Jita Park Speakers Corner

Educating pubbies ITT?

I imagine it's hard to scan them, what with bees camping all the gates, so I sympathize with the people who uploaded that data.

Okay, thank you for illuminating me on this issue.

I took the liberty of rerunning the numbers.

Fade, Branch, Pure blind and Deklein - the area under CFC control - is listed with 76 moons.

That leaves 155 tech moons in the regions not under CFC control

Admittedly different numbers, but it does not change the conclusion now, does it?

This thread delivers good information.

There.

reserved

aahahahahahahahahahahahaha

oh hey, I'm glad we got the complete inaccuracy of Dotlan's moon data out of the way

oh wait, you're still trying to prove your point with it, lmao

It does, my friend. You see, you can verify from looking at the page on Branch, that dotlan has little data on Branch: http://evemaps.dotlan.net/region/Branch/moons

Only a handful (maybe 5 or so) systems of the 94 in Branch have been scanned. Therefore, we must throw out the Branch data and infer what it is likely to be: here, I have offered the low number of 30 as a reasonable guess (surely extremely reasonable as it lists 5 tech moons with so little data). Fade is better scanned, but you will find it only appears half scanned at best.

So we must therefore infer what the numbers are likely to be from the numbers we have.

You are also making an unsupported assumption: moons outside of demonstrable CFC control are outside CFC hands. I will not comment on this issue, of course: knowing who owns moons in non-sov space is valuble intel I will not disclose willy-nilly. But it is, of course, a completely unsupportable conclusion with the information you have that they are universally outside of CFC control. This is the sort of elementry error that makes the lack of intellectual rigor in your analysis clear, and the utter lack of faith anyone can place in it lacking a severe ideological and cognitive bias as you seek to make true opinions that were clearly based on bad information.

Likewise I will not be providing you with non-public information I have gathered concerning other regions with technetium that have not made it to Dotlan, which is also highly relevant and would support your argument were I to do so if most non-CFC regions still are not on dotlan as I recall. But we can also assume that "not CFC" is not a monolithic bloc: the CFC need not own 51% of all tech moons in game to be absurdly benefited from their continued imbalance. You are free to make your own projections if you like of course, from this point: but I hope this exercise has taught you the problem with blindly asserting opinions based on facts that you have not researched - and the integrity of your analysis will of course be rather low if the analysis remains exactly the same after a wholesale revision of the underlying facts.

Take a look at Tenal. Does it look mapped to you?

What about Geminate?

yep. same problem.

So even if you are right about Branch, it all evens out.

All the evidence presented so far squarly suggest that the CFC faces a sever imbalance in tech income. There has not been presented a single shred of evidence supporting a contray position

nobodys forcing you