These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

How effective is CSM? Time to get rid of it?

Author
Spineker
#61 - 2012-01-22 05:48:41 UTC
You defend democracy really? In a game? Haha ok you guys continue on.
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#62 - 2012-01-22 06:07:38 UTC
Spineker wrote:
You defend democracy really? In a game? Haha ok you guys continue on.


No, in a forum discussion.




And "Blah-Blah-Blah, who cares about a game" doesn't fly as an argument once you've put in the effort to post about the CSM "representing" anyone, like they owe it to you.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Aggressive Nutmeg
#63 - 2012-01-22 07:21:07 UTC
Andski wrote:
If you don't want a nullsec-focused CSM, why don't you make a serious effort to organize like-minded players into voting for candidates that represent you? Is that too much work, or are you blaming CCP and the CSM for your own lack of charisma and initiative?

Charisma, you say?

That's the first laugh I've had in this thread. Big smile

Never make eye contact with someone while eating a banana.

Mr M
Sebiestor Tribe
#64 - 2012-01-22 08:37:23 UTC
This thread needs more Motorhead.


Also, if you don't think that the delegates to CSM is doing a good job, campaign yourself. There's still 85% of the player base who's votes you can get. But don't complain if you're too lazy to be arsed to vote or join the many discussions on the forum.

Share your experience

Write for the EVE Tribune

www.eve-tribune.com

Rico Minali
Sons Of 0din
Commonwealth Vanguard
#65 - 2012-01-22 09:15:17 UTC
Thomas Abernathy wrote:
They represent Goons, I think that says it all.... Lol



Derp

Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing.

Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#66 - 2012-01-22 09:18:51 UTC
why should i care about any effectivity of CSM ?

I wish them plenty of holidays and alcohol .
Vyl Vit
#67 - 2012-01-22 09:34:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Vyl Vit
Oh. They're very effective in representing their interests, which happen to happily coincide with each other...fancy that.
They seem to be good dates for the CCP folks who keep havin' them over for sh*ts and grins. I guess CSM loves CCP
since they roll over so well...sounds like a dream date.

Uh...for the vast majority of us? Effective at what? Pretending we either don't matter,
don't know what we need, or don't exist?

Yeah, they're doing a bang-up job. (Pardon the pun.)

Paradise is like where you are right now, only much, much better.

Asuka Solo
I N E X T R E M I S
Tactical Narcotics Team
#68 - 2012-01-22 09:54:16 UTC
Vyl Vit wrote:
Oh. They're very effective in representing their interests, which happen to happily coincide with each other...fancy that.
They seem to be good dates for the CCP folks who keep havin' them over for sh*ts and grins. I guess CSM loves CCP
since they roll over so well...sounds like a dream date.

Uh...for the vast majority of us? Effective at what? Pretending we either don't matter,
don't know what we need, or don't exist?

Yeah, they're doing a bang-up job. (Pardon the pun.)


Quoted for great justice.

Eve is about Capital ships, WiS, Boobs, PI and Isk!

Aineko Macx
#69 - 2012-01-22 09:58:37 UTC
Get rid of it?
No, but next time let's not elect a sperging douchebag with a napoleon complex that needs a voice modulator to sound manly.
Role Play
No Vacancies
No Vacancies.
#70 - 2012-01-22 10:40:36 UTC
If you read the minutes you might agree with what some of the CSM members propose or you might disagree but at least it will get you informed about what the CSM actually does.

I think we should be grateful that we have a body that does represent the players, you might say they represent certain alliances only but ultimately they still represent the players and not the company. The CSM is a body that makes decisions to improve the player experience; it is nice to have a body that is independent of the company (CCP) in order to get a different perspective.

What other video-game has a body like the CSM. I mean just the minutes briefing was 44 pages long of pure text, imagine how many hours of meetings are put into that by players in order to enhance our experience of the game and ensure that CCP does not get too carried away with changes that only benefit them as a company.

I implore you to take a look at other developers and see the changes they make to their games. Blizzard forces you to use your full name for their Real ID implementation and there was a huge outcry from players, but those players had to use other outlets to protest on, people made youtube videos and many bitched on the forums but if that was considered to be an option for CCP the CSM would express deep concerns and tell CCP it would be a bad idea (see CSM minutes concerning security for more details).

I think we as players really undervalue how CCP manages their game. Eve has a common price index, inflation of isk is actually monitored, statistics are kept and organized and most importantly analyzed. I don't think other developers put as much effort into their game as CCP does, and the CSM exists for that reason; I do not think CCP developers want to spend the extra hours required in formal meetings where everything in documented in order to hear the CSM complain about things that should be changed about EVE but guess what, we have that privilege.

I hope people would not be so narrow-eyed in thinking that developers only want $ and the CSM only wants changes that will benefit them. Developers are like artists and EVE is their masterpiece. Devs put so much time, effort and passion into something that at the end of the day they can say, "I helped make this universe"; devs are geeks just like us. I would hope that people don't imagine CCP employees as young guys in sleek suits with hair gelled back exclaiming that the only thing that matters is the bottum line. I think that if any of us were fortunate enough to meet some developers face-to-face we would smile and shake their hands while saying "thank you, for helping make a game that has an effect on my emotions; the excitement of winning a fleet battle with friends, the sadness of losing an expensive ship, the disappointment of not overheating my tackle to grab a nice kill before it gets away, the anxiety of repping a ship out of structure in an incursion/fleet battle, the conversations had during mining and the people I've met thanks for all of it." The dev would smile back and say "my pleasure."

Where am I going with all this? I'm saying if CCP see's EVE as it's work of art it will do whatever it thinks best to help improve EVE so that other people can enjoy it too and what CCP has chosen to do is make the CSM.

I don't believe the CSM only tries to enforce changes that will only benefit them. I'm sure many of the CSM members own supers yet the super nerf still went through and in the last CSM minutes that were released there was talk about other super changes as well.

We should not be so quick to criticize, I say why not give thanks for CSM members and CCP devs that take the time they don't have to in-order to have a player to developer interaction that ultimately wishes to improve the game we all play.
Solinuas
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#71 - 2012-01-22 10:43:26 UTC
You know what?

if you want to be represented, run for CSM
Roime
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#72 - 2012-01-22 10:52:44 UTC
Atticus Fynch wrote:
Who exactly do they represent and how do they speak for the rest of us?

I have yet to receive any surveys or questionaires from them asking what I, as a player, think.

Are they a truely respresentative body or just the body with the biggest mouth? So big they have psuedo-celebrity staus and get free trips to Iceland.


Read the blogs of the CSM members, the meeting minutes and get informed on their opinions and achievements before coming to the forums and make yourself a complete fool.

Also, answer the surveys that CCP continually uses to gather opinions from the player base at large.

.

Tore Vest
#73 - 2012-01-22 11:07:36 UTC
Remove the CSM

No troll.

Akatenshi Xi
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#74 - 2012-01-22 16:45:54 UTC
CSM do not represent me and my views, in addition, given the choice between two bowls of **** in an election the only two things you can do is either not vote or pick the bowl of **** that smells best.

In any case, the CSM have no real power, it is something ''allowed'' by CCP to make thousands of other people happy in some sense. Another method of control. Like the police, courts, tickets, etc..

I've have run large clans in online games, for over 10 years now. I can personally tell you that after a certain point you lose touch with some parts of your member base. You simply can't keep up with every little snowflake you recruit, and the responsibility and administration of a clan puts some claim on your time which further stops you from really knowing what is going on with 100 percent of the people. It is a fine line of delegation and decision making that you have to figure out for yourself and weight what is an acceptable sacrifice of time day to day.

Those bitches in the CSM just like having their name on a list, getting to say whatever, and making deals behind the scenes with gullible people who think their agendas can be spread by isk just like a real politician. The only difference here is that instead of a real politician with years of law experience, you have some fat ass 34 year old living in his mother's basement drinking Red Bull like Mittani.
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#75 - 2012-01-22 16:53:24 UTC
Akatenshi Xi wrote:
CSM do not represent me and my views, in addition, given the choice between two bowls of **** in an election the only two things you can do is either not vote or pick the bowl of **** that smells best.

In any case, the CSM have no real power, it is something ''allowed'' by CCP to make thousands of other people happy in some sense. Another method of control. Like the police, courts, tickets, etc..

I've have run large clans in online games, for over 10 years now. I can personally tell you that after a certain point you lose touch with some parts of your member base. You simply can't keep up with every little snowflake you recruit, and the responsibility and administration of a clan puts some claim on your time which further stops you from really knowing what is going on with 100 percent of the people. It is a fine line of delegation and decision making that you have to figure out for yourself and weight what is an acceptable sacrifice of time day to day.

Those bitches in the CSM just like having their name on a list, getting to say whatever, and making deals behind the scenes with gullible people who think their agendas can be spread by isk just like a real politician. The only difference here is that instead of a real politician with years of law experience, you have some fat ass 34 year old living in his mother's basement drinking Red Bull like Mittani.


There were ~70 candidates, and you couldn't find one you like?


And if you've seen him, the Mittani is frighteningly skinny, pale as a ghost, and a retired lawyer.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Akatenshi Xi
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#76 - 2012-01-22 16:56:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Akatenshi Xi
No I couldn't find one. I'm supposed to just pick from a list? None of them campaigned to me? Etc., etc..

I was generalizing, don't get butt hurt.


On semi-related subject - I don't believe in democracy. It is a complete failure in itself. I live in the USA and I hear about all the stupidity of the US Government all day long here. Do you really think I would support 1,000 people who don't support anything I am interested in? People who are more concerned about themselves, what kind of money they can generate for their personal interests, how they can keep their fingers on the tax rate to make life good for themselves, and how much debt they can put our country into? **** no. You gotta be out of your god damn mind.

I'd much rather have a dictator, and if the MF'er doesn't pan out, we coup'de'ta his ass.
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#77 - 2012-01-22 17:08:59 UTC
Akatenshi Xi wrote:
No I couldn't find one. I'm supposed to just pick from a list? None of them campaigned to me? Etc., etc..

I was generalizing, don't get butt hurt.


On semi-related subject - I don't believe in democracy. It is a complete failure in itself. I live in the USA and I hear about all the stupidity of the US Government all day long here. Do you really think I would support 1,000 people who don't support anything I am interested in? People who are more concerned about themselves, what kind of money they can generate for their personal interests, how they can keep their fingers on the tax rate to make life good for themselves, and how much debt they can put our country into? **** no. You gotta be out of your god damn mind.

I'd much rather have a dictator, and if the MF'er doesn't pan out, we coup'de'ta his ass.


1) Democracy's hard, mmmkay.

2) @GSF guys, get your leader some freaking food already. I worry.


3) You're worried about representative democracy not standing up for the rights of the minority and being corrupt and you want a dictatorship. Really?
First rule in dictator school is disarm your populace and make your military like you. Now, when the military likes their boss, they're not going to perform a coup d'état, they're going to count their paycheck all the way to your house, where they'll shoot you in the face for suggesting it.

Second rule is to fill your offshore bank accounts to the brim so you can run away if the military decides they don't like you so much.

So instead of 1000 people who have to support enough of the populace's interests to get reelected, you get one guy who has to keep the military happy, and has no checks on how much money he can make.

Churchill's got a great quote about democracy. And a bunch of good ones on alcoholism, but that's beside the point.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Mars Theran
Foreign Interloper
#78 - 2012-01-22 22:25:34 UTC
RubyPorto wrote:
Spineker wrote:
You defend democracy really? In a game? Haha ok you guys continue on.


No, in a forum discussion.




And "Blah-Blah-Blah, who cares about a game" doesn't fly as an argument once you've put in the effort to post about the CSM "representing" anyone, like they owe it to you.


I think you miss the point Ruby. They do. That is what they are there for; to represent all players in EVE equally. That is their tsk and their duty as detailed by CCP when they brought this all into being. They are not there to speak for their own , or their Corp, or even their Alliances best interests; they are intended to be objective and unbiased to the best of their ability, in representing the EVE playerbase as a whole. They are failing.
zubzubzubzubzubzubzubzub
Mars Theran
Foreign Interloper
#79 - 2012-01-22 22:28:20 UTC
Akatenshi Xi wrote:
No I couldn't find one. I'm supposed to just pick from a list? None of them campaigned to me? Etc., etc..

I was generalizing, don't get butt hurt.


On semi-related subject - I don't believe in democracy. It is a complete failure in itself. I live in the USA and I hear about all the stupidity of the US Government all day long here. Do you really think I would support 1,000 people who don't support anything I am interested in? People who are more concerned about themselves, what kind of money they can generate for their personal interests, how they can keep their fingers on the tax rate to make life good for themselves, and how much debt they can put our country into? **** no. You gotta be out of your god damn mind.

I'd much rather have a dictator, and if the MF'er doesn't pan out, we coupe d'etat his ass.


fixed that for you.
zubzubzubzubzubzubzubzub
Akatenshi Xi
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#80 - 2012-01-22 23:19:53 UTC
Fix it all you want, the point is in the US Government they have hundreds of people who supposedly represent millions in our nation. This is not the case. I would rather have one singular person representing EVE Online and possibly a couple of people to help filter.

None of them represent me and what I am interested in nor does anyone in the government. And for damn sure Mittani doesn't represent my interests in the game, especially when his alliance and buddies are all about scamming people and all around screwing EVE Online up. I don't think anyone who is a leader of a major powerblock should be anywhere near the CSM, they will be looking out primarily for their alliance's interests.

Look at the trend in EVE, CSM isn't helping anything. Failed expansions, UI is crap, null sec is dying in favor of high sec, broken client, game mechanics screwed up. Where is CSM truly fixing any of this? There is a easier way to go about this, post in the forum and whatever gets a popular following probably should be worked on. Where is the need for a CSM now? Devs can't spend 5 minutes a day looking at the forum?