Assembly Hall

THIS :)

I am not a wormhole dweller although I have considered moving into one several times.

But even I can see how damaging this would be to the wormhole way of life.

W-space is the only place in EVE where you can PVP without the risk of getting blobbed or hot-dropped and it needs to stay that way.

I used to think that it would would be cool if cyno's and jumpdrives worked in W-space. with a mechanic to prevent cyno's in C4 and lower. Of course systems linked by a worm hole would not necessarily be close to one another so it would take so time to find systems within jump distance of each other. But even this would severely damage the current wormhole way of life. The possibility of getting hot-dropped would be equally damaging to the small scale as this idea of wormhole stabilizers.

Leave W-space alone, except maybe expanding it. but the mechanics are close to perfect. do not break them.

All WH residents and people that are active in W-space know that this is true!

The WH mass stabilizer would only benefit large alliances as it would make their W-space "take over" much, much, much easier. A alliance wich can bring together 60+ fleet members cane easily take over a WH if they well plan and coordinate the attack. But for that you need time and some effort wich some don't want to give. They want it easier and therefore make it alot harder for the other side. It is allready hard to defend a WH if you are a small corp or small alliance. This would make it impossible. 60+ hostile BS fleet jumping at once into a WH where a 30 member corp lives. Come on!

"mechanism to get rid of the invulnerability some groups enjoy in wormholes" - huh
If this was refering to C1-C4 Wormholes then that "invulnerbility" shuld be renamed to well planed PVP ships and coordinated team of players wich took alot of time to plan how to effectivly defend their WH, even if that means that they collapse the WH to prevent the enemys forces to get in. That also needs some effort!
C1-C4 WHs usally have a small amount of players in it as there are not that much people needed to do a site and because there is less ISK to share. Therfore if you take some time you can find their weakness. But that time is a bit to much time for some it seems.
C5-C6 are in my eyes allready dominated from large alliances as they have more people inside 1 WH and therefore more people to fly cap ships. For now different alliances can hold their ground if they have alot of people and caps in theitr WH, and that is the only thing that comes near invulnerbility in my eyes. But even that can be taked if you plan well and are willing to take some risk. If the WH stabilizer would come in game then the alliance with the largest fleet and largest number of caps would dominate all C5s and C6s. W-space would become equal to null-sec.
For now people can defend themselves and have a chance against larger corps and alliances. WH mass stabilizer would make the possibility of defending the WH really small. The large alliances would then really become invulnerable!

The people wanting to push this through are the ones eager to benefit from the feature themselfes; the corp/alliances they are in. In my opinion, those in the CSM voting for this are corrupt, and are abusing their voice and influence.


Wormhole mechanics are just fine the way they are now, do not mess with it!

If this ******** "feature" were implemented, wormholes would become nothing more than nullsec with sleeper rats and no local.

WH stabilizers are the worst idea ever.

I live in a WH for more than 2 years now, ALL wh people that i know and that i've talked to agree that:

WH stabs will destroy wormhole game play. We don't want o.o space without local. There are many ways to improve WHs, the WH stabs one is a fail.

@ CMSs that suggested that: I hope your idea won't get any support.

Ah... Never had your wormhole pos camped 24/7 by a major invader huh?

Most wormhole corps are small size. The current wormhole mechanic is a good thing.

You want to stabilize my wormhole so you can shove endless amounts of T3's through it? Would you consider letting me moon mine in my wormhole? Now that would make you 0.0 carebears really cry.

Oh... and for crying out loud. You wanted the 5000+ members in your alliance so you could "own" 0.0. What's the problem? Having a hard time supporting all of them?

Cry harder. I'll send some tissues. I suggest you figure out how to make 0.0 profitable.

Otherwise it seems like you're a failure at 0.0 and just want to mooch off the pro's who specialize in making team work happen in Wormholes. Certainly seems that way with lowsec incursions. Pathetic. Really pathetic.

+1
This petition needs to stay on the first page.

Yeah this is total horseshit. One of mittani's stupid ideas so his goons can ruin more peoples' gametime.

CCP needs to step on this **** if they wish to retain players.

I tried very hard not to snigger, but the juvenile in me could not resist a smirk at your begging for your wormholes not to be interfered with.