These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Why people choose High sec

Author
I Like Characters
Doomheim
#241 - 2012-01-25 04:22:55 UTC
Caghji wrote:
Sicex wrote:


The presence of ganking and Hulkageddon is an attempt to bring the PVP focus of EVE into the realm of mining. Otherwise, miners only partake in PVP activities when they attempt to sell minerals on the market.



harrassing miners by can flipping in hisec - and camping in low /null sec takes it to the next level



That just makes PvP sound like a little boy running around the playground pulling on girl's pigtails. There's no challenge, no hope for a fight. Just running around screaming "PAY ATTENTION TO MEEEEEEEEEE" and hoping someone takes you more seriously than you are.

I wish can flippers could be forced to play in 0.0 for a month, dragged kicking and screaming for their safe little holes in highsec so they can experience a world where there are no calculated losses and they can't avoid additional risk. That would be nice...
Caghji
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#242 - 2012-01-25 04:47:31 UTC
I Like Characters wrote:
[quote=Caghji]

That just makes PvP sound like a little boy running around the playground pulling on girl's pigtails. There's no challenge, no hope for a fight. Just running around screaming "PAY ATTENTION TO MEEEEEEEEEE" and hoping someone takes you more seriously than you are.



\o/ - finally - someone has understood what PvP is about Pirate- what else did you think PvP was about? - please don't say it was some sort of noble heroic cause Roll ? -

However you are wrong about challenge and no hope for a fight - there is plenty of hope for a fight - that miner very likely flies more than a hulk .......

Again people want 'fair.'.......why? - EvE is NOT suppose to be 'fair'.....................if you want goon's tech moons - then stop being a lazy *** - get off your fat backside - and get organising a more powerful alliance to take the moons from them - otherwise STFU and GTFO.........

I don't like the goons - I don't like lazy blinkereed whingers - I don't like RTM scammers/botters

I do like scheming and long term planning - and i respect my enemies who do the same.....


Hainnz
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#243 - 2012-01-25 04:58:47 UTC
Sicex wrote:
You do understand player versus player does NOT exclusively mean combat right?

And you should go on the market forums and tell them they are not engaged in a player versus player activity. The markets are in some ways more cutthroat than actual combat.

The presence of ganking and Hulkageddon is an attempt to bring the PVP focus of EVE into the realm of mining. Otherwise, miners only partake in PVP activities when they attempt to sell minerals on the market.


So which is it? Are miners PVPers or not? Using such a broad definition as you do, miners ARE engaging in PVP when they mine and sell their mins on the market. That's not good enough? Is it an affront that they might not think they are involved in PVP?

Actually, that definition of PVP would include most everything people do playing a game like WOW. Those raiders killing Ragnaros (or w/e) aren't killing a scripted overgrown mob with 40 of their closest friends for the camaraderie and sublime challenge of it, they are doing it to be better than the other guilds and players doing the same (or failing).

So if everyone in EVE is engaged in PVP or some sort or another, then what's the problem with miners or mission runners?
Sicex
#244 - 2012-01-25 12:29:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Sicex
Mining and mission running have their place as stepping stones and as others have stated miners are very much PVPers.

The main beef is with the indignant attitude of said miners that somehow they are above ship to ship combat or that they should somehow be left alone from that. The truly broken element of the game is one of the only ones that violates the entire Risk Vs. Reward structure of EVE: Incursions.

The attitude of the Incursion runners that they don't have to engage in PVP by any means is pretty alarming if that is what is being generated in the 'new breed' of players and new player communities. As I've said before, if Incursions are meant to be EVE's endgame - then by the end of EVE you had better be ready to fire your guns at someone.

It's that non-combat, non-conflict mindset of an EVE player that needs to be squashed and the crux of the argument comes when the conflict-averse crowd starts changing CCP's game of conflict into Hello Kitty Island.
TheBlueMonkey
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#245 - 2012-01-25 12:33:42 UTC
Tian Nu wrote:
I choose highsec because CONCORD protect me.


Lol
Prince Kobol
#246 - 2012-01-25 12:44:00 UTC
Umega wrote:
I demand the title of this thread be changed to 'Assumption vs Truth'.

Can lead a donkey to water, can't make the donkey drink.



I would just like to point something out, this is completely untrue.

You can make a donkey drink.. its just a matter of voltage Big smile
Laina Delapore
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#247 - 2012-01-25 13:36:41 UTC
Someone in here was moaning about Goons delivering depressing propaganda.

They clearly need to go and watch this
Hemmo Paskiainen
#248 - 2012-01-25 13:41:50 UTC
Aruken Marr wrote:
Ok so here's the thing: A lot a people really shouldn't talk about things they know very little about. Im gonna go out on a limb here and say the op's opinion is a little skewed.

1. If you're being forced into joining cta's way past your bed time, either you need to grow some stones and learn to just say no or you're in the wrong alliance. I turn up to ops when I can for as long as I can (edit- and neither do I feel pressured when I cant attend). They're pretty damn fun most the time besides the glaring let downs.

2. Theres plenty of opportunities for pvp on smaller scales. Its not all just blobs. If it's all just blobs for you, I think youre doing it wrong.

3. Moon goo. I honestly couldn't give a flying **** about how much isk comes in through this. I'm getting my fun through regular pvp and I get reimbursed when I lose ships (granted they aren't totally ******** losses). I suck goon balls that's how you get access to all that tech isk. Some reimbursements are laid out so you actually profit from losing your ship in cta's as long as you've insured it.

4. I have enough time to make enough isk to pay for what I want. Granted im not massively rich never have been. Yet again I never understood the mentallity of amassing as many digits in my wallet as i can in a game. Isk's there to be spent unless youre saving up for something.

5. Its a lot more casual than what little Ms. Information up there would have you think.


Any more, for any more?


Fixed, tbh High Sec should be nerfed. Concord should get days off in a year to show high sec puppies there is a more fun aspect to the game. It is possible to live in null sec while only playing a few hours a week. Some ppl you just need to trow into the deep

Edit: i hvnt been in high sec for over 3 yrs :p

If relativity equals time plus momentum, what equals relativity, if the momentum is minus to the time?

Aruken Marr
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#249 - 2012-01-25 14:11:55 UTC
Hemmo Paskiainen wrote:
Aruken Marr wrote:
I suck goon balls that's how you get access to all that tech isk.


Fixed


HHAHAHAHAHaahahahahaa... no.
Rikki Sals
BioLogistics
#250 - 2012-01-25 14:25:24 UTC
I like high sec because it's where the largest markets are found.
Prince Kobol
#251 - 2012-01-25 15:17:30 UTC
This is a argument that can never be won by either sides simply because there is no one reason.

You could ask 100 players why they chose not to live in null full time and there is a good chance you will get 100 different reasons, all of them valid.

After this is supposed to be a sandbox where everyone is suppose to be free to do what they like and where they like within the constraints that have been put in place by CCP.

The strange things is I see many people have a go at the goons and yet if their alliance sucked that bad, then they wouldn't have the members they do and be as successful as they have been.

Also I have seen Andski make this point many times before, you can not force people into null, you have want them to come to null.

This is the hard part because there is no one thing that will make this happen, it will be a number of different things.

The ability fund themselves would be an important part but this is something which only CCP can fix.

The other things which people have mentioned, like wanting to be part of something and not just a drone, which is a fair and valid complaint simply because they can only talk about what they have experienced, can only be solved by the alliances themselves.

Its alight if your part of the goons, but that is very little consolation as if your not part of the SA forums you are never going to be a goon and even if you are, its certainty doesn't guarantee anything.

You could be part of TEST but that is mainly for people who really really really want to be goons but never will be.

So who does that leave us with?

CVA.... next please

I don't see any null sec alliances out there campaigning to get new blood in, I see a few who love noobs just so they can scam the **** out the them and then complain players don't want to come to null.. well what do you think is going to happen.

I'm sorry to say but I kind of wish there was an alliance which was the same as the goons but not the goons.

At the very least you know the goons know how to have fun Big smile
Xuse Senna
Nocturnal Romance
Cynosural Field Theory.
#252 - 2012-01-25 15:46:59 UTC
WH's <3

http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/7501/mindgamesceptionfinaldr.jpg

Hainnz
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#253 - 2012-01-25 15:57:36 UTC
Sicex wrote:
It's that non-combat, non-conflict mindset of an EVE player that needs to be squashed and the crux of the argument comes when the conflict-averse crowd starts changing CCP's game of conflict into Hello Kitty Island.


Well, you sound like you have all the answers then.
Lyron-Baktos
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#254 - 2012-01-25 16:01:16 UTC
pretty lame post tbh. People choose hi-sec because that is where they enjoy themselves the most
Zixie Draco
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#255 - 2012-01-25 16:37:58 UTC
Lyron-Baktos wrote:
People choose hi-sec because that is where they enjoy themselves the most



..oh dear...


Would you like a kitten?

Kiran
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#256 - 2012-01-25 17:50:56 UTC
I lived in sov space and it was ok for a time. Then the eliteist pvp'ers in the alliance and my corp started to call CTA's at all hours and expected you to be in them at least 2 or 3 times a week. I was even told by one person that if I had more than 300 million ISK in my wallet I wasn't doing enough pvp and loosing ships.

With talks of a 100% tax rate to make sure you went to the CTA's I said **** it and left. I enjoy null sec I also enjoy high sec and wormholes industry etc. I pay for the game and I will not have someone dictate to me how to play it. If they want to tell me how to play the game then they can jolly well pay for my accounts.
Bugsy VanHalen
Society of lost Souls
#257 - 2012-01-25 17:51:10 UTC
I have spent over a year living in null sec but currently live in high sec.

This is not because I couldn't handle null sec or because I didn't like null sec.

The truth is living in null sec and being stable enough to really enjoy your game time requires a fair amount of time invested into the game.

I really like living in null sec, however after my wife had our second kid (now have two under 3 years old) I have very little time to spend in game. hrad to suport yourself in null when you only log in a few hours a week.

Maintaining control over a couple of systems is a very costly activity for a small alliance. Every member needs to pull their own weight. Our alliance had a good set up where the alliance maintained all POSes, upgrades, jumpbridges, Sov fees etc. And we did not have any good moons to pay those bills.

Each corp in the alliance was required to donate 30m per month per active member to the alliance coffers. each corp was responsible for how they raised those funds. Some held corp ratting/mining/raiding ops a couple times a month where all profits went to the corp, some required each member to pay their share. 30m per month is nothing when you are living in well upgraded systems. you could make that in 30 mins of ratting. but we had enough members that it payed for everything. If you thing maintaining a null sec alliance with sov space is easy you know very little about the SOV mechanics in EVE.

Well back to the story, with my move to minimal activity and not foreseeing a change in schedule that would allow me to spend the needed time to support myself in null I moved back to high sec. In high sec my expenses are minimal and there are plenty of activities that can be done semi afk and others that can generate decent passive income.

In null it is very hard to participate in CTA's when you can have a kid start crying and need to go AFK with absolutely no notice to the fleet. Does not go over well with most FC's. Living in high sec I can go AFK at any time with very little risk of losing a ship. most of my income comes from a self maintained research POS and some manufacturing. mostly passive. I run missions when I can, use research agents, Do PI some in low sec and work at building up my skills so that when I have the time to go back to Null sec I will be able to contribute much more to my corp and alliance.

High sec is not just for carebears for me it was an alternative to taking a total break from the game.
Zyress
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#258 - 2012-01-25 18:17:27 UTC
Andski wrote:
Salicaz wrote:
All the real pvpers are in low sec anyway.


camping gates is the pinnacle of elite pvp


Yes bubbling them is soooo much better
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#259 - 2012-01-25 18:33:06 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Vyl Vit wrote:
Tippia wrote:
So, basically, people choose highsec because they don't know any better?

Sounds reasonable…

Nice try. No cigar. Conveniently overlook the gist is returning from 0.0 to have fun playing a game, not staying out there to suck up to a handful of bigshots that own you coming and going.
Yeah, no. That would work if all these people actually tried out not-highsec, but they don't. They just stay in highsec because they hear stories like this and don't actually go check for themselves.

They choose it because they don't know better.


True for many high sec people I've known. It was true for me in the beginning, in my 1st 6 months of playing eve I was scared to death of the thought of 0.0. I ran missions for the most part and that's it. A buddy of mine had some friends in BoB so I put together a brutix they gave me the fit for and went on a roam with them. My 1st pvp kill was an IRC guy, my pvp death was to the other 30 IRC guys also there lol.

Faction Warfare is what got me into pvp, and the corp I joined went to null sec and I went with them. I have now lived in every part of null sec except drone regions, shot every kind of rat, been in some epic battles (and fought epic lag) ect ect. I am such a creature of null I don't even LIKE low sec, high sec or wormholes (I have toons in all of those areas, i like to make isk and sometimes get bored).

Looking back I realize how silly it was to be afraid of null sec, but at the time everyone was talking about how dangerous it was, and when you are new losing a ship is a big deal.
Tza Omi
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#260 - 2012-01-25 18:53:20 UTC
I live in Hisec because its the only place I can feel reasonably safe wearing my +5 implants 24/7 for training purposes, it gives easy access to markets, and boring as level 4's are they are light years more interesting that sitting around in my hangar or in my Bomber in Nullsec waiting for something to happen. I'm posting on an alt because I'm disappointed in my alliance and in my corp. They are headquartered out in NPC Nullsec and they have recently been wardecced. Their directive was everybody move to nullsec and stop any hisec operations till the wardecc is over. I checked the killboard for the the corp wardeccing us and they were all in Highsec, so I asked if they were planning to come to hisec and fight, no they are not, they answered because this "carebear" corp wardeccing us will not leave highsec. These ppl are the same ones I hear in alliance chat talking smack about carebears all the time, but now they are going to sit safely behind their lo and nullsec gates and bubbles and hide from some carebears that want to fight them. Frankly I'm disgusted and when I find another corp , i''ll no longer be with these posers