These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Out of Pod Experience

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

I'm a Particle Astrophysicist, ask me anything

Author
FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#141 - 2012-02-08 15:17:17 UTC
Telegram Sam wrote:
Questions:
1) How much antimatter would it take to explode the Milky Way Galaxy?
2) How much would it take to explode just a tiny, tiny corner of it? Say, Wall Street, for example.
3) Is there a way to make an antimatter containment field, say a very tiny one, that is also soluble in water. Or maybe soluble in digestive system acids. And said container could be hidden in, say, an Altoid mint. Is that possible?
4) Where can I get some antimatter?

Someone give this man some antimatter. This will end hilariously.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

Tsadkiel
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#142 - 2012-02-08 17:40:11 UTC
Fiori 161 wrote:
Here are a few others.


1. I read somewhere that although our sun is a "very average main sequence star" recent observations seem to indicate that it's output is somewhat more regular then others like it. Any truth to this?


2. After the big bang, why was only hydrogen formed? I always figured that it would make sense if heavier elements were created do to the great energies and pressures involved. It was far more powerful then a super nova, so why did it not also create heavy elements like super nova do?

3. Cosmic background radiation, why is it only in microwave frequencies, and more importantly, what was it's original frequency before it was red shifted?


4. Has anyone detected wavelengths shorter then gamma waves involved in say... splitting protons into quarks as oppose to just splitting atoms?

Thx!


good ones! yay!

1) so, some background for those who may not be familiar with it. the Main Sequence is a long, continuous band that is formed when you make a plot of a stars color vs how bright the star is (spectral class VS absolute intensity or luminosity) for many many stars. the "average" stars we have observed live somewhere on this band and during the course of their life, travel along it to other parts of the diagram.

now, the short answer to your question is i don't know. if it is, i haven't heard of it, but that doesn't mean it isn't the case. because the plot is only one of color vs intensity, the time behavior of a stars emissions is not taken into account. if we were to quantify and measure the regularity of stars on the main sequence we would probably see something like a normal distribution or bell curve. it may very well be that the sun is on the "more regular" side of this curve. i will do some reading and try to get back to you when i find anything.

2) i made a post about the big bang earlier in the thread if you haven't read it yet =D basically, the key thing to remember is that we start with just energy, and as the universe expands this energy condenses into elementary particles like quarks and leptons. now, the leptons are the electron, the muon, and the tau, but only the electron is stable, so eventually the muons and taus should decay away.

as for quarks, we have observed that they only form particles in specific numbers: 2 quarks, 3 quarks, and we think 5 quarks. (there are other higher groupings but we haven't seen 5 yet). two quark particles are called Mesons and all mesons i know of have a very short lifetime (the pi+- meson, one of the most common mesons, has a lifetime on the order of 1E-8 seconds). 5 quark particles are simply called Pentaquarks (literally, 5 quarks). we have yet to observe a pentaquark in any of our experiments and the conclusion is that they are either can't form for some reason, or have an incredibly short lifetime. so this leaves 3 quark particles, which are called Baryons. of all the baryons, the proton and the neutron are the most stable. the neutron has a lifetime of about 885.7 seconds when it isn't in the nucleus of an atom or clustered with other neutrons, so they would decay. the most stable baryon we know of is the proton. IF it has a lifetime, we haven't observed its decay yet. current calculations put the lifetime of the proton beyond the current age of the universe.

so what does this leave? protons, electrons, and very few neutrons; 1 proton + 1 electron = 1 hydrogen! (there's probably some stray helium in there too from the old neutrons, but i don't think there would be very much. i haven't made any calculations).

3) the frequency of the Cosmic Microwave Background has to do with the the temperature of the universe at the time it was formed. when an object is heated, it emits a continuous radiation spectrum (so the amount to radiation you measure as a function of wavelength forms a smooth curve). this kind of radiation is called Black Body radiation and it has very specific characteristics that allow us to link the radiation we see to the temperature of the object that emitted it. the cosmic microwave background corresponds to a black body temperature of 2.7K +- .00057K (yes, we can make the measurement that precisely) and the peak of its frequency distribution lies in the microwave range (hence the name). if we take our current measurements for the expansion of the universe and project backwards, this corresponds to a temperature of 3000K ! (water boils at a temperature of 373K).

4) Gamma radiation is what we call any radiation beyond X-rays. the gamma ray spectrum starts at a wavelength around 1E-12 meters. so yes, we have seen some pretty intense stuff coming from subatomic collisions, but we just call them gamma rays heheh.
Tsadkiel
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#143 - 2012-02-08 17:56:22 UTC
Quote:
Questions:
1) How much antimatter would it take to explode the Milky Way Galaxy?
2) How much would it take to explode just a tiny, tiny corner of it? Say, Wall Street, for example.
3) Is there a way to make an antimatter containment field, say a very tiny one, that is also soluble in water. Or maybe soluble in digestive system acids. And said container could be hidden in, say, an Altoid mint. Is that possible?
4) Where can I get some antimatter?


1) oh man, i have no idea. if you wanted to Annihilate the milky way (convert it into pure energy) you would need 1:1 matter to antimatter

2) well, a single gram of antimatter would release 9E13 joules of energy (1E-3 * 9E16) which corresponds to an explosive yield of 21.4 kilotons (21,000 tons of TNT). the bomb that destroyed Nagasaki had an estimated explosive yield between 20 and 22 kilotons. will this do?

3) not at the moment. the issue with making an antimatter container is that, if you make if of matter, the antimatter annihilates and you esplode. if you make it out of antimatter, well, then you can't touch it or you will esplode. the current method for antimatter containment is acceleration rings, where streams of atoms of antimatter are suspended electromagnetically and kept moving around a large ring (with diameters usually measured in units like the mile or the kilometer).

4) Geneva Switzerland. they make it there one nucleon at a time. good luck lol
FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#144 - 2012-02-08 18:58:23 UTC
Tsadkiel wrote:
Quote:
1) How much antimatter would it take to explode the Milky Way Galaxy?

1) oh man, i have no idea. if you wanted to Annihilate the milky way (convert it into pure energy) you would need 1:1 matter to antimatter

You mean you can't calculate the necessary explosive force to rip apart an entire galaxy? No one is going to take you seriously if you can't do something simple and pop science-y like that!

I wonder if it would make more sense to use it all at the middle of the galaxy and watch the blast spread out over millenia until the galaxy is obliterate, or throw some in each star and see what happens. i'm betting the latter, even if it would be far less spectacular.

Random semi-related thought question: What happens if we throw antimatter into a black hole? (I'm pretty sure I know the answer)

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

Tsadkiel
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#145 - 2012-02-08 20:05:36 UTC
Quote:
Random semi-related thought question: What happens if we throw antimatter into a black hole? (I'm pretty sure I know the answer)


this is actually the basis for the emission of Hawking radiation and the evaporation of black holes. current theories suggest that the black hole would be reduced in mass by the mass of the antimatter added to it. because the conversion is into energy, another good question would be what happens to the total energy and entropy of the black hole. we briefly touched on entropy calculations for black holes in thermodynamics and it's actually pretty interesting! the long story short of it is that the entropy of a black hole is directly related to its surface area. changes is mass will cause changes in surface area, and also changes in things like temperatrue, angular momentum, charge, and a whole mess of other quantities. this means we can pull all of this information about the black hole just by measuring its surface area.

now, HOW to go about measuring the surface area of a black hole... well... that's a whole different problem lol
Amaroq Dricaldari
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#146 - 2012-02-08 23:39:25 UTC
People have made 4D games (like 4D snake, which is like snake except in a Hypercube and you move along 4 axis of movement).

Do you think it would be more effecient for the Tranquility server to simply move objects really fast when in warp, or to actually move them in the 4th Dimension?

This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.

Alpheias
Tactical Farmers.
Pandemic Horde
#147 - 2012-02-09 08:14:06 UTC
So, has Graham's number given you headache yet?

Agent of Chaos, Sower of Discord.

Don't talk to me unless you are IQ verified and certified with three references from non-family members. Please have your certificate of authenticity on hand.

Arcathra
Technodyne Ltd.
#148 - 2012-02-09 09:39:56 UTC
Great thread, really enjoyed it so far Smile.

Tsadkiel, can you tell us something about neutron stars? How do they form and what are they special properties compared to normal stars? Also heard something about quark stars, what's up with that?
Kehro Urgus
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#149 - 2012-02-09 11:36:16 UTC
Referring to one of the OP's earlier posts about the fate of the universe where heat death occurs. Assuming over time large parts of the universe cool to absolute zero creating a Bose-Einstein Condensate on a large scale, what could be the result? Scientists who have created such matter in a lab with just a handful of atoms have reported strange things; matter acting as a single entity or in soome cases imploding (Bosenova). Might this point to a cyclical nature of the universe, like a really cold Big Crunch?

Yeeee! 

Larry Wickes
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#150 - 2012-02-09 12:09:44 UTC
I guess I'm a noob when it comes to science.... Though, I've read almost every post up to now and first started when it was at page 3. Then every time I read a page, there was another, I actually went to bed an hour later last night reading all these posts, lol.

If space is a vacuum, how exactly does heat travel from the sun to earth and keep us warm? Is it as simple as traveling with the light? As you mentioned earlier light can travel through a vacuum.

Also, given unlimited resources (Money, man power etc) and our current technology, exactly how fast of a ship could we potentially build at this moment in time?
Kehro Urgus
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#151 - 2012-02-09 12:20:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Kehro Urgus
This one I can answer: heat (radiant)is infrared radiation just below the spectrum of visible light. As with all electromagnetic emissions it requires no medium to propagate through space.

Missed the second question. There was a theoretical model for a craft the could potentially reach 0.1 c (1/10) at best, the speed of light. .Would cost hundreds of trillions of dollars and exploding nukes in space is forbidden.

project deadalus

Yeeee! 

Lyrka Bloodberry
Spybeaver
#152 - 2012-02-09 15:13:03 UTC
Can you explain what an air shower is? And what is cherenkov light?

What are the major differences between the HAWC detector and imaging atmospheric cherenkov teleskopes like MAGIC or HESS? What are the respective aims of the experiments?

What do you do to seperate the gamma ray signal from the hadronic background?

Spybeaver

Kehro Urgus
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#153 - 2012-02-09 15:31:19 UTC
Cerenkov radiation (light) is where particles exceed the local light speed, ie. fast neutrons in heavy water.

Yeeee! 

Tsadkiel
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#154 - 2012-02-09 16:50:32 UTC
heya guys, today is super busy and i have a meeting in about 5 minutes and then after i'll be at the bladder factory (i go to CSU and we make the bladders that hold the water for the tanks used in HAWC. these are GREAT questions (especially the ones about HAWC ;) ) and i promise i WILL answer them but it may not be until later.
Amaroq Dricaldari
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#155 - 2012-02-09 22:53:26 UTC
Remember to answer my question about wether it would be more CPU Effecient for CCP to have the ships simply go extremely fast when warping or to just make the game world 4- or 5-dimensional.

This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.

Tsadkiel
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#156 - 2012-02-10 02:22:48 UTC
Amaroq Dricaldari wrote:

Remember to answer my question about wether it would be more CPU Effecient for CCP to have the ships simply go extremely fast when warping or to just make the game world 4- or 5-dimensional.


if CCP wanted to we could just teleport from point A to B, no dimensions required... it's a computer simulation. we can make it do whatever we want.
Tsadkiel
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#157 - 2012-02-10 03:20:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Tsadkiel
Quote:
Can you explain what an air shower is? And what is cherenkov light?

What are the major differences between the HAWC detector and imaging atmospheric cherenkov teleskopes like MAGIC or HESS? What are the respective aims of the experiments?

What do you do to seperate the gamma ray signal from the hadronic background?


1) an Air Shower (also called an Extensive Air Shower or EAS for short) is the cascade of particles formed when an energetic cosmic ray interacts with our atmosphere.

imagine you are playing a game of pool and it's your turn to break. the que ball is the primary cosmic ray. this is the radiation that first interacts with the atmosphere. if it didn't interact with anything on the way it also tells us something about the source that emitted it (objects that could be millions of light years away). the racked balls represent an atmospheric molecule of some kind (like N2). when the cue ball interacts with the racked balls they scatter and we call these secondary particles (it's important to not here that we aren't actually shattering the nitrogen molecule so much as we are converting it and its energy into other products). these propagate through the atmosphere and interact with other molecules, creating more particles. this goes on and on creating the cascade. here are some simulations of EAS.

http://astro.uchicago.edu/cosmus/projects/aires/

Quote:
Cerenkov radiation (light) is where particles exceed the local light speed, ie. fast neutrons in heavy water.


your answer is very close! Cerenkov radiation is created when a charged particle exceeds the speed of light in the local medium. the speed of light is different depending on the medium through which the light is traveling. this is why light refracts in water; the speed limit is 33% slower there. now, matter cannot exceed the speed of light in a vacuum but it CAN exceed it in a medium. when this happens with a charged particle, a "kink" forms in its electric field, which is the Cerenkov radiation. the properties of this radiation can be directly linked to the particles velocity. this effect is not unlike a Sonic Boom.

2) MAGIC and HESS both examine the the fluorescent and Cerenkov light created by Extensive Air Showers as they propagate though the atmosphere. HAWC specifically examines the particles formed by the shower when they reach the ground. all three experiments are designed to examine different regions and compositions of the cosmic ray spectrum. HAWC is designed to examine gamma rays with an energy measured in terraelectronvolts (TeV).

3) i actually worked on this for a long while. i developed an algorithm that produced artificial neural networks through evolutionary methods for the soul purpose of classifying the composition of the primary cosmic ray (gamma ray or hadron). it works great (and i can use the algorithm to do pretty much anything i choose now) but it only meets the efficiency of our current methods. right now we separate gamma rays from hadrons by examining the distribution of of particles when the shower reaches the ground. hadron primary showers tend to create far spreading muons and we can identify them by that characteristic.
Amaroq Dricaldari
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#158 - 2012-02-10 03:35:12 UTC
Tsadkiel wrote:
Amaroq Dricaldari wrote:

Remember to answer my question about wether it would be more CPU Effecient for CCP to have the ships simply go extremely fast when warping or to just make the game world 4- or 5-dimensional.


if CCP wanted to we could just teleport from point A to B, no dimensions required... it's a computer simulation. we can make it do whatever we want.

Yeah, but you can be stopped mid-warp by Interdiction Bubbles, so it isn't as easy as just teleporting the ship and making it look like you're actually moving.

This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.

Tsadkiel
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#159 - 2012-02-10 03:36:15 UTC
Amaroq Dricaldari wrote:
Tsadkiel wrote:
Amaroq Dricaldari wrote:

Remember to answer my question about wether it would be more CPU Effecient for CCP to have the ships simply go extremely fast when warping or to just make the game world 4- or 5-dimensional.


if CCP wanted to we could just teleport from point A to B, no dimensions required... it's a computer simulation. we can make it do whatever we want.

Yeah, but you can be stopped mid-warp by Interdiction Bubbles, so it isn't as easy as just teleporting the ship and making it look like you're actually moving.


yes?
Amaroq Dricaldari
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#160 - 2012-02-10 03:41:07 UTC
Nevermind.

This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.