These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Mass-test feedback - March 1

First post
Author
Why Yes
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#41 - 2012-03-01 21:16:41 UTC
OS version: Windows 7 64 bit Professional
CPU: AMD A8 3850 stock
GPU: Radeon 5850 stock
RAM: 8Gb DDR 3 1600Mhz
How many clients were you running at the same time? 2
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high w. AA

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 7 fps
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 4 fps
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? 2 unresponsive episodes with one client, once @ pos fight ship would not respond but UI updated ranges and notified damage dealt when outside of ship's targetable range. once @ end of test when ship was destroyed, I received insurance notification of destroyed ship but remained in ship graphicly without controls or ability to warp out in ship or pod
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Playing @ 3600x1920 resolution eve looks amazing, 4+ clients can be run smoothly in 30's fps @ crowded c5 pos w/ dozen ships in fleet and @ c5 sleeper sites. Poitot fight was playable with brackets on @ 4 fps zoomed out, 2 fps zoomed in, vastly improved module responsiveness during fight
Gaia Ma'chello
Photosynth
#42 - 2012-03-01 21:17:28 UTC
OS version: OSX10.6.8
CPU: intel core i7
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M
RAM: 8GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Low


User Experience


Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: NA
Average FPS - Zoomed in: NA
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) NA
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no, never connected
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: I ran the client via the terminal command

/Applications/EVE\ Onlinesisi.app/Contents/MacOS/EVE\ Online /server:87.237.38.50

And the Launcher came up. I hit the "Play" button, got the small window that says "Eve Online Crucible" for a couple of seconds, followed by....nothing. No window, no log in screen.

So I was unable to participate, other than finding the current sisi build does not work for me.
Zahn Menhru
Crudespire
#43 - 2012-03-01 21:17:48 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
CPU: Intel Core i3 2100 @ 3.10Ghz
GPU: EVGA Nvidia GTX 550 Ti FPS Edition
RAM: 4GB 1333Mhz
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 8
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 14
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 8-10
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? 2 Diconnects
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

Got Disconnected Right outside the Staging Station, And at the gate where you need to Jump through before the fleet fight.
Reavene
Skaug Farm
#44 - 2012-03-01 21:18:15 UTC
Machine Info and Settings


OS version:Windows 7 x64
CPU: Intel Core Duo E8400 4GHz
GPU: ATI 5850
RAM:6GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high


User Experience


Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out:
Average FPS - Zoomed in:
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome), first fleet op. Better than expected
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? yes, 2. When fleet jumped throug 1st gate and rigth after test ended.
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: overall good. Some waiting before jumping.

Jason Pirkibo
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#45 - 2012-03-01 21:19:32 UTC
Machine Info and Settings


OS version: Windows 7 64 bit Ultimate
CPU: Processor : Intel Core i7 960 @ 3200MHz
GPU: 2x ATI Radeon 5870's Crossfire
RAM: 12 GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High


User Experience


Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 20-30
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 10-15
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 4 i normally get 60 FPS in TQ but still was playable
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? None until the end when i got podded and ended up in ichoriya, trying to enter ibis caused a crash
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Very enjoyable, got to see capital class ships up close very cool. otherwise keep it up CCP

[/quote]
Massive Bone
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#46 - 2012-03-01 21:19:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Massive Bone
Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows 7 SP1
CPU: i7 920 @2.67Ghz
GPU: nVidia GTX 295
RAM: 8GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? - 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): - High

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 21 or so
Average FPS - Zoomed in: around 5
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) Probably an 7
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? Crashed on X-BV98 gate while waiting for test to begin
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

My experience, other than crashing at the 'wait gate', was good, no problems.
Sir Fury
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#47 - 2012-03-01 21:19:53 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version: Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit
  • CPU: AMD Athlon 64 X2 6400+ 3.2GHz
  • GPU: AMD Radeon 6850
  • RAM: 6
  • How many clients were you running at the same time? 2
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High

User Experience

  • Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 5
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in: 5
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) : 2
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Repeating "entering system" animation after jumping in Poitit & reloading overview 4-5 times, Buggy overview alternating between not displaying anything & then showing as intended, got killed & podded amidst lag/"entering system animation repeats".

Wolf Skynet
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#48 - 2012-03-01 21:20:23 UTC
Machine Info and Settings


* OS version: Win 7
* CPU: Pentium 4
* GPU: Radeon X1650
* RAM: 1B
* How many clients were you running at the same time? One
* Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Medium


User Experience


* Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out:
* Average FPS - Zoomed in:
* On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7
* Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no
* Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
no problems, mutch fun
Absolut Kaiser
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#49 - 2012-03-01 21:21:02 UTC

OS version: Win 7 HE
CPU:Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 860 @ 2.80GHz (8 CPUs), ~2.8GHz
GPU:ATI Radeon HD 5750
RAM:16384MB RAM (16 GB)
How many clients were you running at the same time?
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):


User Experience


Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 12 FPS
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 5-8 Fps
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 2
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Very Laggy Slight Hik Ups during test. Simular problems on Tq
Fury's Touch
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#50 - 2012-03-01 21:21:05 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version: Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit
  • CPU: AMD Athlon 64 X2 6400+ 3.2GHz
  • GPU: AMD Radeon 6850
  • RAM: 6
  • How many clients were you running at the same time? 2
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High

User Experience

  • Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 5
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in: 5
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) : 2
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Repeating "entering system" animation after jumping in Poitit & reloading overview 4-5 times, Buggy overview alternating between not displaying anything & then showing as intended, got killed & podded amidst lag/"entering system animation repeats".
Th3K1LL3R
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#51 - 2012-03-01 21:21:08 UTC
win 7 64x ulti
i7 2600
ati HD 5850
8gb 1600
1
high

Did not get dc
Salpun
Global Telstar Federation Offices
Masters of Flying Objects
#52 - 2012-03-01 21:22:39 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version: Win7-64 bit
  • CPU:
  • GPU:
  • RAM:
  • How many clients were you running at the same time? 3 two sisi one TQ wh
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): all high

User Experience
[list]
  • Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: once client in blob 15, fleet overview
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in: 14
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 4
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? alt froze jumping into gate camp
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: The new launcher droped FPS by about 2 FPS, Log started to drop behind and never caught up, At the pos pash 3 clients FPS droped to 9 FPS brackets and all ships. Having an additional brouser in the back ground droped it to 1 1/2 FPS.

  • 2 Mass tests ago less people same setup had 20 FPS across all three clients.

    If i dont know something about EVE. I check https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/ISK_The_Guide

    See you around the universe.

    Dmagnox
    Dragon.
    Pandemic Horde
    #53 - 2012-03-01 21:24:34 UTC
    Machine Info and Settings

    OS version: Windows 7 Home Premium 32 bit

    CPU: HP-Pavilon

    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce 6150 LE, 825MB memory

    RAM: 2048MB

    How many clients were you running at the same time?:
    Two, LogServer and Eve exe file

    Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):
    Low

    User Experience

    Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out:
    5 - 8 FPS

    Average FPS - Zoomed in:
    1 - 2 FPS

    On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)
    5

    Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?
    No

    Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
    Just as I was about to warp to planet 1 after the gate camp, everything stood still. Controls, overview and tabs wouldn't respond. But fleet voice still worked. When CCP Hababuk gave the call to ceasefire, not everyone would stop. Bubbles and smartbombs were used. It's hard for players with low RAM/graphics cards to keep up with their mouse as they can only move it as fast as their FPS, taking me for an example. This was my first time attending a mass test
    easterbunny16
    Absolute Order XVIII
    Absolute Will
    #54 - 2012-03-01 21:25:21 UTC


    Machine Info and Settings

    • OS version: win 7
    • CPU: Intel Core i5-2700k
    • GPU: GeForce GTS 250
    • RAM: 2Gb
    • How many clients were you running at the same time? 2
    • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high

    User Experience

    • Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 14
    • Average FPS - Zoomed in:8
    • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
    • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? twice
    • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: nice
    [/quote]
    Josurr
    Navy Angels
    #55 - 2012-03-01 21:25:48 UTC
    • OS version: win 7 home 64
    • CPU: i3 3.1 Ghz
    • GPU: ATI radeon 6670
    • RAM: 4.00 Gb
    • How many clients were you running at the same time? one
    • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): medium

    User Experience

    • Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 40
    • Average FPS - Zoomed in: 10
    • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 8
    • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? yes, 2
    • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

    I used to mutch time starting SisiLauncher after update and etc.
    Buy all the parts to fit a ship and get out to the gate. Its a bit hard to get ready in 15 min.

    Jumping thru gates now, even 500++ at same time, are so easy now.
    Same with shooting at tower now and responce on start / stop of modules are with very low lag.



    Janne1789
    The Scope
    Gallente Federation
    #56 - 2012-03-01 21:26:11 UTC
    OS version: Windows 7 64 bit Ultimate
    CPU: Intel Core I5 2,67 GHz
    GPU: Radeon HD 5770
    RAM: 8 Gb DDR 3 RAM
    How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
    Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High

    User Experience

    Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 30-50fps
    Average FPS - Zoomed in: 10-15fps
    On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7
    Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? a client crash while waiting at the gate, after about 60 committees on the pos went off my targeting information, I had no right click options gennerell, when objects are in front of a light-effect, the flash-light effects on the entire, the problem is with the lighting effects reproducibility because I'm also in the normal tranquility as if The station is between the sun and me.
    Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: nothing
    Droki Anomar
    Aerobic Corporation
    #57 - 2012-03-01 21:26:12 UTC
    Machine Info and Settings

    • OS version: win 7
    • CPU: Intel Core i5-2700k
    • GPU: GeForce GTS 250
    • RAM: 2Gb
    • How many clients were you running at the same time? 2
    • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high

    User Experience

    • Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 14
    • Average FPS - Zoomed in:8
    • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
    • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? twice
    • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: nice!
    [/quote]
    Tamborius
    Die grauen Panther
    #58 - 2012-03-01 21:26:43 UTC
    OS version: Win XP SP3
    CPU: AMD Phenom II X4 965
    GPU: ATI Radeon HD 4800 Seriees
    RAM: 4GB
    How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
    Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high


    User Experience


    Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 5fps
    Average FPS - Zoomed in: 15fps
    On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ?
    (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 2-3
    Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?
    2 crashes, one at the POS shooting and the second one after a frozen screen during the Gate Camp
    Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
    Was quite Fun and despite the low FPS one could react to every taget calling, good client-server response time
    Sabr Sheppard
    Brotherhood of Redemption
    #59 - 2012-03-01 21:27:16 UTC
    Machine Info and Settings

    • OS version: Windows 7 Pro x64
    • CPU: AMD Phenom II x4 955 @ 3.6GHz
    • GPU: 2x nVidia GTX 260 Core 216 SLI
    • RAM: 8GB DDR3
    • How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
    • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High

    User Experience

    • Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 10fps
    • Average FPS - Zoomed in: 7fps
    • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
    • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? Crash to desktop during the PvE part of the test.
    Lunwi Tan Karr
    Stoned Clones
    #60 - 2012-03-01 21:28:13 UTC
    OS version:Windows 7 x64 Ultimate
    CPU: Intel Core Quad E8400 2.66GHZ
    GPU: NVIdia Geforce GTX 275 <900MB
    RAM: 4GB
    How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
    Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high


    User Experience


    Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: forgot to turn it on
    Average FPS - Zoomed in: same
    On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome), first fleet op greater than 4 people. Better than expected
    Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No but I did restart my client when i noticed that my Log server wasn't running right as the call was made to make the first jump.