrote:
what happens now is the war decked doesn't get reps & dies... standing order for his stupidity for not reading my fleets MOTD.

DarthNefarius wrote:
I often fly 6 billion ISK ships in certain fleets



i'm a pretty chill guy, but others are reading your post as well. With this attitude i wouldn't be surprised if you get visited by some battlecruisers who post a warning in local about flying 6b ISK ships and then call you stupid for not reading it after the inevitable tears. I'm not saying something like that will happen, but it should give a reasonable man some food for thought.

i just locked an open door.. strange, yet symbolically compelling.

Sade Onyx
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#87 - 2012-03-19 10:13:32 UTC
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
That's an extra 10 trillion ISK that was not in the economy previously on a monthly basis. The 10 trillion ISK seems to be approximately 20% of the ISK Faucet economy ... so yeah, Incursions are having an effect.

The bounty system was here before Incursions.



Oh look, another example of a live herpaderp, lol

not very good at understanding Economy are you?... Suggest maybe you dont comment on things you know nothing about?

If the people who are running incursions right now, were NOT running incursions, like, I dont know..BEFORE Incursions came out.... what do you think they would be doing?... nothing? Perhaps in your mind they are having a lovley cup of tea while taking screenshots of ships?... maybe you believe them all to be sat on their sofa in the captains quarters watching the screen?

Oh wait... you thought that before incursions people were running ship spinning contests? Because before incusions came out it never even crossed their mind to make any ISK what so ever...


Seriously, either get a brain or admit that the whole incursion inflation thing was a story, a lie, a deception meant to catch simple minded people.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#88 - 2012-03-19 10:22:45 UTC
Sade Onyx wrote:
Seriously, either get a brain or admit that the whole incursion inflation thing was a story, a lie, a deception meant to catch simple minded people.
…except that what they did before probably didn't inject nearly as much ISK into the economy, so no, it was actually none of those. It's just that the incursion defenders refuse to get the point and keep coming up with various-sized straw men rather than any actual facts or data to counter what we already know.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#89 - 2012-03-19 10:23:09 UTC
Sade Onyx wrote:
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
That's an extra 10 trillion ISK that was not in the economy previously on a monthly basis. The 10 trillion ISK seems to be approximately 20% of the ISK Faucet economy ... so yeah, Incursions are having an effect.

The bounty system was here before Incursions.



Oh look, another example of a live herpaderp, lol

not very good at understanding Economy are you?... Suggest maybe you dont comment on things you know nothing about?

If the people who are running incursions right now, were NOT running incursions, like, I dont know..BEFORE Incursions came out.... what do you think they would be doing?... nothing? Perhaps in your mind they are having a lovley cup of tea while taking screenshots of ships?... maybe you believe them all to be sat on their sofa in the captains quarters watching the screen?

Oh wait... you thought that before incursions people were running ship spinning contests? Because before incusions came out it never even crossed their mind to make any ISK what so ever...


Seriously, either get a brain or admit that the whole incursion inflation thing was a story, a lie, a deception meant to catch simple minded people.


They would be injecting a lot less isk into the system.
Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
#90 - 2012-03-19 10:53:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Tarryn Nightstorm
J3ssica Alba wrote:
That's why I added it to my sig. But jelly people are just blinded and see only what they want to see Roll



Ad hominem attack in your post, and blatant appeal to authority in your sig.

Very nice, but you need to be a little less obvious about it.

Unless you actually have a legitimate argument to prove your assertion? Yeah, I thought not.

It is you and CCPSoundwave and/or Recurve who are deliberately blind here, not us.

Star Wars: the Old Republic may not be EVE. But I'll take the sound of dual blaster-pistols over "NURVV CLAOKING NAOW!!!11oneone!!" any day of the week.

Allko
Zero Tax services
#91 - 2012-03-19 10:56:19 UTC
I`m no expert but IMHO EVE economy had issues with ISK befoure incursions it`s just that Incursions was the last drop that the economy could cope with. Now the extra ISK effect is noticable even by a casual pl like me.
I liked the lvl5 in hi sec more Blink
Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
#92 - 2012-03-19 11:12:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Tarryn Nightstorm
Falin Whalen wrote:
Tippia wrote:
DarthNefarius wrote:
Stop explaining the truth to the trolls..
…and the truth of the matter is that incursions make for a massive ISK faucet that is completely out of proportion to how many are doing it and where they're done.

Hey, don't come in here with your logic and well reasoned arguments, this is the EvE-O forums.

EDIT: Besides I like to watch the tinfoil hatters and sperge lords fling poo at each other.Twisted


My God, I'm actually agreeing with a Goon...what is this world coming to, eh?

But then, I've been doing a lot of six-month "price history" checks in-game on...well, at least a little of pretty much everything, and that damned near half-again price increase of same didn't come from nowhere:

A Myrmidon costs now what a Dominix cost just 6-8 months ago, last I checked.

Ugh...Carebear white-knighters, most odious white-knightersRoll

E: Well, OK, it's not quite that bad, yet, but at the rate it's going, we will soon be paying ISK 45mn plus for tier 2 BC chassis. Thanks for shitting your money in our faces Incursion-parasites, it would seem that EVE = RL after all.

[/cynicism]

Star Wars: the Old Republic may not be EVE. But I'll take the sound of dual blaster-pistols over "NURVV CLAOKING NAOW!!!11oneone!!" any day of the week.

Dror Roidcrusher
Balls of Megacyte
#93 - 2012-03-19 12:45:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Dror Roidcrusher
a myrmidon is sold for more isk than before you say.

could it have anything to do with the mineral prices spiking due to:
1. wars in the drone regions.
2. mass bans of bots (it's sad that bots have to be taken for granted but welp)
3. people buying up existing stocks of ships due to the increases in mineral prices, e.g for reprocessing.
4. speculators driving up mineral prices due to some chaos data suggesting no more drone alloys.
5. speculators driving up prices in general (and the .01-isking is still unpenalized).


in fact, i'm off to produce some myrmidons because it seems i can sell them at an n1 price.

(p.s. - i think hisec vanguard farming is a disgrace)
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#94 - 2012-03-19 13:22:11 UTC
Allko wrote:
I liked the lvl5 in hi sec more Blink
L5s (and high-end L4s) were more about LP and loot, specifically tags, and thus largely cancelled out their ISK injections.

They still paid too much for what you had to do, but that's a rather different issue.
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#95 - 2012-03-19 17:33:04 UTC
Tippia wrote:
[
Cipher Jones wrote:
Incursions are done everywhere but wormhole space, and wormhole space injects more ISK than Incursions.
First of all, no, it doesn't. It injects about ⅔ the amount. Wspace is also 0.0, and thus deserve a higher payout, so even if it did, that would be kind of expected. More the to point, though, since you seem to be missing it, just like Darth here: how many people are running those wspace sweeps?



You got it mixed up babe Incursions inject 2/3 the amount of ISK in the form of blue loot here is my citation http://twostep4csm.blogspot.com/2012/03/its-econmony-stupid.html
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#96 - 2012-03-19 17:39:53 UTC
Tippia wrote:
[
Quote:
You are telling me there are not considerable investments in man hours devoted to incursion running?
Compared to keeping a profitable moon? Nope.

Quote:
YOU ARE TELLING ME MOON GOO IS NOT AN ISSUE FOR THE ECONOMY?!?!?!
What economical issues are there with moon goo (aside from being a deflationary materials faucet)?



Incursioners spend many man hours & spend ALOT o ISK on ships & AMMO ( faction ammo at theat ). Compated to keeping a single profitable moon, yep
I can argue the deflationary minerals until 2011 were wrecking the economy as a matter of fact I'll start a thread concerning how deflation is worse then inflation by along shot
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#97 - 2012-03-19 17:59:00 UTC  |  Edited by: baltec1
DarthNefarius wrote:


Incursioners spend many man hours & spend ALOT o ISK on ships & AMMO ( faction ammo at theat ). Compated to keeping a single profitable moon, yep


When was the last time you saw an incursion fleet field several hundred ships at a cost of 200+ billion and lose it all to titans. Then field another 200 bil in ships when the tower comes out of its timer?
Serge Bastana
GWA Corp
#98 - 2012-03-19 18:06:41 UTC
DarthNefarius wrote:
Tippia wrote:
[
Quote:
You are telling me there are not considerable investments in man hours devoted to incursion running?
Compared to keeping a profitable moon? Nope.

Quote:
YOU ARE TELLING ME MOON GOO IS NOT AN ISSUE FOR THE ECONOMY?!?!?!
What economical issues are there with moon goo (aside from being a deflationary materials faucet)?



Incursioners spend many man hours & spend ALOT o ISK on ships & AMMO ( faction ammo at theat ). Compated to keeping a single profitable moon, yep
I can argue the deflationary minerals until 2011 were wrecking the economy as a matter of fact I'll start a thread concerning how deflation is worse then inflation by along shot


And how often has your 6 bill shiny been blown up?

WoW holds your hand until end game, and gives you a cookie whether you win or lose. EVE not only takes your cookie, but laughs at you for bringing one in the first place...

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#99 - 2012-03-19 18:16:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
DarthNefarius wrote:
You got it mixed up babe Incursions inject 2/3 the amount of ISK in the form of blue loot here is my citation http://twostep4csm.blogspot.com/2012/03/its-econmony-stupid.html
…and I get my data from my own collection of sources, where it's about ⅔, and the numbers you just linked to show that you're wrong regardless. Maybe you should read them before posting, hmm…?

But sure, it's probably seasonal — people export and sell off in bulk once enough has been gathered up, so let's place it somewhere between the two. That puts it at the same level as incursion, and the question remains the same: how many people are running those wspace sweeps?

Last I saw any numbers on, a bit over 5 percent of the population lived in wspace, making those 300:ish billion ISKs per day spread over 35k+ wspacers, for a meagre 8M ISK injected per character per day. This is of course a massive increase over the average mission runner's 1.8M ISK per runner per day (which is probably be higher still, since not all of those 35k will be collecting blue loot), but it's still a lo-o-o-ong way behind the average incursion runner's 120M ISK injected per character per day.

Quote:
Incursioners spend many man hours & spend ALOT o ISK on ships & AMMO ( faction ammo at theat ). Compated to keeping a single profitable moon, yep
It's not even close. Stop pretending to be a blithering idiot — you're not that stupid. The manpower and running costs are insignificant compared to keeping a moon safe. So no, it's not a considerable investment in manpower and ISK compared to holding a moon.

Quote:
I can argue the deflationary minerals until 2011 were wrecking the economy as a matter of fact I'll start a thread concerning how deflation is worse then inflation by along shot
You could. Do you have any shred of evidence? Or, to restate the question since you didn't actually answer it: what economical issues are there with moon goo?
Hainnz
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#100 - 2012-03-19 18:33:06 UTC
If there are only a handful of people making gobs of isk from incursions, then it would *less* inflationary. There is only so much isk a person needs. That whole isk velocity thing the author of the blog went on about.