These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Theological Musings 01: Traditional Amarr

Author
Uraniae Fehrnah
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#1 - 2012-02-27 16:36:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Uraniae Fehrnah
There are a few things I'm hopeful will come about as a result of sharing my personal understanding of the various belief systems across New Eden. The primary thing I'm hopeful for is that in the sharing, I will help others to possibly see any of the faiths in a way that is unclouded by total bias, and in seeing them in a new light they might just find faith themselves. Second among my hopes is that these musings of mine will prompt more genuine discussion above the level of passive aggressive remarks or genuine insults. Finally my third hope for these postings is that the discussion, either here or through other means, will help to further refine my own understanding of the disparate faith systems across the cluster.

With those three things in mind, I submit the first of what I hope to be many of my questionably useful ramblings on theological and spiritual matters.

Traditional Amarrian Orthodox


Being the faith I was raised with as a child, this seems the natural place to start. That said, in the eyes of the Empire herself, I am but a citizen theologian and not an actual ordained authority on the matter.

The traditional Amarrian faith is easily the oldest surviving religion in today's world, which is in and of itself an accomplishment of note. The primary tenants of traditional Amarrian faith include a value and respect for toil, living a morally good life, offering assistance to those in need, and the spreading of the faith through example as well as the controversial use of force. Faith, any faith, can be a very powerful motivator for a person as well as a whole society, and the Amarrian Empire is perhaps the best example of what a near totally unified people can do with their faith pressing them onward.

The first notable facet of traditional Amarrian faith, the value of toil and struggle, is in my mind, a cornerstone of the entire belief system. Without the specifically religious overtones present, the point alone is still very valid and respectable. With hard work comes good results and a sense of satisfaction and pride in both the result and the work itself. Many other cultures have a similar guiding principle, though it's not always ingrained into a religion. Regardless, this particular point of Amarrian Scriptures is, by comparison, rather clear and forthright. Any Amarrian, from commoner to the Empress herself that is utterly unwilling to do a task that they would hand to another, is being negligent in their faith.

The second aspect I made note of for this is the principle of a righteous or morally upstanding lifestyle. Again this idea is not unique to the traditional Amarrian faith, and is in fact universal to all the surviving belief systems I know of personally, and even evident in some that have died out. However, the specific moral guidelines of a society are rarely as universal to all of humanity. This particular notion within Amarrian faith is, essentially, a reminder to adhere to the others. Among traditional Amarrian faithful, a righteous lifestyle cannot be maintained if a person does not work for those in their care and for themselves. It cannot exist if a person does not show compassion toward the less fortunate, and beyond simply showing compassion they must do something to improve the lot of the less fortunate. Obedience itself is central to a righteous lifestyle, perhaps moreso in the Empire than in other cultures and faiths. But it is not obedience for the sake of obedience itself, but for the sake of social harmony and the good of all involved. Naturally there are limits to this obedience. As it is righteous to obey those good people above you, it is also righteous to rally in disobedience should those above your station stray from a righteous life themselves.

My third primary tenant of traditional Amarrian faith is in a word, charity. As the Empire grew beyond the shores of it's founding island, beyond the gravity of it's planet, and beyond the reaches of it's parent star, social wellness of the whole became more and more prevalent in the lives of every Amarrian. From the small local efforts of a wealthy merchant helping to endow a school with funding, to the organized and far reaching efforts of myriad large-scale charities unified under a Civil Service core, the hand of even the minutely "better off" became the foundation of bettering not just the local community, but the whole of the Empire, and even humanity itself. When an Amarrian no longer seeks to help others, they might as well not be Amarrian at all.

The last of my primary cornerstones of the traditional Amarrian faith is the one that raises the most ire among some in the Empire, and a great deal more from those outside of it. The insistence that the faith must be spread to all. In and of itself this notion isn't a terrible thing, but it can be used to justify terrible things. The Reclaiming is the symbol of this tenant of faith, and as such is just as conflicted of an effort as any other human endeavor. Traditionally speaking, and with historic precedent, using soldiers and fleets to stamp out an alternative faith, while at the same time throwing a new belief system at a people has actually worked. It has also failed in some cases, the obvious one being the chief cause for conflict between not only nations, but between two very different thought processes. In the eyes of traditional Amarrian faithful, using force is but one acceptable method of spreading the faith. It is however only one method among many.
Uraniae Fehrnah
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#2 - 2012-02-27 16:38:02 UTC
This may simply be a lack of experience, even naivety on my part, but I find the current practice of slavery among the traditional Amarr to be fundamentally different from its spiritual intent. Far too often I hear of or see examples of a Holder's handiwork in this regard, and while I have to admit this may be partly a matter of "the squeaky wheel" but regardless of how prevalent abuse of a slave is, it is unacceptable. While common historic records indicate slavery within the Empire has had a cyclical history, rises in it's use coinciding with the discovery of new peoples and ideas, I cannot accept that the practice in and of itself is purely for sociopolitical reasons. Slavery can, and has worked to safeguard and educate the Amarr, and to safeguard and educate others to live as Amarr. It does have its place and can be acceptable, however I feel the intent behind the practice has faded, as well as the practice itself changing over time. I have often wondered if the ancient Amarr defined slavery differently than we, as a multicultural, multinational human race of today define it. Today's definition of slavery is less than desirable, no doubt. But perhaps at the core of the practice, on ancient Amarr, it was more closely related to a strict apprenticeship? An exchange of services and time for education.

In closing, bear in mind that this is by no means even an attempt to delve into the veritable ages of tradition, doctrine, and interpretation of traditional Amarrian belief. These are opinions, on small but important segments of the Amarrian faith.

This should also not be looked upon as some sort of evangelical attempt to convert others in any specific sense. While I would be greatly honored to know that my words helped someone, anyone, find faith, I do not wish to preach for or against any particular faith. The birth of faith in the human heart is to be encouraged, but not overly structured, it should be a natural and organic result of contemplation and introspection that is unique to each and every individual.

Those that know me should by now know that the understanding of spirituality, unlimited by specific faiths and belief systems, is something of a personal quest of mine. In this endeavor I invariably come into disagreement with those who subscribe to specific faiths that think my desire to understand one facet of spirituality must imply my disapproval toward another facet. This is quite simply untrue, but I will not apologize for making others uncomfortable in the course of pursuing knowledge, understanding, and enlightenment.

Comment and question if you wish. Yell and insult if you must, but remember this is simply the first of many musings on specific faiths.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#3 - 2012-02-27 18:25:01 UTC
This is an interesting reading.

I am personnally versed into more esoteric matters, though, where I do think that the main and core tenet and goal of all Amarr religion is about knowledge. Everything else is an ideaological and sometimes political "sugarcoat" that helps define the Amarr society as a whole.
Nick Bete
Highsec Haulers Inc.
#4 - 2012-02-27 19:06:15 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:

... I do think that the main and core tenet and goal of all Amarr religion is about knowledge...


No Pilot Farel, the quest for knowledge is called SCIENCE, not religion, and particularly not the Amarrian form. The core of Amarrian religion is about forcible conversion and conquest.

How in the world did you arrive at your conclusion, by the way? Having read some of the Amarrian scriptures I see nothing about gaining knowledge of humanity or of the natural world. What I do find is admonishments to unquestioning obedience and orthodoxy, which is the antithesis of knowledge.
Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#5 - 2012-02-27 19:34:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Katrina Oniseki
Nick Bete wrote:

No Pilot Farel, the quest for knowledge is called SCIENCE, not religion, and particularly not the Amarrian form. The core of Amarrian religion is about forcible conversion and conquest.


If you're going to start tossing the word science around, please make sure you do so correctly and accurately.

Science, depending on the usage of the word, is the systematized collection of testable explanation and predictions of the universe. It is not the only path to knowledge or wisdom, and there are in fact certain types of both that science cannot quite make sense of.

Religion, on the other hand, is merely a system of beliefs held to (often arduously) with faith. It is more about a cause or principle, which more often than not is not simply to spread it to others. Much of religion is metaphoric historical accounts and codified law, as well as personal teachings for wisdom.

Your statements border on the biased and bigoted. You also do a disservice to science by claiming just as zealously that it is the only path to knowledge.

Katrina Oniseki

Uraniae Fehrnah
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#6 - 2012-02-27 21:33:25 UTC
Firstly I'd like to ask people to keep the discussion of the wider perspective limited in this, and subsequent threads. I did not intend for this to become simply another Science versus Religion thread. This is a thread for the faithful (of any denomination) and the curious. Further, if I feel I can speak my mind with some clarity and insight, I will eventually make a thread of the same type dedicated to agnostic or atheist "beliefs." Be patient, enjoy discussion for the sake of discussion.

And at the risk of sounding hypocritical I'll say one thing about science versus religion, then invite people to mail me or contact me through real-time comms.

In my opinion Science is a pursuit of knowledge and understanding, while Spirituality is the pursuit of understanding and wisdom. The difference is subtle but the curiosity and the desire for answers between both are the same. The Sisters of EVE are but one example of spiritual beliefs interacting with scientific processes and creating what most would consider a functional and good result.

Again, if you have questions about my understanding of this particular faith, ask away, but if you wish to move towards a wider realm of discussion do it elsewhere. I'll gladly come along for that discussion, but I'd prefer to not have it in this specific thread.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#7 - 2012-02-28 00:13:47 UTC
I think everything, including spirituality, is related to science eventually, but we just do not have the sufficient knowledge currently to pull them together (yet) so we have to conciliate both as much as we can. Though of course, I truely apologize if I contributed to derail anything in your thread.

Nick Bete wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:

... I do think that the main and core tenet and goal of all Amarr religion is about knowledge...


No Pilot Farel, the quest for knowledge is called SCIENCE, not religion, and particularly not the Amarrian form. The core of Amarrian religion is about forcible conversion and conquest.

How in the world did you arrive at your conclusion, by the way? Having read some of the Amarrian scriptures I see nothing about gaining knowledge of humanity or of the natural world. What I do find is admonishments to unquestioning obedience and orthodoxy, which is the antithesis of knowledge.


Of course the quest for knowledge is called Science... You confuse everything and do not know what you are talking about. I am not refering to the various imperial dogmas that have come to existence in the Amarrian religion over the course of History. They are mere facts that eventually are part of the whole picture (History with capital H), but I was just refering to the Scriptures as a whole.

I could argue over it endlessly but I think I should keep it brief in the case I am still out of topic, for which I apologize again if this is still the case. I hope it is not, though, as I consider it a fundamental principle deeply rooted in the core of Amarrian faith. What are the Scriptures ? I mean, not the most public and controversial bits you have obviously read, but the whole Scriptures ? It is about litterally everything related to Amarr, and now, probably partially to New Eden itself considering they have met other cultures in the process, cultures that have also contributed to this sum of knowledge. Anyway, (almost) everything is written here, be it about the last laser weaponry to that famous cake that is cooked in that particular city on Athra. Or so it is supposed to be, but this is another debate.

With this in mind, how can people forget that the first and original purpose of the Scriptures was about knowledge ? Because of dogmas or changing religious doctrines ? Maybe, or maybe not. It has obviously been forgotten a bit, and this is at least a little true, but the first quest of Amarr that has always been described in the Scriptures is the quest for God. Whatever God is supposed to be - again, I am not refering to religious dogma - , he has many names, which includes before all a symbol, the source of all Creation and the answer to everything. Therefore, looking for God is looking for the Truth (capital T). The only one and absolute Truth that governs everything. So, yes, this is a quest about knowledge which is supposed to bring us everyday closer to the concept of God.

Whatever are our little and personnal interpretations of this, and all our little personnal uncomplete truths we believe in, it is hard to deny that very first purpose of the Scriptures. What has been done besides, Reclaiming, dogma, way of life, traditions, is how unperfect beings define their own world and shape themselves through their own personnal truths.

Again, I am sorry if this was not the kind of answer you expected, Ms Fehrnah.
Uraniae Fehrnah
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#8 - 2012-02-28 07:02:21 UTC
Not at all Miss Farel. You, while responding to a somewhat wider topic than I intend, are actually doing so in a respectful and thoughtful manner. As long as it is genuine discussion and not simple insult-slinging I consider it a very welcome addition to any of my threads.

Likewise Katrina-haani ( or would it be Oniseki-haani? I am struggling with napanii but mean no offense) is doing the same and is therefore also welcome to contribute even if it is slightly past my intended topic.

As for Mister Bete, if all you find in the Scriptures is an intent to forcibly conquer and repress greater understanding, then, and I mean no offense by this, you have missed quite a bit. This is most likely through no fault of your own, and it is in fact a failure on the part of those who have tried to explain Amarrian faith to you. If you are willing I would do my best to make another attempt, however it would have to be through a different communications medium as I did already make it clear I am not attempting to preach here. Further if you don't want to learn of Traditional Amarrian faith, I would be willing to relate what I have learned of any other belief system I have studied, which I can safely say is a surprising number compared to the stereotype of the average Amarrian.
Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#9 - 2012-02-28 08:25:24 UTC
Nick Bete wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:

... I do think that the main and core tenet and goal of all Amarr religion is about knowledge...


No Pilot Farel, the quest for knowledge is called SCIENCE, not religion, and particularly not the Amarrian form.


Science has its limits. It's very good at telling us how something happens, but it's hopeless at telling us why it happens. For that, one needs spiritual enlightenment.

Quote:

The core of Amarrian religion is about forcible conversion and conquest.

How in the world did you arrive at your conclusion, by the way? Having read some of the Amarrian scriptures I see nothing about gaining knowledge of humanity or of the natural world. What I do find is admonishments to unquestioning obedience and orthodoxy, which is the antithesis of knowledge.



You clearly know nothing about our religion then.

Dolce et decorum est pro Imperium mori

Roga Dracor
Gladiators of Rage
Fraternity.
#10 - 2012-03-06 15:21:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Roga Dracor
Science and Religion go hand in hand, regardless the opined statements to the contrary. One school looks outward, while the other school looks inward. The problems and confrontations arise from our own blurring of the demarcation lines that divide the perceptions of these schools of thought.

One asks what am I. While the other asks who am I? There is a cosmos of divide between the answers to these questions.

My own personal disagreements with the Amarrian version of Truth are varied. But they do not stem from a total dismissal of objectivity from the basic premise of religion. For a purely atheist mind to debate religion in the first place seems ludicrous to me.

Many scientists begin looking inward, but, with no frame of reference, refute the existence of a higher being or purpose in the universe, citing lack of empirical data and blatantly ignoring possibility and plausibility. They keep their blinders firmly positioned against the possibility that being human is more than being a reproductive flash of momentary intellect that fades into senility and forgotten, unachieved potential.

Sadly, they reproduce before taking such faulty data into a self concieved oblivion of perception.

Many theologians have their blinders firmly planted against empirical data of any kind... Sadly, they too breed these fruits of misconception to plague the universe with their mediocrity. To the detriment of the noble causes they espouse.. And they inevitably decide that they have looked inward long enough and find that looking outward, everyone is as unholy as they are..

It's no use going back to yesterday, because I was a different person then, and it's a poor sort of memory that only works backward.