These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Fiction

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

The size of Eve and distance to Anoikis... Confirmation ?

Author
Wyke Mossari
Staner Industries
#1 - 2012-03-15 07:28:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Wyke Mossari
In The size of EVE thread, I argued that The 1000LY proximity is most likely a programming artefact like stationary planets.

In the latest Patch Notes we see that Control towers in wormhole space no longer reveal distance in the Control Tower Management window.

This is some interesting implications, especially when tied in with some rather oblique references in Templar One, which I've not seen mentioned here yet.
Risting
State War Academy
Caldari State
#2 - 2012-03-16 18:58:27 UTC
I am intrigued by your post, would you indulge me and expand on your thoughts?

I just finished Templar One.
Wyke Mossari
Staner Industries
#3 - 2012-03-18 09:35:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Wyke Mossari
I think the evidence is building that New Eden is part of a Multiverse, that the classes of wormholes are separate universes with different Cosmological Constants

If Anoikis systems were distant parts of this universe, the quantum entanglement would still work. This change removes a significant blocker that repeated stifled this conversation in the past.

Consider the Talocan's expertise in Hyper-Euclidean geometry, this is the mathematical model used to describe Muti-dimensional space. This establishes that multi-dimensional universes exist within Eve physics. A Minkowski space is a three dimensional-space with an fourth dimension of time and could be considered Hyper-Euclidean. This is part of the Poincaré group.

A 'point defect' is another name for as Cosmic string these are the fundamentals of Brane cosmology and Membrane Theory, a theory of multi-verse.

In this model, wormholes are separate from black-holes which is consistent with Einstein-Rosen Bridge, which coincidentally appears as spheres in 3D space, not 'holes'.

In Templar One we can see that the Loci of Anoikis systems are references to Quasars without ascension.

When used as a clock they they are two dimensional suggesting a Riemann Surface with wormholes as perhaps Brane Defects (1)(2)(3)

Further reading

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotropic_coordinate

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minkowski_spacetime

MULTIVERSE COSMOLOGICAL MODELS
Horatius Caul
Kitzless
#4 - 2012-03-18 11:55:27 UTC
Wyke Mossari wrote:

If Anoikis systems were distant parts of this universe, the quantum entanglement would still work. This change removes a significant blocker that repeated stifled this conversation in the past
Quantum entanglement does work between New Eden and Anoikis. The fact that chat systems and cloning works between the two is clear enough evidence of that.

In fact I don't see what QE has to do with the distance indicator change at all.
Deceiver's Voice
Molok Subclade
#5 - 2012-03-20 04:19:05 UTC
Templar One clearly states two things:

A. The nearest recognizable objects were quasars (the oldest objects in the universe, and some of the farthest).
B. Without Fluid Router technology, there would be no way to communicate between New Eden and the uncharted systems.

This suggests that w-space is far, FAR removed from New Eden. How far? Most likely NOT within 120,000 light years (the diameter of the Milky Way). It would most certainly be more than 1,000 light years. Hence the idea that W-space is in another galaxy, in another part of the universe. For reference, it would suggest that it was so far that only these distant radio sources (quasars) were observable; a quite astounding realization in and of itself, considering these objects are billions of light years away from our own Milky Way.

I also seriously doubt that it is in another universe altogether; the fact that quasars are used as a common landmark pretty much seals it.

In short: the location of W-space is supposed to be "unknowable", insofar as it can be said to be somewhere other than close to New Eden (meaning far greater a distance than 1,000 light years).
Wyke Mossari
Staner Industries
#6 - 2012-03-31 22:17:45 UTC
Wyke Mossari
Staner Industries
#7 - 2012-04-03 18:37:08 UTC

So Quasars are used as navigational beacons.

This raises the question 'what is the purpose of Talocan Polestars?'
Publius Valerius
AirGuard
LowSechnaya Sholupen
#8 - 2012-04-04 00:09:51 UTC


Just drive by and ninja tru the comments..... by the way: Nice link there Wyke.

I would love to have those classes ingame. See here:

http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/376566/march-07-2011/joshua-foer

Gosakumori Noh
Coven of One
#9 - 2012-04-04 03:31:29 UTC
The evidence isn't really "building" that EVE is part of a multiverse. It is explicitly stated in the T1's opening scene: "several dozen traces of parallel universes pass through the ship every second."

These traces are coming from the EVE Gate, site of a naturally occurring wormhole. The Anoikis can be in parallel universes without contradicting the fact that distant quasars are points of common reference. Parallel universes may differ from ours in the resolution of certain events, while retaining similarity in others.

Deceiver's Voice
Molok Subclade
#10 - 2012-04-04 04:36:27 UTC
Wyke Mossari wrote:

So Quasars are used as navigational beacons.

This raises the question 'what is the purpose of Talocan Polestars?'

Ahem...

"Ancient Coordinates Database"

Quote:
A brief analysis of the technology inside reveals that the database may in fact still be fully functional. The format and layout of the information within suggests it is a list of three-dimensional coordinates, charting a path to some distant place.


Might be "local" reference points for triangulating location, and the "distant place" being a quasar/quasars. Very accurate way to determine location.
Montevius Williams
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#11 - 2012-04-04 06:16:56 UTC
Damn, I need to read Tempar One. Wormholes not even in the New Eden Cluster? Wow.

"The American Government indoctrination system known as public education has been relentlessly churning out socialists for over 20 years". - TravisWB

Roga Dracor
Gladiators of Rage
Fraternity.
#12 - 2012-04-04 21:26:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Roga Dracor
It has been stated the Yan Jung held some kind of fuel monopoly to which the Talocan were bound.. If such were the case, most likely Talocan sites are fueling stations...

If you are explorers, making blind forays toward distant unmarked worlds, you would need concrete navigatible targets where you could resupply. At least until you overcame the limitations imposed by the interstellar travel methodology of the day...

Which brings to mind another thought.. Are the Yan Jungs the Terrans?

On the original topic, after some quick browsing, quasars produce different emmissions and it sounds plausible that maybe the quasars are the reason for the anomolies we find in wormhole space..

If that is the case, then the spiral outward was toward these quasars, which after ten billion years or so spawn new, virgin galaxies...

It's no use going back to yesterday, because I was a different person then, and it's a poor sort of memory that only works backward.

Deceiver's Voice
Molok Subclade
#13 - 2012-04-09 07:47:47 UTC
Roga Dracor wrote:
Which brings to mind another thought.. Are the Yan Jungs the Terrans?
Everyone in New Eden are technically "Terrans". Sleeper technology is referred to as "Terran".

Caldari, Gallente, Amarr, Minmatar... all technically Terran. Jovians? Terran. I think what you're referencing is pre-Collapse Terran society, in which case they would also be "Terran".

Quote:
On the original topic, after some quick browsing, quasars produce different emmissions and it sounds plausible that maybe the quasars are the reason for the anomolies we find in wormhole space..

If that is the case, then the spiral outward was toward these quasars, which after ten billion years or so spawn new, virgin galaxies...

Quasars are used for navigation simply because you can accurately use them to triangulate position in relation to another object based on the known position of the quasars.

For reference: GPS using Quasars

Simply put; combining Quasar navigation techniques with a more localized navigation beacon system (like the various sites in Sleeper space; radar, ladar, magnetometric, gravimetric) you can accurately determine your location not only within the cluster, but in relation to other objects in Sleeper space.

To be honest, it just doesn't make sense to remove the distances, because given the information in Templar One, it's actually unbelievable that this information isn't widely available currently. The data should easily be determined by the onboard systems, if they're sensitive enough to detect quasars, and "modulation navigation" techniques are used by probes in-game. Lol

But you know, for the sake of narrative, I could overlook that major scientific inconsistency. I just think that the "science" bit just blew up the "we don't know exactly where this is" argument, because yeah... any halfway intelligent scientist in New Eden really should know where "Anoikis" is if they had access to Capsule navigation data.

That's just my opinion though, no need to go spreading it around. Bear
Jowen Datloran
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#14 - 2012-04-09 11:06:22 UTC
"Who is a Terran?" "Everybody and nobody."

I believe the labeling of certain artifacts and stations as "Terran" is another of Tony's less brilliant contributions as the term does not really add up to what else we know about the origin of the settlers that colonized New Eden. One could say that everybody is Terran as we are all humans and our forefathers at one point were living on Terra/Earth. Using the word "Terran" seem to indicate that the human race had somehow unified on Earth except no other source indicate the same. In fact it seems like big corporations (the origin for the Caldari) as well as ethnicity and religion still played a big role in separation people and nations.

We also know that humans had colonized other planets before arriving in New Eden and if these people still regarded themselves as Terran or not is unknown. And what exactly is the difference between a Terran station from one, say, build by people from Soekheviti or Tau Ceti?

So ya, the Yan Jungs are Terrans because we know they are of Chinese origin from the planet Earth. But to say that they are the only Terrans is wrong. Also, we do not know if they too settled on a different planet before venturing to New Eden.

Mr. Science & Trade Institute, EVE Online Lorebook 

Wyke Mossari
Staner Industries
#15 - 2012-04-09 11:08:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Wyke Mossari
Deceiver's Voice wrote:
To be honest, it just doesn't make sense to remove the distances, because given the information in Templar One, it's actually unbelievable that this information isn't widely available currently. The data should easily be determined by the onboard systems, if they're sensitive enough to detect quasars, and "modulation navigation" techniques are used by probes in-game. Lol

But you know, for the sake of narrative, I could overlook that major scientific inconsistency. I just think that the "science" bit just blew up the "we don't know exactly where this is" argument, because yeah... any halfway intelligent scientist in New Eden really should know where "Anoikis" is if they had access to Capsule navigation data.

That's just my opinion though, no need to go spreading it around. Bear


It's this logic that makes New Eden and Anoikis a dichotomy and that leads me to conclude they are different universes. Or at the very least that far away that even Quasars are beyond the visible Galactic horizon.
Wyke Mossari
Staner Industries
#16 - 2012-04-09 11:31:38 UTC
Wyke Mossari wrote:
In Templar One we can see that the Loci of Anoikis systems are references to Quasars without ascension.


Has anybody else noticed that the complement of Bifurcation Locus is called J-Stable. Anoikis loci could be considered consistent time stamp, or time-based reference frame.

In Julia sets distance becomes very strange property, depending on how you measure it, along the surface it can be extremely small, but along the edge extremely large.

In Set Theory the Complement refers to things not in (that is, things outside of) the set. While 'those in the set exhibit dynamical behavior changes drastically under a small perturbation of the parameter'. I find this strikingly similar to the Many World Interpretation were every single quantum event in the universe spawns a new universe.

Deceiver's Voice
Molok Subclade
#17 - 2012-04-09 17:02:38 UTC
Wyke Mossari wrote:
It's this logic that makes New Eden and Anoikis a dichotomy and that leads me to conclude they are different universes. Or at the very least that far away that even Quasars are beyond they visible Galactic horizon.

Quasars are the nearest recognizable objects to onboard navigation gear. These are accurate enough to use as location identifiers in relation to "Anoikis" systems. The point being, the quasars are identifiable by onboard navigation systems, while other features are not. Fairly straightforward so far. That makes quasars a good reference point for New Eden explorers, but that's not the end-all and be-all of evidence of "we should know where Anoikis is". Given that this information is stated in a CONCORD report... and CONCORD having access to Capsule navigation data...

Well, let's move on, because there's a lot of evidence to put out here. Blink

You've got a good point with the observable universe link. My counterpoint:

Sleeper Data Library

Quote:
Small data fragments preceding each file appear to function as time-stamps. If this is indeed what they are, then this Data Library could offer a snapshot of the universe stretching back millennia.


There are Pulsars in Anoikis; this would allow for accurate navigation within the star clusters of Anoikis. Multiple forms of in-system signal sources (exploration sites) for accurate in-system navigation. EVERYTHING I see points to there being no excuse for not having accurate maps of Anoikis, and only one source that absolutely, without a doubt, would have a reason to keep this information hidden (aside from narrative purposes):

CONCORD controls the data available. Twisted

I could even, stretching my own suspension of disbelief, accept that the exact location of Anoikis in relation to New Eden is unknowable. Not having accurate maps, and not understanding the structure of Anoikis or having access to such information, kind of breaks my immersion. Unless that is the very point that is made in the Anoikis chronicle; that there's enough evidence to suggest that someone is keeping said information hidden for a reason, and that this information is vital in some way.

Which, in my opinion, is quite likely.

Further, if you take all of this evidence into account as well as certain Meta knowledge, there's only one logical conclusion to make as to the location of Anoikis, though if this is actually the intent of CCP I would be utterly and completely shocked:

Anoikis is the other side of the EVE wormhole.

While it is possible that Anoikis is in another part of the multiverse, it is more likely that New Eden and Anoikis just can't observe each other due to being on opposite sides of the universe. Given that quasars recognizable to onboard systems are used as system names (the implication being that these are commonly observed landmarks to both New Eden and Anoikis), I just can't accept the "multiverse" theory. There are more reasonable interpretations of the data.
Roga Dracor
Gladiators of Rage
Fraternity.
#18 - 2012-04-09 23:17:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Roga Dracor
I guess I really do need to read Templar One.. So, you are unequivocally saying that Tony G. states Sleeper tech is Terran tech?

One of the fundamental ideas I harbor is that the Oruze Osobnyk seperates Terran and Talocan tech as fundamentally different. If such is not the case why the seperate listings? l.e. Sleeper tech is Talocan tech, which evolved into Jovian tech, all of which is an extension or development away from Terran tech.

Or you are saying that the Sleepers are Terrans, from whom the Talocan and Jove descended? The Gallente are not Terrans by my definition.. They are of Tau Cetan descent, which originally may have been Terrans, but, after a generation is born, they are Tau Cetans..

In a galaxy with thousands of worlds, the only way I can reasonably accept them as Terrans is if there is a central Terran authority..

Just as the Achur are Caldari only by virtue of their political affiliations... The Tau Cetans would only be Terran by virtue of a central Terran authority..

The Yan Jungs are said to be Chinese, Han Chinese to my mind.. They seem to have enjoyed a higher status in whatever hierarchy there was, back then, than the Jove did.. You are killing my logic processes here.. Cry

I feel like I am missing a imperative piece of the puzzle..

Oh and the disingenuine nature of CONCORD is apparent in the fiction.. That's why I always assumed the Jovians were up to no good..

It's no use going back to yesterday, because I was a different person then, and it's a poor sort of memory that only works backward.

Deceiver's Voice
Molok Subclade
#19 - 2012-04-10 00:08:19 UTC
I had a long post written, but I decided against posting it. I'll simply say this:

There is only one way any reference to "Terrans" makes sense, and that is in reference to Human settlers from the other side of the EVE Gate. Early human settlers (aka "Terrans") of New Eden, whatever their nationality, creed, race or religion. Sleepers, Talocan, Yan Jung... all Terrans. Tau Ceti settlers arriving in New Eden would be "Terran".
Roga Dracor
Gladiators of Rage
Fraternity.
#20 - 2012-04-10 00:12:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Roga Dracor
Further, consider, only two factions have EVER been tied in Prime Fiction to the Terran, or Old Earth System. The Unified Catholic Church, and the Conformists, from which sprange the Amarr..

One could argue the Yan Jung, with their Middle Kingdom ties them to Earth.. China also means Milky Way.. So the tie is tenuous, at best.. If anyone represented Terran tech, it would be the pre-Amarrians.. Or some, as yet undefined factional element.. Well, defined, maybe, but, still operating in the shadows of Capsuleer knowledge...

Once again, the Jove considered themselves distinct from both Terrans and Yan Jungs.. A few have stated it in their Grious quotes..P

There are pieces to the history we still don't understand..

You will notice the preponderance of aliens in the link you provided, also note the context of a Terran Confederation.. No aliens that we have encountered, yet, in Eve.. Why would human beings who embrace nationalism and seperatism define themselves in such a way?

The Sleepers define two "races" in their databanks, further, the Jove relate the Yan Jung as a faction in it's own right, Terran and Talocan, two technologies, not one.... Then we have the general assertion that Jove ARE HUMANS... Too many indications that the "Terrans" were a faction unto their own..

It's no use going back to yesterday, because I was a different person then, and it's a poor sort of memory that only works backward.

12Next page