These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Issler Dainze for CSM7! Hear the bears roar!

First post
Author
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#161 - 2012-02-01 23:52:15 UTC
Akirei Scytale wrote:
Issler Dainze wrote:


Issler


Your name is over there to the left, under your portrait. Repeating this does nothing except annoy people who read it. Some people use that fact in order to elicit negative responses out of people, but some are just oblivious.

Though, it might just get you an invite to the Tautology Club. They're very selective, only accepting a handful of applicants. You have to prove to them that you would fit in, by making it clear that your share their interests.


Well, I will consider that feedback.
Wolfduke
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#162 - 2012-02-01 23:56:52 UTC
Issler Dainze wrote:


Since I've run a mining corp with great success for 5+ years, I think I have some idea what miners want and it definitely is not "isks per hour".

Issler


Have you yourself mined? Have you canvassed those you claim to lead? What was their response? Do you have a rebuttal to the other points I made?
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#163 - 2012-02-01 23:58:42 UTC
Weaselior wrote:
Issler Dainze wrote:
Weaselior wrote:
Issler Dainze wrote:
The Mittani wrote:


i see you claim we've done no work on mining, when we've spent quite a bit of time discussing the drone alloy situation with ccp and that's in the minutes, too, and is likely to be solved soon. consider me mildly annoyed by your obvious, easily dismissed falsehoods.


That is about nul and not the daily high sec belt miner. When I talk about real improvmements in the mining experience I'm talking about how mining works for the average player.

Noodling with sources of high end minerals will affect markets to be sure but the majority of miners won't notice a thing. They don't mine the ore those minerals come from.

Thanks for a great example of the basic disconnect that CSM 6 has with the average "carebear" miner.

Issler


hello issler

i hate to pull your pants down in front of the entire class but drone alloys are the biggest source of low-ends in the game, the things the average miner mines

I hope this was edifying to you!


I hate to pull your pants down but as I said, that will affect MARKETS! Not the fundamental mining experience that every miner has since mining was put in Eve. You know, the thing that every PvP-er describes when they belittle miners for doing something boring and repetitive.

Learn to read more carefully. I said right up front markets will be affected, but that doesn't change warp to belt, approach rock of interest, target, activate laser...yawn... repeat, do one of a couple of the same things for years with the ore one you fill your hull.... rinse, repeat.

That is the mining experience that needs some improvements, that is what I meant. If you don't see that as the problem then you really have no idea what miners would like to see improve.


Issler


hello issler

i will work on reading you more closely! i did that, and found, once again, you said this:

"Noodling with sources of high end minerals will affect markets to be sure but the majority of miners won't notice a thing. They don't mine the ore those minerals come from."

you may notice that this is horribly wrong because the drone regions - the largest source of low-end minerals - produce the very minerals 'the majority of miners' mine.

in the future when you get 0wned and need to claim you never said any such thing, I recommend waiting a day or two so i won't immediately notice and 0wn you again, and to cut out the offending portion from the quote so your own post doesn't include both the thing you said and a denial of ever saying such thing

now that we've all agreed the CSM has done more to improve the life of the average miner than all CSMs before it, we can and should discuss further ways chairman for life the mittani will improve mining in CSM7 so we can populate the belts with more prey to devour


You are using the isk per hour, not the enjoyment per hour metric. My point is mining as an activity is what needs improvement. Making the bots more money per hour which is a side affect fo this change could just feed the common conspiracy theory that it is the nul power blocks that benefit the most from mining bots.

Start thinking about how the actual experience of mining could be made more challenging and fun and then you can understand what I want to bring to mining. The CSM 6 did nothing to address the fundemental improvements in mining that from direct experience I know that many miners would like.

It is fun per hour that matter most. Once the markets adjust the overal experience for high sec miners will be "same as it ever was".


Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#164 - 2012-02-02 00:02:46 UTC
Issler Dainze wrote:
Making the bots more money per hour which is a side affect fo this change could just feed the common conspiracy theory that it is the nul power blocks that benefit the most from mining bots.


there are no mining bots in high-sec, nope not at all

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#165 - 2012-02-02 00:05:50 UTC
Wolfduke wrote:
Issler Dainze wrote:


Since I've run a mining corp with great success for 5+ years, I think I have some idea what miners want and it definitely is not "isks per hour".

Issler


Have you yourself mined? Have you canvassed those you claim to lead? What was their response? Do you have a rebuttal to the other points I made?


My focus in Eve has been almost 100% mining focused, I have mined myself for years, I have represented miners in 2 previous CSMs.

Sorry about the lack of point by point rebuttal but I generally don't find members of nulsec power blocks to be very close to the feelings of the high sec small corp miners I seek to represent.

If you'd like to make a case that mining has an extensive career path with active and dynamic elements and that real skill can dramatically improve your results like it does in PvX ship combat or that it isn't about fun per hour but only isks per hour I'm happy to debate you.
Akirei Scytale
Okami Syndicate
#166 - 2012-02-02 00:10:54 UTC
I have to say, I heartily approve of Weaselior's subtle trolling.
Wolfduke
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#167 - 2012-02-02 00:12:22 UTC
Issler Dainze wrote:
Wolfduke wrote:
Issler Dainze wrote:


Since I've run a mining corp with great success for 5+ years, I think I have some idea what miners want and it definitely is not "isks per hour".

Issler


Have you yourself mined? Have you canvassed those you claim to lead? What was their response? Do you have a rebuttal to the other points I made?


My focus in Eve has been almost 100% mining focused, I have mined myself for years, I have represented miners in 2 previous CSMs.

Sorry about the lack of point by point rebuttal but I generally don't find members of nulsec power blocks to be very close to the feelings of the high sec small corp miners I seek to represent.

If you'd like to make a case that mining has an extensive career path with active and dynamic elements and that real skill can dramatically improve your results like it does in PvX ship combat or that it isn't about fun per hour but only isks per hour I'm happy to debate you.


PVE is crap, missions are repetitive, rats are repetitive and plexes are only enjoyable for the pot at the end of the rainbow. But people do it because it generates ISK.

Mining is also an isk generating venture. If you wanted to continue on from that then you would manufacture, research, market. To make the argument that mining should be improved because it is boring is to say that all base level isk generating activities should be made more enjoyable - it does not make sense as ISK is a means to an end. If miners want more than click click rinse repeat then the opportunities are there for them.

As for the "nullsec" (note the additional l there) powerblock thing - to think that we are only interested in our own little world is both ignorant and degrading. If you wish to make a stand for CSM then I would expect such a candidate to make full and considered response - not bare minimum posts with the intent to either fob off or disenfranchise the recipient.
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#168 - 2012-02-02 00:17:46 UTC
Andski wrote:
Issler Dainze wrote:
Making the bots more money per hour which is a side affect fo this change could just feed the common conspiracy theory that it is the nul power blocks that benefit the most from mining bots.


there are no mining bots in high-sec, nope not at all


Never said that, just saying there is a popular conspiracy theory that claims the big alliances are the ones botting the most and the folks that hold to than notion will claim the CSM 6 pushed for this change to maximize their profits. I think those same folks go on to connect it to RMT and would then say the money is used to pay for the Quafe filled underground grotto that is under Mittens secret lair.

I could see that maybe being true in part, in that in well controlled alliance held nulsec some alliances would let some members bot, but why would mittens spend a second messing with bots when he controls isk printing moons? So I thnk I'd be surprised if there was any thruth to those rumors. Although if it turns out Mittens does have a Quafe filled underground grotto you heard it here first!

You have to admit that if mining was changes to something that required real time player feedback to maximize yields you could create a system much harder to bot.
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#169 - 2012-02-02 00:29:30 UTC
Wolfduke wrote:


1. I think all miners would disagree there. ISK is ALWAYS the bottom line.

2. Quickly train? Again I beg to differ. Any idea how long it takes to train Exhumers V? Ore processing V? Mining Foreman Links?

3. Unfortunately you have yet to demonstrate or even hint at what this might even begin to entail.

4. It would appear that you don't either.



You are right, no matter where you hail from, you deserve a specifc point by point rebutal.

1. I have run a mining corp for half a decade. It is about fun per hour that keeps people in Eve no matter what you do. So I am sorry but I disagree with you. If you disagree then I would suggest you play a game called "Progress Quest" where you don't have to do anything to accumulate "wealth".

2. Getting those skills to V will increase your profit, however, they don't change anything about what you can fly or how you mine. They do not make it more fun per hour of play. If you are mining to maximize isks per hour I would argue that you should consider other activities in Eve.

3. Imagine the UI presented you with a "mining display" where all elements are presented grpahicallyand you had to adjust elements to keep the laser producing. Depending on how those are shown in the UI it could be made much more difficult to script any sort of effective bot. If CCP was serious about making it extremely hard they could even take measures that would prevent any easy client side hacking that could circumvent that.

4. And you are wrong and my history in game make that clear.

There you go, the rebutal you requested.
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#170 - 2012-02-02 00:36:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Issler Dainze
Wolfduke wrote:


PVE is crap, missions are repetitive, rats are repetitive and plexes are only enjoyable for the pot at the end of the rainbow. But people do it because it generates ISK.

Mining is also an isk generating venture. If you wanted to continue on from that then you would manufacture, research, market. To make the argument that mining should be improved because it is boring is to say that all base level isk generating activities should be made more enjoyable - it does not make sense as ISK is a means to an end. If miners want more than click click rinse repeat then the opportunities are there for them.

As for the "nullsec" (note the additional l there) powerblock thing - to think that we are only interested in our own little world is both ignorant and degrading. If you wish to make a stand for CSM then I would expect such a candidate to make full and considered response - not bare minimum posts with the intent to either fob off or disenfranchise the recipient.



So everyone that PvEs in Eve is "wrong"? Same for "missions and rats". And the only thing you like about plexes is the pay off?

I would suggest that many folks in Eve continue to participate in those activities and just because you don't enjoy them, many folks do.

You're opinion about that is enjoyable in Eve is just that, your opinion. Statisitcs prove you mostly wrong because if you were correct no one would be doing any of those things.

You actually are going a great job of making the case that we need someone with a broader appreciation of how the majority of players in Eve choose to spend their time. Because if the CSM could get CCP to make a game with the kind of feeback you just provided Eve would be dead in a year.

You are entitled to your opinion, you are not entitled to make everyone else adopt it however.

Honestly, given how little you seem to like most of the elements of Eve I'd love to hear what keeps you playing. I'm being serious, what makes Eve worth your time in your opinion?
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#171 - 2012-02-02 00:38:26 UTC
Wolfduke wrote:
I think all miners would disagree there. ISK is ALWAYS the bottom line.


If ISK was indeed the bottom line, they would be running missions for 20M ISK/hr, not 7M ISK/hr. For all the people I know who participate in mining, the main motivation is shooting the breeze, socializing, and participating in a low-attention activity where ISK is a convenient side effect. For w-space in particular, mining is something they do because they literally have nothing else to do: no signatures, no anomalies, waiting for reactions to complete before opening the exit and heading off to market.

That lady who stood up at FanFest 2011 is truly representative of hisec miners. They like their relatively relaxing hypnotic screen saver. That aspect of gameplay is important to them.

Wolfduke wrote:
Quickly train? Again I beg to differ. Any idea how long it takes to train Exhumers V? Ore processing V? Mining Foreman Links?


"Quick" is a relative term in EVE. The SP ceiling for mining is lower than the SP ceiling for, say, T2 cruisers. An Orca is a far less efficient mining boat than an Osprey, much less a Hulk. One of my characters is a perfect hulk pilot, but has fewer SP invested in mining than flying an Oracle with T2 large pulse lasers. Sure, the SP ceiling for T2 frigates is lower, if you stay away from EAS.
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#172 - 2012-02-02 00:53:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Mara Rinn
Seleene wrote:
Mara Rinn wrote:
As for Seleene's comments about "getting things done" — yes, at least under this CSM the trains ran on time. Pity noone knew where the stations where, what time the trains ran, or where the damned things were going.


As analogies go, this pretty much owns and I'm going to steal the hell out of it at some point. PirateBig smile


Hopefully you can combine it with a statement about lifting skirts and not holding cards too close to ones' chest. Lol
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#173 - 2012-02-02 00:54:32 UTC
Mara Rinn wrote:
Wolfduke wrote:
I think all miners would disagree there. ISK is ALWAYS the bottom line.


If ISK was indeed the bottom line, they would be running missions for 20M ISK/hr, not 7M ISK/hr. For all the people I know who participate in mining, the main motivation is shooting the breeze, socializing, and participating in a low-attention activity where ISK is a convenient side effect. For w-space in particular, mining is something they do because they literally have nothing else to do: no signatures, no anomalies, waiting for reactions to complete before opening the exit and heading off to market.

That lady who stood up at FanFest 2011 is truly representative of hisec miners. They like their relatively relaxing hypnotic screen saver. That aspect of gameplay is important to them.

Wolfduke wrote:
Quickly train? Again I beg to differ. Any idea how long it takes to train Exhumers V? Ore processing V? Mining Foreman Links?


"Quick" is a relative term in EVE. The SP ceiling for mining is lower than the SP ceiling for, say, T2 cruisers. An Orca is a far less efficient mining boat than an Osprey, much less a Hulk. One of my characters is a perfect hulk pilot, but has fewer SP invested in mining than flying an Oracle with T2 large pulse lasers. Sure, the SP ceiling for T2 frigates is lower, if you stay away from EAS.


There is a big social aspect to mining in high sec. It is definitely what drives mining in my corp. Cooperative activities with a strong social element. How many times have you met a miner that was in corp "x" but left because there were never any mining ops? We hear that all the time from folks joining us from other corps.

The ability to keep mining an activity that can stay similar to the current experience if that is what the player wants is important. What I'd like to see is a new more active element. So if you want an more challenging and rewarding mining experience you can be more real time focused and get better rewards. Say a new family of realtime active mining lasers that you have to focus on the 'roid. Or another class of mining droids that you control real time. Just some brainstorming of possible new mining experiences.


An idea I still come back to us comets, something that would add some new skills, something you would have to mine "actively" and if done right could become somethat that as your real skill improves so do your outcomes.

There will be some VoR discussions during the elections with miners to see if we can develop some ideas to present to CCP so that maybe the miners can finally get some long overdue attention.

Two step
Aperture Harmonics
#174 - 2012-02-02 01:20:23 UTC
The role of the CSM isn't to play Junior Game Designer and come up with some new system for mining. CCP has people to design stuff. If fact, those people are kinda protective of their jobs and really don't appreciate some amateur telling them what to do.

I would expect someone who has been on the CSM before to know all this.

CSM 7 Secretary CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog

Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#175 - 2012-02-02 01:36:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Issler Dainze
Two step wrote:
The role of the CSM isn't to play Junior Game Designer and come up with some new system for mining. CCP has people to design stuff. If fact, those people are kinda protective of their jobs and really don't appreciate some amateur telling them what to do.

I would expect someone who has been on the CSM before to know all this.


I have long held that the CSM is not mean to be Eve's "feature farries" to CCP. The CSM 6 seems to have changed that to being CCPs thought leaders in Eve. So I would absolutely strongly advocate the idea of new mining experience to CCP as part of the CSM 7.

If you search some of my posts in the general discsussion section (may be the old forums by now) you'll see I made a call out to CCP to ignore the shouty minority and let the game designers do their job and to surprise us with their awesomeness. Sadly, that seemed to fall on deaf ears.

I am just offering ideas in order to start dialogs. I have no expectation that anything I suggest gets implements as suggested. I offered those ideas in response to someone asking to clarify what I meant by new mining experiences.

What my job in the CSM would be is to make sure that CCP comes up with that new mining experience because I believe there is a strong interest in one in the mining player community.

And as for my experience, I have direct experience in the games industry and in fact every time you play Eve you are usng a graphics pipeline I helped invent.

So could you explain again what your post was trying to accomplish?
Trebor Daehdoow
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#176 - 2012-02-02 02:17:13 UTC
The Mittani wrote:
considering Trebor signed on csm5's open letter against incarna more than a year ago i'm going to say you're a sad-sack tryhard troll

I have to step in and correct this blatant falsehood.

I did not "sign on" to the open letter. I was one of the principal authors of the letter.

The entire of CSM5 was united behind the letter, with the exception of one person who changed her mind at the last moment. Our only real differences were about how to best get our message across.

Furthermore, quoting from the letter: "The CSM would like to reiterate that we are not opposed to the development of Incarna; rather we are primarily concerned about the apparent lack of significant planning for a feature CCP properly regards as crucial to the future of the company, and the game we love so much."

IMHO, Incarna -- properly planned and implemented -- could be an interesting addition to the game. But the development cost to do that correctly would be very high, and there are simply too many other things that have much higher bang-for-buck.

I dare say that very few people would give further significant Incarna development a higher priority than, say, improvements in mining (which were encouraged by both CSM5 and CSM6).

Private Citizen • CSM in recovery

The Mittani
State War Academy
Caldari State
#177 - 2012-02-02 02:23:10 UTC
weaselior has a good point: there is literally no candidate on this earth (possible exception being helicity, should he decide to run) that is as keen on seeing hisec belts packed with happy miners as me















so i can murder them and coat my orca in their entrails, and then scam them for protection money, and then kill them again~

~hi~

Seleene
Body Count Inc.
Mercenary Coalition
#178 - 2012-02-02 02:59:48 UTC
I'm just marveling that an off-hand comment I made turned this into a, "NO I WANT BETTER MINING!!!" thread. Cool

2004-2008: Mercenary Coalition Boss

2007-2010: CCP Game Designer | 2011-2013: CSM6 Delegate & CSM7 Chairman

2011-2015: Pandemic Legionnaire

2015- : Mercenary Coalition Boss

Follow Seleene on Twitter!

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#179 - 2012-02-02 03:07:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Alavaria Fera
The Mittani wrote:
so i can murder them and coat my orca in their entrails, and then scam them for protection money, and then kill them again~

They won't be happy for too long if you do that.

But the happiness is transferred from them elsewhere so I guess in total society should not be worse off.
Seleene wrote:
I'm just marveling that an off-hand comment I made turned this into a, "NO I WANT BETTER MINING!!!" thread. Cool

Mining is great, it gets us minerals to build more ships. Well, the drones have them beat, but that might change.

Still, I'm sure industrious miners will make up the shortfall if such a change were to occur, be mining boring or not.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Indahmawar Fazmarai
#180 - 2012-02-02 07:47:46 UTC
The Mittani wrote:
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
The Mittani wrote:
Why should a hisec player support you over Trebor, who has a proven record of consistent support for the same constituency you claim to represent?

Is it that Trebor is skeptical of Incarna, and you prioritize 'ambulation' as something of value?


Bear in mind that this same guy was in favor of Incarna like... let me recall... was it some 9 months ago? Surely i could stretch my memory and conduct a succesufl search for the written evidence of it (internet barely deletes and never forgets).


considering Trebor signed on csm5's open letter against incarna more than a year ago i'm going to say you're a sad-sack tryhard troll

your vote and your 'issue' literally does not matter to the playerbase, which is why subs are going up post-crucible rather than nosediving during your precious WiS experience

i and basically everyone else playing this game welcome your emnity and rage with delight as we tool around in our newly-revamped and balanced and lag-free spaceship game (about spaceships)

try second life~



Oh, my excuses for the misunderstanding: i was talking about you, Mittani, not about Trevor. It was in that petty op-eds you write for some online review.