These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The Mittani Declares War

First post
Author
AnzacPaul
Tactical Farmers.
Pandemic Horde
#81 - 2011-09-08 14:29:59 UTC
Jade Constantine wrote:

Isn't that like a failing fast food join cranking up the price of its burgers to offset dropping sales? I can't see that strategy working for long.



My view (and mine only) from trawling forums, reading the Fearless newsletter, seeing growth charts, plans for further games etc, is that CCP are looking to get the best return for their buck on a game that is no longer growing substantially, and probably never will again. Everyone knows what happens when you get a new project, the old one gets not only put on the back burner, but also the interest in it drops aswell.

The fact that Wis ties in with W.O.D makes it an important part of CCPs development process, added with the fact that we have been told that Eve is on the backburner whilst Dust is released, makes it hard for me to believe that Upper management will go "ok here's more resources for a game that we are kind of done with".

I find it more likely that PR will go into overdrive and try and ride out the next 12 months or so, and hope that between nex sales, and people that aren't disgruntled yet will continue to keep the wheels turning until a secondary form of income arrives.
Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#82 - 2011-09-08 14:30:54 UTC
J Kunjeh wrote:
The Mittani mostly likes seeing his name in lights. That's mostly what his "protest" is about. He takes whichever side gets him the most publicity. Seriously, this man has more ego than I thought it was humanly possible to have.


That may be true.

But even a broken clock is right twice a day.

Dolce et decorum est pro Imperium mori

White Tree
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#83 - 2011-09-08 14:31:07 UTC
'I work in marketting' leaps to mind.

Former member of CSM6.

Prince Kobol
#84 - 2011-09-08 14:32:48 UTC
Great blog as always Seleene.

However reading it just makes me think even more that the suits at CCP simply are not interested in anything anyone, including Devs have to say.

"It's great to see again but what saddens me is how Greyscale's 0.0 road map reminds me pretty much exactly of stuff that was discussed between Dominion and Apocrypha (about 2.5 years ago). I could go back and pull out old emails and (if I still had access) meeting minutes on the internal CCP 'Trac' pages that had shitloads of similar trains of thought to them. It's all been updated and thought through again, but the core principals and goals are the same: iterate on existing crappy game play and make it more better good fun awesome"


This was happening 2.5 years ago and nothing has changed.

Why should now be any different.

Personally I think Eve is on the precipice of a slow and painful death similar to that of SWG yet ultimately it will not be decided by the players posting here on the forums, the devs, the CSM, any online gaming publication or anything else but by the suits at CCP.

They will keep on course until the income from subs/plexs decrease to a certain threshold for a sustained period of time.

The question is will it be too late by then?

White Tree
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#85 - 2011-09-08 14:34:30 UTC
I don't think we're going to have an SWG scenario.

So far, no NGE-type patch has been added to the game to break it on a very fundamental level.

People get angry because they like EVE, not because the hate it.

Former member of CSM6.

Prince Kobol
#86 - 2011-09-08 14:38:12 UTC
My example of using SWG was that of people leaving over time due to game play changes and the change of direction to the point where it was a shadow of its former self.

For example Eve becoming less about spaceships but being more like Sims in Space.
Vilggiiee
Mammoth Finances
#87 - 2011-09-08 14:39:36 UTC
bla bla bla bla ... CCP always talking about patience , and slow process ... its bullsh*** . We aint got nothing in winter and next summer . EvE is closed . ~8 years for MMO ? WoW with blizzard funds is dying , and u talking about crap like CCP . What u get after all these years ? some sov mechanics ,some "pve" content , few ships , and nothing more. Sh** like Knight Online got more content than EvE
Barakkus
#88 - 2011-09-08 14:40:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Barakkus
It actually would be in CCP's best interest to do away with the PR disaster and nonsense that is the CSM. All I've seen so far of this latest batch is a bunch of e-peenery and self inflated egos over pixels that have actually no significance to anyone in the grand scheme of things.

The CSM is ******** and should just be done away with. This isn't like a labor union or political activists dealing with a government, it's a bunch of people playing a video game that can just go play something else when the game is no longer appealing to them. This whole business of the CSM is just silly. The onus is on CCP to figure out what the market wants and develop to that, not play this silly little game of "us against the MAN" every month or so. It's ******** and a really bad business decision.

http://youtu.be/yytbDZrw1jc

White Tree
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#89 - 2011-09-08 14:40:30 UTC
Vilggiiee wrote:
bla bla bla bla ... CCP always talking about patience , and slow process ... its bullsh***


No it isn't. You're wrong. Sorry.

Former member of CSM6.

J Kunjeh
#90 - 2011-09-08 14:41:10 UTC
Rodj Blake wrote:
J Kunjeh wrote:
The Mittani mostly likes seeing his name in lights. That's mostly what his "protest" is about. He takes whichever side gets him the most publicity. Seriously, this man has more ego than I thought it was humanly possible to have.


That may be true.

But even a broken clock is right twice a day.


Oh, I'm not disagreeing that he's right, but so were the hundreds of others saying the same things all Summer of Rage while Mittens was busy playing kissass and making videos with CCP in Iceland to appease the players.

"The world as we know it came about through an anomaly (anomou)" (The Gospel of Philip, 1-5) 

Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#91 - 2011-09-08 14:42:14 UTC
AnzacPaul wrote:
Jade Constantine wrote:

Isn't that like a failing fast food join cranking up the price of its burgers to offset dropping sales? I can't see that strategy working for long.



My view (and mine only) from trawling forums, reading the Fearless newsletter, seeing growth charts, plans for further games etc, is that CCP are looking to get the best return for their buck on a game that is no longer growing substantially, and probably never will again....



It was growing very well when they were working on FIS - the core of eve.

Eve has the only internet spaceship game in the world. Anyone who thinks 350k is some sort of cap is crazy. This game has allot of growth left - as long as it isn't abandoned.

They will get the best bang for the buck if they continue to develop this game.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

AnzacPaul
Tactical Farmers.
Pandemic Horde
#92 - 2011-09-08 14:42:31 UTC
I don't want people to mistake what i'm saying here, I'm one of the people pleading with CCP to change their ideas.

On the inside, to the CSM, you might see "lots of exciting things coming for FiS", inside CCP hq. You speak with CCP daily.

But what do us players get?

Soon ™


How long do CCP think people will hang around with that terminology. Only yesterday CCP Prism X stated in the Ship spinning thread that CCP are in a planning stage, 3 months after the old functionality was demanded. How long, after planning, can we expect the few devs still working on Eve to give us that back?

I guess my real question is

"How long should people expect to wait for something more than Soon ™"

Another 3 months? 6? Will CCP devote 6 months of resources away from another project to give to EVE? Will they hire more devs to fill the need?



J Kunjeh
#93 - 2011-09-08 14:47:16 UTC
AnzacPaul wrote:
I don't want people to mistake what i'm saying here, I'm one of the people pleading with CCP to change their ideas.

On the inside, to the CSM, you might see "lots of exciting things coming for FiS", inside CCP hq. You speak with CCP daily.

But what do us players get?

Soon ™


How long do CCP think people will hang around with that terminology.


Oh, I'd say 8 years or so? The Soon terminology has been used since day 1 I think, hasn't it?

"The world as we know it came about through an anomaly (anomou)" (The Gospel of Philip, 1-5) 

Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#94 - 2011-09-08 14:51:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Cearain
Prince Kobol wrote:
Great blog as always Seleene.

However reading it just makes me think even more that the suits at CCP simply are not interested in anything anyone, including Devs have to say.

"It's great to see again but what saddens me is how Greyscale's 0.0 road map reminds me pretty much exactly of stuff that was discussed between Dominion and Apocrypha (about 2.5 years ago). I could go back and pull out old emails and (if I still had access) meeting minutes on the internal CCP 'Trac' pages that had shitloads of similar trains of thought to them. It's all been updated and thought through again, but the core principals and goals are the same: iterate on existing crappy game play and make it more better good fun awesome"


This was happening 2.5 years ago and nothing has changed.

Why should now be any different.

....



It should be different now because incarna has been released and they can see the results. They can see that incarna is not that great of a draw to the game. Even I thought the subscriptions would get a boost from incarna.

However, now that incarna was released, it is clear that having that many devs assigned to incarna, for so long, is not financially justified. They need to find a sensible place to finish up with what they are working on with incarna, and then reassign the devs back to FIS.

They also need to let the players know they are doing this. Because right now players are leaving this game because they think it is abandoned. (and it has been since apoc 1.5.)

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Barakkus
#95 - 2011-09-08 15:00:30 UTC
Cearain wrote:

They also need to let the players know they are doing this. Because right now players are leaving this game because they think it is abandoned. (and it has been since apoc 1.5.)


CCP PrismX mentioned in another thread they are in the planning stages for the next development cycle so they don't really have an idea at present what is going to be scheduled for development.

http://youtu.be/yytbDZrw1jc

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
#96 - 2011-09-08 15:05:33 UTC
AnzacPaul wrote:

My view (and mine only) from trawling forums, reading the Fearless newsletter, seeing growth charts, plans for further games etc, is that CCP are looking to get the best return for their buck on a game that is no longer growing substantially, and probably never will again. Everyone knows what happens when you get a new project, the old one gets not only put on the back burner, but also the interest in it drops aswell.


It stopped growing when they stopped investing significant developer resources into providing content and feature improvements. To make it grow again they need to reverse that policy and invest again. CCP's problem with the "new projects" is that they have probably underestimated the value of good-press from existing player base. Eve (as was) grew immensely from good word of mouth and players selling the game to other communities and circles of friends. Take away that aspect and reverse it - and you'll see Dust and WoD poisoned from the get go by people who have a bad tastes in their mouth from what CCP did to Eve.

Quote:
The fact that Wis ties in with W.O.D makes it an important part of CCPs development process, added with the fact that we have been told that Eve is on the backburner whilst Dust is released, makes it hard for me to believe that Upper management will go "ok here's more resources for a game that we are kind of done with".


Whats pretty shocking to me is how bad Incarna actually is from a technical viewpoint. It makes me feel that WOD is years and years away because what we see from the CQ test is frankly appalling. Compared to mainstream avatar based mmo's its like cavemen bashing rocks together to make sparks. This tells me that CCP is going to need to survive on Eve subscriptions for quite a while yet while trying to keep those WOD devs in salary. There is a balancing act sure - but you cannot afford to let your sole income source go.

I think there will come a critical point for CCP when (if they do not divert massive resources to eve) they will be pressed by dropping subs and lack of interest that will go beyond eve itself and endanger those other projects. I mean if what we're hearing is the case (that eve is basically 2-3 teams of number tweaking balance devs) then its on subsistence mode already.

Say the Dust launch next year is not a crazy success. (Which given bad word of mouth publicity from eve players and dropping interest in core eve would be likely - since a game built around interacting with the eve server is going to be a bit of a flop if the eve server is sliding to bored stasis) then with the continuing decline in Eve profitability the company will have to make some hard choices.

One of them might be selling WOD license, laying off a portion of their employee base and putting the rest back on eve to trying to recover the situation. This might sound apocalyptic - but such things happen in business.

Quote:
I find it more likely that PR will go into overdrive and try and ride out the next 12 months or so, and hope that between nex sales, and people that aren't disgruntled yet will continue to keep the wheels turning until a secondary form of income arrives.


PR without payload is an embarrassment. If its 12 months of "buy NeX/Plex" and walk around in your 1(4) rooms and dream of Dust then its going to do more harm than good.

What CCP need to remember is that their success was built on the goodwill, passion and positive word-of-mouth of their player base. I've never been the CEO of a big corp/alliance in Eve but I can say pretty confidently that I've delivered CCP several hundred subs for the best part of five years and thats because I love the game. Seleene and Mittani can make that claim with thousands upon thousands of players - they loved the game and convinced a lot of players to play. Every CEO/alliance leader/fleet commander/personality in this game can say similar really.

Take away those good vibes and desire to proselytize on behalf of this game and the decline will accelarate rapidly.

The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#97 - 2011-09-08 15:08:31 UTC
Barakkus wrote:
Cearain wrote:

They also need to let the players know they are doing this. Because right now players are leaving this game because they think it is abandoned. (and it has been since apoc 1.5.)


CCP PrismX mentioned in another thread they are in the planning stages for the next development cycle so they don't really have an idea at present what is going to be scheduled for development.



There was a time when CCP planned things at least a year in advance.

They had teams working on not only the next expansion, but the one after that as well. So in theory they should have an idea by now what will be in the Summer 2012 expansion.

Dolce et decorum est pro Imperium mori

Aryndel Vyst
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#98 - 2011-09-08 15:11:38 UTC
J Kunjeh wrote:
The Mittani mostly likes seeing his name in lights. That's mostly what his "protest" is about. He takes whichever side gets him the most publicity. Seriously, this man has more ego than I thought it was humanly possible to have.


So do you think things are ok with flying in space right now? Because that's what you're saying.

Who else would you want to bring this attention to the gaming community? You? Who are you? In the context of the eve online community you are a nobody, just like I am. Whereas this issue is being brought up by the head of a group the Players voted on. He might not be who you voted for, but it doesn't make him any less the CSM chairman and the person that has a responsibility to get problems with things Joe the Plumber eve players experience which is flying in space.
AnzacPaul
Tactical Farmers.
Pandemic Horde
#99 - 2011-09-08 15:11:54 UTC
Jade Constantine wrote:
good points


I agree with all that you say, but I think i'm past the point of believing that CCP will do a U-turn.

Like I said guys, these are my own opinions. They are most definitely not fact, and all i've asked for from CCP is a reason to keep playing the game that I enjoy more than any other. But I won't pay for Eve to be abandoned in favour of new projects.
Mechael
Tribal Liberation Distribution and Retail
#100 - 2011-09-08 15:12:47 UTC
Gregor Palter wrote:
I don't care who does it or what personal motive he may have for it, as long as Hilmar gets a firm kick in the ego gland and CCP is forced to refocus.


Amen.

Whether or not you win the game matters not.  It's if you bought it.