These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Missions & Complexes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

ISN - Incursion Shiny Network - Incursion Community

First post First post
Author
Gordwin Sendare
House Lannister
#421 - 2012-09-11 17:22:23 UTC
To be honest, I don't give a flying badger what TVP says ISN does or doesn't do. They run sites. We run sites. ISN wins most of the sites. Why would TVP members then like ISN? Calling ISN elitist is just the immediate reaction to not being able to field the same hardware. If they had the same hardware standards they'd just call us griefers for the same act.

SO MUCH BUTTHURT X_X

If you don't like being farmed then up your game, or move elsewhere. Whining accomplishies nothing.
Kadeyoo
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#422 - 2012-09-11 17:38:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Kadeyoo
Roxxo I'doCocaine wrote:
Perhaps it could be a free-for-all of sorts, with everyone attempting to form fleets that contest for the MOM with only the TIME being set in stone. In other words, all communities could agree to not take the gate before a specified time, and all else is fair game. Pilots could join whatever fleet they wished and we could all have fun in a massive contest. Of course this means ISN fleets will almost certainly "win" the MOM contest every time because they have the shiny ships, T2/faction ammo, more contest experience, more player/character skills, etc. So this solution is a bit unfair in a way, but, speaking for myself I really do not CARE who "wins" the MOM as long as it goes down as late as possible. This would also be an opportunity for ISN to demonstrate to the other incursion pilots what ISN is all about....winning fleets.... and encourages pilots to aspire to the ISN level. This was also brought up in the meeting and it is a valid point. I would rather ISN demonstrate its superiority during the MOM sites as opposed to rolling in randomly to contest TVP HQ fleets which will only cause resentment toward ISN. If ISN wanted to really show their stuff, they could even give the competing fleet(s) a head start, delaying as long as they dare before taking the gate. What would demonstrate their DPS superiority more than allowing for a handicap? It would also make it a challenge and sporting instead of a predictable slaughter, much like a golf handicap.



Wouldn't be unfair a bit. Also this *is* how we're doing it at the moment. Whether TDF and TVP have an agreement between each other, that's up to them. Though actively giving them a handicap seems arbitrary, and I don't see a possible reason for this.

You said "demonstrating DPS superiority". As it has been mentioned, by many ISN pilots - while we do agree that we might have started doing that to TVP sort of (by actively scouting and seeking those contests we were sure we would win), and *maybe* it was justified to an extent at the time ....

.... but we are done with it. All that remains is real contests - which is fighting for the isk (including the mom loot).

Any "handicapping" or talking about "fairness" is just nonsensical - especially in the sense that the only meaningful difference from the kundalini manifest from other sites is the mothership loot. Coincidentally, it's also the very same thing, that the pilots in TVP/TDF/Others don't get to see anyway. If it's just about the isk from that site, there's no need to do that then. If you knew there was a stronger fleet around, that would actively do this, and you'd have no chance of contesting it - then you might as well farm isk in regular sites instead in the meantime. This is what ISN for example has been doing for a long time (maybe for less of a "chance" to contest, but more for a lack of interest back then) - but this has changed now.

It still makes no real difference to non-ISN pilots in the end, as they can make the same if not more isk either way, and they don't get to see loot anyway - and for any existing replacement funds - questions about the actual existence completely aside - they can be filled with direct donations anyway. Or you can charity auction pieces of Tritanium at horrendous prices to keep filling that "fund" of yours after each incursion dies.


-- Weasel Juice on an alt. Didn't realize I was logged on to it.
Roxxo I'doCocaine
Doomheim
#423 - 2012-09-11 18:26:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Roxxo I'doCocaine
goldiiee wrote:
Roxxo I'doCocaine wrote:
I realized that one other important point was brought up at the meeting that I completely forgot to cover, and another point which was not addressed at the meeting.

Yada Yada Yada

and more Yada yada yada

and then a litlle more Yada yada yada

.


I Agree with many or your conclusions,


LolLolLol @ mocking what I said by reducing it to "yada yada yada" and then agreeing with most of it in the next line. Funny stuff! Not sure you quite grasp the whole concept of mockery.

goldiiee wrote:

Unfortunately your previous post, your war decs, your trolling, and your persistent use of an Alt to further an agenda, makes me doubt if you are even an incursion runner, 3 to 1 odds, you’re a troll and spend all your time in a WH bored out of your mind looking to get a rise out of anything you can.

Man up and do something.


How about a friendly wager then? I will take your bet, and you're gonna regret, cause I'm.... oh never mind. But seriously, 3 to 1 odds that I'm "not even an incursion runner?" It's a bet. Let's make the wager....3 billion ISK. If I am not an incursion runner, I will pay you 3 billion ISK. If I am, you will pay me 9 billion ISK. We'll deposit our funds with Chribba as the third party ISK holder and judge. I will submit my main's API to Chribba who will keep it confidential, check it, decide if I run incursions at all, and pay the winner.

So, man up and bet?
Roxxo I'doCocaine
Doomheim
#424 - 2012-09-11 19:01:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Roxxo I'doCocaine
Kadeyoo wrote:
Roxxo I'doCocaine wrote:
Perhaps it could be a free-for-all of sorts, with everyone attempting to form fleets that contest for the MOM with only the TIME being set in stone. In other words, all communities could agree to not take the gate before a specified time, and all else is fair game. Pilots could join whatever fleet they wished and we could all have fun in a massive contest. Of course this means ISN fleets will almost certainly "win" the MOM contest every time because they have the shiny ships, T2/faction ammo, more contest experience, more player/character skills, etc. So this solution is a bit unfair in a way, but, speaking for myself I really do not CARE who "wins" the MOM as long as it goes down as late as possible. This would also be an opportunity for ISN to demonstrate to the other incursion pilots what ISN is all about....winning fleets.... and encourages pilots to aspire to the ISN level. This was also brought up in the meeting and it is a valid point. I would rather ISN demonstrate its superiority during the MOM sites as opposed to rolling in randomly to contest TVP HQ fleets which will only cause resentment toward ISN. If ISN wanted to really show their stuff, they could even give the competing fleet(s) a head start, delaying as long as they dare before taking the gate. What would demonstrate their DPS superiority more than allowing for a handicap? It would also make it a challenge and sporting instead of a predictable slaughter, much like a golf handicap.



Wouldn't be unfair a bit. Also this *is* how we're doing it at the moment. Whether TDF and TVP have an agreement between each other, that's up to them. Though actively giving them a handicap seems arbitrary, and I don't see a possible reason for this.

You said "demonstrating DPS superiority". As it has been mentioned, by many ISN pilots - while we do agree that we might have started doing that to TVP sort of (by actively scouting and seeking those contests we were sure we would win), and *maybe* it was justified to an extent at the time ....

.... but we are done with it. All that remains is real contests - which is fighting for the isk (including the mom loot).

Any "handicapping" or talking about "fairness" is just nonsensical - especially in the sense that the only meaningful difference from the kundalini manifest from other sites is the mothership loot. Coincidentally, it's also the very same thing, that the pilots in TVP/TDF/Others don't get to see anyway. If it's just about the isk from that site, there's no need to do that then. If you knew there was a stronger fleet around, that would actively do this, and you'd have no chance of contesting it - then you might as well farm isk in regular sites instead in the meantime. This is what ISN for example has been doing for a long time (maybe for less of a "chance" to contest, but more for a lack of interest back then) - but this has changed now.

It still makes no real difference to non-ISN pilots in the end, as they can make the same if not more isk either way, and they don't get to see loot anyway - and for any existing replacement funds - questions about the actual existence completely aside - they can be filled with direct donations anyway. Or you can charity auction pieces of Tritanium at horrendous prices to keep filling that "fund" of yours after each incursion dies.


-- Weasel Juice on an alt. Didn't realize I was logged on to it.


As was mentioned in the meeting, giving non-ISN pilots a demonstration of ISN's might give them something to aspire to and show them that it can be done better and faster than TVP. I am pretty sure it was one of the officers that agreed with this sentiment along with several others. It is not surprising that a known troll would disagree I suppose. What I am surprised at is that ISN's leadership allows you to speak for ISN when I don't see Weasel Juice or any of your other alts on the MOTD as leadership or officer.... *shrug*
Roxxo I'doCocaine
Doomheim
#425 - 2012-09-11 19:22:52 UTC
Gordwin Sendare wrote:
To be honest, I don't give a flying badger what TVP says ISN does or doesn't do. They run sites. We run sites. ISN wins most of the sites. Why would TVP members then like ISN? Calling ISN elitist is just the immediate reaction to not being able to field the same hardware. If they had the same hardware standards they'd just call us griefers for the same act.

SO MUCH BUTTHURT X_X

If you don't like being farmed then up your game, or move elsewhere. Whining accomplishies nothing.


Actually, most TVP pilots who dislike ISN do so because of things like

THIS

and

THIS

...being spammed in incursion local, and then complaining about the "propaganda" put out by TVP leadership. In general most people dislike hypocrites. Roll Also, as Weasel Juice said, because for a while you were "actively scouting and seeking those contests we were sure we would win" in HQs, the net effect of which was to drive TVP from HQs altogether. If you need to oversimplify the issues and blame it all on the fact that you fly better ships so you can feel good about yourself, that's fine too I guess.
Yeyra
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#426 - 2012-09-11 19:26:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Yeyra
Roxxo I'doCocaine wrote:


So, man up and bet?


The one who hides behind an alt says "Man up!". Lol

Roxxo I'doCocaine wrote:


Actually, most TVP pilots who dislike ISN do so because of things like

THIS

and

THIS



How can you forget to post the best ones? This and this!

Quote:
...being spammed in incursion local, and then complaining about the "propaganda" put out by TVP leadership.


There is a difference between mocking and spreading lies.
Roxxo I'doCocaine
Doomheim
#427 - 2012-09-11 19:39:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Roxxo I'doCocaine
Yeyra wrote:
Roxxo I'doCocaine wrote:


So, man up and bet?


The one who hides behind an alt says "Man up!". Lol

Roxxo I'doCocaine wrote:


Actually, most TVP pilots who dislike ISN do so because of things like

THIS

and

THIS



How can you forget to post the best ones? This and this!

Quote:
...being spammed in incursion local, and then complaining about the "propaganda" put out by TVP leadership.


There is a difference between mocking and spreading lies.


Yes there is. I have posted links to the mockery and propaganda spread by ISN. Can you provide us all links to the "lies" spread by TVP? Let's air out all of the laundry. However don't forget there is also a difference between "lies" and misunderstanding or opinions. Proof or GTFO as they say.

As for the use of alts, that has been covered already, so I will just quote previous posts. Please try to keep up with the conversation if you are going to participate:

"On a personal level, that is where I am. I do not wish to be made to choose between the good people in ISN who are devoted to excellence, and the good people in TVP who are devoted to acceptance, and I should not have to. This is why people are posting with alts. No one wants to be seen as taking a side and be excluded from the other side, because we have friends on both sides. No one wants to burn bridges, and they shouldn't be forced to."
goldiiee
Bureau of Astronomical Anomalies
#428 - 2012-09-11 19:48:56 UTC
Roxxo I'doCocaine wrote:
goldiiee wrote:
Roxxo I'doCocaine wrote:
I realized that one other important point was brought up at the meeting that I completely forgot to cover, and another point which was not addressed at the meeting.

Yada Yada Yada

and more Yada yada yada

and then a litlle more Yada yada yada

.


I Agree with many or your conclusions,


LolLolLol @ mocking what I said by reducing it to "yada yada yada" and then agreeing with most of it in the next line. Funny stuff! Not sure you quite grasp the whole concept of mockery.

goldiiee wrote:

Unfortunately your previous post, your war decs, your trolling, and your persistent use of an Alt to further an agenda, makes me doubt if you are even an incursion runner, 3 to 1 odds, you’re a troll and spend all your time in a WH bored out of your mind looking to get a rise out of anything you can.

Man up and do something.


How about a friendly wager then? I will take your bet, and you're gonna regret, cause I'm.... oh never mind. But seriously, 3 to 1 odds that I'm "not even an incursion runner?" It's a bet. Let's make the wager....3 billion ISK. If I am not an incursion runner, I will pay you 3 billion ISK. If I am, you will pay me 9 billion ISK. We'll deposit our funds with Chribba as the third party ISK holder and judge. I will submit my main's API to Chribba who will keep it confidential, check it, decide if I run incursions at all, and pay the winner.

So, man up and bet?


I don't bet on anything, Gambling is a waste of money. Know quanities and absolutes, make me happy. But if you need isk X up, get in a fleet and earn it.

And I wasn't mocking, I was getting rid of all the text that I am sure everyone had read already.

I reviewed as many of your post as I could stand, you go from one extreeme to another, so much that I can only assume medication is involved. Not judging, just saying you scream for so many things I have forgotten what you wanted in the first place.

You hate ISN: your first post called for all pilots to declare war and grief ISN managment/officers/members.
The next post I find you want to influence the views of ISN in our members meeting.
Then we get a useless post of music lyrics.
Upon hearing the ISN meeting you remove your first post and seem to agree with the general direction of the community.
But low an behold less than a day later you have flipped back to HATE ISN.
Now it seems you want to make a wager on the validity of your existence. You should probally have a convo with Descartes.
Interestingly all your posts are in ISN's Forum so you really don't talk to anyone but ISN about the fact that ISN bothers you.

Ok, Really if your on drugs stop. If your not on drugs seek professional help and get some.

Things that keep me up at night;  Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state, Once you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another.

goldiiee
Bureau of Astronomical Anomalies
#429 - 2012-09-11 19:56:06 UTC
And It should be noted that ISN has never booted banned or in any way excluded an Incursion runner for affiliation. The only thing we required was t2 guns and a pirate faction BS. So your fears of bieng outed by ISN if your true Identity was know are unfounded on our end.

Things that keep me up at night;  Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state, Once you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another.

Yeyra
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#430 - 2012-09-11 19:56:35 UTC
Roxxo I'doCocaine wrote:

Yes there is. I have posted links to the mockery and propaganda spread by ISN. Can you provide us all links to the "lies" spread by TVP? Let's air out all of the laundry. However don't forget there is also a difference between "lies" and misunderstanding or opinions. Proof or GTFO as they say.


I can not. Because almost everything happened either in the chat channels or in Teamspeak. I never bothered to save chat logs and on top of that I'm banned from TVP. Well, I can post one minor misinformation, but that's it.

Danibunkins evemail in TVP News wrote:
TVP has faced drama, contention, outright attacks, and bullying in the past. You're still standing. When ISN wants to take a site. Let them have it. Yes, your isk will hurt a bit, move on to the next site. Bullies are bullies. In high sec, you just ignore them. Move on to the next site, and do what you do best. Enjoy yourselves, regardless of what is going on. If you were in nullsec, I'd say burn them to the ground, chase them down and then do it again. But high sec is a different animal. Ignore them, and soon enough, they will be bored, realize their "fight" isn't getting them attention, and they'll go on to bullying someone else.


Yes, this is not a lie, but misinformation. We didn't start the "fight". TVP managment did by popping every MOM as soon as the next High Sec Incursion spawned. The mockery and HQ contests were just reactions to TVP managment actions.

Quote:
"On a personal level, that is where I am. I do not wish to be made to choose between the good people in ISN who are devoted to excellence, and the good people in TVP who are devoted to acceptance, and I should not have to. This is why people are posting with alts. No one wants to be seen as taking a side and be excluded from the other side, because we have friends on both sides. No one wants to burn bridges, and they shouldn't be forced to."


Don't make me laugh. This is a very poor excuse.
Roxxo I'doCocaine
Doomheim
#431 - 2012-09-11 20:06:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Roxxo I'doCocaine
goldiiee wrote:

I don't bet on anything, Gambling is a waste of money. Know quanities and absolutes, make me happy. But if you need isk X up, get in a fleet and earn it.


If you don't want to place a wager, and are not a gambling man, then might I suggest you do not give odds and issue challenges.

Quote:

You hate ISN: your first post called for all pilots to declare war and grief ISN managment/officers/members.

The next post I find you want to influence the views of ISN in our members meeting.

Then we get a useless post of music lyrics.


I never called for anyone to grief anyone, nor have I ever stated I hate ISN, because I do not.

I suggested means of fighting back against ISN's attempt to destroy a community I care about. The next post was requested by one of your officers. My input was asked for and given.

The lyrics post was originally mocking ISN. The original text was quoted several times in replies if you need to go back and see what it originally said. I removed it as a courtesy, not due to medication nor an attempt to confuse you. I effectively removed the mockery as a response to the good faith actions of your community.

Quote:

Upon hearing the ISN meeting you remove your first post and seem to agree with the general direction of the community.
But low an behold less than a day later you have flipped back to HATE ISN.


Again, you seem confused. Where exactly have I posted that I hate ISN or implied that I do? This is where quoting actual words instead of erasing them and replacing them with nonsense come in handy...so that your audience can tell WTF you are talking about. All of my posts since the meeting have been either constructive commentary given in a genuine attempt to help resolve issues between ISN and the rest of the incursion communities or replies to ISN members who have commented on my input. I realize that you may be angry at me for calling you on your completely random and unjustified accusation that I "do not run incursions at all", but as a leader you may want to consider if what you are doing....making blind accusations and throwing personal insults...is helping or hurting your community's image.
Yeyra
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#432 - 2012-09-11 20:14:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Yeyra
Roxxo I'doCocaine wrote:
FAIR WARNING

ISN has been griefing the incursion community for a few months now. After waiting well over a year for incursion pilots to realize that their way is the "best way" to play Eve to no avail, they have begun a desperate "war" to force their way of running incursions on the incursion community and to exclude anyone not willing to do it their way. They have joined fleets run by other incursion groups with logi and intentionally let ships die, then posted videos of this to promote themselves. They have pre-loaded HQ sites with the intent of causing a hazard for other groups. They have waged a propoganda war, spreading lies and slandering some very good pilots in the incursion community. They have entered into negotiations in bad faith, never intending on coming to a mutally beneficial agreement in an attempt to dishearten community leaders. I have witnessed all of these things and waited patiently for them to grow bored, but alas they are easily amused.

ISN's goal is simply to control all of incursions and to force pilots to adhere to their strict (shiny/expensive) fitting guidelines. This of course excludes most newer pilots. While this is well within the Eve mentality of elitism, it is (imho) bad for the community and the game as a whole. For a very accurate description of ISN's leadership, see this post.

I am tired of waiting for someone to organize a resistance to this and so I have taken action on my own. I have a logi pilot (or 2) who is embedded within the ISN community. This pilot will fly for hours without incident and wait for a key member of ISN to be primaried at a particularly nasty time and then reps will be withheld (or just a bit "slow") with the goal of seeing that ship destroyed. This pilot has been successful already and will succeed again. I do not enjoy this style of play, but feel it is the most effective way to fight back against ISN's strategy, and sometimes fire must be fought with fire.

If you routinely fly with ISN, you are in danger of losing your ship because of this. While I will try to target ISN directors, officers, and those highly active on the griefing front, this is far from an exact science, and war being war, unintended casualties are unavoidable.

Are you an incursion pilot that is fed up with ISN's griefing, and want to help fight against their fascist agenda, there are quite a few things you can do:

1 - Infiltration and Sabotage as logistics. The most effective method is to infiltrate an ISN fleet with logistics and join me in sabotaging ISN's fleets by withholding or simply being a bit slow on shield repairs/capacitor requests. If you have already flown in ISN with logistics, and are tired of their new "direction", you are in a unique position to do something about it.

2 - Infiltration and Sabotage as DPS. Only fly DPS? Join an ISN fleet and subtly sabotage their efforts to run sites. Disconnecting, "forgetting" to get ammo, trolling comms, getting hung up on gates, shooting the wrong tags, "forgetting" to assign drones properly, asking for AFK time, etc. can all be done subtly enough to not raise suspicion while being very frustrating to their FCs.

3 - Wardecs. Got an anonymous alt and tons of incursion ISK you're not doing anything with? Get corporate management to 1 in a few minutes, start a corp, and place a wardec on an ISN griefer. This can cost as little as 50 mil. ISK. Look for targets that have been in a corporation with more than a few members for a good amount of time. This forces them to either drop a corp they enjoy being a member of, or spreading war aggression among ISN logis when they run sites. Get the alt in system when you see the decced ISN member so they must continually be on the lookout. If it is an alt with some PVP skills, you may be able to catch a logi with aggro at a gate or station after completing a site.

4 - Gank their OGB. You can hire mercs for this or scan their booster down, find a friend, and do the deed yourselves with only a couple of tier 3 BCs. Don't forget to bring a low-skill thrasher too and get their pod.

5 - Hunt their pods. A low-skill neutral alt in a thrasher or catalyst outside of the station ISN is staging from can often times find a juicy ISN pod undocking and pop it before they (or CONCORD) can react.

6 - Recruit from ISN Secondary. Put one toon in their channel, and recruit with a second toon. When you see someone new, be sure to let them know about your favorite incursion channel and tell them about what ISN has been doing. Are they having trouble getting into an ISN fleet because it is too restrictive or simply not running? I bet you know a place where they can find a fleet.

These are just a few ways you can help in the effort to fight back against ISN's griefing. I am sure that you can think of other ways become involved in this fight and take an active role in removing the cancerous mass that ISN's leadership has become. My goal is the harmonious cooperation of all incursion groups that we had before, with a fun sense of competition. But until ISN's leadership understands that cooperation is the only way to be successful, they will continue to grief and harass all other incursion groups. YOU are capable of causing change and influencing this struggle.

Any pilots wishing to coordinate efforts or donate resources that will be used against ISN are welcome to contact this character via Evemail. Any useful intel, known ISN officer alts, fleet chat logs, FRAPS of counter-ISN ops, are also very welcome. All submissions will remain completely anonymous unless otherwise specified. Videos and screen shots will be scrubbed of all identifying information before release.



Yes, you never suggested to grief ISN.
goldiiee
Bureau of Astronomical Anomalies
#433 - 2012-09-11 20:16:04 UTC
I just dont care anymore. I will do my best to reserve my comments for old members and toons with questions.

Things that keep me up at night;  Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state, Once you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another.

Roxxo I'doCocaine
Doomheim
#434 - 2012-09-11 20:24:33 UTC
Yeyra wrote:
Roxxo I'doCocaine wrote:

Yes there is. I have posted links to the mockery and propaganda spread by ISN. Can you provide us all links to the "lies" spread by TVP? Let's air out all of the laundry. However don't forget there is also a difference between "lies" and misunderstanding or opinions. Proof or GTFO as they say.


I can not. Because almost everything happened either in the chat channels or in Teamspeak. I never bothered to save chat logs and on top of that I'm banned from TVP. Well, I can post one minor misinformation, but that's it.

Danibunkins evemail in TVP News wrote:
TVP has faced drama, contention, outright attacks, and bullying in the past. You're still standing. When ISN wants to take a site. Let them have it. Yes, your isk will hurt a bit, move on to the next site. Bullies are bullies. In high sec, you just ignore them. Move on to the next site, and do what you do best. Enjoy yourselves, regardless of what is going on. If you were in nullsec, I'd say burn them to the ground, chase them down and then do it again. But high sec is a different animal. Ignore them, and soon enough, they will be bored, realize their "fight" isn't getting them attention, and they'll go on to bullying someone else.


Yes, this is not a lie, but misinformation. We didn't start the "fight". TVP managment did by popping every MOM as soon as the next High Sec Incursion spawned. The mockery and HQ contests were just reactions to TVP managment actions.


Wow, that's pretty weak. So basically you have gone from "Sure we griefed you endlessly with mocking propoganda but that's nothing compared to the LIES TVP told!!!" to "well it wasn't lies, but misinformation" to "they started it" as justification. So I suppose ISN popping the mom early three times in a row, forcing hundreds of pilots to waste their time moving to new incursions, wasn't "looking for a fight" in your opinion? And everything ISN did afterwards... Herr Ronin preloading TCRCs*, a long list of mocking GIFs mocking not just TVP's leadership but TVP pilots as well, video propaganda, contesting TVP to the point that it had to break up their fleets... is justified because you were butthurt over that single line in a TVP mailing on top of anger expressed by these pilots that wasn't even worth saving a log of. Just....wow. I really don't know what to say to that.

* As I don't like to post baseless accusations, log attached below, names removed to comply with forum rules:

[ 2012.09.03 18:01:10 ] ISN Leader > Yes see me loading!!
[ 2012.09.03 18:01:14 ] ISN Leader > pre-loading...
[ 2012.09.03 18:02:39 ] Player > give my ronin a lick
[ 2012.09.03 18:02:53 ] ISN Leader > Rawr!
[ 2012.09.03 18:05:59 ] Player > MeOw!
[ 2012.09.03 18:07:52 ] ISN Leader > o/
[ 2012.09.03 18:08:40 ] ISN Leader > Have fun lad's, Take care.
[ 2012.09.03 18:08:42 ] Player > oh no!!!!! preloads!!!!!!
[ 2012.09.03 18:08:47 ] Player > oh well,,,,,
[ 2012.09.03 18:09:24 ] Player > stewpid gweefers.... Im taking my baw and going home
[ 2012.09.03 18:09:31 ] ISN Leader > Spell correctly.
[ 2012.09.03 18:09:37 ] ISN Leader > Then try once again.
[ 2012.09.03 18:10:11 ] ISN Leader > and "stewpid" ? I love Irish stew.
[ 2012.09.03 18:10:51 ] Player > lvl 3 troll fail.... please try again
[ 2012.09.03 18:11:04 ] Player > irish stew is amazing,,,,,,,,
[ 2012.09.03 18:13:17 ] ISN Leader > Ta Ta for now my sweety's
[ 2012.09.03 18:13:24 ] ISN Leader > o/


Roxxo I'doCocaine
Doomheim
#435 - 2012-09-11 20:32:07 UTC
Yeyra wrote:


Yes, you never suggested to grief ISN.


To quote Eve's EULA:

"(Griefing) should not be confused with standard conflict that might arise between two (or more) players, such as corporation wars."

As I believe we all agree that TVP and ISN have/had a "standard conflict" in Eve terms, fighting back is not griefing. If you disagree, then please petition CCP to have me banned for griefing as I engaged in many of the activities I suggested in my post. Just as contesting is not griefing, neither is ganking ships, pods, wardecs, infiltration and sabotage, or recruitment. You cannot have it both ways and define something as griefing only when it is done to YOU. Soz, but it doesn't work that way.
Roxxo I'doCocaine
Doomheim
#436 - 2012-09-11 20:53:22 UTC
So, are we done with all of the name calling, finger pointing and butthurt, or shall we continue to drag the details of this stupid little drama out into public view? Because as you can see, I can do this all night boys.

When you are ready to move on and get back to making ISK and flying in fun fleets instead of waving our respective epeens around in your recruitment forum, simply ignore me and move on. Yes, that is a challenge. The only posts I will put in this thread from this point on will be replies to posts directed at me. Your move.
Yeyra
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#437 - 2012-09-11 21:00:34 UTC
Roxxo I'doCocaine wrote:

Wow, that's pretty weak. So basically you have gone from "Sure we griefed you endlessly with mocking propoganda but that's nothing compared to the LIES TVP told!!!" to "well it wasn't lies, but misinformation" to "they started it" as justification.


Read my post again.

Quote:
To quote Eve's EULA:

"(Griefing) should not be confused with standard conflict that might arise between two (or more) players, such as corporation wars."

As I believe we all agree that TVP and ISN have/had a "standard conflict" in Eve terms, fighting back is not griefing. If you disagree, then please petition CCP to have me banned for griefing as I engaged in many of the activities I suggested in my post. Just as contesting is not griefing, neither is ganking ships, pods, wardecs, infiltration and sabotage, or recruitment. You cannot have it both ways and define something as griefing only when it is done to YOU. Soz, but it doesn't work that way.


TVP vs ISN is by no means a "standard conflict". So... what you suggested is not griefing, but contesting is? Okay.

Quote:
So, are we done with all of the name calling, finger pointing and butthurt, or shall we continue to drag the details of this stupid little drama out into public view? Because as you can see, I can do this all night boys.


If this is a stupid little drama, why did you bother to post in this thread and waste hundred of millions of ISK wardeccing ISN managment?

Quote:
When you are ready to move on and get back to making ISK and flying in fun fleets instead of waving our respective epeens around in your recruitment forum, simply ignore me and move on. Yes, that is a challenge. The only posts I will put in this thread from this point on will be replies to posts directed at me. Your move.


We never stopped making ISK.
Roxxo I'doCocaine
Doomheim
#438 - 2012-09-11 21:08:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Roxxo I'doCocaine
Yeyra wrote:
Roxxo I'doCocaine wrote:

Wow, that's pretty weak. So basically you have gone from "Sure we griefed you endlessly with mocking propoganda but that's nothing compared to the LIES TVP told!!!" to "well it wasn't lies, but misinformation" to "they started it" as justification.


1. Read my post again.

Quote:
To quote Eve's EULA:

"(Griefing) should not be confused with standard conflict that might arise between two (or more) players, such as corporation wars."

As I believe we all agree that TVP and ISN have/had a "standard conflict" in Eve terms, fighting back is not griefing. If you disagree, then please petition CCP to have me banned for griefing as I engaged in many of the activities I suggested in my post. Just as contesting is not griefing, neither is ganking ships, pods, wardecs, infiltration and sabotage, or recruitment. You cannot have it both ways and define something as griefing only when it is done to YOU. Soz, but it doesn't work that way.


2. TVP vs ISN is by no means a "standard conflict". So... what you suggested is not griefing, but contesting is? Okay.

Quote:
So, are we done with all of the name calling, finger pointing and butthurt, or shall we continue to drag the details of this stupid little drama out into public view? Because as you can see, I can do this all night boys.


3. If this is a stupid little drama, why did you bother to post in this thread and waste hundred of millions of ISK wardeccing ISN managment?

Quote:
When you are ready to move on and get back to making ISK and flying in fun fleets instead of waving our respective epeens around in your recruitment forum, simply ignore me and move on. Yes, that is a challenge. The only posts I will put in this thread from this point on will be replies to posts directed at me. Your move.


4. We never stopped making ISK.


LOL, can't resist feeding the troll huh? Okay then....

1. Why?
2. How is it not a standard conflict? I never said contesting was griefing. As a matter of fact, I said, "Just as contesting is not griefing..." You quoted me saying that. *boggles*
3. I bothered to post in this thread at various times for various reasons. Be more specific. Why waste hundreds of millions of ISK wardeccing management? Many reasons: mainly because ISK is pixels, and I have lots of pixels, because I run incursions. Hundreds of millions of ISK is nothing. If I really cared, I'd have dropped a few bil to see their ships popped by mercs.
4. You never stopped making an ass of yourself either. Still doing a fine job of it actually. Big smile Aw, just kidding bro. You aren't s*****ing up ISN's recruitment thread at all, or making yourself or your community look silly by arguing with a forum alt on the internet. Never stop posting. <3
Yeyra
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#439 - 2012-09-11 21:23:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Yeyra
Roxxo I'doCocaine wrote:


LOL, can't resist feeding the troll huh? Okay then....


I can. But I don't want to right now.

Quote:
1. Why?


Because you didn't read it carefully enough. Or didn't understand it.

Quote:
2. How is it not a standard conflict? I never said contesting was griefing. As a matter of fact, I said, "Just as contesting is not griefing..."


What is your definition of a "standard conflict"?

Quote:
3. I bothered to post in this thread at various times for various reasons. Be more specific. Why waste hundreds of million of ISK wardeccing management? Many reasons: a) ISK is pixels, and I have lots of pixels, because I run incursions. Hundreds of millions of ISK is nothing. If I really cared, I'd have dropped a few bil to see their ships popped by mercs.


Should have given me the ISK. I would have put it to better use, than just flushing it down the drain.

Quote:
4. You never stopped making an ass of yourself either. Still doing a fine job of it actually. Big smile


Thank you. I always strive to be the best.
Kodavor
Iz Doge Korp .
#440 - 2012-09-11 21:24:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Kodavor
Roxxo I'doCocaine is not a ISN pilot . Anything that is written by him is completely made up or gathered among the rumors of many mouths . For some odd reasons this person seems to be bored and chose this thread to ease his boredom . Free bump is a free bump . Thank you .

Best regards
Kodavor