Jita Park Speakers Corner

+1

Because i know you can.
+1

+1

Noticed this from your manifesto:



I was wondering if you wished to expand on any views you may have regarding the subject of player policing systems?

(I didnt want to simply co-allate your initial statement without giving you an opportunity to fully express things on the subject as desired)

Voloses is the man, he has bent over backwards to help people learn and enjoy this game.

Good luck mate!

The ideas that Malcanis has posted are very similar to what myself and a few corp mates had come up with. I was very sad reading this because I really thought we had come up with an amazing idea, but it seems someone beat us there. Most of the big points where the same. A contract that would transfer "kill rights" to the person accepted the contract. A transfer of "kill rights" can only be accepted by one person. You can put up a contract on anyone, but all rules apply. Gate guns, system security level, and all other low sec/high sec rules. Yes, that means no ganking freighters in high sec under this mechanic. If they person is -5 sec status then low sec rules apply again. Corp/alliance can accept contracts but not for a transfer of "kill rights" that can only go to one player. Now, and alliance/alliance can accept that contract but has to pick one person to receive the "kill rights."

Now, where my idea is different was the pay out. We thought keep it simple. The contract can up to pay different values depending on the ship that died. For Example. I am going to put a contract up for player X. For killing player X you will always get 50 million, but if you kill him in a T2 Cruiser the hunter will get an extra 50 million, If you kill him in a Battleship the hunter will get 75 million. Then if the hunter gets the pod kill he will get 50 million. So if the hunter kills player X in a t2 cruiser but missed the pod he will get 100 million. If it is accepted at the corp/alliance level then the isk goes to the corp/alliance. This would allow for the player placing the contract more options. While may make the hunter wait for the target to bring a bigger ship out. Now you would have to set so that there are only a few different categories to place prices on. I'm thinking about 4 to 5 categories, should be more than enough. This would give more options but without having to set prices for all ship classes.

Malcanis's post... https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=344786#post344786
Really the ideas are very similar with a few differences. But the big point is still the same. Bounty hunting needs a fix and bad.

Should Corps in 0.0 be able to outgrow their need to visit the Empire for provisions and live as autonomous entity in their own space? Also please expand in your answer regardles if is negative or not.

No. A corp or alliance needs to be able to support its self to a point. Really if you wanted to try you could. The about of ships that are used in the fights we see in 0.0 right now, are so big there is no way. That or we would all be flying T1 Cruisers with only T1 fittings. All of eve depends on the rest of eve to survive. The miners in high sec have to have the wars, or the ship that they just build is worthless. If all the miners stopped mining we would not have ships to fight our 0.0 wars with. Eve has a live market, that lives off of supply and demand. That means anything that happens in high sec effects the people in 0.0, and anything in 0.0 effects high sec.


http://www.e-peen.com/voloses-for-csm/

+1