EVE General Discussion

"people should use the ship my supercap is specifically designed to kill to try and counter my supercap"

Oh...... Nothing?

I thought for sure with all this talk about how the Goons were simply using the wrong tactics that there was some way to do it.
Just something quick?

Guess the Goons might have a point then.

Never mind.

Grath's apparently done with this game and doesn't want to have to figure out anything more complicated than "do we have more of the big things than the other guys do?" to get his semi-annual fleet battle on.

Please think of the bitter vets so they don't have to! What a travesty it would be if everyone who didn't want large scale engagements to be any more complicated than "bring more of a single unit type than the other guy" just logged off forever because you made it too hard for them!

Wait. What ship was specifically designed to kill the titan?

If it's the titan itself, I think we have an infinite loop error in our programming.

Hate to say it. But I think I see a future where PL members no longer have personal 10 billion isk a month tech moons all to themselves.

They may have to start doubling up.

Better put that under your pillow.

We'll talk after the nerf about how your "collections" are graphing.

How's mintchip btw? Still minty fresh?

nope, it's actually "more titans"

Thanks again for (not) playing!

Moon income is ran differently in PL than most alliances who 'nationalize' moons, or let corps own them, so that the common man never sees a dime of it and just gets ships replaced or a spreadsheet of expenditures.


Here a moon is given a caretaker (literally anybody can be a caretaker) and they pay the alliance a fee every month to control the tower, this amounts to just about half what the towers make, so if a moon makes 8 billion a month, the player caretaker gets 4 and the alliance gets 4.


Thus the whole of our moon take over the past year is 6 trillion, split into the alliance getting 3, and the members of the allaince getting 3 trillion. The alliance income is then used to manipulate the market, we invest the cash, and the profit from that is then turned into new titans and supercarriers, plus a modest hictor/dictor/logistics reimbursement program, and a supercap replacement program. Contract isk then goes to replace mainline ships used in the completion of a contract (BS/Tengus).

This model insures maximum participation during moon defense, people show to defend your moons because they want people to defend their moons.



Are you denying that one of the lead guys is an ex goon who seems to always push forward changes that benefit your alliance?

I mean, the older players in the game remember this happening before, and in many of our opinions Soundwave was the worst possible choice for a lead guy as he has well known player connections still.


Who knows, maybe you're a new goon and you weren't around when he still played.

You have to forgive him, this will be the 5th or 6th time PL have based their entire alliance around a FOTM only to get curbstomped by everyone when CCP nerfed it.

this game has come down to mittani Saying something at csm and ordering 8000 people to spamm the forum on the matter and ccp ''thinking'' Oh .. i guess thats what people want


ive always wondered how mittani can be in CSM .. its been shown several times how he Leaks Inside info to hes own alliance .. goonswarm recieved news on the super nerf way before enyone els . last time i checked Leaking info and trying to influence ccp for your own benefit wasent allowed .. but it seems like that rule has been removed lately



Props to mittani for manipulating everyone around him and having hes way with ccp and gettin all hes enemy's nerfed instead of teaching hes fc's to command a fleet .




formula must be something like

x beats goons = its overpowered and needs fixing