These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Thinking about becoming CSM chair...

First post
Author
Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#21 - 2012-01-25 01:41:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Poetic Stanziel
Xenuria wrote:
As far as supporters I seriously doubt I would have ANY problems finding at least 100 people to outright and zealously support me.
You seem, kinda, full of yourself.

BTW, you don't run for the CSM Chair. You run for the CSM. If you get the most votes, you get the Chair position (unless you decide to give it up.)

Good luck beating The Mittani. I believe he's a shoe-in for Chairman again.
Nephilius
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#22 - 2012-01-25 01:59:46 UTC
Severian Autarch wrote:
Xenuria wrote:
I was joking around with a few bros from CnP and said maybe I would run for CSM chair. To my surprise an overwhelming number of people jumped at me with support and encouragement.

. . .

I already looked at the CSM evelopedia and did not find any clear criteria for joining. Sorry if this thread is in the wrong location can somebody point me in the right direction and tell me why I am getting this error?


You can't run for CSM directly. You first need to be an active, paying member of the "somethingawful" forums for at least three months (or shorter if you find a sponsor). Then you can apply again for CSM.


Oooo, zing!
"If."
Brock Nelson
#23 - 2012-01-25 02:18:44 UTC
I want a free account too

Signature removed, CCP Phantom

JC Anderson
RED ROSE THORN
#24 - 2012-01-25 02:22:45 UTC  |  Edited by: JC Anderson
Look over the recent minutes and you'll find the part where CCP wants to make some changes to the regulations when it comes to qualifying as a CSM candidate.

Likewise, a lot might change prior to the next CSM election, and the rules of today may not be the same by then.

EDIT: I'll just post that part of the minutes here. Give me a moment to pull them to text.
Ioci
Bad Girl Posse
#25 - 2012-01-25 02:27:05 UTC
When all the CSM's are hot blonde strippers, I want to become a CSM chair too.

R.I.P. Vile Rat

JC Anderson
RED ROSE THORN
#26 - 2012-01-25 02:36:37 UTC  |  Edited by: JC Anderson
The CSM
Present: CCP Xhagen, CCP Diagoras

During this session CCP detailed three changes to the CSM project (all these changes will also be listed in a devblog that will be forthcoming in the buildup for the upcoming election). While these proposals are not very controversial as such, CCP felt it was necessary to include the CSM in the discussion and do this in cooperation with the council, rather than forcefully implement them.

The first change mentioned was that a candidate would need to demonstrate he/she had X supporters to appear on the ballot, where X is a number between 50 and 500. The proposed method of gathering these supporters is to write a nomination post on the Jita Park Speakers Corner and then count the number of supports the post received. If the candidate receives at least X supports, they appear on the final ballot.

The reasoning behind this is to reduce the number of candidates to a more manageable level, down from 70 to perhaps 30-40. (although CCP doesn't have a strong preference towards a particular number). The number of candidates can (and does) have an influence on voters, being presented with a huge list of candidates is intimidating and having to form an informed opinion about 70 candidates is daunting to say the least. CCP expressed the desire that the supporters' number should be meaningful without being crippling, and asked for feedback as to what a reasonable threshold might be. The CSM responded in turn that if (for example) a candidate cannot get the support of 50-100 people there is not much change of that candidate getting the 1500-2000 votes needed to actually get on the council. The CSM did however agree with CCP's concern that the 'little' guys could potentially be excluded from the race, i.e. highsec dwellers might not get the support they needed to be on the ballot.

The second change proposed was to drop the concept of alternate in the CSM, but only fly the top 7 available members to Iceland (instead of the top 9 as with the previous CSMs). If a voting needs to happen within the CSM, the top 9 members available at that time would perform that vote (the CSM white paper states that the minimum of 7 members are needed to hold a legal vote).

The third change proposed was changing the election system from the current form to a single transferrable vote (STV) (i.e. any surplus or unused votes are transferred according to the voter's stated preferences should their highest preference not need them or not make it in). The timeframe for this change would be the election in 2013 (thus, no changes would be made for the next CSM election).

**Some text excluded. For the entire transcript see page 4 and 5 of the most recent CSM summit minutes**
Bernie Nator
Seal Club Six
Plug N Play
#27 - 2012-01-25 02:41:33 UTC
People, people. Do the right thing. Vote me for CSM. I'll be sure to give everyone a voice. From the high seccers to the low, from the holers to the nulls! I shall speak for the people, and EVE will be a fair balanced game for all!
JC Anderson
RED ROSE THORN
#28 - 2012-01-25 02:43:53 UTC
Bernie Nator wrote:
People, people. Do the right thing. Vote me for CSM. I'll be sure to give everyone a voice. From the high seccers to the low, from the holers to the nulls! I shall speak for the people, and EVE will be a fair balanced game for all!


Don't you remember Ankhesentapemkah? The queen of spoons? :P
Mr M
Sebiestor Tribe
#29 - 2012-01-25 08:07:18 UTC
If something like this happens it's probably a lot better to send a mail to support and ask. Just saying.

Share your experience

Write for the EVE Tribune

www.eve-tribune.com

Grumpy Owly
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#30 - 2012-01-25 08:25:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Grumpy Owly
JC Anderson wrote:
Quoting from CSM minutes: The CSM did however agree with CCP's concern that the 'little' guys could potentially be excluded from the race, i.e. highsec dwellers might not get the support they needed to be on the ballot.


Which means, the null sec puppet masters who want to control everything "recognise" that it may be difficult for certain parts of EvE to get noticed but then of course do nothing to make the process any more equal. Since, just because they confirmed the notion of inequality with CCP doesn't mean they will do anything to address the issue. And they say they are not corrupt?
Darius III
Interstellar eXodus
#31 - 2012-01-25 09:16:16 UTC
Certainly Xenuria has demonstrated ample knowledge of Eve as well as having given us much in the way of Quality posting. I think the nay sayers are overlooking your qualifications and contributions that all of us have reaped the benefits of. Anyone with half a brain can see that this is a good idea...

Hmmm

Rico Minali
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#32 - 2012-01-25 09:18:04 UTC
But people will sit on you, hat if its someone really really heavy?

Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing.

Zowie Powers
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#33 - 2012-01-25 10:34:18 UTC
Before you attempt for a win, be sure your ego could take a loss. Even the game's biggest troll community rejected you, don't count those troll votes just yet.

You're just not funny enough.

ATX: The best of the rest.

Lors Dornick
Kallisti Industries
#34 - 2012-01-25 10:59:09 UTC
Xenuria wrote:

My final semester at college ends some time in april


So in other words you are a kid.

CCP Greyscale: As to starbases, we agree it's pretty terrible, but we don't want to delay the entire release just for this one factor.

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#35 - 2012-01-25 11:28:11 UTC
i can easily get 100 supporters

i'm a popular guy, you see~

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#36 - 2012-01-25 11:28:42 UTC
not that i plan on running because ahahaha iceland

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Previous page12