These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

incarna vs. crysis2
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
AnzacPaul
Farmhouse.
Fraternity.
#21 - 2011-09-10 00:10:14 UTC
Magnus Orin wrote:


Regardless of where you communicate, you should do so clearly and properly if you ever expect to be taken seriously.



Ok, make a clearly and properly communicated thread and see if CCP or anyone else on the forums takes you seriously.
Magnus Orin
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#22 - 2011-09-10 01:27:47 UTC
Large Collidable Object wrote:
Magnus Orin wrote:
AnzacPaul wrote:
Magnus Orin wrote:
okst666 wrote:


Yesterday a friend borrowed me crysis2..




I can't stand when people cannot communicate properly.

You 'borrow' something from someone.

You 'lend' something to someone.

The pass tense of the verb 'lend' is 'lent'

So what you mean to say, is "Yesterday a friend lent me Crysis 2"

Go back to school kid.




Ever think maybe his natural language isn't English?
Also it's an internet forum, no need to be pedantic.


Regardless of where you communicate, you should do so clearly and properly if you ever expect to be taken seriously.



Actually it's 'past tense', not 'pass tense'.


Absolutely correct.
Demon Azrakel
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#23 - 2011-09-10 01:37:50 UTC
On topic, comparing the two is kinda pointless. But we can still bash on the performance of Incarna because, not only is it ****, but the minimum requirements have gone up to support an a "feature" (in whatever world in which features are considered the removal of functionality) that is merely a closet and a cash shop.
Name Family Name
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#24 - 2011-09-10 02:00:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Name Family Name
Demon Azrakel wrote:
On topic, comparing the two is kinda pointless.



I wouldn't say so - as a matter of fact, Incarna is about at the graphics level of thief 3, which is over seven years old (with better lighting, *a tad* more space to walk around and *a bit* more interaction).

Considering the fact it ran perfectly smooth on hardware that would be considered heavily outdated by now (whilst Incarna doesn't) comparisons with other games - even todays games, such as crysis - are perfectly legitimate.

Moreover, it's embarrassing to see how long CCP take to create 3 more confinement cells the size and quality the one in Oblivions prologue had (except for the fact that oblivions prison cell had better lighting and physics).

If you think development of duke nukem forever took ages, think again - at CCP's pace, it would have taken 30 years to complete.
Large Collidable Object
morons.
#25 - 2011-09-10 02:28:55 UTC
Magnus Orin wrote:
Large Collidable Object wrote:


Actually it's 'past tense', not 'pass tense'.


Absolutely correct.



Considering you just stood corrected by the completely hammered CEO of morons. whose native language isn't English, you should probably watch out which 'kids' you tell to 'get back to school'.

I'm not discriminating you - Dyslexia is a disorder. Morons. can help.
You know... [morons.](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gjOx65yD5A)
Previous page12