These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Player Mining Structure
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Honnete Du Decimer
#1 - 2012-01-27 22:11:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Honnete Du Decimer
Same for POS, need SOV or standing .
Anchor mining belt or gravimetric site.
War declare or fight like POCO or POS, is same.
Maximum five ship same corporation are get remote repair automatically when turn on.

HP, resist, and so on is for developer to chose.

Edit

Is no protect mining ship from scramble and web. It only delay destroy for make more fight and chance respond corporation friends. So, very good in low sec, null sec and worm hole but need fix war declaration for make good with high sec.

PMS [:p]
Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
#2 - 2012-01-27 22:47:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Petrus Blackshell
Already implemented, albeit not at belts.

Edit: for some non-sarcastic feedback: This sounds almost reasonable, if it were balanced properly. The anchorable module could be ganked itself, or a ganker could wait cloaked for whatever carebear to come get his ore. It could be the source of some fun pew pew.

Accidentally The Whole Frigate - For-newbies blog (currently on pause)
ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors
#3 - 2012-01-27 22:49:37 UTC
I'm sure the already over saturated mineral market would appreciate passive 23/7 mining.

Not supported.

How did you Veterans start?
Valei Khurelem
#4 - 2012-01-27 22:52:13 UTC
ShahFluffers wrote:
I'm sure the already over saturated mineral market would appreciate passive 23/7 mining.

Not supported.


It isn't minerals that's over saturated, it's ISK that's inflated, get your facts right.

"don't get us wrong, we don't want to screw new players, on the contrary. The core problem here is that tech 1 frigates and cruisers should be appealing enough to be viable platforms in both PvE and PvP."   - CCP Ytterbium
Honnete Du Decimer
#5 - 2012-01-27 22:54:49 UTC
Mineral no make ISK. NPC only one give player ISK. No enough ISK sink.

PMS [:p]
Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
#6 - 2012-01-27 22:56:30 UTC
ShahFluffers wrote:
I'm sure the already over saturated mineral market would appreciate passive 23/7 mining.

Not supported.


Mining needs fixing, everyone loves botting, so automated mining is obviously the right answer. Duh!

Accidentally The Whole Frigate - For-newbies blog (currently on pause)
Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
#7 - 2012-01-27 23:12:24 UTC

+1

Properly balanced, this would be an interesting device. Especially if it doubled as a storage device for minerals. I don't want the deployed module actually MINING, but having it provide a fixed amount of RR for miners could be interesting....

The most important attribute... it needs to be a reasonable target that a small gang could disable/destroy and loot! Taking an extra 10-20 minutes to gank the hulk you caught at the device can create some interesting situations!
Honnete Du Decimer
#8 - 2012-01-28 15:43:48 UTC
It would also have cap limit can have EWAR done to it and can maybe have some module upgrade.

PMS [:p]
Honnete Du Decimer
#9 - 2012-01-30 01:19:04 UTC
Up it is go. Smile

Why people now want to grow idea but only fight like children for discussion thread?

PMS [:p]
Ghazu
#10 - 2012-02-04 16:43:27 UTC
cut the yoda rp talk yo

http://www.minerbumping.com/ lol what the christ https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2299984#post2299984
Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
#11 - 2012-02-04 17:08:28 UTC
Ghazu wrote:
cut the yoda rp talk yo

Learn to be more tolerant of people who know less English than you do, yo.

Accidentally The Whole Frigate - For-newbies blog (currently on pause)
Honnete Du Decimer
#12 - 2012-02-04 17:37:56 UTC
Ghazu wrote:
cut the yoda rp talk yo


Correction: "Cut you - must the talk as Yoda. Yo, fly super dawg" P

PMS [:p]
Ghazu
#13 - 2012-02-05 05:23:51 UTC
Petrus Blackshell wrote:
Ghazu wrote:
cut the yoda rp talk yo

Learn to be more tolerant of people who know less English than you do, yo.

i have a feeling that this person is doing it on purpose like the accountant character Kevin in that episode of The Office (US version).

http://www.minerbumping.com/ lol what the christ https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2299984#post2299984
mxzf
Shovel Bros
#14 - 2012-02-05 06:14:08 UTC  |  Edited by: mxzf
Ghazu wrote:
i have a feeling that this person is doing it on purpose


Confirming, if you look back through his posts, there are a few times where he slipped up and wrote regular posts, and he didn't start doing it 'till the 1/25 anyways, the posts before that were normal.

There's also a noticeable difference between the baby talk that this poster has been using and the errors in sentence construction you would see if the issue was poor grasp of English or Google Translate, if you know what to look for.
Honnete Du Decimer
#15 - 2012-02-05 17:22:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Honnete Du Decimer
Maybe Google just better now? Some time I no so sure. I try keep simple so I know if translate work.

Quote:
For example, it is always possible entrance to the rhetoric of all the words I want. However, once I commit to such a business, how can I ascertain if the translation is correct?


Like this one. I don't know if right words or no.

Edit: Why we talk for this in this thread? Roll

PMS [:p]
Baaa Shakiel
Kinnah Incorporated
#16 - 2012-02-11 20:43:17 UTC
Mining needs fixing, everyone loves botting, so automated mining is obviously the right answer. Duh![/quote]

Fix the Bot Miners first. Then we can talk.

Who Said that Noob Ships SuCK? http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?id=15091146#lostLoadout

Buddy Program Available - Start off with Millions of Isk! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=9874&p=10