These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Factional Warfare: The ongoing abandonment saga.

Author
Damassys Kadesh
Royal Khanid Hunting Society
#81 - 2011-09-24 08:24:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Damassys Kadesh
I understand your perspective on the ship-type detail, but simply cannot agree with you there. My vision of the mechanic involves inter-communication among militia members/corps concerning plexing activities, while your example is more solo-oriented. You could definitely make the best ship choice with that kind of information as an individual, but I still feel that on larger scales you'd essentially be given the entire composition of the enemy fleet, and that is too much detail. With the level of activity and chaos that we envision, it shouldn't be necessary to be given such fine details. It'll either be reported by player allies, or you'll find out yourself. It feels like a very large leap in information distribution from anything that currently exists, not to mention that it could just as easily be purposely misleading if some of the enemy doesn't enter the plex or waits in the next system. That type of information will always be a player responsibility.

If you are solo'ing, I think you would always want to ship up to the size of plex that has been reported, or the opposite, stick to plexes relative to your current ship-size. In your example, if the enemy has opened a large plex in a small ship, you should be pleased to chase him off in your larger ship and profit from closing the plex... and if he really wants that plex, he'll reship to the right size and come back, resulting in the fight. And if you show up under-powered in a larger plex, it's your own fault.

I have always thought they should implement an arena-style mechanic, but stay true to the EVE universe of course. Like an underground fight-club of EVE, with server-controlled betting on fights, and alliance-tournament type rules and boundaries. That could serve the truly immediate action that is missing, but FW should maintain some of the uncertainties that are natural to an EVE war.

I think the goal should be to move towards MORE quick action, but not abandon some of the higher-level strategy that is still present. There are many possible permutations of plex notifications, and we definitely agree that there should be some form of them.

Sourem Itharen > Congratulations Lady Kadesh, you have been selected by trial of fire and blood, under the watchful eyes of God, to represent Lord Khanid as his champion in the Imperial Succession trials -YC117

Har Harrison
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#82 - 2011-09-26 03:23:47 UTC
I think some kind of interface that shows the location of plexes that have been popped and when they were popped is about the limit of what you want - make players investigate them, otherwise you are giving all the intel to the defenders on a silver platter.

Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#83 - 2011-09-26 15:15:21 UTC
Damassys Kadesh wrote:
I understand your perspective on the ship-type detail, but simply cannot agree with you there. My vision of the mechanic involves inter-communication among militia members/corps concerning plexing activities, while your example is more solo-oriented. You could definitely make the best ship choice with that kind of information as an individual, but I still feel that on larger scales you'd essentially be given the entire composition of the enemy fleet, and that is too much detail. With the level of activity and chaos that we envision, it shouldn't be necessary to be given such fine details. It'll either be reported by player allies, or you'll find out yourself. It feels like a very large leap in information distribution from anything that currently exists, not to mention that it could just as easily be purposely misleading if some of the enemy doesn't enter the plex or waits in the next system. That type of information will always be a player responsibility. .


What I describe would value each and every pilot and value solo skill but it would not be a solo effort. The militia would have to coordinate their forces so that they are sending the proper number of pilots to each system.

The way the militia plexing vent would sound would be something like this:

Your intel channel tells you an enemy entered a plex in dal in a frigate so you ask in vent:

“is anyone going to fight for that plex in Dal?”
Lets say five people respond they are heading there.

Well then if the militia is smart they will communicate that first one into dal should see if they have more ships sitting outside the accel gate. If not then you probably shouldn’t have all 5 go in. So if you have 2 or whatever you would say we have it covered. And the other three should cover other plexes that will be popping up.’

In other words the communications will be to make sure that you are not over shipping plexes. The side that gets plexxes with the minimum amount of pilots will win.

Vent for plexing may end up being divided into different regions. So for the amarr militia front there may be a vent for people plexing in and around frerstron, another plexing around dal etc. They would coordinate with eachother in whatever zone and also try to coordinate with the other zones if they aren’t able to cover the plexes.

And yes the intel will only be on who enters the plex not who enters the system.

I agree it would be a very large leap from anything in eve. But that is good. The whole deal where you have alt scouts and fleets and try to bait and blob can be done in many other areas of eve. I say have fw provide something you can’t get elsewhere.

Not only that but spys can often destroy that sort of game. Spies having an effect may be good in other parts of the game but in FW its impossible to control who is in the militia. By providing more intel to more pilots the effect of spies is pretty much eliminated.


Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#84 - 2011-09-26 15:18:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Cearain
Har Harrison wrote:
I think some kind of interface that shows the location of plexes that have been popped and when they were popped is about the limit of what you want - make players investigate them, otherwise you are giving all the intel to the defenders on a silver platter.



Both sides will get the exact same intel. So your not favoring defenders or attackers.

No need for giving advantages to the side with more alt scouts.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#85 - 2011-09-26 17:35:00 UTC
Damassys Kadesh wrote:
I think the goal should be to move towards MORE quick action, but not abandon some of the higher-level strategy that is still present. There are many possible permutations of plex notifications, and we definitely agree that there should be some form of them.



I think by giving this sort of intel it opens fw to higher level strategy that currently doesn't exist. Right now the strategy is: Lets get the biggest blob we can and go plodding around ganking ships. Alt scouts are key.

Having a plexing mechanic that gave both sides more intel would mean that they would have more intel they would need to consider when making decisions about which resources (i.e. pilots) should be sent to which systems.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Damassys Kadesh
Royal Khanid Hunting Society
#86 - 2011-09-27 04:09:01 UTC
I value your opinion and the fact that there are several points of view being voiced in the thread here. I think our play-styles and past-experiences differ, however, which is why we have different opinions on this potential mechanic. I still hold my original preference in this matter.

On another note; Is anyone else itching to hear what this "moment that defines history" will bring in the next dev blog? It will be ridiculous if it doesn't have FW info :|

Sourem Itharen > Congratulations Lady Kadesh, you have been selected by trial of fire and blood, under the watchful eyes of God, to represent Lord Khanid as his champion in the Imperial Succession trials -YC117

Har Harrison
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#87 - 2011-09-27 05:37:58 UTC
I would be astounded if it DID have FW in it - since FW has nothing to do will 0.0 and vanity items.

Doesn't mean we won't keep the pressure on CCP and keep making noise...

Kern Hotha
#88 - 2011-09-27 08:52:35 UTC
Out of pity and a casual interest in this subject I move the topic to a position of greater visibility. If there is any real internal 'revolution' going on inside CCP this surely must be one of the half-assed abandoned projects that gets attention.

We distinguish the excellent man from the common man by saying that the former is the one who makes great demands upon himself, and the latter who makes no demands on himself.

Jose Ortega y Gasset (1883 - 1955)

Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#89 - 2011-09-27 12:49:01 UTC
Damassys Kadesh wrote:
I value your opinion and the fact that there are several points of view being voiced in the thread here. I think our play-styles and past-experiences differ, however, which is why we have different opinions on this potential mechanic. I still hold my original preference in this matter.

On another note; Is anyone else itching to hear what this "moment that defines history" will bring in the next dev blog? It will be ridiculous if it doesn't have FW info :|



Well thanks for reading. We are mostly in agreement. Even if we didn't know the ship types it would still be a huge step forward.


On every decision about plexing I think that if it promotes frequent, quality, smallscale or solo pvp it is good. If it doesn't its bad. Eve has plenty of slow gank blob pvp.

I think the dev blog will say they are reassigning a bunch of devs back to FIS. Many things will get worked on including but not limitted to FW. At least, if they want to have a big future to define I think that is what they will do.

It might also be the release of dust.Roll

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Damassys Kadesh
Royal Khanid Hunting Society
#90 - 2011-10-06 05:13:06 UTC
And there it is lads. Right from the mouth of the big man himself. Factional Warfare is right up there as a main priority on today's Dev Blogs.

I have a good feeling the saga is coming to a close soon(tm).

Thanks to CCP for the clear communication today. It goes without saying that I'm eager to experience some changes to Factional Warfare! Big smile

Sourem Itharen > Congratulations Lady Kadesh, you have been selected by trial of fire and blood, under the watchful eyes of God, to represent Lord Khanid as his champion in the Imperial Succession trials -YC117

Benilopax
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#91 - 2011-10-06 16:40:23 UTC
Damassys Kadesh wrote:
And there it is lads. Right from the mouth of the big man himself. Factional Warfare is right up there as a main priority on today's Dev Blogs.

I have a good feeling the saga is coming to a close soon(tm).

Thanks to CCP for the clear communication today. It goes without saying that I'm eager to experience some changes to Factional Warfare! Big smile



Winter is coming...

...

StillBorn CrackBaby
Doomheim
#92 - 2011-10-06 16:55:25 UTC
FW would be great if it had more nudity. But I don't expect to see CCP ever fix FW, can't understand why they won't but I don't see it...
If they did I'd really like to go back again...
Ruah Piskonit
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#93 - 2011-10-06 20:38:17 UTC
If anyone was holding their breath waiting, they long ago turned blue an quit (or are just waiting and passing time as best as they can in a perpetual holding pattern above 'completion')
Damassys Kadesh
Royal Khanid Hunting Society
#94 - 2011-10-07 05:24:23 UTC
There are plenty of us just making the best of the fact that we are constantly at war, PvPing for fun. But I'm just excited to hear that it's finally getting looked at by the Devs.

Sourem Itharen > Congratulations Lady Kadesh, you have been selected by trial of fire and blood, under the watchful eyes of God, to represent Lord Khanid as his champion in the Imperial Succession trials -YC117

Damassys Kadesh
Royal Khanid Hunting Society
#95 - 2011-10-07 06:05:54 UTC
I'm trying to make sure all those interested in discussing FW see this... I'll just copy what I said in another thread that was even lengthier than this one:


Damassys Kadesh wrote:
I thought I'd share something with all you FW fans. Since the announcement that FW changes are (hopefully) going to make it into the winter expansion, I checked to see if there has been a new thread created for suggestions to the Devs. There are many threads like this one floating around, but it would be nice to have one specifically for submitting your thoughts to the Devs, it be a fresh one based on the recent announcement, and located in the appropriate section.

There is such a thread located in the "Features and Ideas" section, where it won't be buried intensely like things are in "General Discussion".

So far it looks like people are sticking to submitting write-ups of their vision of FW, which is nice because although back-and-forth discussion is great, it can result in an extremely cluttered thread. So, do as you please, but consider that it may be more effective to copy this write-up format when posting.

Hope this is helpful, here it be:

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=18059

Sourem Itharen > Congratulations Lady Kadesh, you have been selected by trial of fire and blood, under the watchful eyes of God, to represent Lord Khanid as his champion in the Imperial Succession trials -YC117

Har Harrison
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#96 - 2011-10-11 03:00:45 UTC
Woot - FW has gotten a boost (kind of...) - aggro log off mechanics + SC changes mean people will have to be more careful hot dropping FW members in low sec!!!!

Kengutsi Akira
Doomheim
#97 - 2011-10-11 03:02:36 UTC
Im kinda curious now if theyre all sorry for everything if theyre going to start giving FW love

"Is it fair that CCP can get away with..." :: checks ownership on the box ::

Yes

Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#98 - 2011-10-11 03:42:26 UTC
Damassys Kadesh wrote:
I'm trying to make sure all those interested in discussing FW see this... I'll just copy what I said in another thread that was even lengthier than this one:


I also started this thread in General Discussion, right before Bloodpetal started theirs. Both contain great dialogue regarding the subject, I encourage all FW enthusiasts or hopefuls to post in both, but I'm not trying to compete with threads, I only started mine in GD because the Dev's are far more active there than anywhere else.

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary