These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Hans Jagerblitzen for CSM7

First post First post
Author
Har Harrison
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#61 - 2012-02-08 02:40:11 UTC
Flyinghotpocket wrote:
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:

-Send the message that we want more activity in lowsec, but not more blobbing!

-Send the message that we culturally disdain the drama that complicates 0.0 warfare!

-Send the message that we are not a test bed for nullsec sovereignty improvements!

-Send the message that we are not here to be “co-opted” by nullsec groups!


I cant beleive im saying this.

You have my vote

Haha - FHP is supporting a minnie!!! Big smile

Lord Azeroth
Perkone
Caldari State
#62 - 2012-02-08 02:55:00 UTC
Got my vote !
Benilopax
Colonial Industries
Reckless Contingency.
#63 - 2012-02-08 02:57:40 UTC
Don't forget to like the OP so he gets to the threshold of 100.

...

Zmaster BloodLust
BloodLust Enterprises
Amarr Locals Alliance.
#64 - 2012-02-08 03:21:16 UTC
No need to writte a Wall of text... mutch has been said before so... Good luck to you Hans, you got my vote!


Regards, Z
Zostrallis
KA POW POW Inc
Late Night Alliance
#65 - 2012-02-08 03:30:17 UTC
u got my vote Hans, i hope those that dont know you take the time to read your manifesto.
Iestor
Grog Mileghere Corporation
#66 - 2012-02-08 03:41:06 UTC
Hans go for it mate, we need someone to represent us, you got my vote.
Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
Wild Geese.
#67 - 2012-02-08 03:48:28 UTC
Flyinghotpocket wrote:
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:

-Send the message that we want more activity in lowsec, but not more blobbing!

-Send the message that we culturally disdain the drama that complicates 0.0 warfare!

-Send the message that we are not a test bed for nullsec sovereignty improvements!

-Send the message that we are not here to be “co-opted” by nullsec groups!


I cant beleive im saying this.

You have my vote


You have no idea how much this means to me Twisted

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

Deen Wispa
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#68 - 2012-02-08 04:10:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Deen Wispa
I had a feeling that you would eventually run. The only lingering question was whether you would pigeonhole yourself as a FW delegate or make a wiser move to represent lowsec/hisec space.

Your document and platform really shows how much you've thought this through. I have already promoted your link in the Gallente militia channel for more 'likes' . I will also promote you to my own corp.

Good luck

EDIT: Your document is too wordy and could probably be more succinct and concise. Alot of people will not read through 20 pages. Hopefully you can find someone to cut down the verboseness of the document and help get your message across alot clearer.

High Five. Yeah! C'est La Eve .

Bob McGenericname
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#69 - 2012-02-08 04:28:25 UTC
Flyinghotpocket wrote:
I cant beleive im saying this.

You have my vote


I say we form a superpac: Ex Proper Villains for a More Jagerblitzen'd CSM

plus, voting for Hans means I get to spite Zero, and what greater purpose is there in life
Flyinghotpocket
Doomheim
#70 - 2012-02-08 04:40:17 UTC
Har Harrison wrote:
Flyinghotpocket wrote:
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:

-Send the message that we want more activity in lowsec, but not more blobbing!

-Send the message that we culturally disdain the drama that complicates 0.0 warfare!

-Send the message that we are not a test bed for nullsec sovereignty improvements!

-Send the message that we are not here to be “co-opted” by nullsec groups!


I cant beleive im saying this.

You have my vote

Haha - FHP is supporting a minnie!!! Big smile


i have flown with hans many times, and he is still a minmatar militia member, and i know that his intentions are good.

IF i, flyinghotpocket am saying this. the rest of all militia's need to be saying this.

Amarr Militia Representative - A jar of nitro

Jhaelee de'Auvrie
Amarrian Vengeance
Team Amarrica
#71 - 2012-02-08 04:42:58 UTC
I think Hans is one of the few people I would trust to voice FW issues in a non-faction biased fashion. You will have may vote.
Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
Wild Geese.
#72 - 2012-02-08 05:01:00 UTC
Deen Wispa wrote:


EDIT: Your document is too wordy and could probably be more succinct and concise. Alot of people will not read through 20 pages. Hopefully you can find someone to cut down the verboseness of the document and help get your message across alot clearer.


No apologies here. I have been unimpressed by the amount of information and opinions offered by the other candidates in the race, and much criticism has rightfully been cast about whether any of us actually stand for anything, or have any proposals we'd like to push through.

That, and a lot of people just don't know me. Frankly, I've just chosen to lay it all out there, and let people decide whether to read it or not. The ones that are patient enough to read the document, are the ones really care about the outcome of this race. Readers that simply go "TL:DR" are less likely to follow through with actually voting when the time comes, so I'd rather reach out to the ones that are really invested enough in the race to be studying the candidates carefully this early in the game.

There will be certainly time to bulletinize everything in the days to come, but frankly I'm spent after writing that beast and the bloggers will surely do most of the dissecting work for me over the next few days. Whatever they can't distill from my little paper, I'll be happy to spell out more clearly for you all.

In the meantime I'm just continuing to quietly build my core network of committed support, and answering the various questions that arise that haven't been covered by my primer.



If you're one of the many CEO's, FC's, Directors, or other community leaders that will be supporting my campaign by sending out the call to vote, be sure to get in touch with me or Shalee Lianne ASAP if you haven't already. We'd love to get you on our mailing list for announcements and the like. I'll try to get everyone responded to within 24-48 hours, thank you for your patience with me during this busy time.



CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

Choc talar
Miners Legion
Already Replaced.
#73 - 2012-02-08 05:22:46 UTC
Finally someone who wants to honestly represent the "others". +1 Hans you got my vote!
Joyitii
Red.Line
#74 - 2012-02-08 07:43:03 UTC
Okay so originally I asked these questions to or rather suggested them to the person who was seeking help on what people of highsec may want. I never received a response from him despite spending a fair amount of time before reading up on the issues and condensing them down enough to not be such a headache to read. So anyway without further ado here is some edited copy pasta to see what you think about them.

Personally I think that industry really needs a great big revamp, specifically the mining side of industry. To summarize a thread post that I was reading not too long ago it talks about how to improve mining to the point in which it could potentially be enjoyable and require skill to do properly. The ways in which to make mining more “fun” also increase the difficulty of making a botting program that does everything on its own. Some of the things in this forum post include: Visual differentiation of asteroids up close in order to see a better yield, system wide belts (finally), Much larger difference in yields of ore essentially giving more use to the survey scanner along with the visual cues to show the difference (i.e. Instead of having there be 2 better yields of 5% per ore instead have 5%, 50%, 100%, 200%, etc.), remove drone mineral drops and replace them with higher bounties, remove t1 drops and instead have rats drop bpc’s (This one I’m unsure about but it’s mostly going towards only allowing players to acquire minerals through mining), and finally having probing mechanics assist you in finding this higher yield ore.

Those are just some of the things mentioned within the thread that I believe have some merrit.

The thread can be found here: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=672496#post672496

Also anyone who considers the mining system in ME2 to be anywhere near "good" seriously needs to reconsider what you find fun and worth your time.

The second suggestion that I mentioned was the removal of "tiers" and instead having roles instead for each type of ship in Eve. There are a fair amount of T1 ships all across the board that are never used because there are just direct upgrades to them. This should be fixed and can be done by adjusting the ships into their own specific roles. There honestly isn't much more to say on the issue and in my original post suggesting this I started to ramble. So anyway here is the thread post, however it does take a fair amount of reading compared to the other one to find some of the better posts in it.

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=24582

Anyway those are the two biggest things that I would like to know out of pretty much all of the candidates, you seem like one of the more likely ones that may win running partially for highsec.
DeBingJos
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#75 - 2012-02-08 07:51:54 UTC
You have my vote.

Ungi maðurinn þekkir reglurnar, en gamli maðurinn þekkir undantekningarnar. The young man knows the rules, but the old man knows the exceptions.

Venus Rinah
Arcanum Industry
#76 - 2012-02-08 07:54:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Venus Rinah
Likewise the manifesto or details you have surrounding your intentions for improving the game I find appealing and well balanced.

But like the comment above, as much as moving roids might add some fun, i don't think it will remove botting, they'll simply compensate, more importantIy I would want to see supported views of making mining a more "competive" role in EvE so as to be better recognised as a more valid activity which would sway a number of industrial types like myself much more strongly in favour of the candidacy.
ceyriot
Carebear Educational Services
#77 - 2012-02-08 07:55:59 UTC
Joyitii wrote:
Also anyone who considers the mining system in ME2 to be anywhere near "good" seriously needs to reconsider what you find fun and worth your time.

Wasn't saying it was good, just wanted to say that it is something that could be done, relatively easily. (I think) Also, it would add more variation to the long-stagnant process of mining.

Not Flyinghotpocket's alt. At all.

Faction Warfare is like Fight Club. But with spaceships.

Joyitii
Red.Line
#78 - 2012-02-08 07:57:46 UTC
ceyriot wrote:
Joyitii wrote:
Also anyone who considers the mining system in ME2 to be anywhere near "good" seriously needs to reconsider what you find fun and worth your time.

Wasn't saying it was good, just wanted to say that it is something that could be done, relatively easily. (I think) Also, it would add more variation to the long-stagnant process of mining.

I suppose you have me there but I've forever had a gripe with how terrible that system was for mining. At least unlock how fast you can spin the damn planet. : /
thoth rothschild
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#79 - 2012-02-08 08:31:00 UTC
as it seems all the csm candidates try very very hard to kill all the empire pvp and empire wardec system.

Ask yourself the question why 70% of players are highsec and why 30% of them are pvp vets.
This is the last pvp resort for many old vets who no longer have the time to play 24/7.

Gianiss Dee
Monty Pythons Flying Spaceships
#80 - 2012-02-08 08:35:55 UTC
+1 Hans. Glad to see someone knows there is more to Eve than 0.0.