These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Rage with the CSM.

Author
Ruthless Erection
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#81 - 2012-01-22 19:01:08 UTC
Renan Ruivo wrote:
Cyzlaki wrote:
In all fairness, they're doing a good job and some of them actually care about the game and want to make it better.

Vote Darius III for CSM!


I do believe that all of them want ot make EVE a better game. Though i can't say theres even one of them that knows how to make it a better game in all aspects, naturally.


Thats a blatant lie. Goons will wreck this game. They wrecked the economy as well.


Here's something I'd like an official CCP member to comment on, including these fucktwit CSMs.


You speak about nerfing Incursions? Why? Why not nerf Tech moons? OH WAIT, Everyone in a CSM position is apart of an alliance that owns tech or is a pet of a tech moon owner. I forgot, my bad. Silly questions...


Seriously, Nerf tech before you nerf Incursions.
Grumpy Owly
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#82 - 2012-01-22 19:10:35 UTC
Renan Ruivo wrote:
So the CSM are giving input and feedback about stuff they don't understand and shouldn't be giving feedback on. Well this is definatly a big issue with the CSM, but it isn't new.

And it has already been estabilished that the advantages behind having the CSM outweight the issues with it. People need to remember that the feedback provided by the CSM is not final, and if CCP goes forward with something that passes through them but doesn't fly with the community as a whole, they will read what you have to say on the forums.

I don't believe i ever saw a feature that wasn't welcome by the community, but still got implemented because "The CSM said it would be ok to do it".


Making quite the generalisation that the majority of people are in any way unhappy with the idea of what CSM stands for.

The problem people seem to be commenting on in the main is the corrupt individuals on the CSM whose intentions have selfish interest. As a result it's this belief that the CSM are not fully representating player interests and likley causing headaches for CCP in the process who generously offered the opportunity for the council to help them with improving EvE holistically.
Renan Ruivo
Forcas armadas
Brave Collective
#83 - 2012-01-22 19:11:36 UTC
Ruthless Erection wrote:
Renan Ruivo wrote:
Cyzlaki wrote:
In all fairness, they're doing a good job and some of them actually care about the game and want to make it better.

Vote Darius III for CSM!


I do believe that all of them want ot make EVE a better game. Though i can't say theres even one of them that knows how to make it a better game in all aspects, naturally.


Thats a blatant lie. Goons will wreck this game. They wrecked the economy as well.


Here's something I'd like an official CCP member to comment on, including these fucktwit CSMs.


You speak about nerfing Incursions? Why? Why not nerf Tech moons? OH WAIT, Everyone in a CSM position is apart of an alliance that owns tech or is a pet of a tech moon owner. I forgot, my bad. Silly questions...


Seriously, Nerf tech before you nerf Incursions.


You know, like it has been estabilished in the previous pages i haven't read the Incursion discussions. Not that it would help if i did, since i know next to nothing about how they work.


But i can tell you that i've both read and am interested about what they say about null economy. Read it again, they want to re-balance r64 moons. So anything they will do will naturally be a tech moon nerf. Like re-balancing assault ships and interceptors was an automatic nerf to the Dramiel.

And about having goons in the CSM. Well, this CSM has pushed for supercapital nerfs more than any CSM before it. And goons have one of the biggest supercapital fleets in the game.


The CSM also has a "russian overlord" member, and he was in favor of switching drone alloys for drone bounty.

The world is a community of idiots doing a series of things until it explodes and we all die.

Anndy
The Evocati
#84 - 2012-01-22 19:13:14 UTC
Ruthless Erection wrote:
Renan Ruivo wrote:
Cyzlaki wrote:
In all fairness, they're doing a good job and some of them actually care about the game and want to make it better.

Vote Darius III for CSM!


I do believe that all of them want ot make EVE a better game. Though i can't say theres even one of them that knows how to make it a better game in all aspects, naturally.


Thats a blatant lie. Goons will wreck this game. They wrecked the economy as well.


Here's something I'd like an official CCP member to comment on, including these fucktwit CSMs.


You speak about nerfing Incursions? Why? Why not nerf Tech moons? OH WAIT, Everyone in a CSM position is apart of an alliance that owns tech or is a pet of a tech moon owner. I forgot, my bad. Silly questions...


Seriously, Nerf tech before you nerf Incursions.


yep god forbid anything but null sec can actually make isk

CSM bitching about incursions yet they sit on tech moons which is a very passive 10 bill per month per moon, atleast incursions actually require you to do something
Renan Ruivo
Forcas armadas
Brave Collective
#85 - 2012-01-22 19:38:59 UTC
Anndy wrote:
CSM bitching about incursions yet they sit on tech moons which is a very passive 10 bill per month per moon



Hmm.. okay..

Meeting Minutes wrote:


The CSM spoke critically of the technetium bottleneck and the need to rebalance moon income. The
CSM noted that alliance income should be tied more closely to actually possessing territory rather
than sov-independent income sources like moons.

[...]

The CSM noted that there is too much emphasis on moons
particularly technetium, as a source of alliance income

[...]

The CSM noted that if moons were
medium-value sources of income they would still drive conflict, but not have an overwhelming
imbalance like technetium presently does. The CSM noted that line members do not particularly
enjoy fighting over moons.

[...]




Most CSM's are members of alliances that hold the most amount of technetium moons in the game.

The world is a community of idiots doing a series of things until it explodes and we all die.

Ispia Jaydrath
Reib Autonomous Industries
#86 - 2012-01-22 19:43:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Ispia Jaydrath
Quote:
Here's something I'd like an official CCP member to comment on, including these fucktwit CSMs.

You speak about nerfing Incursions? Why? Why not nerf Tech moons? OH WAIT, Everyone in a CSM position is apart of an alliance that owns tech or is a pet of a tech moon owner. I forgot, my bad. Silly questions...

Quote:
Seriously, Nerf tech before you nerf Incursions.

yep god forbid anything but null sec can actually make isk

CSM bitching about incursions yet they sit on tech moons which is a very passive 10 bill per month per moon, atleast incursions actually require you to do something


Jesus **** you are terrible at the internet

Quote:
The CSM spoke critically of the technetium bottleneck and the need to rebalance moon income. The CSM noted that alliance income should be tied more closely to actually possessing territory rather than sov-independent income sources like moons.


Quote:
The CSM stated that a sovholding alliance’s primary income should stem from the territory itself, such as the taxation of line member’s ratting income or Planetary Interaction, rather than from sovless income sources such as moons. The CSM noted that there is too much emphasis on moons, particularly technetium, as a source of alliance income.


EDIT: Redundant post to emphasize how bad you are.
Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#87 - 2012-01-22 19:44:04 UTC
nerf tech .. well actually change T2 manufacturing..
Renan Ruivo
Forcas armadas
Brave Collective
#88 - 2012-01-22 19:49:45 UTC
And about wormhole discussion.. i went ahead and read it.

So the people who are mad at what was discussed are mad because something the CSM said, or about something they didn't propose?


The following caught my attention:

Quote:


CCP was worried that the introduction of some sort of wormhole stabilizer would remove
some of the everyday safety that people have grown to expect. Some CSM members raised an
objection to the stabilizer, as they thought it would remove some of the main constraints from
wormhole space that help to keep it different than known space.

Two Step's list of smaller wormhole fixes was presented to CCP, most of which are generally
applicable to POS life. Some small scanning tweaks were also mentioned. It was also requested to
allow Rorqual clone vats to be usable to allow players to switch clones (and implants) within the
wormhole



So the wormhole "module" was a CCP proposed idea, and the CSM didn't liked it.. Furthermore Two Step's proposed changes can't be bad for WH life.


The main thing i saw on there was the CSM arguing that wormholes were too difficult to properly invade, and that can indeed be "seen" as lobbying for a change that would allow their null-sec alliances to properly invade wormholes with blobs of capital ships.

I can't and won't discuss it though, since i can't verify anything that has been said. However i do hear more often than not people that live in wormholes complaining about the fact that its too hard to wage war in there.

The world is a community of idiots doing a series of things until it explodes and we all die.

Renan Ruivo
Forcas armadas
Brave Collective
#89 - 2012-01-22 19:52:31 UTC
Ah i also read the FW discussion, however i have no idea if what was proposed is good or bad... have no idea about how FW mechanics work and/or should work.

The world is a community of idiots doing a series of things until it explodes and we all die.

Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#90 - 2012-01-22 20:09:51 UTC
My opinion of the CSM is that they are heavily skewed in favor of nullsec. I've no doubt they want the game to be better. However, their perspective is that of null and all it encompasses. The fault with the CSM is not so much the function but, rather the representation. Obviously, the only place that will support large organizations is null. The wealth to be had in the other regions will not support such focused organization. Currently, representation can only be that of null with minor representation of the other facets of Eve so long as self-interests are not threatened. This is, of course, only human nature.

Mittani being the consummate politician has often sited his suggestions that do not favor nullsec. But, what risk is there in suggesting such when the outcome is already certain? No, this is good politics demonstrating to everyone a disingenuous impartiality.

Unfortunately, as long as null is the moon goo center of Eve and the RMT haven of Eve, the CSM will continue to be null-centric without any hope of change. Only if CCP were to require the CSM to be composed of representatives with devoted investments specific to each of the realms of New Eden (hisec, losec, nullsec, w-space) will the playerbase be adequately represented.

Don't ban me, bro!

Renan Ruivo
Forcas armadas
Brave Collective
#91 - 2012-01-22 20:10:15 UTC
ALSO, i've just read the incursion discussion..

Where does it say that they want to REMOVE incursions from high-sec? What i'm reading is that they are proposing more balance between the different types, since you incursion bears are min-maxing and forgetting about everything in the middle.

More balance means more people will be able to do them and turn a profit, not less.

The world is a community of idiots doing a series of things until it explodes and we all die.

Xen Solarus
Furious Destruction and Salvage
#92 - 2012-01-22 20:11:46 UTC
Are there any statistics on how many people voted, and what kind of player they tend to be? I'd be interested to see how many bears bothered, compared to the alliances that i expected voted in giant bloc's for those that would represent their interest.

I've been playing eve for ages, and personally got quickly bored of all the alliance politics and such. Time in null made me pretty bored of being a tiny cog. I joined eve at first because it is the most expansive of all the MMO's, and truthfully, i wanted to own my own system and gain sovergeignty! Cool

But its pretty clear to me that this game is dominated by Alliances, which i imagine is why most people stick around in empire. Personally, i have zero chance of achieving my dream (Tho i do have a wh system now!) When the vote came along for the CSM, i carefully looked into the candidates and voted for the one that appealed to me. I did not, however, know the "greater picture" that these individuals represented, or the alliances/affiliations that they came from.

I think this is mostly the same for many players, especcially carebears, who mostly just want to be left alone and do there thing. If the CSM is really hated for there choices, then perhaps that will galvanize the bears (The majority) into voting in people that will represent their views.

And why is it that null players moan about carebears so much anyways? Is it just their need for a fresh supply of victims? Pirate

Post with your main, like a BOSS!

And no, i don't live in highsec.  As if that would make your opinion any less wrong.  

Renan Ruivo
Forcas armadas
Brave Collective
#93 - 2012-01-22 20:13:14 UTC
Mr Kidd wrote:
Only if CCP were to require the CSM to be composed of representatives with devoted investments specific to each of the realms of New Eden (hisec, losec, nullsec, w-space) will the playerbase be adequately represented.


I agree with this, however i prefer a CSM that only gets elected if at least 2/4 of the entire active EVE population casts a vote.

Even though i live in null-sec, i agree that it does not have enough people living in it to warrant over 70% of the CSM representation.

The world is a community of idiots doing a series of things until it explodes and we all die.

Renan Ruivo
Forcas armadas
Brave Collective
#94 - 2012-01-22 20:17:57 UTC
Xen Solarus wrote:
And why is it that null players moan about carebears so much anyways? Is it just their need for a fresh supply of victims? Pirate


We don't moan about carebears. We just like to bully them =)

And not because we are mean, but because we want to help them. Every week i see carebears that are converted to PVP'ers but not ONCE i saw a PVP'er convert to being a carebear.

The world is a community of idiots doing a series of things until it explodes and we all die.

Jonathan Malcom
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#95 - 2012-01-22 20:20:13 UTC
The sheer volume of stupid on display in this thread is staggering.

If you're going to make statements about the state of the CSM, at least take the time to read the minutes.
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#96 - 2012-01-22 20:24:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Nicolo da'Vicenza
most highsec carebears posting through forum alts have some sort of weird deep-laden inferiority complex against people that play in null

i know that sounds absurd, but is it any less absurd then creating a forum alt because of fearing space-pixel consequences?

The CSM is naturally a big focus point of their online neurosis.
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#97 - 2012-01-22 20:29:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Nicolo da'Vicenza
Mr Kidd wrote:
My opinion of the CSM is that they are heavily skewed in favor of nullsec. I've no doubt they want the game to be better. However, their perspective is that of null and all it encompasses. The fault with the CSM is not so much the function but, rather the representation.
The CSM was founded because of actions (T20) that happened in null. So it's hardly surprising that null players consider CSM representation more important then others.


Quote:
Unfortunately, as long as null is the moon goo center of Eve and the RMT haven of Eve, the CSM will continue to be null-centric without any hope of change. Only if CCP were to require the CSM to be composed of representatives with devoted investments specific to each of the realms of New Eden (hisec, losec, nullsec, w-space) will the playerbase be adequately represented.
This is unfeasible as more and more null players have PvE alts in the other 3 types of space. Distinguishing between a 'null' and 'highsec' representative is a completely arbitrary call.
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#98 - 2012-01-22 21:22:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Vaerah Vahrokha
Ruthless Erection wrote:

Here's something I'd like an official CCP member to comment on, including these fucktwit CSMs.


You speak about nerfing Incursions? Why? Why not nerf Tech moons? OH WAIT, Everyone in a CSM position is apart of an alliance that owns tech or is a pet of a tech moon owner. I forgot, my bad. Silly questions...


Seriously, Nerf tech before you nerf Incursions.


Moons don't introduce a single ISK in game.



Anndy wrote:

yep god forbid anything but null sec can actually make isk

CSM bitching about incursions yet they sit on tech moons which is a very passive 10 bill per month per moon, atleast incursions actually require you to do something


Moon goo does not produce a single ISK.
Those who farm incursions, missions and other ISK faucets (ratting etc) do.
It's THEM who *want* to pay for the moon goo.

If people are so willing to pay 10B per moon, then why would moons owners refuse?

It's a market. That thing where there's demand and offer. If there weren't huge numbers of people demanding so much moon goo, then the price would be much less.

Also, if 10B is so good and dandy, play EvE like it's meant to be: harden the F**K up and go take them.
Too hard? Have to stop being a soloer and pour in much effort? Too bad. Others did, you either out-do them or you are rigthfully a minuscule, insignificant cog.


Xen Solarus wrote:
Are there any statistics on how many people voted, and what kind of player they tend to be? I'd be interested to see how many bears bothered, compared to the alliances that i expected voted in giant bloc's for those that would represent their interest.


Like in all MMOs and in all RL communities, there are those who step up and take the hassle of forming motivated groups that will end up commanding the others.
And like in all MMOs and in all RL communities, there are the "randoms", the baddies who solo against the world and get crushed and cry momma. Rightfully, no one gives a damn about them. They may be the majority, yet they are irrelevant sheep.
Renan Ruivo
Forcas armadas
Brave Collective
#99 - 2012-01-22 21:30:39 UTC
Just to chime in.. real mission runners aren't isk faucets..

And a little off-topic, weren't incursions LP-reward based? They give isk bounty now? How does it work?

The world is a community of idiots doing a series of things until it explodes and we all die.

Xen Solarus
Furious Destruction and Salvage
#100 - 2012-01-22 21:35:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Xen Solarus
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Xen Solarus wrote:
Are there any statistics on how many people voted, and what kind of player they tend to be? I'd be interested to see how many bears bothered, compared to the alliances that i expected voted in giant bloc's for those that would represent their interest.


Like in all MMOs and in all RL communities, there are those who step up and take the hassle of forming motivated groups that will end up commanding the others.
And like in all MMOs and in all RL communities, there are the "randoms", the baddies who solo against the world and get crushed and cry momma. Rightfully, no one gives a damn about them. They may be the majority, yet they are irrelevant sheep.


Thats generally true, especcially in the real world. There is plenty of voter apathy going on these days, whats the point in voting if you don't really care/ all the candidates are the same.

That being said, you mess around with people's lives enough and they sure as hell will turn up to the voting booth. Voting is the only power we have these days. Though i'm not effected by anything the CSM has done, they start messing with wormholes significantly and they'll definately get my attention. Seems to me they're definately getting some other people's attentions.

The question is, are they representing the greater good for the eve community (As Democracy is "supposed" to do), or are they representing their individual affiliations needs?

/Discuss

Post with your main, like a BOSS!

And no, i don't live in highsec.  As if that would make your opinion any less wrong.