These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Issler Dainze for CSM7! Hear the bears roar!

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Taiwanistan
#1001 - 2012-03-26 03:51:43 UTC
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
None ofthe Above wrote:
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
Interesting conclussion #1:

As CSM got 10,000 vots more than CSM 6, and of those 10,000, 8,500 are rigged alt votes, this means that there's 1,500 actually "new" voters.

Then, the "new bloc" candidates, Issler and Hans, gathered some 4,000 votes.

Dunno how many votes for Issler and Hans are "reallocated" votes, but provided how have risen the numbers for non-bloc candidates, and how some candidates have lost a helluva votes (Seleene lost 1,000 votes himself alone), I guesstimate that CSM 7 would had lost votes compared to CSM6 if weren't for the new bloc candidates and the rigging bloc alts

Think of it. 10,000 new votes, 8,500 are rigged ones, and candidates aimed to people who never voted before got as much as 4,000 votes themselves.

Smells of FAIL.


Wait what? While I suspect you may be at least partially correct here. From where are you drawing the conclusion there where 8500 "rigged" alt votes?

And how do you define "rigged"? As far as I know we are allowed to vote freely on all qualifying accounts, what makes a vote rigged?


8,477 votes were cast by players between 30 and 250 days old, and they are the largest individual age range.

Dunno you, but I find interesting how those guys got to figure that there is a CSM, what it means, and how to vote, and bothered to vote, in less than 8 months into the game. Sepcially when much older players essentially don't care to vote.

Unless they are -oh god- alts created specially for the purpose of voting someone. I think that a per-candidate voter age breakup would be a funny thing to see...


stick to suggesting new earrings and /dance and play with your barbie facemaker you dumb runt

TA on wis: "when we have a feature that is its own functional ecosystem of gameplay then hooks into the greater ecosystem of EVE as a whole, and it provides good replayability."
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#1002 - 2012-03-26 18:30:51 UTC
I want to continue to thank the folks still posting relevant analysis and the trolls as well!

This will be the largest CSM 7 thread!!! Big smile

Issler
Carl Thunderthise
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#1003 - 2012-03-26 23:45:27 UTC
Karl Hobb wrote:
No one cares about missioners or miners. Null-sec and sovereignty drives the game. This is why a vote for Issler was a wasted vote.


I just laughed so hard I blew tea out of my nose.
If no one cares about miners or missioners then why did candidates supporting them get into the CSM?
How can a vote for Issler be wasted if she gets into the CSM to support us?
I love how you guys just can't bear that she got into the CSM despite the endless prating that she'd never manage.

I'm proud to have voted for her.
Eben Harper
Doomheim
#1004 - 2012-03-26 23:50:33 UTC
Carl Thunderthise wrote:
Karl Hobb wrote:
No one cares about missioners or miners. Null-sec and sovereignty drives the game. This is why a vote for Issler was a wasted vote.


I just laughed so hard I blew tea out of my nose.
If no one cares about miners or missioners then why did candidates supporting them get into the CSM?
How can a vote for Issler be wasted if she gets into the CSM to support us?
I love how you guys just can't bear that she got into the CSM despite the endless prating that she'd never manage.

I'm proud to have voted for her.


Likewise
Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
#1005 - 2012-03-27 00:09:53 UTC
Carl Thunderthise wrote:
If no one cares about miners or missioners then why did candidates supporting them get into the CSM?
How can a vote for Issler be wasted if she gets into the CSM to support us?
I love how you guys just can't bear that she got into the CSM despite the endless prating that she'd never manage.

Do you think people outside of the game sub up because they heard someone talk about mining and missioning? If so, you're ******* stupid; no potential subscribers give a **** about your missioning and mining stories. In order for a PvP game like EVE to grow, you need space drama.

A professional astro-bastard was not available so they sent me.
Indahmawar Fazmarai
#1006 - 2012-03-27 06:39:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Indahmawar Fazmarai
Karl Hobb wrote:
Carl Thunderthise wrote:
If no one cares about miners or missioners then why did candidates supporting them get into the CSM?
How can a vote for Issler be wasted if she gets into the CSM to support us?
I love how you guys just can't bear that she got into the CSM despite the endless prating that she'd never manage.

Do you think people outside of the game sub up because they heard someone talk about mining and missioning? If so, you're ******* stupid; no potential subscribers give a **** about your missioning and mining stories. In order for a PvP game like EVE to grow, you need space drama.


Yay, like Mittens calling for the cyberharrassment of a guy so he committs suicide... that sure makes for some briliant headlines.
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#1007 - 2012-03-27 18:53:42 UTC
Karl Hobb wrote:
Carl Thunderthise wrote:
If no one cares about miners or missioners then why did candidates supporting them get into the CSM?
How can a vote for Issler be wasted if she gets into the CSM to support us?
I love how you guys just can't bear that she got into the CSM despite the endless prating that she'd never manage.

Do you think people outside of the game sub up because they heard someone talk about mining and missioning? If so, you're ******* stupid; no potential subscribers give a **** about your missioning and mining stories. In order for a PvP game like EVE to grow, you need space drama.



Some of the most popular games today attract players because of things equivalent to "mining and missioning". You are the idiot who is looking through the telescope backwards at the gaming industry.

Sorry folks don't agree with your narrow view of gamers, thank goodness folks in Eve that like those elements of play are making their voice heard because the Eve you'd like will never grow past where it is today.

Issler
Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
#1008 - 2012-03-27 19:22:00 UTC
Issler Dainze wrote:
Some of the most popular games today attract players because of things equivalent to "mining and missioning". You are the idiot who is looking through the telescope backwards at the gaming industry.

Sorry folks don't agree with your narrow view of gamers, thank goodness folks in Eve that like those elements of play are making their voice heard because the Eve you'd like will never grow past where it is today.

Subscription stats seem to say otherwise.

Are there any other purely PvP free-market simulations where nearly all of the content is player-generated? if there are, you rarely hear of them. That's what makes EVE special. There are ****-tons of games out there with realistic boob-bouncing barbies you can dress in a myriad of latex fashions and emote in complete safety. Thankfully CCP seems committed to their vision of a harsh universe.

I'd also like to note that I find it quite unbecoming of a CSM member to be calling people idiots, much less blocking them on the forums. You are reinforcing a lot of player's opinion of you as a myopic candidate.

A professional astro-bastard was not available so they sent me.