These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Can flippers and gankers in High sec problem

Author
Ludi Burek
The Player Haters Corp
#141 - 2012-01-30 13:13:05 UTC
Shazzam Vokanavom, you seem to state yourself that eve shouldn't cater to the lowest common denominator. Who do you think is the victim in almost all gank cases? The lazy, ignorant people. Is that who you're defending?

Also, I see these claims how it's all too easy. Have you ever tried hunting a real gank target to profit from? Or are you passing off opinions as facts in the same post where you accuse other of being biased.

As a high sec pirate, when I can be bothered, I can tell you with absolute certainty from personal experience, for every person ganked there are hundreds that pass me by because they are taking precautionary measures like being tanked, using cloaky haulers, perfect balance of cargo value for ship making it not worth ganking and so on and so on. Then there are the shanked ganks, the terrible drops.

Please don't spout off your opinions as if they are common knowledge facts.

I believe my post was civilised enough. This uninformed whining about suicide ganks annoys me to no end, because I fear someone who matters at CCP may start believing it.

On the flip side, I have transported, 100s of billions, probably even more, accross high sec over the years without a single incident. Surely with all this super easy ganking out there, the law of probabilities would demand that I'd have been ganked already, multiple times.
Planetmaster
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#142 - 2012-01-30 13:19:56 UTC
Go to 0.0 and mine there. Join any SOV ally
Hiply Rustic
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#143 - 2012-01-30 13:21:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Hiply Rustic
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:

CSM forums are reserved for serious discussion


I laughed. Well really I chuckled. Out loud.

7/10 for well delivered and undoubtedly unintended irony.

Ralph King-Griffin wrote: "Eve deliberately excludes the stupid and the weak willied." EvE: Only the strong-willied need apply.

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#144 - 2012-01-30 13:23:48 UTC
Alex Sinai wrote:
Baltec1 we argue for ages on these forums and not once you suggested anything, just all denials and not a breeze of fresh air from you. Offer something creative or beneficial to anyone and don't say Eve is perfect. It's far from it and that's a good thing.


What part of tank your ships is so hard to get? How many ways is it possible to say this same thing over and over again before it get through to you that there are many ways to defend yourself in high sec or avoid the chance of getting ganked all together?


I suggest that you use the current tools in game rather than whining on the forums for CCP to protect you.
Alex Sinai
Doomheim
#145 - 2012-01-30 13:30:32 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Alex Sinai wrote:
Baltec1 we argue for ages on these forums and not once you suggested anything, just all denials and not a breeze of fresh air from you. Offer something creative or beneficial to anyone and don't say Eve is perfect. It's far from it and that's a good thing.


What part of tank your ships is so hard to get? How many ways is it possible to say this same thing over and over again before it get through to you that there are many ways to defend yourself in high sec or avoid the chance of getting ganked all together?


I suggest that you use the current tools in game rather than whining on the forums for CCP to protect you.


What part of a sentence "I don't live in high sec" you missed? And I don't ask for advise. I asked for discussion which seems to be going well. So either give ideas or base your argumentson something more then "no because I say no."

Don't let them fly safe!

Caldari Acolyte
Shark Enterprises
#146 - 2012-01-30 13:33:23 UTC
No reason for endless debate on this, 2 words, Nich game, fixed.
Shazzam Vokanavom
Doomheim
#147 - 2012-01-30 13:33:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Shazzam Vokanavom
Ludi Burek wrote:
Shazzam Vokanavom, you seem to state yourself that eve shouldn't cater to the lowest common denominator. Who do you think is the victim in almost all gank cases? The lazy, ignorant people. Is that who you're defending?

Also, I see these claims how it's all too easy. Have you ever tried hunting a real gank target to profit from? Or are you passing off opinions as facts in the same post where you accuse other of being biased.

As a high sec pirate, when I can be bothered, I can tell you with absolute certainty from personal experience, for every person ganked there are hundreds that pass me by because they are taking precautionary measures like being tanked, using cloaky haulers, perfect balance of cargo value for ship making it not worth ganking and so on and so on. Then there are the shanked ganks, the terrible drops.

Please don't spout off your opinions as if they are common knowledge facts.

I believe my post was civilised enough. This uninformed whining about suicide ganks annoys me to no end, because I fear someone who matters at CCP may start believing it.

On the flip side, I have transported, 100s of billions, probably even more, accross high sec over the years without a single incident. Surely with all this super easy ganking out there, the law of probabilities would demand that I'd have been ganked already, multiple times.


I don't have to be a ganker to understand. The balance books on these things seem pretty obvious looks kind of profitable from someone elses perspective above. Some ganks fail, some ganks profit. If you have all the figures to demonstrate your view then I might also agree with you 100% as to the effective levels you want to claim also.

But really this is what I want to know, some suicide ganks fail, most don't on the assest level. Or else why do it? If we are led to beleive from the stats above suicide gankers have it nice a cushy with the plex an afternoon process.

I could agree that suicide ganking may not be a prevelant issue for most though.

Still from the examples above what I want to see is the relative simplicity of "actual" ganking events, all the other "ganker not bothered" targets don't really interest me. They really weren't any risk to you either where they?

If we could get an accurate picture of "net" gains it might help.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#148 - 2012-01-30 13:34:44 UTC
Alex Sinai wrote:


What part of a sentence "I don't live in high sec" you missed? And I don't ask for advise. I asked for discussion which seems to be going well. So either give ideas or base your argumentson something more then "no because I say no."


What does it matter where you live in relation to your topic?

Also, please re-read what I put, its clear you didn't read it before typing out that reply.
Alex Sinai
Doomheim
#149 - 2012-01-30 13:41:30 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Alex Sinai wrote:


What part of a sentence "I don't live in high sec" you missed? And I don't ask for advise. I asked for discussion which seems to be going well. So either give ideas or base your argumentson something more then "no because I say no."


What does it matter where you live in relation to your topic?

Also, please re-read what I put, its clear you didn't read it before typing out that reply.


Still trollin as usual Baltec? Well, everyone gets fun in their own field.

What really surprised me though is that a lot of ppl assumed I'm a carebear just because I put up a topic on ppl that left this game thanks to flips and ganks. How the hell that makes me a carebear in their minds I fail to understand.

Don't let them fly safe!

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#150 - 2012-01-30 13:43:52 UTC
Alex Sinai wrote:


Still trollin as usual Baltec? Well, everyone gets fun in their own field.

What really surprised me though is that a lot of ppl assumed I'm a carebear just because I put up a topic on ppl that left this game thanks to flips and ganks. How the hell that makes me a carebear in their minds I fail to understand.



Ok riddle me this

Blocade runner fitted with a cov ops cloak, agility mods in the lows, AB and tank in the mids using insta undocks from stations.

How would you gank this in high sec?
Liam Mirren
#151 - 2012-01-30 13:47:36 UTC
Alex Sinai wrote:
What really surprised me though is that a lot of ppl assumed I'm a carebear just because I put up a topic on ppl that left this game thanks to flips and ganks. How the hell that makes me a carebear in their minds I fail to understand.



Dude, anyone who quickly glances at your lossmails and notices the sheer stupidity of your fits KNOWS you're a carebear. Blaming others for one's own lack of knowledge&effort is the very definition of a carebear.

Excellence is not a skill, it's an attitude.

Alex Sinai
Doomheim
#152 - 2012-01-30 13:50:40 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Alex Sinai wrote:


Still trollin as usual Baltec? Well, everyone gets fun in their own field.

What really surprised me though is that a lot of ppl assumed I'm a carebear just because I put up a topic on ppl that left this game thanks to flips and ganks. How the hell that makes me a carebear in their minds I fail to understand.



Ok riddle me this

Blocade runner fitted with a cov ops cloak, agility mods in the lows, AB and tank in the mids using insta undocks from stations.

How would you gank this in high sec?


Can noob fly that? No.
Can relatively new player fly that? No if he's not industrial.

Who said I'm against that king of ganks on gates? I am for that!
I am against stupid ganking of new players and in proportion of 3 Lokis vs 1 Navitas.

Don't let them fly safe!

Alex Sinai
Doomheim
#153 - 2012-01-30 13:55:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Alex Sinai
Liam Mirren wrote:
Alex Sinai wrote:
What really surprised me though is that a lot of ppl assumed I'm a carebear just because I put up a topic on ppl that left this game thanks to flips and ganks. How the hell that makes me a carebear in their minds I fail to understand.



Dude, anyone who quickly glances at your lossmails and notices the sheer stupidity of your fits KNOWS you're a carebear. Blaming others for one's own lack of knowledge&effort is the very definition of a carebear.


Dude, FYI I'm not putting kills on battleclinic unless asked for km. Not my style, it's childish to use that thing and gives out info on what you fly to kill. Surprise worth more then km.

Don't let them fly safe!

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#154 - 2012-01-30 13:58:07 UTC
Alex Sinai wrote:


Can noob fly that? No.
Can relatively new player fly that? No if he's not industrial.

Who said I'm against that king of ganks on gates? I am for that!
I am against stupid ganking of new players and in proportion of 3 Lokis vs 1 Navitas.


An iteron V can get 22k ehp and 350 dps tanked
Liam Mirren
#155 - 2012-01-30 13:58:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Liam Mirren
Alex Sinai wrote:
Liam Mirren wrote:
Alex Sinai wrote:
What really surprised me though is that a lot of ppl assumed I'm a carebear just because I put up a topic on ppl that left this game thanks to flips and ganks. How the hell that makes me a carebear in their minds I fail to understand.



Dude, anyone who quickly glances at your lossmails and notices the sheer stupidity of your fits KNOWS you're a carebear. Blaming others for one's own lack of knowledge&effort is the very definition of a carebear.


Dude, FYI I'm not putting kills on battleclinic unless asked for km. Not my style, it's childish to use that thing. And nice troll.


Yes because none of the 70 million people you killed in this game have a KB of their own, I'm sure. How is it childish to use facts? Your fits are all idiotic which means that your knowledge on EVE close to 0. I like the troll thingy reply, because that's about the best thing you can try.

Lets keep this real: you're clueless about EVE, on several fronts.

Excellence is not a skill, it's an attitude.

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#156 - 2012-01-30 13:58:52 UTC
Shazzam Vokanavom wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Shazzam Vokanavom wrote:
Never been personally ganked.

Always try to be sensible rather than being stupidly greedy.

Will try to reduce risks.

Will use defensive tehcniques.

Will use sensible tactics, routes, spying, intelligence, watch local, don't just assume the closing mining ship is not a future warping point, keep a distance from belt warp points etc etc.

For me personally its not an issue.

For those who risk stupid things like plex running, multi billion assests in one haul with no provisions for sensible hauling techniques or shiney officer factions modded ships, they deserve what they get.

My view is simply that the risk needs to remain, ganking needs to remain but some steps towards valid retaliation and the discrepency of what gankers can achieve needs to be rebalanced in favour of the industrial.

Being in a corp currently does not afford any protection to a unaffiliated ganker who might have used a trial account just to make a small profit, rinse and repeat. Even more of a problem now with 60 day trials and the increased free training time. And the poor newb who cannot war dec, cannot respond to the avoidance tactics afforded and poor combat abilities.



Interesting fact: It's virtually impossible to gank someone in high sec if they are alert and aware of how the game works.

Arguments like "but mining is so boring that it's impossible to pay attention while you're doing it" are not persuasive: if mining is so boring, why are you doing it? Do something else! There are so many things other than mining that even a fresh-out-of-the-tutorials player can do that there's simply no reason for them to be mining. It's not even the most lucrative - in fact it's actually one of the WORST income streams available to hi-sec players.

And yes, it's appallingly easy to gank someone in hi-sec if they're AFK and have never bothered to try to find out how EVE works, but in all honesty, so what? Why should we even try to balance EVE around a minority of lazy self-inflicted ignoramuses?


Totally agree, afk, blast away.

Sorry the fact that mining is underpaid is not a valued argument to not do it, a valid argument to make it more competative perhaps.



Actually the argument wasn't that mining isn't lucrative enough but that if it's not intereting enough for you to pay attention, you should do something more engaging. But as a matter of fact I agree with that last sentence of yours. Mining does need to be more competitive. At the moment, the income from mining is so low because it's incredibly easy, ore is superabundant and there's a very low barrier to entry, and mining is, overall, pretty safe.

To increase the income from mining, we will need to either make mineral sources much scarcer, or make mining require considerable player skill, or make mining more dangerous. Probably some combination of the 3 will be required. What are your preferences?

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Sasha Azala
Doomheim
#157 - 2012-01-30 14:03:33 UTC
Alex Sinai wrote:

Who said I'm against that king of ganks on gates? I am for that!
I am against stupid ganking of new players and in proportion of 3 Lokis vs 1 Navitas.




Is it not better that a new player learns early on when they have less to lose?


It does not matter how many ships are ganking that's fairly irrelevant. You can't say it has to be one on one for example as that would be too artifical.



Alex Sinai
Doomheim
#158 - 2012-01-30 14:03:39 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Alex Sinai wrote:


Can noob fly that? No.
Can relatively new player fly that? No if he's not industrial.

Who said I'm against that king of ganks on gates? I am for that!
I am against stupid ganking of new players and in proportion of 3 Lokis vs 1 Navitas.


An iteron V can get 22k ehp and 350 dps tanked


Does newbie know how to fit it or have skills?

Don't let them fly safe!

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#159 - 2012-01-30 14:06:31 UTC
Alex Sinai wrote:

Does newbie know how to fit it or have skills?


If their cargo is worth ganking for then they have played long enough to get the skills to tank an iteron V.

If not, Badger, 14k EHP and 2x t2 warp core stabs, trainable in a matter of weeks.
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#160 - 2012-01-30 14:06:47 UTC
Alex Sinai wrote:
Vimsy Vortis wrote:
Corp added to wardec list.


I will enjoy that wardec dear troll. May be next time it will cause you to check further before throwing out such word. Don't cry when undocking.

I don't think you've seen our killboard.