These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

Mass-test feedback - September 8

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Ygenesis
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#41 - 2011-09-08 21:27:14 UTC
OS version: Vista SP2 (32 bit)
CPU: AMD Athlon 64 X2 6400+ 3.2 GHz
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
RAM: 2GB
Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high

Client crashed during NPC battle while zoomed out and working with Overview settings. Brackets were disabled.
Nemiron
Katsu Corporation
#42 - 2011-09-08 21:27:31 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

  • Vista Home Premium 32bit
  • CPU: AMD 7750 Dual-Core 2,7 GHz
  • GPU: ATI Radeon HD 4500
  • RAM: 4GB
  • Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? 1
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): -

User Experience

  • Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot:
    • Brackets disabled: zoomed out: 5-10 - Zoomed in: didn't zoom in
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) -
  • Did you experience any disconnects, complete freezes or crashes? No.
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: jumps / docking were good. Fleetfight was OK.
Jocho
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#43 - 2011-09-08 21:29:03 UTC
Machine Info and Settings


OS version: Windows 7 64 Bit
CPU: Phenom II X4 940 3.0Ghz
GPU: GTX 560 Ti 1GB O/C
RAM: 4 GB DDR2 1066Mhz CL5
Were you running more than one EVE client? How many?: No, just Singularity
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High


User Experience


Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 5
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 5
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) : 1 although brackets were not disabled
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? Yes, crash to desktop at arrival to Poitot gate from station
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc: In the graphics opinions menu have recommended fleet engagement settings to help FPS. Black screen in mass undock seemed like a crash, some text to show the client is still running would be beneficial.
Arthay
#44 - 2011-09-08 21:30:17 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

• OS version: Windows 7 Professional
• CPU: Intel Core Quad Q6600 @2.4GHz
• GPU: Nvidia GTX 470
• RAM: 4GB
• Were you running more than one EVE client? no
• Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high

User Experience

• Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 16FPS
• Average FPS - Zoomed in: 8FPS
• On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 4
• Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no

 If you find any misspelling or grammar errors, your allowed to keep them.
Flynn Fetladral
Tempered Aggression
Seker Matar
#45 - 2011-09-08 21:37:19 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

OS version: OSX 10.6.8
CPU: 2.8 Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo
GPU: Nvidia GeForce 9600M GT
RAM: 4Gb DDR3 1067Mhz
Were you running more than one EVE client? No
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Low (All effects turned off)

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 20 FPS
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 6 FPS
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 6
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

I've not done any kinda large fleet fight in a long time so it's hard for me to know how well what happened on SISI compares to a large fleet flight on TQ now. The last big fight I was in had A LOT more people in system about 1800 ish. Anyway, this seemed pretty good overall, and as this was my first time on SISI at a test the whole thing ran smoother on my Mac than I was expecting, changing overview settings and even turning brackets on zoomed out was ok. The only thing was maybe getting a black screen while undocking from the station, but this loaded within a minute or two. The gate jump was, I felt pretty smooth and responsive considering the numbers, and was certainly better than I find on TQ at times with a lot less activity.

Oh and we used a little officer mods. KIDDING! We used a lot of officers mods, A LOT! Because we don’t :censored: around in low-sec.

@flynnfetladral on #tweetfleet
Darth Behelzebhu
Lair of Demons
#46 - 2011-09-08 21:41:47 UTC
Machine Info and Settings
• OS version: WIndows Vista 64
• CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200, 2.8 mhz
• GPU: 2 Nvidia GeForce GT120 each 1gb, up to 2431mb
• RAM: 8 GB
• Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? 1
• Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Texture medium, all the rest high

User Experience
• Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 28 (br on - 25)
• Average FPS - Zoomed in: 9 (br on - 7)
• On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7
• Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? NO
• Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Good test, most people followed the instructions this time, =)
Herold Oldtimer
State War Academy
Caldari State
#47 - 2011-09-08 21:45:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Herold Oldtimer
OS: Windows 7 64 bit.
CPU: Intel Core i7 3 Ghz
GPU: GeForce GTX 570
RAM: 12 gb

Was running one client with graphics on high.

Average fps zoomed in 13
Average fps zoomed out 14
No brackets on, during gate fight.

This test was very good. If only the undocking part had gone a bit smoother it would have been a solid 9. Instead I'm giving this test an 8.

Since I was not using a mac, I couldn't partake in that part of the test. But overall for me this was one of your solid tests.
Leonidas Tokugawa
The Red Circle Inc.
Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
#48 - 2011-09-08 21:47:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Leonidas Tokugawa
CCP Habakuk wrote:
Hi! If you participated in the mass-test on the 8th September, please reply in this thread to give your feedback, based on following template:

Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version: Windows 7 64-bit Home Premium
  • CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM0 i7 CPU 920 (8 Core) @ 2,67 GHz/2,67 GHz/2,67 GHz/2,67 GHz/2,67 GHz/2,67 GHz/2,67 GHz/2,67 GHz
  • GPU: ATI Radeon HD 5890
  • RAM: 12.0 GB
  • Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? 1 (was downloading another game at time)
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High (all max setting eveything turned on)

User Experience

  • Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 21-38
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in: 12-21
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 4
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
    • Gate jumping was fine. Fleet fight was not laggy and I had brackets on...but I did find it took longer too aquire target than on TQ. The Fleet undocking was where I experienced a very long time of black screen. All other fights; starbase and NPC were enjoyable with no discerbanle problems.
Palovana
Inner Fire Inc.
#49 - 2011-09-08 21:55:08 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version: Xubuntu 11.04 64-bit, Wine 1.3.26
  • CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 (2.5 GHz)
  • GPU: NVidia GTX 460, 1 GB vRAM
  • RAM: 8 GB PC6400 DDR2
  • Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? Just one
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High settings on everything except AA turned OFF and "Effects" turned off to stop the FPS-killing sebo effect, hide all brackets

User Experience

  • Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: Between 10 and 15 FPS zoomed out
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in: Not too much difference, maybe between 9 and 13 FPS zoomed in
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)
    • I don't do fleet fights (mostly a hauler) so this is a "2" compared to what I normally experience on TQ, but overall nothing game-breaking (crashes, bugs, or lag-wise), and better than the test 2 weeks ago IMO which I had to rank a "1" because of the crash I had then.

    Performance of EVE-VOICE is still choppy/stuttery enough that I could barely make out what was being said at the best of times and couldn't hear it at all at the worst of times. I am running Linux so this could be a Wine issue and I'll have to check with other Wine users (I think mumble or mangler is more commonly used on Linux).
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? None
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
    • This one didn't seem to take as long and the fleet seemed to be better behaved, I wasn't getting attacked by my own fleet waiting to jump, maybe because the test seemed to flow better, maybe because I was in a Drake and not in a Rattlesnake like the last time. :-)

    POS shoot didn't seem to take as long as the previous time (2 weeks ago) but I had a CTD in the previous test and had to re-log.

    FPS was better during the fleet combat than during the POS shoot - even zoomed out, the POS shoot dropped to around 5 FPS at times and was usually between 6 and 7 FPS.

    I didn't have any issues with offline modules during undocking or combat, or any issues switching ammo (heavy missile) types. Warp tunnel was always present when it should have been.

    However, prior to running LogServer, when setting up my Drake in-station (ie, fitting screen) some modules did, when dragged onto the ship, get installed as offline. Specifically the Large Shield Extender IIs in the 3rd and 4th mid slots, and the Shield Power Relay IIs in low slots 2 through 4. Unfortunately I wasn't saving logs at the time.

    Idea: Since it can be difficult to setup the overview on the fly (during the fight) to display/not display certain object types, maybe an overview XML file can be provided that testers can import prior to the start of the test?

Please support: export of settings in editable format

Your stuff goes here.
Oleg 519
Seekers of Heaven
#50 - 2011-09-08 21:58:32 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

•OS version: Windows 7 32-bit Ultimate
•CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM0 i7 CPU 860 (8 Core) @ 2,8 GHz
•GPU: ATI Radeon HD 5770
•RAM: 3.0 GB
•Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? 1 (was downloading another game at time)
•Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High (all max setting eveything turned on)

User Experience

•Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 8-20
•Average FPS - Zoomed in: 4-15
•On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 3
•Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? Yes
•Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
long entrance and exit of the station
during combat low fps
rest in the normal range.
Haeri
Club Bear
#51 - 2011-09-08 22:48:22 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version: Mac OS X 10.7
  • CPU: 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
  • GPU: NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT 256 MB
  • RAM: 4 GB
  • Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? No
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Lowest

User Experience

  • Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: ~20
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in: 1-10
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? One disconnect/crash right before the test started, while at the gate with everyone else.
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Got one "unexpected exception", clicked "No" and kept going. After the first jump and throughout the entire test I couldn't see any ship models or ship icons. At one point when shooting the POS tower my capacitor indicator got stuck: http://i.imgur.com/YPdDS.jpg. Got several freezes that lasted for several seconds, mostly during the fight at the gate.

YouTube: HaeriEVE  |  Twitter: @Haeri_EVE  |  Club Bear
HOPSTOP
HOPSTOP LLC.
#52 - 2011-09-08 23:34:45 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

- OS version: XP sp3
- CPU: Dual core 3.2ghz
- GPU: ati hd4850
- RAM: 4gb
Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): medium

User Experience

- Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: <10 fps
- Average FPS - Zoomed in: 1-5 fps
- On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
- Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? yes, 1 d/c.
- Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: laggy, laggy, laggy... Uundock was about 2 minutes of black screen.
OXOTHuK
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#53 - 2011-09-08 23:41:29 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

OS version: XP sp3
CPU: Dual core 3.2ghz
GPU: ATI HD 4850
RAM: 6gb
Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): medium/high

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: <10 fps
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 1-5 fps
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? yes, 1 d/c.
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:ugly lag. Long time undock (about 3 minutes of black screen.
Phreeoni
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#54 - 2011-09-08 23:57:04 UTC
Machine Info and Settings


  • OS version: WIN XP SP3
  • CPU: INT DUAL CORE 3.0 GHZ
  • GPU: ATI HD4850
  • RAM: 4GB
  • Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? 1
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): MEDIUM


User Experience


  • Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: <10 fps
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in: 5-6 fps
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? NO
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: very laggy. Long time undock, low fps
Tertharan
#55 - 2011-09-09 06:57:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Tertharan
Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version: Windows 7 Professional 64-bit
  • CPU: AMD Athlon X2 5600+
  • GPU: nVidia GeForce 8600 GTS
  • RAM: 6 GB
  • Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? 1
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high

User Experience

  • Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 7
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in: 5
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 I'm never in fleet fights like this on TQ, so I can't make any comparison there. When there was no one around, it was about the same.
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: FPS was low, but modules seemed responsive. The only real lag seemed to come up during undocking and during jumps.
Silent Twilight
Zero Transversal
#56 - 2011-09-09 10:07:59 UTC
Machine info and settings

* OS version: winXP Pro SP3 32-bit
* CPU: Core 2 Duo @ 3.00 GHz
* GPU: nVidia GeForce 8800GT
* RAM: 2 GB
* Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? 1
* Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Present interval - one, Drone models, turret efects and camera shake off; resource cache, HDR, anti-aliasing - disabled; post-processing - low; shaders, LOD, and textures - high; shadow quality - disabled, inferior effects - medium.


User Experience

* Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 15
* Average FPS - Zoomed in: 10-15

* Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?
No.

* Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
The gate fight part was as smooth as the last time. However, the tower shooting part has greatly improved compared to August 25th test. Almost no module or drone lag, no looped targeting, no being stuck while trying to warp off. Even FPS was close to gate fight's.

The only troubles I had this time were a couple of freezes.
The first one was around 20:15, and it was rather a severe FPS drop than a complete freeze. FPS dropped from 10+ to 0.-1. with a very short total freeze before low FPS values were shown, and it happened when I tried to zoom out with the mass of the ships on the way of the camera.
The second one happened around 20:22 during warping to the station after the POS was destroyed, and it was a complete freeze. When it had ended, I was near the station already.
The third one was a black screen at the time of mass undock. During that FPS and Resource Cache Usage didn't change, only VM Size/D/TD changed a little.

Bugreport with logserver files sent.
Scarcane
Pulling The Plug
PURPLE HELMETED WARRIORS
#57 - 2011-09-09 16:30:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Scarcane
Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version: win 7 professional
  • CPU: Intel I5 750 @4 ghz
  • GPU: Nvidia 470 GTX x2 SLI
  • RAM: 4gb
  • Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? 2
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High on both

User Experience

  • Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 20
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in: 15
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) can't comment
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: overall much better than last test, no module freezes, lag or any problems really. Only annoyance was going into siege in my alt just as I got bumped from the pos and ended up off grid? and therefore couldn't do anything til the siege timer was up.
[/quote]


Take it the skillpoints don't come with the new patch... not that desparate but tis a nice thing to experiment with : )
DeepGray
Green Goo Project
#58 - 2011-09-10 12:13:29 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows 7 Professional SP1 - 64 bits
CPU: i7 - 2600k
GPU: Nvidia GTX 570
RAM: 16 GB
Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? only one
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out:
60 (maxed by vsync) with no antialiasing
50 with any antialiasing (low or high made no difference)
brackets didn't make a difference in fps
Average FPS - Zoomed in:
50 with no antialiasing
30 with any antialiasing (low or high made no difference)
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)
No basis for comparrison
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
Previous page123