These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Supercap Reballancing
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#261 - 2012-03-01 17:12:08 UTC
Reilly Duvolle wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Reilly Duvolle wrote:

CCP have several avenues of approach open to them on how to handle the Titan blob, including options that will not favour any particular group in game. Yet, if they choose to implement the very change that the Goons are openly campaigning for because it will benefit them the most, I am indeed calling that favouritsm, yes.


CCP are chosing to give us the players the most options possible to countering titans rather than forcing everyone to blob just one or two. This benefits everyone aside from the titan heavy brigade.


And most of all, it benefits you.


What wouldnt?

We could easily spam jamming titan capitals or if CCP do nothing, pile it all into building titans and then drop 200 of them on everything.

AT least we fight for what is good for the rest of eve rather than letting hatred for one collection of player blind us. We are demanding our own titan fleet to get nerfed too afterall which makes it easier to attack us in turn.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#262 - 2012-03-01 17:13:26 UTC
Reilly Duvolle wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Reilly Duvolle wrote:

CCP have several avenues of approach open to them on how to handle the Titan blob, including options that will not favour any particular group in game. Yet, if they choose to implement the very change that the Goons are openly campaigning for because it will benefit them the most, I am indeed calling that favouritsm, yes.


CCP are chosing to give us the players the most options possible to countering titans rather than forcing everyone to blob just one or two. This benefits everyone aside from the titan heavy brigade.


I do find it interesting that you as a Goon seem very certain about the exact nature of the change to come. The EVE community has certainly not been told yet.


Two devs are currently working on titan tracking.
Reilly Duvolle
Hydra Squadron
#263 - 2012-03-01 17:17:36 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
CCP are chosing to give us the players the most options possible to countering titans rather than forcing everyone to blob just one or two. This benefits everyone aside from the titan heavy brigade.


baltec1 wrote:
Two devs are currently working on titan tracking.


I see. And perhaps you would like to share with the rest of the community what specific changes are going to be implemented?
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#264 - 2012-03-01 17:17:37 UTC
Reilly Duvolle wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Reilly Duvolle wrote:

CCP have several avenues of approach open to them on how to handle the Titan blob, including options that will not favour any particular group in game. Yet, if they choose to implement the very change that the Goons are openly campaigning for because it will benefit them the most, I am indeed calling that favouritsm, yes.


CCP are chosing to give us the players the most options possible to countering titans rather than forcing everyone to blob just one or two. This benefits everyone aside from the titan heavy brigade.


I do find it interesting that you as a Goon seem very certain about the exact nature of the change to come. The EVE community has certainly not been told yet.


http://twitter.com/ktouborg

sorry rock

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#265 - 2012-03-01 17:21:41 UTC
Reilly Duvolle wrote:


baltec1 wrote:
Two devs are currently working on titan tracking.


I see. And perhaps you would like to share with the rest of the community what specific changes are going to be implemented?


They are going to increase it so they can hit the only ship they currently cant, frigates.
Reilly Duvolle
Hydra Squadron
#266 - 2012-03-01 17:25:23 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Reilly Duvolle wrote:


baltec1 wrote:
Two devs are currently working on titan tracking.


I see. And perhaps you would like to share with the rest of the community what specific changes are going to be implemented?


They are going to increase it so they can hit the only ship they currently cant, frigates.


Ah. Avoiding the question. Well, that is also an answer.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#267 - 2012-03-01 17:27:22 UTC
Reilly Duvolle wrote:
Ah. Avoiding the question. Well, that is also an answer.


"nobody knows"

what is for certain is that titan tracking is not going to be the same as it is now

believe it or not, Mittens doesn't feed us any data protected by NDA

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Reilly Duvolle
Hydra Squadron
#268 - 2012-03-01 17:32:10 UTC
Andski wrote:
Reilly Duvolle wrote:
Ah. Avoiding the question. Well, that is also an answer.


"nobody knows"

what is for certain is that titan tracking is not going to be the same as it is now

believe it or not, Mittens doesn't feed us any data protected by NDA


Have I accused him of doing that?

But, tbh. I am still curious about the degree of certainty displayed by you and baltec on this issue, and also the instant backpedaling once questioned about that certainty. You did it a few days ago in another thread. Baltec today.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#269 - 2012-03-01 17:34:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Andski
Reilly Duvolle wrote:
Have I accused him of doing that?

But, tbh. I am still curious about the degree of certainty displayed by you and baltec on this issue, and also the instant backpedaling once questioned about that certainty. You did it a few days ago in another thread. Baltec today.


I am not backpedaling. I am telling you that titan tracking is not going to remain as it is unless CCP Soundwave suddenly decides that massive turrets should track HICs just fine.

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Reilly Duvolle
Hydra Squadron
#270 - 2012-03-01 17:43:53 UTC
Andski wrote:
Reilly Duvolle wrote:
Have I accused him of doing that?

But, tbh. I am still curious about the degree of certainty displayed by you and baltec on this issue, and also the instant backpedaling once questioned about that certainty. You did it a few days ago in another thread. Baltec today.


I am not backpedaling. I am telling you that titan tracking is not going to remain as it is unless CCP Soundwave suddenly decides that massive turrets should track HICs just fine.


And I am wondering where you have that information from. Because it sure isnt from his twitter feed.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#271 - 2012-03-01 17:53:36 UTC
Reilly Duvolle wrote:
Andski wrote:
Reilly Duvolle wrote:
Ah. Avoiding the question. Well, that is also an answer.


"nobody knows"

what is for certain is that titan tracking is not going to be the same as it is now

believe it or not, Mittens doesn't feed us any data protected by NDA


Have I accused him of doing that?

But, tbh. I am still curious about the degree of certainty displayed by you and baltec on this issue, and also the instant backpedaling once questioned about that certainty. You did it a few days ago in another thread. Baltec today.


Whos backpedaling?

You dont need a PHD to see what two devs working on titam turret tracking will result in.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#272 - 2012-03-01 18:02:32 UTC
Reilly Duvolle wrote:
Andski wrote:
Reilly Duvolle wrote:
Have I accused him of doing that?

But, tbh. I am still curious about the degree of certainty displayed by you and baltec on this issue, and also the instant backpedaling once questioned about that certainty. You did it a few days ago in another thread. Baltec today.


I am not backpedaling. I am telling you that titan tracking is not going to remain as it is unless CCP Soundwave suddenly decides that massive turrets should track HICs just fine.


And I am wondering where you have that information from. Because it sure isnt from his twitter feed.


https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=841398#post841398

"nooo please don't nerf titans they are expensive and thus balanced"

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Reilly Duvolle
Hydra Squadron
#273 - 2012-03-01 18:05:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Reilly Duvolle
Andski wrote:


"nooo please don't nerf titans they are expensive and thus balanced"


Plese notify me if you find any post made by me where I hold this point of view.

I'll wait.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#274 - 2012-03-01 18:08:38 UTC
Reilly Duvolle wrote:
Andski wrote:


"nooo please don't nerf titans they are expensive and thus balanced"


Plese notify me if you find any post made by me where I state this view.

I'll wait.


you've been against any adjustment to titans because THE GOONIE BLOB WILL BE UNSTOPPABLE or some nonsense

you have been bleating about this (and tech rebalancing) for months and you don't even bother posting from your main

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Reilly Duvolle
Hydra Squadron
#275 - 2012-03-01 18:10:55 UTC
Reilly Duvolle wrote:
Andski wrote:


"nooo please don't nerf titans they are expensive and thus balanced"


Plese notify me if you find any post made by me where I hold this point of view.

I'll wait.


Again. Plese notify me if you find any post made by me where I hold this point of view.

I'll wait.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#276 - 2012-03-01 18:11:51 UTC
Reilly Duvolle wrote:
Reilly Duvolle wrote:
Andski wrote:


"nooo please don't nerf titans they are expensive and thus balanced"


Plese notify me if you find any post made by me where I hold this point of view.

I'll wait.


Again. Plese notify me if you find any post made by me where I hold this point of view.

I'll wait.


enjoy waiting

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#277 - 2012-03-01 18:12:21 UTC
Reilly Duvolle wrote:
Andski wrote:


"nooo please don't nerf titans they are expensive and thus balanced"


Plese notify me if you find any post made by me where I hold this point of view.

I'll wait.


"EAF should not be able to jam a 60 bil ship"
Reilly Duvolle
Hydra Squadron
#278 - 2012-03-01 18:13:55 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Reilly Duvolle wrote:
Andski wrote:


"nooo please don't nerf titans they are expensive and thus balanced"


Plese notify me if you find any post made by me where I hold this point of view.

I'll wait.


"EAF should not be able to jam a 60 bil ship"


No they shouldnt. Thats silly. That does NOT equal "don't nerf titans they are expensive and thus balanced", though, in any shape or form.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#279 - 2012-03-01 18:14:43 UTC
Reilly Duvolle wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Reilly Duvolle wrote:
Andski wrote:


"nooo please don't nerf titans they are expensive and thus balanced"


Plese notify me if you find any post made by me where I hold this point of view.

I'll wait.


"EAF should not be able to jam a 60 bil ship"


No they shouldnt. Thats silly. That does NOT equal "don't nerf titans they are expensive and thus balanced", though, in any shape or form.


you account for cost as a balancing factor, that is exactly what you're saying

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Reilly Duvolle
Hydra Squadron
#280 - 2012-03-01 18:16:06 UTC
Andski wrote:


enjoy waiting


Failed to back up your claim? Thought so. Propaganda can be hard sometimes.