These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

So you want T3 Frigates. Please explain.

Author
Akirei Scytale
Okami Syndicate
#21 - 2012-02-16 20:32:27 UTC
highonpop wrote:
Karl Planck wrote:
Dessau wrote:
Karl Planck wrote:
lol, really?

Well, yes that was an RvB themed roam, but I'm referring more to my hours logged than my pathetic losses.

Thanks for the responses, all.


I am laughing at your age and record, not the loss. As someone with zero kills in a frig, and more importantly zero losses, you DO NOT EXCLUSIVELY FLY FRIGS.




Or he just doesnt post to battleclinic.


This, pretty much.

Why do people assume everyone uses KBs? Roll
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
#22 - 2012-02-16 20:36:37 UTC
I have been trying to dispute a non api verified kill on battleclinic for the longest time, it originally stated I killed a guy with my tier 2 destroyer that is clearly not in the game yet.

Dust 514's CPM 1 Iron Wolf Saber Eve mail me about Dust 514 issues.

War Kitten
Panda McLegion
#23 - 2012-02-16 20:38:37 UTC
I want a T3 frigate so I can have the speed and tackle range of an inty, launch bombs, warp cloaked and have the tank of a cruiser.

It should also be immune to bubbles, and what the heck, let it probe down other cloaked ships.

As a tradeoff, it could lose one of those abilities and have the DPS of a dramiel or drone bay of an ishkur.

amidoinitrite?

I don't judge people by their race, religion, color, size, age, gender, or ethnicity. I judge them by their grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation, clarity of expression, and logical consistency.

Paragon Renegade
Sebiestor Tribe
#24 - 2012-02-16 20:45:20 UTC
War Kitten wrote:
I want a T3 frigate so I can have the speed and tackle range of an inty, launch bombs, warp cloaked and have the tank of a cruiser.

It should also be immune to bubbles, and what the heck, let it probe down other cloaked ships.

As a tradeoff, it could lose one of those abilities and have the DPS of a dramiel or drone bay of an ishkur.

amidoinitrite?


And it would cost hundreds of times more than the other ships :P

The pie is a tautology

Xorv
Questionable Acquisitions
#25 - 2012-02-16 22:02:43 UTC
T3 cruisers pretty much obsolete all other cruisers, aside from the cost factor, and I really dislike the idea that cost becomes a major factor in balance. I'd much rather see all T3s go away and CCP fix existing T1 and T2 ships than add T3 frigs.
Jack Traynor
Doomheim
#26 - 2012-02-16 22:39:44 UTC
Rather than a T3 frigate, how about a hull that's a dedicated Science ship for those of us that aren't 24x7 knuckle-draggers? Blink Great scanning/probing ship, maybe dedicated hacking/codebreaking scanner that doesn't need modules, no turrets, etc... Take the Noctis one step further for the non-pewpew...
Lord Wamphyri
Starside Lost
#27 - 2012-02-16 22:41:17 UTC
Two words: Interdiction Nullifier.

I would imagine that a highly agile frigate that can warp while cloaked and can't be stopped by bubbles would be the biggest reason a lot of people would want them.

[IMG]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/ChrisW73/WampsigFinal.jpg[/IMG]

Atticus Lowa
Lowa Corp Industries and Security
#28 - 2012-02-16 23:43:02 UTC
T3 Frigs would act the exact SAME way they do as cruisers, they would be highly customizable and at its heart they act like the assualt frigs, and otherwise fill a variety of needs, they would also be very ISK inefficent (but i own a tengu with fittings so whatever)

anyways... yeh lets balance other ships first, at least ships in their own class ( i mean yes a battleship will kill a frigate eventually, maybe not a cruiser but you get the idea).

but hey it gives an excuse to make t3 cruisers harder to get into, and gives a low-cost solution, perhaps weaker but still.
Shukuzen Kiraa
F4G Wild Weasel
#29 - 2012-02-17 00:49:09 UTC
Would much rather have T3 Battleships, but im all for any type of new ship really.
Diablo Ex
Nocturne Holdings
#30 - 2012-02-17 03:41:57 UTC
I'm all for having T3 Frigates, especially if they are as flexible as the T3 Cruisers.
MULTI-ROLE and personalized should be the direction to take T3 ships.

The Cruiser has 5 subsystems, so the Frigate might only be able to fit 3.
Choices will be more limited on a Frigate because of size limitations.

Don't worry about what niche role that they might fill, give them the flexibility to be not awesome, but satisfactory in all roles.

Diablo Ex Machina - "I'm not here to fix your problem"

Ines Tegator
Serious Business Inc. Ltd. LLC. etc.
#31 - 2012-02-17 04:00:43 UTC
Tech 3 Frigates should be a cheap way to get the t3 experience, and a way for hardcore frigate pilots to use their speedy boats in PVE. Cause that's where the current lineup suffers. Kinda like marauders are for L4, gear them towards chaining l3 missions really amazingly fast. Lowsec exploration and ratting would be a shoe in as well. Let's say 50m for the hull, 3 subsystems (no need for 5 on a frig), and some kind of hideous weakness to pvp. We really don't need uber frigates breaking the pvp balance atm, which is delicate enough as it is.
ClusterFook
Doomheim
#32 - 2012-02-17 07:00:43 UTC
Xorv wrote:
I really dislike the idea that cost becomes a major factor in balance. .


I got a huge kick out of that statement. Cost has always been a balancing factor and is what drives ALL conflict in EVE. Why else would poeple fight over isk... so they can buy the expensive shinys and caps. This is why you see 10x more drakes than Tengus even though the Tengu is vastly superoir. If cost was not a balancing factor everyone would be in T3's, super caps and cyno ships. Everything would be Officer fitted and the game would boring as hell.
Vaal Erit
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#33 - 2012-02-17 07:12:57 UTC
Cov ops Cloak + Bubble immune cruisers are annoying enough and very hard to catch. Now you want to make a frig that does that?

WTB bubbles that actually stop ships from warping.

Also, T3 frigates are a horrible idea just like EAF ships were a horrible idea. But everyone wanted them and quickly found out how horrible they are and now they are non-existent.

We have plenty of frigates to cover every role. We need T2 versions of all of the BS and BC ships, maybe a T2 Maelstrom that can use 8x XL guns and wreck capitals. Something new with a different role that you have to actually risk on the battlefield.
HELIC0N ONE
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#34 - 2012-02-17 07:35:53 UTC
There are 60+ frigates already in game and at least two thirds of them are worthless. The last thing we need is more of them.
Ciar Meara
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#35 - 2012-02-17 10:44:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Ciar Meara
ISK sink
Industry boost
Something fun to train for (again and again)
Shiny (as in oooh, that shiny and shiny, lets be bad guys)
Snazzyness
Tech III guns (small, later medium, oh joy!)
Tech III modules
Evolution
General humour

oh and someone said:

Interdiction nullifier

Saying there are already 60 frigs in game and 2/3's are useless, is saying there are only 20 frigs in game and only a few are worth wild, so basicly we need more.

- [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img] [yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow]

Brunmunde Hildegaard
The Green Machine
That Escalated Quickly.
#36 - 2012-02-17 10:46:49 UTC
Xorv wrote:
I really dislike the idea that cost becomes a major factor in balance. .

So ships should all be free, no one should need to farm isk to have them, and the only balance factor should be the easily offline trainable skillsets to use them, amidoinitrite?

http://i.qkme.me/35d9dm.jpg

"Sings me a dances of wolfs, who smells fear and slays the coward. Sings me a dances of mans, who smells gold and slays his brother."

Lexmana
#37 - 2012-02-17 11:03:06 UTC
Why not introduce a T4 ship instead?
Same as flexibility as T3 but also possibility to be frigate, cruiser or battleship size.

Lexmana
#38 - 2012-02-17 11:10:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Lexmana
T5 is the real winner though. Modelled after the T4 ships it can choose between four different racial core systems of different turrets/launcher/drones/ewar and tank fitting and bonuses.

Why obsolete a handful of ships when you could do it to dussins or even hundreds?
Bischopt
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#39 - 2012-02-17 11:18:53 UTC
As someone who flies and loses frigates almost exclusively (yes really, go check my killboard) , I would like to have T3 frigs in eve.

I imagine them being just like T3 cruisers, just frig sized. Customizable, unpredictable, able to travel deep into nullsec relatively safely.
Do I want to see a new dramiel, something so overpowered it's the only thing anyone's ever going to use? No, I do not. Losing a dramiel was simple because it was only a T1 frigate. With T3 frigates I assume there would be SP loss involved with the destruction of the ship. It's also quite safe to assume that T3 frigs would be expensive which should limit their use in pvp especially.
I live in a fairly busy part of lowsec and I must say that the only T3 cruisers I see are probing alts and mission runners. There aren't many of them around actually doing pvp so I think the same would go for T3 frigs as well.

The most important thing to remember is that they're just frigs after all. frigs cant withstand medium or heavy neuts (except maybe the cruor) and they cant survive great alpha or gate guns. Frigs are thin, have horrible cap and they die. Same would go for the T3 frigs.

So... Some nullsec peeps will get annoyed when they cant catch everything with a bubble? Even more reason to get some T3 frigs.

Personally even if the T3 frigs cannot fit interdiction nullifiers I would want one because of the customizability and flexibility. Right now the only question when fighting a frigate is whether they're short range or long range which you can usually see just by looking at their guns. Because frigs have very limited amounts of slots available they must be fit in a specific way. ofc there's usually a choice between kity and brawly fits but most of the time you dont get to choose if it's shield or armor fit, for example. You dont get to choose the ewar either because there's no room for it.
I'm hoping T3 frigs could change this and give more frigs the advantage of unpredictability.

Having said all that, I do hope that if CCP actually does T3 frigs they do it carefully. The risk of having one must be great enough considering the reward so every belt and planet in eve doesnt become dominated by overpowered frigates.

But that's just me.

TL;DR
T3 frigs are still only frigs and done right their only "downside" is that they would annoy people who are too lazy to catch stuff with an actual point. For frig pilots they would be very exciting.
Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#40 - 2012-02-17 11:31:12 UTC
Dessau wrote:
Let me begin by saying that, as someone who flies frigates almost exclusively, I am not in favor of T3 frigates.

First, there is already a wealth of frigates which can be fit to excel in a number of highly specialized roles. T1s can be fit as throwaway DPS, decoys, boosters, pursuit, tackle, painters, dampers, jammers, and then there are specialized EAFs, Assault Ships, Covert Ops, Stealth Bombers, Interceptors.

What role(s) are you looking for a T3 to fill that existing ships don't already?

Second, assuming for the time being that T3 frigates would use subsystems, frigate models are small. I am having a hard time visualizing a frigate-sized ship with 5 sets of interchangeable, modular hull components that does not look like an absolute mess.

How would you reconcile the T3 frigate visual design with the existing T3 Strat Cruiser designs? Would you take T3 design (either in terms of visuals, game mechanics, or both) in a different direction when it comes to frigates?

For those who back the idea of T3 frigates, I'm interested in hearing your reasoning on the topic. Perhaps they are a good idea and I simply have not seen the light.

Also, posting this in General Discussion like a ******* so I can get more responses.


I want T3 frigates for the same reason i fly T3 cruisers. They are more versitile in that they can fill multiple roles but you can also fit them specific if you want.

T3 cruisers generally have a better tank and dps that HAC's and they can use one of the specialized abilities of T2 cruisers like how the Proteus uses the Arazu's long point range, so it's not out of the question to expect T3 frigates to be better that some T2 ships.

I want to make a frigate gun boat that can cloak and do around 350-400 dps instead of using a stealth bomber, as i never fit a launcher to my bomber anyway.