These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

Mass-test feedback - September 8

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Celas Tial
Defenders of Souls
#21 - 2011-09-08 21:06:43 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
  • CPU: Intel i7 Q720
  • GPU: nVidia GeForce 310M
  • RAM: 8GB
  • Were you running more than one EVE client? No
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low

User Experience

  • Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 15-18
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in: 5-10
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 4
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No crashes or disconnects.
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Moderate lag during the 3 fights (POS, Fleet, and NPC) and undocking. Light lag for everything else. The only problem I had was Eve Voice failing to join channels.
Gin'no Taki
Kairos Corp
#22 - 2011-09-08 21:08:29 UTC
CCP Habakuk wrote:
Hi! If you participated in the mass-test on the 8th September, please reply in this thread to give your feedback, based on following template:

Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version: Windows 7 64-bit
  • CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 @ 4GHz
  • GPU: NVIDIA GTX260 896Mb
  • RAM: 4Gb DDR2-800
  • Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? NO
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High, except HDR, DEPTH, Shadows and AA disabled

User Experience

  • Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 8-15fps
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in: 5-12fps
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? NO
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

Lacria
Ascendance
Goonswarm Federation
#23 - 2011-09-08 21:09:20 UTC
Machine Info and Settings



•OS version: Windows 7
•CPU: core2 E6750
•GPU: HD 6850
•RAM: 2 GB
•Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? 1
•Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): medium

User Experience

•Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 6
•Average FPS - Zoomed in: 7
•On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 3
•Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no crashes
•Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
McBorsk
Multispace Technologies Inc
#24 - 2011-09-08 21:09:21 UTC
CCP Habakuk wrote:
Hi! If you participated in the mass-test on the 8th September, please reply in this thread to give your feedback, based on following template:

Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version: XP sp3
  • CPU: Dual core 3.2ghz
  • GPU: ati hd4850
  • RAM: 2gb
  • Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? 1
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): medium/high

User Experience

  • Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: <10 fps
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in: 1-5 fps
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? yes, 1 d/c.
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: laggy as hell. undock was like 2 solid minutes of black screen. got d/c on the pos bash for some reason.

Maior Death
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#25 - 2011-09-08 21:09:58 UTC

OS version: Win Vista 64
CPU: Intel E8500
GPU: GTX 260 AMP²
RAM: 8 GB

Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high


User Experience


Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 25-30
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 12- 15

Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? nope
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

Delay whilde docking and undocking has become better (15-20 Sec.)
kaban 7610
TransGalaxy
#26 - 2011-09-08 21:10:49 UTC
OS: Wn7 Ultimate x64
CPU: Core i3 550
GPU: Ati 4670 1024mb
Ram: 8 Gb
2 clients
Graphic settings: low

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 10
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 3 - 7
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? 2
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? crashes every 3-5 min during the combat: 0

[b]Нужный бубледуй не в том месте может похоронить флот. У титанов всего один недостаток - они время от времени взрываются. Большому кораблю - большая торпеда. (Калдарская народная мудрость) Чем ярче лазер, тем бледнее пираты. (Амарская народная мудрость)[/b]
Tazandbeyond
Rhino Ballz of Various Sizes
#27 - 2011-09-08 21:12:03 UTC
Tazandbeyond wrote:
When I turned my guns off they stopped firing but the graphics showed they were still firing on the screen not the modules even after warp when we were hold on gate they were still firing.

laggy for only 350 in local too.

Other then that was a blast andd can't wait for thee next test. Thx for allowing me to join in.



Machine Info and Settings

OS version:
CPU: Intel Centino 2 Duo T5450 @1.66GHz 1.67GHz
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GT
RAM: 3.00 GB
Were you running more than one EVE client? NO
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Low

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: N/A
Average FPS - Zoomed in: N/A
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) N/A
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? NO
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

Anything that said N/A I did not know how to find. Sorry I'm a first time tester sorry this didn't attach befor for some reason
Maya DeReneau
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#28 - 2011-09-08 21:12:59 UTC
OS version: Mac OS 10.6.8
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo 2.4 GHz
GPU: ATI Radeon HD2600
RAM: 4GB
Were you running more than one EVE client? no
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low, effects off

User Experience

Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?

One crash when fleet x jumped into the camp (I was in fleet w). I had the member list disabled in all chat windows to avoid mass loading of portraits but it still crashed.

There was one other issue with Eve voice. I was in the fleet voice channel for a minute or two before getting a message that I was logged out of voice, but the fleet window still showed me connected. I tried leaving the channel to rejoin but it had no effect. Even turning Eve voice off wouldn't let me leave the channel.
McGringo
Multispace Technologies Inc
#29 - 2011-09-08 21:13:03 UTC
CCP Habakuk wrote:
Hi! If you participated in the mass-test on the 8th September, please reply in this thread to give your feedback, based on following template:

Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version: Win XP
  • CPU: Intel Centrino Duo 2.0 Ghz
  • GPU: ATI Mobility X1600
  • RAM: 2 GB
  • Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? 1
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): All low, no antialias

User Experience

  • Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 2 FPS - 8 FPS
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in: 1-2 FPS plus heavy lag
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 4
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Very laggy altho stable.

Gaia Ma'chello
Photosynth
#30 - 2011-09-08 21:13:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Gaia Ma'chello
OS version: OSX 10.6.8
CPU: Intel Core i7, 2.66 GHz
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M
RAM: 8 GB, 1067MHz
Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? One
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Low
Computer: MacBook Pro


User Experience


Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 10
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 6
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): 5
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? None. I had the chat channel list turned off per request.
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

Clean test. First in a long time with no crashes. There was lag, but it was not the crippling lag that makes play seem unfair.

Fix voice chat! "You were logged out of audio chat", go to esc, cycle voice, "you were logged out of audio chat", over and over. Then it stopped letting me use voice at all. (Option showed when right clicking on a chat tab, but when used, nothing happens).

When we docked in the middle of the test I wanted to take the opportunity to change clothes. But I realized I could not see chat, could not see instructions when doing so. Consider making chat available when I'm changing my appearance.
Nyio
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#31 - 2011-09-08 21:13:25 UTC
• OS version: Windows XP Professional (5.1, Build 2600) Service Pack 3 (2600.xpsp_sp3_gdr.101209-1647)
• CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.40GHz (2 CPUs)
• GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 (1280MB)
• RAM: 3072MB

• Were you running more than one EVE client? Nope
• Graphic setting of the client: low-medium

• Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot: 14-25
• On a scale of 1-10: 7

• Did you experience any disconnects, complete freezes or crashes? Nope
• Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

The overview seemed to be delayed before jumping to Poitot.
All in all the best performance I've had in a mass-test so far. Smile

Golem • CCP In-Game Event 2011.11.23 • Nyio • Grenade?
Velarra
#32 - 2011-09-08 21:13:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Velarra
Machine Info and Settings


OS version: Windows 7 Professional 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1
CPU:Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T9500 @ 2.60GHz (2 CPUs), ~2.6GHz
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT
RAM:4096MB
Were you running more than one EVE client? Yes. How many? 2. 1 onTQ docked, 1 on SiSi.
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High, HDR/AA off, Medium interior effects & Medium texture quality.


User Experience


Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: (I wasn't keeping track, will submit log server logs) Functional, modules cycled.

Average FPS - Zoomed in: quite functional, no apparent lag issues

On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome). 5
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No.
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Experienced offline module bug after podding and re-entering a ship. I will file bug report with log server logs.

Filed as Bug report # 116329.

Note: experienced the offline module issue today, on logging into TQ with multiple midslot modules.
OptimuzPR
Brothership Of EVE
#33 - 2011-09-08 21:14:48 UTC
Machine Info and Settings


OS version: Windows 7
CPU: Core2Quad @ 2.6G
GPU: GeForce 9800 GTX+
RAM: 3G
Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High, some Medium, Low Shadows


User Experience


Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 5-10-ish fps
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 1-5 fps
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 2
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? yes, 3 d/c.
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: more lag than usual and got D/C a few times. This is the most D/C i've ever gotten testing.
Drake Eldaharr
Perkone
Caldari State
#34 - 2011-09-08 21:15:23 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows 7 Home Premium (64-bit)

CPU: Intel Core i3-540

GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GT 320

RAM: 4GB

Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? No, just the one.

Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High.

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 30-40

Average FPS - Zoomed in: 8-15

On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 3

Did you experience any disconnects, complete freezes or crashes? No.

Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc: Much faster than last mass test, everything seemed much smoother although locking a target seemed to lag slightly, and docking was a little slow. Other than that, fine.
Tobias Callahan
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#35 - 2011-09-08 21:18:21 UTC
CCP Habakuk wrote:
Hi! If you participated in the mass-test on the 8th September, please reply in this thread to give your feedback, based on following template:

Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version: Windows 7
  • CPU: Intel Core i7-740QM, 1.73GHz
  • GPU: GTX 460M
  • RAM: 4gb
  • Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? 1
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low

User Experience

  • Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 30
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in: 9-12
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 4
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Just f....... marvelous!!!

Vladimir Reyes
We Don't Mess With Goats
#36 - 2011-09-08 21:21:16 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows vista 64 bit 2007 home premium
CPU:AMD phenom II x4 945 3.00 ghz
GPU: ATI HD 4800
RAM: 8 gigs
Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? noe one client only
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): medium with all effects going

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: (around 30 fps)
Average FPS - Zoomed in: ( 15)
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) (5 but mainly because I have never been involved in anything that demanding graphics wise on TQ)
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? negative
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

Was alot of fun though I have some tweaks to work on with the over view to make things more simple XD

As for the lag it wasnt as bad as I would have expected it to be with so much going on, on field.

Good experiance for my first "test flight"
Keras Authion
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#37 - 2011-09-08 21:21:27 UTC
OS: Win Vista Home Premium 32bit
CPU: Intel Core Quad Q9550
GPU: Radeon HD 4870 1Gb
Ram: 4Gb
1 client
Graphics settings: high

FPS zoomed out: 10-12
Zoomed in: 7-8

Crashes: 3. At POS, at fleet fight while changing ships and at the planet in the end.

Felt somewhat more fluid than the last mass test I participated. Crashes were caused probably by the high graphics settings and between those and losing my ship it was hard to get a good estimate about the FPS. Cannot compare the performance to TQ as I haven't been in fleets even nearly that size.

This post was rated "C" for capsuleer.
Aris Bock
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#38 - 2011-09-08 21:21:51 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows 7 64 bit
CPU:Intel core 2 duo E6850 3 GHZ
GPU:Nvidia 570 GTX
RAM:8 GB Corair 6400
Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? 2
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 8
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 3
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5

Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No

Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Was very difficult to play, but overall I enjoyed it, and I'm looking forward to the next one. Big smile
Blitzkrieg64
Multispace Technologies Inc
#39 - 2011-09-08 21:24:37 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version: Win 7 Ultimate SP1
  • CPU: 2x Intel Xeon Dual core 5130 @ 2GHz
  • GPU: ATI Radeon X1950
  • RAM: 8GB
  • Were you running more than one EVE client? No
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Medium

User Experience

  • Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 8
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in:3
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 3
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Client was stable but at points (during fleet fight) I was unable to interact at all with the ship (massive lag)

Rick Maken
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#40 - 2011-09-08 21:24:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Rick Maken
Machine Info and Settings


OS version: Windows 7 64 bit
CPU: INTEL I7 920
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 1GB vram
RAM: 6GB
Were you running more than one EVE client? How many?: 2 clients in total
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Low


User Experience


Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: N/A
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 5
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): 7
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?: 2
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Gate jumping seems to be improved over TQ, it was a lot faster. Fleet fight seems to be less laggy (however I normally play with brackets on), the most laggy part of the test was the undocking, both my clients were stuck in black screen for a long time.
Previous page123Next page