These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Obvious Avoiding war decs exploit is still an obvious exploit.

Author
Msgerbs
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#21 - 2012-02-25 03:49:32 UTC
Last I checked you had to be in a station to join/leave a corp, so how could these corp-hopping "exploits" you discuss possibly work?
Inkdew
#22 - 2012-02-25 03:56:16 UTC
Msgerbs wrote:
Last I checked you had to be in a station to join/leave a corp, so how could these corp-hopping "exploits" you discuss possibly work?


the magic of docking.
Msgerbs
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#23 - 2012-02-25 05:17:10 UTC
Because docking doesn't already save you from being blown up. And undocking is much faster than jumping in. (Well, if they're outside the station maybe)
Written Word
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#24 - 2012-02-25 09:01:36 UTC
I'm pretty sure wardec dodging exploits are legal so the GM department doesn't have to hurt their brains making judgement calls or understanding a single mechanic related to wardecs.

All that's really left is hoping that CCP actually puts in wardec rules that favor the aggressor. I wouldn't really count on it though.
Nathan Jameson
Grumpy Bastards
#25 - 2012-02-25 09:24:10 UTC
"Inferno" will be addressing war mechanics in a few months. Here's hoping they tweak this aspect of it.

http://www.wormholes.info

Misanth
RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE
#26 - 2012-02-25 09:53:46 UTC
Inkdew wrote:
war dec avoidance and war dec removal alliances are really really stupid.


That.

There's also the aspect that wardecs always was a tool to hit enemy logistics too, and a means for mercenaries to get job while hitting those opponents.

Another aspect is the tool to avoid GCC in lowsec when hitting a hostile POS (or players obviously), especially if your alliance for various reasons can't/won't go down the pirate path either. I know plenty of situations where regular nullsec alliances have wardecced someone to strike their nullsec POS, and situations where I myself have been dropping sec from +5 to below zero on just one POS alone.

Another prime aspect is what some of you already mentioned, the sandbox. So suddenly parts of EVE is supposed to be safe? And people can lock up moon slots in high, play completely safe, etc? How is that even remotely relevant to what this game is in the first place.. if you want safety, you play the wrong game.

Can't be arsed giving more examples, it's just beyond stupid that higher ups at CCP even consider this. Makes you wonder if they even play this game. Or have played it. Or maybe they did, but don't give a ****. Perhaps the multitude of players they gained in recent years, who want a safe carebear environment, is more important than what EVE is and always has been about.

I wonder what happened with this;
CCP Wrangler: "EVE is a dark and harsh world, you're supposed to feel a bit worried and slightly angry when you log in, you're not supposed to feel like you're logging in to a happy, happy, fluffy, fluffy lala land filled with fun and adventures, that's what hello kitty online is for."

AFK-cloaking in a system near you.

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#27 - 2012-02-25 12:00:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Krixtal Icefluxor
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:
and now they have apparently removed C1 wormhole access from high sec.



I agree with your post, but this statement was definitely NOT true. Just sayin'.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Beat General
Doomheim
#28 - 2012-02-25 13:44:07 UTC
Lady Ayeipsia wrote:
U mad bro? LOL

Stupid puns aside, ccp knows war decs have issues. There are additional exploits, such as people dropping corp, lying in system, then joining corp to spring a trap. Basically, this is an exploit that us often used by the agressor in the war dec. Since there are issues in both sides, ccp seems content to run neither as an exploit, reducing the petition load on the gms. This will remain as such until they can devote time and resources to properly fix the issue.

So you are stuck, deal with it. And if you don't like it... Go find another mmo that allows declaring war on people.

As an alternative, try faction warfare. Still a bit glitches, but it might work.



LMAO LOL


Dropping corp then rejoining isn't and never was an exploit. HAHAH Real.
Akrasjel Lanate
Immemorial Coalescence Administration
Immemorial Coalescence
#29 - 2012-02-25 14:01:09 UTC
Inkdew wrote:
For once im inclined to agree with a rant, war dec avoidance and war dec removal alliances are really really stupid.

I agree

CEO of Lanate Industries

Citizen of Solitude

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#30 - 2012-02-25 14:14:52 UTC
Msgerbs wrote:
Last I checked you had to be in a station to join/leave a corp, so how could these corp-hopping "exploits" you discuss possibly work?


Dock up, apply to join, undock, go around looking for a juicy wartarget. When you find one, accept the character into the corp and gank.

You only have to be docked to apply.

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Buruk Utama
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#31 - 2012-02-25 15:11:25 UTC
Andski wrote:
Msgerbs wrote:
Last I checked you had to be in a station to join/leave a corp, so how could these corp-hopping "exploits" you discuss possibly work?


Dock up, apply to join, undock, go around looking for a juicy wartarget. When you find one, accept the character into the corp and gank.

You only have to be docked to apply.


This will get you in big trouble and possibly a short ban. It has been stated again and again by GM and Devs that this is a bannable exploit and has not changed under the loosening of the corp war deck rules. Do this expect someone to file a petition on you straight away and you'd deserve the ban.
Ahrieman
Codex Praedonum
Divine Damnation
#32 - 2012-02-25 17:01:29 UTC
Gizznitt Malikite wrote:


  • Dec Shields Allow any corp to easily shed a wardec, thereby making high-sec POS's invulnerable.
  • Wartime Corp Hopping allows aggressing Players to enter a corp moments before they gank a wartarget, and it allows war-decced players to run away instantly.



  • I'm inclined to agree with 1.5 of your points. I disagree that war decced players shouldn't be allowed to leave corp. I would be fine with a longer wait time if a war is ongoing and the bill is paid. Some wars are over dominance and there are few things more dominant than destroying the player base of another corporation. Some war deccers may be trying to decrease the playerbase of another corporation and this is a reasonable goal in many circumstances.

    Solo Rifter since 2009

    Aqriue
    Center for Advanced Studies
    Gallente Federation
    #33 - 2012-02-25 18:13:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Aqriue
    double post
    Aqriue
    Center for Advanced Studies
    Gallente Federation
    #34 - 2012-02-25 18:13:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Aqriue
    Dilligafmofo wrote:
    Is it wrong that I get wood when you rant??

    Its like Viagra, but its safer to use for more then 4 hours Lol
    Dura Nedobitaya wrote:
    Gankers tears are the sweetest.

    Not ganker per se, more of a whine...distilled bitter whine.

    And like any whine, it just gets better with rage Twisted
    Written Word wrote:
    All that's really left is hoping that CCP actually puts in wardec rules that favor the aggressor. I wouldn't really count on it though.

    lol, no they put in rules and features that work to both sides. Remember what is used to be

    1. Send wardec at a cheap ass rate of 2 mill for corp and the alliance cost if you wanted to go big
    2. Wait 24 hours
    3. Shoot POS, it couldn't leave alliance to extend timer as it was an exploit
    4. ???
    5. PROFIT!!! You won, every ******* time. You couldn't even be happy when someone just dropped corp.

    Then CCP changed the rules, cause

    1. They got tired of the bitching
    2. They got other things to fry first

    And for the OP, you said it yourself. GTFO of highsec, no worries at all of a wardec and exploitation. As for moon slots...lots of moons in highsec, to hit that particular corp, you could either OMG WHY DIDN'T YOU THINK OF THIS!!! -> raise POS fuels and or compete with industry/market (cause thats the only reason to have a POS in high, BUT you don't have to opt for easy mode SHOOT THA ****** ON SIGHT like a CoD clown...man up and compete another way to screw him over Lol )
    Vimsy Vortis
    Shoulda Checked Local
    Break-A-Wish Foundation
    #35 - 2012-02-25 18:26:27 UTC
    Buruk Utama wrote:
    This will get you in big trouble and possibly a short ban. It has been stated again and again by GM and Devs that this is a bannable exploit and has not changed under the loosening of the corp war deck rules. Do this expect someone to file a petition on you straight away and you'd deserve the ban.

    No it won't. So long as a session change occurs between you changing corp and you engaging your war target it isn't considered an exploit and docking causes a session change.
    FloppieTheBanjoClown
    Arcana Imperii Ltd.
    #36 - 2012-02-25 19:35:11 UTC
    Archdaimon wrote:
    As long as all the Gankers and wardeccers have rep, trading and mining alts in NPC corps your tears are invalid.

    Especially regarding the reppers in NPC corps. Just shows how much war deccers in high sec are looking for easy kills.


    As I already said, neither is okay. Neutral reps need to be dealt with. Long-term NPC corp residency needs to be discouraged. And dec scraping should be abolished.

    Quit justifying one moronic mechanic on the existence of another.

    Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

    FloppieTheBanjoClown
    Arcana Imperii Ltd.
    #37 - 2012-02-25 19:38:52 UTC
    Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
    FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:
    and now they have apparently removed C1 wormhole access from high sec.

    I agree with your post, but this statement was definitely NOT true. Just sayin'.

    My sample size is admittedly small at this point, that was based on a lot of complaints I've seen that C1s are inaccessible from highsec (except K162s, which can only be initiated from inside a populated wormhole). Hence the "apparently" in my post.

    v0v

    Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

    ShipToaster
    #38 - 2012-02-26 00:29:42 UTC
    C0SMIC GIRL wrote:
    How is war dec avoiding not an exploit ?


    Money. It is all to do with new player retention. CCP believe that veterans will never unsub.

    .

    Misanth
    RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE
    #39 - 2012-02-26 00:42:19 UTC
    ShipToaster wrote:
    C0SMIC GIRL wrote:
    How is war dec avoiding not an exploit ?


    Money. It is all to do with new player retention. CCP believe that veterans will never unsub.


    Pretty much that. I really want to, but it's damn hard to find an alternative game that is somewhat similar in terms of the sandbox'y. The very thing they try to kill off, heh..

    -4 accounts this summer tho, and they're not coming back in a reasonable future.

    As for the people claiming it's an exploit regarding session change and applying to corp, then being in space etc.. all the stuff you post has zero substence until you actually can post to any kind of verification from a blue that whatever-you-state is the case.

    AFK-cloaking in a system near you.

    The Zerg Overmind
    Rule Reversal
    #40 - 2012-02-26 01:59:30 UTC
    I am Dec Shield. I completely agree with the original poster. What we do is obviously an exploit, and we have challenged CCP to change the rules to prevent what we've been abusing. We have contacted the CSM and pushed for change as well. Harvesting rage ingame and on the forums has been a strategic move to raise awareness of how broken the current wardec mechanics are. All of this has been part of a massive group effort by the playebase to evoke positive change in wardec mechanics in Eve.

    While the tears of griefers are amusing, we don't want to drive people out of the game. We agree with you on all accounts though. The Inferno expansion coming up is solely designed to completely revamp faction warfare and wardec mechanics. We have it from the word of the chariman of the CSM, The Mittani that CCP are working on changing wardec rules to prevent what Dec Shield does.

    https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=792435#post792435

    Our collective effort to improve the game is nearly upon us. Soon we'll be able to hang up the alliance and everyone can go back to war as it was originally intended.