These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Please voice specific suggestions for High Security Space
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
#21 - 2012-01-28 03:11:59 UTC
Lyris Nairn wrote:
It seems to me as though that proposal could be combined with an argument for something I've heard discussed as "personal war declarations," within the same sort of functionality. Thanks for linking that proposal, and thanks for posting!



As posted in General Discussion: You are Goon.
You are deceitful.
You wish to destroy as much gaming enjoyment as you can.

You DO NOT represent anyone in high sec.
Tarsus Zateki
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#22 - 2012-01-28 03:20:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Tarsus Zateki
Yes, Goonswarm is interested in destroying the game we enjoy playing Roll.

You asked me once, what was in Room 101. I told you that you knew the answer already. Everyone knows it. The thing that is in Room 101 is the worst thing in the world.
Lyris Nairn
Perkone
Caldari State
#23 - 2012-01-28 03:22:51 UTC
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
Lyris Nairn wrote:
It seems to me as though that proposal could be combined with an argument for something I've heard discussed as "personal war declarations," within the same sort of functionality. Thanks for linking that proposal, and thanks for posting!



As posted in General Discussion: You are Goon.
You are deceitful.
You wish to destroy as much gaming enjoyment as you can.

You DO NOT represent anyone in high sec.

As posted in General Discussion: logically fallacious argument.

Sky Captain of Your Heart

Reddit: lyris_nairn Skype: lyris.nairn Twitter: @lyris_nairn
Akrasjel Lanate
Immemorial Coalescence Administration
Immemorial Coalescence
#24 - 2012-01-28 08:41:07 UTC
Nerft Incursions

Remove the ******** dec shields

CEO of Lanate Industries

Citizen of Solitude
Shriven89
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#25 - 2012-01-28 09:47:46 UTC
The "Surrender" option in wars needs to MEAN something... like the total and immediate dissolution of the corp, and the forced takedown of any structures they have in space...

OR, The contents of the corp wallet. This'd give people more incentive to learn PVP in highsec, and to actually fight back.

If a corp drops alliance whilst at war, they shouldn't be able to rejoin for say, a month.

I love incursions, but I must agree, they do pay out a hell of a lot of money for little risk.

Also, there's gotta be a way to get new incursion players in. As it is, bling fleets are the norm, not regular fleets.
Roosterton
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#26 - 2012-01-28 16:50:46 UTC
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
Lyris Nairn wrote:
It seems to me as though that proposal could be combined with an argument for something I've heard discussed as "personal war declarations," within the same sort of functionality. Thanks for linking that proposal, and thanks for posting!



As posted in General Discussion: You are Goon.
You are deceitful.
You wish to destroy as much gaming enjoyment as you can.

You DO NOT represent anyone in high sec.


As posted in General Discussion: SA has over 160,000 active accounts.
This includes all kinds of people.
They can enjoy games just as well as you can.

Also, can somebody tell me ONE thing that Goons have actually done with the intent of damaging highsec specifically?

I'm waiting...
Ireland VonVicious
Vicious Trading Company
#27 - 2012-01-28 18:04:34 UTC
You have no idea.

You ask for an idea and a vote.

You praise the rifter.

This is political pandering at it's finest and doestn' belong in this area of the forums.
Lady Spank
Get Out Nasty Face
#28 - 2012-01-28 18:05:59 UTC
Lyrias NMairn is a bad person and not to be truset, do not postin herthreads or you will be virused.

(ಠ_ృ) ~ It Takes a Million Years to Become Diamonds So Lets Just Burn Like Coal Until the Sky's Black ~ (ಠ_ృ)
Lyris Nairn
Perkone
Caldari State
#29 - 2012-01-28 19:10:57 UTC
Ireland VonVicious wrote:
You have no idea.

You ask for an idea and a vote.

You praise the rifter.

This is political pandering at it's finest and doestn' belong in this area of the forums.

What you call political pandering I call offering to do the job description of an elected representative.

Sky Captain of Your Heart

Reddit: lyris_nairn Skype: lyris.nairn Twitter: @lyris_nairn
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#30 - 2012-01-28 20:12:17 UTC
Tarsus Zateki wrote:
Yes, Goonswarm is interested in destroying the game we enjoy playing Roll.

Shush, don't reveal our Dear Leader's ultra secret plan for MetaWin of Titans Online: An Internet SuperCap Game.

We really enjoy our null sec mining, don't take it away from us ~~

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?
Lyris Nairn
Perkone
Caldari State
#31 - 2012-01-28 20:14:10 UTC
Dearest goons and friends, please stop trying to "help" me with my political campaign. Thanks in advance, love you.

Sky Captain of Your Heart

Reddit: lyris_nairn Skype: lyris.nairn Twitter: @lyris_nairn
Zixie Draco
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#32 - 2012-01-28 20:19:29 UTC


There's a special tinfoil hat for a goon that wants to know what the needs of the high sec constituency are. That's why I'm voting for Skippermonkey...he already knows the woes and actually cares.

Would you like a kitten?

Lyris Nairn
Perkone
Caldari State
#33 - 2012-01-28 20:24:11 UTC
Zixie Draco wrote:


There's a special tinfoil hat for a goon that wants to know what the needs of the high sec constituency are. That's why I'm voting for Skippermonkey...he already knows the woes and actually cares.

That's just fine. I don't think ill of you at all for having another candidate in mind. But since the possibility exists that I will be elected to the CSM over your objection, and thereby put into a position of representing you whether you like it or not, is it not in your better interest to be sure that I understand the issues that you personally find important? Engaging me in discussion here in this thread is not an affirmation to vote for me, and I don't see how you have anything to lose by voicing your specific suggestions for High Sec.

Sky Captain of Your Heart

Reddit: lyris_nairn Skype: lyris.nairn Twitter: @lyris_nairn
Ebonyte
Noir.
Shadow Cartel
#34 - 2012-01-29 11:34:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Ebonyte
High sec needs a complete revamp.

What I would like to see:

1. Either the removal of Level 4 missions from high sec or have the isk rewards reduced to 20m an hour including all bounties

2. Incursion Lite, Make the rewards half what they are currently for running all incursions in high sec this includes the 10m isk every 6 mins for running them.

3. Change war dec mechanics so once a war starts no corp can leave for 72Hours this will stop people using war mechanics to avoid getting POS destroyed. Make a surrender option available that is enforced. Example pay this amount of isk the war ends and we cannot war dec you for this period of time. Make war decs cost 1m per member of the opposite corp or alliance.

4. stop station hugging, once a ship is either warp scrambled or warp disrupted they should not be able to redock. or make all aggression timers 2mins instead of the current 1.

5. Aggression for neutral logi should be made 2mins

6. if a pilot jumps then logs off to avoid losing a ship it should be made that if a pilot gets a point that the ship is held and killed following the normal game mechanics. This would stop haulers which 90% do of logging once jumping and avoid dieing.
Shazzam Vokanavom
Doomheim
#35 - 2012-01-29 11:38:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Shazzam Vokanavom
Examples below in context in responce to the claims above.

On gameplay:

Lyris Nairn wrote:
Yes please. But you shouldn't let goons play. They use unfair griefer tactics.


On development priorities:

Lyris Nairn wrote:
It's not that the suggestions would negatively impact life in nullsec if implemented, it's that CCP has limited attention span and limited development resources to devote to all possible things. The more things that are on the plate for consideration, the less likely any specific thing will be considered, developed and implemented; so, by putting forth proposals for non-nullsec improvements our dear friend here is lowering the total chance that other proposals which positively effect nullsec will be considered, developed and implemented.


On power blocs and equality:

Lyris Nairn wrote:
What is to stop any other group of people from banding together and having a voice exactly as loud as or louder than the collective voice of Goonswarm? I can think of exactly two things: first, that other groups of people lack the necessary organization or group cohesion to do it; second, that enough other people do not exist. If the first is the case, then one can hardly blame Goonswarm and her allies for being successful. That is generally regarded as a good thing, ya know. If the latter is the case, and literally the voice of Goonswarm is the loudest because there are more of us than there are players in every other group combined, then we honestly deserve to get everything we want because that is how a democracy works. Welcome to the tyranny of the masses.


Realise Lyris' popularity might work in her favour in this channel, but at least the hypocrasy is on record. Blink
Captain Sunnymuffins
Jita Customs and Excise
#36 - 2012-01-29 13:01:52 UTC
I have noticed widespread use of an exploit lately where players are recycling alts for the purpose of ganking to avoid sec status hit. This has been particularly so since the release of the Tornado.

How many people have found themselves ganked by a 20-day old alt lately? It should be quite easy to address from CCP's point of view with a little bit of programming, if the player is using the same account for these alts over and over.
Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#37 - 2012-01-29 13:31:40 UTC
A Goon asking for advice about what to do about High Sec ?

YOU are HIGH, dude...and so is anyone who replies.


Good God..........

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882
Momma Lovebone
Doomheim
#38 - 2012-01-29 14:42:07 UTC
Leave incursions just the way they are....move all lvl 4 agents to low sex.

Either move all your crap around everytime the isk farm moves or go play EvE.
Shazzam Vokanavom
Doomheim
#39 - 2012-01-29 14:45:53 UTC
Momma Lovebone wrote:
..move all lvl 4 agents to low sex.


Wont they get grumpy? I know I would with such an idea. Blink
Momma Lovebone
Doomheim
#40 - 2012-01-29 14:49:51 UTC
Shazzam Vokanavom wrote:
Momma Lovebone wrote:
..move all lvl 4 agents to low sex.


Wont they get grumpy? I know I would with such an idea. Blink



What's wrong with a grumpy munchkin?