Jita Park Speakers Corner

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=67950&find=unread

Will he accept the challenge or will he hide behind some bullshit?

I dont want to get a candidate that cant argue his point well before CCP. Maybe Kelduum cant debate well?

If he doesn't accept is a clear sign he is out of touch with us, the 99% percent.

His only campaing statement is that he has knowledge of the corp interface. Not the 99%!

I for one, applaud Kelduum for running. I spent a few months in E-UNI myself as a stepping stone between hi-sec carebearing and null-sec, well null-seccing (there's just a lot more going on out in null sec). I respect what E-UNI does, it's a much better alternative than becoming a low-sec pirate if you want PvP experience, it's more forgiving than just jumping into 0.0 headfirst, and it was a great place to help me plan what I wanted to train and basically learn to play the game.

As for what you should bring to the CSM, my vote's elsewhere (for obvious reasons), but of any hi-sec or low-sec candidate, I would probably trust you the most to have some semblance of an idea as to what's going on across the rest of EVE.

I was in E-UNI during war decs and let me be honest, losing ships is a part of EVE. Sheet happens, it's learning how to best deal with it that is part of the game. The game provides players with all the advantages and tools to deal with other players, it's up to how you use them. EVE is the best empire simulator I have ever played, and the null-sec alliances needn't be the only "superpowers" in the game. E-UNI is the closest thing to a nullsec alliance I ever saw in hisec, I mean, they operate like a nullsec alliance that doesn't hold sov, they just happen to be based in hisec. I guess the real problems with warsecs and ganking is getting caught on a battlefield that you don't want to be a part of. Well, what do you do when your country is invaded? You either get your army and fight back, submit, or flee elsewhere. EVE allows for all of these options! Even in hisec, you can fight back, you can roll over and die or plead for your life, and you can flee and just play the game off in another system. There are so many ways built into the game to make someone uncomfortable, and there are just as many ways to avoid that discomfort. For that, I applaud CCP. EVE appeals to greifers, PvPers, soloers, and industrialists, and gives me the option to do them all. I mean, how many games have people who are for hire to go rain on other people's parades? Not many. Not many. I don't suicide gank. It's just not my thing, It's too much effort for no easy-to-discern reward, but my friends have great stories of holding ships hostage and scamming people out of millions of ISK (in hisec, ofc. In nullsec they would have just blown it up and been on their merry way). I love that, space piracy being an option is just so cool. Life's hard enough for pirates as it is, it would seem, they have to abuse game mechanics just to get by. Players have an area in the game where people with good sec status are protected and where poor sec status are persecuted, but why is there no place where the reverse is true? Why is there no pirate faction concord for pirates to rely on in a pocket of space they can call home? All the NPC pirate factions have space of their own, but players can't really join them... perhaps they should iterate on that part of the game, who knows?

Anyways, back on topic, Kelduum, just listen to the rest of the CSM when they get elected, I'm fairly certain they'll be competent, and if they're not, why they simply won't achieve anything. You have to be balanced to be a good diplomat and when someone else knows better than you about something you just have to sit and listen, like mittens seemed to say. No CSM candidate should give input on every aspect of the game. If they have a stance on everything they're an uninformed ****, EVE is too large a game for someone to have a deep understanding of EVERY aspect of the game. Just preach what you know and I'm sure you'll do well Kelduum. As I said, you're probably the best chance hisec pubbies have at getting a semi-competent CSM rep.

And in 4 months, tell me how many non-consensual wardecs you got ? 2 ?

This is a lie. EVEuni used a decshield before the current one, got petitionned a few times, and a GM told you to stop using it (which you did). You can spin it like you want, but the fact remains that you used an exploit (even if you [or even CCP] didn't know it was one).


No, I was talking about the previous consensual wardec too (with Noir. and the Orphants ? Not sure) when your POS were hit and you cried a lot, begging them to stop.

Kelduum the glorious may not have all the answers but I think the CSM needs some balance. I'm tired of all the nullsec whiners on the CSM...vote hisec, vote now.

Interesting candidate Jaegerblitzen; I agree on many points ... I'm not experienced to say one way or another on the FW or lowsec items. We should have a caucus or primary type of election for all of the non-nullsec candidates to select a front runner. I'm inclining toward Kelduum right now, just to let you know; primarily because I know what he's done for E-Uni and the 'newb' population of Eve, as a proven player and leader.

Kelduum Revaan,

I would like to direct your attention to this thread, where I invite you to engage me in debate.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=67950&find=unread
Thank you in advance!

Stay on topic, the topic of Kelduum Revaan as a candidate running for CSM7

Kreul Intentions

Seeing as you place so much stock in the Mittani, lets look at his views other than two people discussing an idea:

Views on Keldumm as a candidate:




his view specifically in responce to your trolling:

Heaven has no rage like love to hatred turned
Nor hell a fury like a woman scorned.

Actually, it does make me wonder if Poetic has a silent middle name begining with 'M'.