These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Legacy Repost] A New Caldari Cause

Author
Conventia Underking
Underking Family
Khimi Harar
#61 - 2011-09-13 01:19:16 UTC
Rodj Blake wrote:
Dilaro thagriin wrote:


As a matari individual, in the caldari system i could rise in the 'ranks' while maintaining my own heritage and beliefs, as long as i had the skill and drive to succeed.



Believe that if you like. But you probably won't get very far in the Caldari system if you put tribe before corporation.


As much as I value our allies, I must say that their ways baffle me, though, of course, the Admiral is correct.

For God; Salvation is Imperative, but not at the cost of our Humanity!

The Vitoc Problem - Conventia Underking

Malcolm Khross
Doomheim
#62 - 2011-09-13 01:21:08 UTC
Altarr Orkot wrote:


Are you kidding me? The reason a aggressive war of occupation is being fought is because of capsuleer alliances like I-RED? Really? I must have missed the bit where Taisho Revenent ordered the invasion of Federal space.

The State may be at war, but that doesn't make it a just war.


You are correct in that my assessment of your original post was apparently inaccurate, the ability to question the State is a right you possess, I apologize for my misstep here. Your original remark against my corporation and integrity led me to perceive the rest of your argument in the same tone.

I agree that Heth has not exactly restored the State to its original founding but I would also argue that he has made progress in that direction and we can expound it from there. Be "we" I refer to the Caldari as a whole.

We also agree that just because we are at war does not make it a just war.

However, you misunderstand me in the last part. I did not state that the war is being fought because of capsuleer alliances, I stated that capsuleer alliances contribute to the war. Lai Dai Infinity Systems provides resources and supplies to the Caldari people and the capsuleers fighting for the State, a group to which you belong. My corporation proudly stands beside that.

Unless, of course, you'd rather we stop providing the defenders of the State with the resources and supplies they need to defend themselves and subsequently the State?

We are making enemies between ourselves when we need not. If you truly wish to discuss our differences, you may open a private comms channel with me at any time. Continuing to beat each other here will accomplish nothing.

~Malcolm Khross

Ilsenae Alexandros
Perkone
Caldari State
#63 - 2011-09-13 01:26:42 UTC
Maya Erena wrote:
Between the two of you, it's clearly a waste of time for me to respond, considering all you can do is sidestep around the core of my arguement or toss empty insults at me.


I was hoping you'd bring this up.

Yes, I am employing what is generally termed as ad hominem attacks. Basically it means that I attack your character rather than the substance of your argument. Problem is, there isn't any substance to any of your arguments.

Maya Erena wrote:
And yes, suggesting that my state of mind might come from having my period or being dumped rather then anger at the horrendous actions your country commits against it's own people is anti-feminist, though it's no wonder you can't understand why, considering the regressive nature of your culture.


Ah, here we go.

Here's why I made those "anti-feminist" statements against you, aside from the obvious and previously mentioned motivation of trolling: You are very clearly angry. Frothing at the mouth, bulging artery at the temple, seeing red, eyes bulging, bitterly angry. And that anger doesn't come from nowhere. It doesn't just come from a hatred of my culture, or rather your twisted and misinformed horror-reel vision of my culture. This is pathological. Something happened in your past to make you angry, and its probably very justified. And we are the proxies for that anger, stoked by political manipulation for your likely legitimate anger and whipped up to a cult-like fervor, and we have where we are now. Irrational, hypocritical, bitter anger.

To know the face of God is to know madness.

Malcolm Khross
Doomheim
#64 - 2011-09-13 01:32:24 UTC
This is getting tiresome.

Maya Erena wrote:
Malcolm Khross, I might have what you percieve to be a biased or uneducated viewpoint of the State, but at least I bothered to address your points. The fact that you've completely ignored my comments about the sheer cruelty of how it treats it's own people who are left behind or unable to conform to it's system.

The only part you confronted was in regard to my statement about "Family", where you obviously ignored the fact that there are vast amounts of tube-childern or simply poor individuals that have no one to support them, and are left to die.


Maya Edena wrote:
I don't think I quite understand.

You're not even bothering to form an arguement anymore. The ideals of the State are not "needed". The Federation continues to expand and prosper - and repel you - in spite of being "Self-absorbed." The people are free to live the lives they wish and express their individuality, and have their basic rights protected. You're not pointing out virtues of your way of life, simply saying "We exist, and we demand respect!"

When you're fighting for survival, one is driven to cull the weak. However, that sort of thinking deserves to abandoned as soon as it's no longer needed to stay alive. But instead, you carry this inane "Survival complex" still, even though it's completely and utterly irrelevant and harmful to those who need to be protected the most.

The States ideals have no place in the modern world.

Are you claiming that the things I have stated don't happen? You're deluded if so, because I'm simply speaking from the facts.


Yes, I have completely ignored your arguments and sidestepped every issue you've raised with the following direct responses to your statements:

Malcolm Khross wrote:
You misunderstand the State here.

The Federation continues to expand and prosper, perhaps. It does not do so to "repel the State" however, it was doing so long before the State declared its separation from it. I have pointed out the virtues of the Caldari way of life, at least twice now, but you have chosen to attack them and ignore them instead of consider them. You are testing my patience with explaining them to you.

The Caldari promote advancement and recognition based on merit. It is not a "survival" complex, it is a drive to constantly better oneself and subsequently those around you through your service. We have a society that emphasizes service to one another and the benefit of contributing to the whole instead of dwelling on the individual.

The ideals of honor, service, duty, integrity and the sacrificial dedication to community and family above the selfishness of the individual stand in bold contrast to the self-absorbed mindset that dominates "modern" thinking like yours. The sooner you realize that your misunderstanding of our culture breeds your unwarranted hatred of our people, the sooner you can begin your walk toward actual enlightenment.

Furthermore, I do not ignore that negative things occur in the State, they do in all societies. I merely have stated, time and again, that you misunderstand completely the culture of the Caldari.


I even placed them in order for you, to make it easier to see the correlation. You have continued to refer to me and my people negatively, responded in hostility and continue to get more and more angry. Now you are dismissing my attempts to respond to you reasonably by saying that I am not responding to you, only sidestepping you.

Your latest argument is a replica of your former one, the evidence completely stands against you.


Maya Edena wrote:

Like all Caldari, you're under the fool delusion that those who were born or raised with disadvantages deserve to be punished for this very fact. It's utterly backwards, and the fact that you cannot see this only demonstrates the extent of your own indoctrination. Beyond that, you only seem interested in making corrections to my statements, without bothering to address the core points.


Really? We do not believe they need to be punished, this is the same thing I've been telling you the whole time we've been having this circular debate. You perceive things one way because you do not understand them and my attempts to explain them to you have apparently been, how did you put it? "Ignoring your arguments and sidestepping them."

~Malcolm Khross

Malcolm Khross
Doomheim
#65 - 2011-09-13 01:32:35 UTC
Maya Edena wrote:

By the way, never once did the Federation abuse the State, only try and push it to abandon it's culture that alienates and kills billions. It's a pity that this boon was not accepted out of petty spite from it's leaders.


That is abuse. Demanding that a people abandon their culture simply because you believe yours is superior to theirs is not only a judgment you have no right to make, it is tyrannical, oppressive and abusive.

Maya Edena wrote:

And yes, suggesting that my state of mind might come from having my period or being dumped rather then anger at the horrendous actions your country commits against it's own people is anti-feminist, though it's no wonder you can't understand why, considering the regressive nature of your culture. And for the record, I'm not name calling. I haven't said anything I wouldn't back up with an explanation or a sword.


Again you attack my culture, as you have done repeatedly with every statement you make. As for your last statement? The willingness to back something up does not negate it as name-calling or petulance.

~Malcolm Khross

Maya Erena
Doomheim
#66 - 2011-09-13 01:41:19 UTC
Ilsenae Alexandros wrote:
I was hoping you'd bring this up.

Yes, I am employing what is generally termed as ad hominem attacks. Basically it means that I attack your character rather than the substance of your argument. Problem is, there isn't any substance to any of your arguments.


So you freely admit your not interested in actually talking? Well, at least you're honest about your own ignorance.

Ilsenae Alexandros wrote:
Ah, here we go.

Here's why I made those "anti-feminist" statements against you, aside from the obvious and previously mentioned motivation of trolling: You are very clearly angry. Frothing at the mouth, bulging artery at the temple, seeing red, eyes bulging, bitterly angry. And that anger doesn't come from nowhere. It doesn't just come from a hatred of my culture, or rather your twisted and misinformed horror-reel vision of my culture. This is pathological. Something happened in your past to make you angry, and its probably very justified. And we are the proxies for that anger, stoked by political manipulation for your likely legitimate anger and whipped up to a cult-like fervor, and we have where we are now. Irrational, hypocritical, bitter anger.


How arrogant. You mistake distaste for anger. I don't like the State, of course - For the demented manner in which it governs. But I regard it more as one would a rabid dog in my back garden then as something worth becoming angry over. It's a nuisance.

By the way, your attempt to play at psychoanalysis is absolutely hilarious.
Malcolm Khross
Doomheim
#67 - 2011-09-13 01:50:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Malcolm Khross
Maya Erena wrote:


Well, at least you're honest about your own ignorance.


You're not.


Maya Erena wrote:

How arrogant. You mistake distaste for anger. I don't like the State, of course - For the demented manner in which it governs. But I regard it more as one would a rabid dog in my back garden then as something worth becoming angry over. It's a nuisance.

By the way, your attempt to play at psychoanalysis is absolutely hilarious.


Yes, it is utterly arrogant for her to consider that you might actually have a legitimate reason to display the hostility and demeaning behavior that you have consistently displayed throughout this discussion. How completely obnoxious that she would even suggest that there might be something else to pinpoint your aggression on.

So, let me get this straight...you would be this aggressive, insulting, demeaning and yes angry with a rabid dog, or something you describe as a nuisance?

You have consistently displayed absolutely no desire to talk, rather to continue to spout why you perceive the State and the Caldari people as an evil, regressive, oppressive, abusive, cruel and demented establishment and culture. You ignore every attempt to explain to you why you are misunderstanding things.

I have lost the desire to speak with you because I can no longer do so with decency. At this point, I am prone to engaging you in the same bitter hostility that you have shown me time and again throughout this discussion and I refuse to do so.

~Malcolm Khross

Maya Erena
Doomheim
#68 - 2011-09-13 01:59:19 UTC
Your mashup of chronologically warped and out of context statements hardly proves that you have made any effort to argue with me whatsoever. You've corrected me on a few details about the State, I'll admit that much. I feel educated about some finer details. But you've failed to defend your nation in my eyes.

Malcolm Khross wrote:

Your latest argument is a replica of your former one, the evidence completely stands against you.


Of course it is. Because at the end of the day, my arguement is that your government persecutes the weak. And does. You've not made any effort to debate the fact that a person who has no family wealth to back them and somehow manages to annoy, or cannot serve, a corporation, will be forsaken and left to die by the State. You're welcome to try and do so directly, but I doubt you'll have anything to say.

And this fact alone is all I need to hear.
Simca Develon
Doomheim
#69 - 2011-09-13 02:03:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Simca Develon
Maya Erena wrote:
I regard it more as one would a rabid dog in my back garden then as something worth becoming angry over.


I wouldn't say the State is a rabid dog. More like a dog that has issues with being told what to do and how it should be a dog.


Maya Edena wrote:

By the way, never once did the Federation abuse the State, only try and push it to abandon it's culture that alienates and kills billions. It's a pity that this boon was not accepted out of petty spite from it's leaders.



The Caldari and Gallente can live in peace. My home is a testament to that. However, trying to force someone to abandon their culture does tend to put a strain on any relationship. How would you feel if I told you that starting tomorrow you had to renounce everything that you hold dear and conform to my wishes? I doubt you would appreciate that, no? Effectively to many Caldari that is what the Federation did many years ago, and it is not something easily forgotten.

Je suis le commencement de votre fin.

Le diable prend soin de son proper.

Malcolm Khross
Doomheim
#70 - 2011-09-13 02:10:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Malcolm Khross
Thank you Develon.

Maya Erena,

One correction, my "mashup" was chronologically reversed, not warped nor was it out of context. But again, you ignore that, so I will leave it there.


Those who wish to serve in the State will find a place to serve with whatever capabilities and talents they have, the merit of their labors will be rewarded accordingly. Those who "cannot" serve, as you put, I assume refers to those with disabilities and debilitating conditions beyond medical capability? If that is the case, then you are correct, the State does not go to extended lengths to support them. It does, however, have individuals who will assist others with their own wealth and time.

Because charity in the State is not federally supported, does not mean that we, as a people, are negligent and cruel to one another. It continues to fall in line with our belief that we all serve the community together and work toward our collective betterment.

The apparent disconnect is that the emphasis in the State is on the individual, not the government. It is reversed in your Federation, with the government being the organization of charity and support instead of depending on the individuals to support one another out of their own merits and talents.

We truly are barbaric for trusting one another to see to ourselves (and each other). How dare we?!

With that, good riddance, I am done attempting to discuss anything with you. I've answered your "one concern."

~Malcolm Khross

Ava Starfire
Khushakor Clan
#71 - 2011-09-13 02:58:14 UTC
Ethnocentrism is good. Spirits know I love my people and culture, my traditions and ways.

Rabid, foaming, "I am right!" ethnocentrism is not. It is just scary.

Ms. Erena, maybe back away and cool off a bit... yeah, pot calling kettle black. Trust me, arguments are best entered into with a cool head, not full of emotion. You will say less things you regret.

"There is no strength in numbers; have no such misconception." -Jayka Vofur, "Warfare in the North"

Maya Erena
Doomheim
#72 - 2011-09-13 03:02:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Maya Erena
That's your retort? That the wonderful and kind citizens of the State will simply help those who have fallen through the cracks? A nice idea, but one need only to take a single glance at it to see that many people are left behind in spite of it, because often, people are not the wonderful, generous beings you describe them as. And you still do not address people who alienated because of the manner in which they wish to live, or disagraced themselves before a corporation and now cannot even depend upon their neighbors.

The Caldari place so much emphasis on things like honor, that you fail to account for the times when it simply does not exist. Which is often, in modern times, even among your own. And people suffer because that foolish assumption.
Malcolm Khross
Doomheim
#73 - 2011-09-13 03:09:11 UTC
Maya Erena wrote:
That's your retort? That the wonderful and kind citizens of the State will simply help those who have fallen through the cracks? A nice idea, but one need only to take a single glance at it to see that many people are left behind in spite of it, because often, people are not the wonderful, generous beings you describe them as. And you still do not address people who alienated because of the manner in which they wish to live, or disagraced themselves before a corporation and now cannot even depend upon their neighbors.

The Caldari place so much emphasis on things like honor, that you fail to account for the times when it simply does not exist - which is often, in modern times, even amongst your own. And people suffer for the assumption.




You still continue to drone on....

I could sit here and argue with you for the rest of our unnatural lives and we would never reconcile our viewpoints. I could also take your stance and point out all the evils, injustices, inequities and failures that I perceive in your beloved Federation. Yet I have consciously chosen not to because my involvement in this thread has been to discuss Caldari culture and values.

You simply choose to disagree with them. Your presentation is hostile, confrontational and aggressive but the core is the same. You disagree with our culture and you view it as inferior to your own.

Good for you. We disagree fundamentally with one another. I am done trying to rectify that.

~Malcolm Khross

Taronyu Eywa
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#74 - 2011-09-13 10:44:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Taronyu Eywa
A topic that started out with such a positive outlook has fallen, like so many other topics into pointless, regurgitated arguments about State and Federation that plague every discussion here. It only takes one to light the fuse and the rest to react...

Going back to the original topic, helping to free enslaved Matari is something I support, but fundamentally it is there problem and I am guessing, correct me if I'm wrong that most Minmatar would want to free themselves from oppression. Of course, assistance asked could readily be given, and fostering good relationships with the Minmatar is a good step. It is a tricky situation however, for actions to free Minmatar slaves might have detrimental effects on the good terms that we have with the Amarr Empire.

Taronyu Freight and Logistics Division Caldari Provisions

Malcolm Khross
Doomheim
#75 - 2011-09-13 11:14:40 UTC
I agree Eywa, it is essentially what I stated from the start before this mess began. I apologize for contributing to the derailment of the thread.

~Malcolm Khross

Ava Starfire
Khushakor Clan
#76 - 2011-09-13 11:48:11 UTC
Taronyu Eywa wrote:
A topic that started out with such a positive outlook has fallen, like so many other topics into pointless, regurgitated arguments about State and Federation that plague every discussion here. It only takes one to light the fuse and the rest to react...

Going back to the original topic, helping to free enslaved Matari is something I support, but fundamentally it is there problem and I am guessing, correct me if I'm wrong that most Minmatar would want to free themselves from oppression. Of course, assistance asked could readily be given, and fostering good relationships with the Minmatar is a good step. It is a tricky situation however, for actions to free Minmatar slaves might have detrimental effects on the good terms that we have with the Amarr Empire.


The Minmatar people wish to stand on our own, Captain, though it is uplifting to hear that some in the State are "on our side".

I hope this topic can stay a bit more focused from here on; it is (or was) an enlightening read.

"There is no strength in numbers; have no such misconception." -Jayka Vofur, "Warfare in the North"

Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#77 - 2011-09-13 15:38:17 UTC
Taronyu Eywa wrote:
there problem and I am guessing, correct me if I'm wrong that most Minmatar would want to free themselves from oppression.


This statement is way too broad and vague to actually be corrected or not.
Maximillian Triton
Doomheim
#78 - 2011-09-13 16:34:05 UTC
Ms. Starfire, there are also some of us in the Amarr Empire who are on your side as well, even if it means being forced to leave it.

As for you Maya, I'm not going to waste my time on you any further. You've proved my previous statement, and there is no need for me to continue any further.

"One can never escape the glaring light of destiny, no matter how dark the hole they crawl into" ~ Commodore Maximillian Triton

Half Cocked Jack
Un4seen Development
Goonswarm Federation
#79 - 2011-09-13 16:48:02 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:
Taronyu Eywa wrote:
there problem and I am guessing, correct me if I'm wrong that most Minmatar would want to free themselves from oppression.


This statement is way too broad and vague to actually be corrected or not.


I'll use your statement as a springboard to contribute my own rambling thoughts, if you don't mind:

The Minmatar are not a unified people. Those in Amarrian bondage and those who are free exist on difference sides a fence and represent two entirely separate groups. Being an ally to one does not preclude being an ally to both. No-one will become my enemy simply because they do not engage in the enterprise of freeing slaves.

I have been on both sides of this fence--a fence I would have never been able to jump if I had not been prepared to die if I failed to jump high enough. Granted, my foray into the next pasture over would have been very short-lived if there had not been hands waiting to catch me, but I did not know they were there at the time. The State is no different from the Republic itself in that we can wait for the leapers and perhaps even lower the fence, but there is nothing in the universe we can do to persuade people to jump.

At this point in time, the fence is lower and there are more helping hands than ever before. Amarr space is riddled with SOE establishments and countless anti-slavery ships do business with the core worlds of Domain every single day. This is no secret. Any group of slaves who can make it to a docking port nowadays is practically guaranteed a free pass out of the Empire. So why aren't they? Simply put: because they are slaves.

I did not become a free man by jumping over a fence (this is a metaphor, remember). I became a free man by deciding to risk it all to try. If I had died in the attempt, I would have died a free man...or boy, at least. If, by contrast, someone had come into my quarters one day, shepherded me into a hauler, given me a new life, and told me to be free, I would still be very much a slave.

There was a time when the Minmatar people were united in their resolve to jump the fence. The Federation aided them immensely, but the Federation did not give them the will to be free. That came from themselves, just as it will have to today. If that happens, I'll be on my way to Penirgman with a Battle Mammoth lickety-split. At the moment though, my distant cousins in bondage simply value their lives too much. As long as they are content enough in slavery that they won't risk their lives to escape it, there is nothing I can do for them. It would, I believe, be a disservice to make the executive decision to risk their lives for them.

All this is to say that I question many of the efforts put forth by the Republic itself to turn slaves into free men and women, and my personal involvement with the venture is almost as hands-off as that espoused here by the WHG. It isn't my fight either...at least not until the people on whose behalf I would be fighting send a signal. If they do, I'll offer a helping hand. Other hands will be appreciated, but not expected...and never demanded.
Faelan Maris
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#80 - 2011-09-13 18:50:46 UTC
"Maya Erena" wrote:
The State has no form of social security. If you're dimissed from your corporation for whatever reason, you are almost certainly not going to find employment elsewhere - That's statistical fact. If this happens, and you cannot afford to pay for food or healthcare, the State will do nothing to help you. Again, fact. Further, it's well known that the State ostracizes many social groups, for example, people with nonstandard sexual orientations. And that it does nothing to support the physically and mentally disabled, and instead forces the burden onto their families.

You mislead. The State does not provide social security because for us that is a function of corporation and family. We do not have quite as unified a governing structure as the Federation, and we expect different things from it. To a Caldari, stating that the government will do a better job of providing healthcare than one's corporation sounds almost as silly as saying that the government should be in charge of manufacturing all of the microwave ovens. Do you feel that your life would be better if the Federation made all of your appliances rather than your corporations? We do not.

As for all the people you seem to claim are dying of starvation and disease: references please. I would especially like to see your evidence of what must be a near 100% fatality rate among the elderly from starvation - after all retirees are not employed, and therefore by your claim they must not have any food. Or do you instead claim that we force them to stay at their jobs until the moment of their last breath? I hope so, for I can always use a good laugh.

The "statistical facts" are that almost everyone in the State is gainfully employed, and we do not have millions starving to death every year in every station in every system. Our society is not perfect but it is the exception not the rule that people die of starvation or preventable disease.

I do not know your background, but in my experience it is extremely rare for anyone to be flat-out fired by a megacorp. If someone does not perform well at their current level, they are swiftly demoted, or possibly transferred, but they remain employed. Even for someone who fails repeatedly, there are always open jobs at the lower levels that need to be filled; they may not be the most pleasant jobs, but they give everyone who is willing to work a chance to lead a productive life and gain a place in society. It is not uncommon for a low-level or underperforming worker to be shuffled from one subsidiary to another, but to be outright fired takes an act of unusual severity - blatant disregard for the safety of others, embezzlement, murder. People who commit such crimes should suffer for them. One of the key elements behind Heth-haan's rise of popularity is that he laid bare places where the upper eschelons of Caldari society were showing such blatant disregard for safety and firing workers without cause - as had started to happen regularly to mine and production workers - and Heth-haan inspired all of us to hold our leaders accountable.