These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

No support from me
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Trabzz
Little Monsters
#21 - 2012-03-11 22:40:38 UTC
Pheusia wrote:
How are you being pressured to vote against your will?


People are being banned left and right from the forums, some for 90 days or more, for supporting their own candidates. If you can't post your lossmails you can't get reimbursement, so a large amount of money is being denied to anyone that speaks up.

They are also keeping tabs on how individual corps are voting through their own exit polling system, and publishing the stats so that those who refuse to toe the line can be mocked publicly.
Frying Doom
#22 - 2012-03-12 01:01:14 UTC
Trabzz wrote:
Pheusia wrote:
How are you being pressured to vote against your will?


People are being banned left and right from the forums, some for 90 days or more, for supporting their own candidates. If you can't post your lossmails you can't get reimbursement, so a large amount of money is being denied to anyone that speaks up.

They are also keeping tabs on how individual corps are voting through their own exit polling system, and publishing the stats so that those who refuse to toe the line can be mocked publicly.


Finally its nice to here a member of the Goons actually telling how it really is inside the Goon Socialist-Democratic Workers Party.

Hell denied forum access and ship reimbursement for having a dissenting idea of who to vote for.

Its hardly the Democratic idea the CSM was actually built on. This probably explains why in CSM 6, the Goons were so happy to have so many 0.0 people so they could form a politburo.

So will CSM 7 be where we get a lot of propaganda pictures of Mittens? It probably will be if the Goons get in by extorting votes again.

Its EVE so Vote rigging is probably legal but we really should expect better of our CSM.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!
Johnny Marzetti
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#23 - 2012-03-12 01:36:43 UTC
I am actually making all these posts with a gun to my hea
Johnny Marzetti
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#24 - 2012-03-12 01:41:14 UTC
I am proud to be for voting The Mittani. Thank you for reading this messages.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#25 - 2012-03-12 02:10:38 UTC
Trabzz wrote:
Pheusia wrote:
How are you being pressured to vote against your will?


People are being banned left and right from the forums, some for 90 days or more, for supporting their own candidates. If you can't post your lossmails you can't get reimbursement, so a large amount of money is being denied to anyone that speaks up.

They are also keeping tabs on how individual corps are voting through their own exit polling system, and publishing the stats so that those who refuse to toe the line can be mocked publicly.


shut up

quit whining and show up for your CTAs and mine for us slave

*cracks whip*

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Powers Sa
#26 - 2012-03-12 02:36:58 UTC
Trabzz wrote:
I fully support the position put forth by the OP. The vast majority of our coalition's efforts are for the benefit of only a handful of people within Goonswarm Fed, specifically those in Goonwaffe (like the two idiots above who can't even exercise the least bit of civility when addressing their peers).

Voting hasn't been any different, with members of the coalition being pressured to vote for The Mittani against their will and in some cases even prevented from running their own candidates.

Sverige Pahis wrote:
jesus he's actually blue to us?


Yes, imagine that. Some people can see through the smoke and mirrors.

Razor and Test sure aren't having a hard time running their candidates for CSM. We decided we wanted our allies to have a chance so we only ran one candidate.
Trabzz wrote:
Pheusia wrote:
How are you being pressured to vote against your will?


People are being banned left and right from the forums, some for 90 days or more, for supporting their own candidates. If you can't post your lossmails you can't get reimbursement, so a large amount of money is being denied to anyone that speaks up.

They are also keeping tabs on how individual corps are voting through their own exit polling system, and publishing the stats so that those who refuse to toe the line can be mocked publicly.

You mean terribly bad posters getting set to read only? They can still PM their reimbursement requests.

Do you like winning t2 frigs and dictors for Dirt Cheap?https://eveninggames.net/register/ref/dQddmNgyLhFBqNJk

Remeber: Gambling addiction is no laughing matter unless you've lost a vast space fortune on the internet.
Frying Doom
#27 - 2012-03-12 03:38:32 UTC
Powers Sa wrote:
Trabzz wrote:
I fully support the position put forth by the OP. The vast majority of our coalition's efforts are for the benefit of only a handful of people within Goonswarm Fed, specifically those in Goonwaffe (like the two idiots above who can't even exercise the least bit of civility when addressing their peers).

Voting hasn't been any different, with members of the coalition being pressured to vote for The Mittani against their will and in some cases even prevented from running their own candidates.

Sverige Pahis wrote:
jesus he's actually blue to us?


Yes, imagine that. Some people can see through the smoke and mirrors.

Razor and Test sure aren't having a hard time running their candidates for CSM. We decided we wanted our allies to have a chance so we only ran one candidate.
Trabzz wrote:
Pheusia wrote:
How are you being pressured to vote against your will?


People are being banned left and right from the forums, some for 90 days or more, for supporting their own candidates. If you can't post your lossmails you can't get reimbursement, so a large amount of money is being denied to anyone that speaks up.

They are also keeping tabs on how individual corps are voting through their own exit polling system, and publishing the stats so that those who refuse to toe the line can be mocked publicly.

You mean terribly bad posters getting set to read only? They can still PM their reimbursement requests.


Could you share an example of this bad posting? Or is it merely disagreeing that makes it bad?

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!
Triskian
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#28 - 2012-03-12 04:02:35 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:


Could you share an example of this bad posting? Or is it merely disagreeing that makes it bad?


https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=search&postedby=Frying%20Doom

Every post you can find through this link is a bad one.
Frying Doom
#29 - 2012-03-12 04:08:34 UTC
Triskian wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:


Could you share an example of this bad posting? Or is it merely disagreeing that makes it bad?


https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=search&postedby=Frying%20Doom

Every post you can find through this link is a bad one.


Oh look more lack of information and more insults by Goons.

Defence mechanism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"In Freudian psychoanalytic theory, defence mechanisms (or defense mechanisms) are unconscious[1] psychological strategies brought into play by various entities to cope with reality and to maintain self-image. Healthy persons normally use different defences throughout life. An ego defence mechanism becomes pathological only when its persistent use leads to maladaptive behaviour such that the physical and/or mental health of the individual is adversely affected. The purpose of ego defence mechanisms is to protect the mind/self/ego from anxiety and/or social sanctions and/or to provide a refuge from a situation with which one cannot currently cope."

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!
Triskian
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#30 - 2012-03-12 04:14:14 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Triskian wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:


Could you share an example of this bad posting? Or is it merely disagreeing that makes it bad?


https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=search&postedby=Frying%20Doom

Every post you can find through this link is a bad one.


Oh look more lack of information and more insults by Goons.

Defence mechanism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"In Freudian psychoanalytic theory, defence mechanisms (or defense mechanisms) are unconscious[1] psychological strategies brought into play by various entities to cope with reality and to maintain self-image. Healthy persons normally use different defences throughout life. An ego defence mechanism becomes pathological only when its persistent use leads to maladaptive behaviour such that the physical and/or mental health of the individual is adversely affected. The purpose of ego defence mechanisms is to protect the mind/self/ego from anxiety and/or social sanctions and/or to provide a refuge from a situation with which one cannot currently cope."


I'm trying to save you from yourself but you just had to go and quote wikipedia.
Zain Andreas
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#31 - 2012-03-12 04:15:00 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Triskian wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:


Could you share an example of this bad posting? Or is it merely disagreeing that makes it bad?


https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=search&postedby=Frying%20Doom

Every post you can find through this link is a bad one.


Oh look more lack of information and more insults by Goons.

Defence mechanism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"In Freudian psychoanalytic theory, defence mechanisms (or defense mechanisms) are unconscious[1] psychological strategies brought into play by various entities to cope with reality and to maintain self-image. Healthy persons normally use different defences throughout life. An ego defence mechanism becomes pathological only when its persistent use leads to maladaptive behaviour such that the physical and/or mental health of the individual is adversely affected. The purpose of ego defence mechanisms is to protect the mind/self/ego from anxiety and/or social sanctions and/or to provide a refuge from a situation with which one cannot currently cope."


I found another bad post. See below

Frying Doom wrote:


Oh look more lack of information and more insults by Goons.

Defence mechanism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"In Freudian psychoanalytic theory, defence mechanisms (or defense mechanisms) are unconscious[1] psychological strategies brought into play by various entities to cope with reality and to maintain self-image. Healthy persons normally use different defences throughout life. An ego defence mechanism becomes pathological only when its persistent use leads to maladaptive behaviour such that the physical and/or mental health of the individual is adversely affected. The purpose of ego defence mechanisms is to protect the mind/self/ego from anxiety and/or social sanctions and/or to provide a refuge from a situation with which one cannot currently cope."
Frying Doom
#32 - 2012-03-12 04:21:18 UTC
Do you Goons really believe that filling the pages of the forum with drivel will make the voter extortion and belittlement of the CSM done by The Mittani go away?

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!
esc shk
Okay Sax
#33 - 2012-03-12 04:22:38 UTC
Jesus **** I hope we invade these bastards next.
Frying Doom
#34 - 2012-03-12 04:27:27 UTC
esc shk wrote:
Jesus **** I hope we invade these bastards next.

Well at least that's a pretty straight forward answer.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!
Triskian
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#35 - 2012-03-12 04:29:47 UTC
esc shk wrote:
Jesus **** I hope we invade these bastards next.


We will purge the galaxy of the bad-posting infidels.
Johnny Marzetti
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#36 - 2012-03-12 04:31:02 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Triskian wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:


Could you share an example of this bad posting? Or is it merely disagreeing that makes it bad?


https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=search&postedby=Frying%20Doom

Every post you can find through this link is a bad one.


Oh look more lack of information and more insults by Goons.

Defence mechanism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


You can help improve Wikipedia by creating an entry called "Ice Burn" and pasting the post you just quoted into the edit window.
Krios Ahzek
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#37 - 2012-03-12 04:37:58 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Triskian wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:


Could you share an example of this bad posting? Or is it merely disagreeing that makes it bad?


https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=search&postedby=Frying%20Doom

Every post you can find through this link is a bad one.


Oh look more lack of information and more insults by Goons.

Defence mechanism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"In Freudian psychoanalytic theory, defence mechanisms (or defense mechanisms) are unconscious[1] psychological strategies brought into play by various entities to cope with reality and to maintain self-image. Healthy persons normally use different defences throughout life. An ego defence mechanism becomes pathological only when its persistent use leads to maladaptive behaviour such that the physical and/or mental health of the individual is adversely affected. The purpose of ego defence mechanisms is to protect the mind/self/ego from anxiety and/or social sanctions and/or to provide a refuge from a situation with which one cannot currently cope."


Jesus you went full Freud. Never go full Freud.

 Though All Men Do Despise Us
Krios Ahzek
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#38 - 2012-03-12 04:38:30 UTC
Freudian psychoanalytic theory is completely proven and relevant in the 21st century.

 Though All Men Do Despise Us
Frying Doom
#39 - 2012-03-12 04:47:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Frying Doom
Krios Ahzek wrote:
Freudian psychoanalytic theory is completely proven and relevant in the 21st century.


ok just for some fun here is an article from 2000

Defense Mechanisms in Psychology Today
Further Processes for Adaptation
Phebe Cramer
Williams College

Although the concept of the defense mechanism was rejected from academic psychology for a number of years,
recent empirical studies show renewed interest in defenses.
Cognitive psychologists have confirmed the existence of unconscious psychological processes, a requisite for defenses.
Developmental, personality, and social psychologists have all found evidence for defense mechanisms that
explicate psychological functioning. The relevance of this new information for clinical practice is discussed.


My be a 2010 article DEFENCE MECHANISMS: A NOVEL APPROACH TO MENTAL ILLNESS
by Dr. Brad Bowins
Big smile

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!
Krios Ahzek
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#40 - 2012-03-12 04:54:43 UTC
One article: Yep, it's peer reviewed

 Though All Men Do Despise Us
Previous page123Next page