These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

CCP - Regarding Medium Rails

Author
Hungry Eyes
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#1 - 2012-01-14 19:36:18 UTC
thanks again for a solid blaster buff. the null changes are promising.

as you may already know, medium rails cannot be fitted on most hybrid ships. you will probably notice in your metrics that medium rails are never used. they require lower cpu/pg reqs, and another 10-15% dps.

is there any news regarding medium rails?
Kyoko Sakoda
Achura-Waschi Exchange
Monyusaiya Industry Trade Group
#2 - 2012-01-14 19:47:17 UTC
+1
Aglais
Ice-Storm
#3 - 2012-01-14 19:55:25 UTC
So I'm not the only one who has noticed this problem.

I can fit a whole rack of heavy ion blasters on, say, a Moa (inb4 'lol moa'), have three mag stabs, LSE II, a MWD, etc. and have a probably not horrible ship. But I need to lose some already horribly low DPS and fit a grid mod if I want to have a fit similar with the 200mm rails (also T2), and I can't even fit 250s because they require far too much grid. They're not artillery. They don't do nearly enough... Anything to justify these insanely high fitting requirements (280 DPS, like 600-700 volley damage with my skills I think), and Caldari aren't exactly renowned for having splendid fitting resources compared to other factions, either. You have to sacrifice anything that'd make you worth being in fleet otherwise to fit weapons that offer nothing over any other weapon systems except range.

(Caracal and Cerberus IMO suffer from this lack of grid/cpu as well, and Gurista ships could use more CPU as well. Just throwing that out there.)
Hungry Eyes
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#4 - 2012-01-14 20:24:32 UTC
there are two ships on which medium rails are semi viable: Astarte and Proteus. and thats with a sub-par tank, and not the best range.

what about the rest of the Gallente line-up? for example, rails should and must be viable on the Deimos. it's the Gall's answer to the Zealot.
Ninevite
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#5 - 2012-01-14 22:08:26 UTC
We should buff rails by giving all minmatar ships a 20% bounus to fall off, it's the CCP way to improving ship balancing in this game

all hail the minmatar
Galphii
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#6 - 2012-01-15 10:46:04 UTC
I was just trying to set up some fittings for gallente cruisers with this relatively new alt, and couldn't believe the pg requirements for the 200's and 250's. I agree with the OP, it needs addressing.

"Wow, that internet argument completely changed my fundamental belief system," said no one, ever.

X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#7 - 2012-01-15 15:38:45 UTC
What's the problem?
200mm rail Thorax requires zero fitting rigs
200mm rail Moa requires one anciliary current router

[Thorax, 200mm Rail] Zero Fitting Rigs
Damage Control II
Tracking Enhancer II
Tracking Enhancer II
Magnetic Field Stabilizer II
Overdrive Injector System II

Y-T8 Overcharged Hydrocarbon I Microwarpdrive
Large F-S9 Regolith Shield Induction
Warp Disruptor II

200mm Railgun II, Antimatter Charge M
200mm Railgun II, Antimatter Charge M
200mm Railgun II, Antimatter Charge M
200mm Railgun II, Antimatter Charge M
200mm Railgun II, Antimatter Charge M

Medium Core Defence Field Extender I
Medium Core Defence Field Extender I
Medium Core Defence Field Extender I


Hammerhead II x5


[Moa, 200mm rail] One Fitting Rig
Magnetic Field Stabilizer II
Magnetic Field Stabilizer II
Tracking Enhancer II
Damage Control II

Y-T8 Overcharged Hydrocarbon I Microwarpdrive
Large Shield Extender II
Invulnerability Field II
Warp Disruptor II

200mm Railgun II, Antimatter Charge M
200mm Railgun II, Antimatter Charge M
200mm Railgun II, Antimatter Charge M
200mm Railgun II, Antimatter Charge M
200mm Railgun II, Antimatter Charge M
Small Unstable Power Fluctuator I

Medium Ancillary Current Router I
Medium Core Defence Field Extender I
Medium Core Defence Field Extender I

Warrior II x 3

Hungry Eyes
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#8 - 2012-01-15 15:53:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Hungry Eyes
X Gallentius wrote:


What's the problem?



you joking? you're doing like 250dps with a full rack of rails. you dont see anything wrong with that? a maxed out rail Deimos does something like 370dps with 2 mfs, but has a pathetic tank. and you cant fit 250's on anything except the Astarte and Proteus.

not gonna dissect your fits too much, but that Thorax would get 2-volleyed by a Cane. and using t1 cruisers as an example doesnt help the matter Shocked
Aglais
Ice-Storm
#9 - 2012-01-15 23:50:02 UTC
X Gallentius wrote:
What's the problem?




You're kidding, right?

You can fit a full rack of ion blaster cannons on a Moa without the need for any kind of grid mod whatsoever, and you can push over 400 DPS out of it. I think the raw number I get with my skills and stuff is 456. 200mm rails, the 'equivalent' if you could say of ions? You need to wreck the fit with a grid mod of some kind, and it will perform that much worse.
Hungry Eyes
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#10 - 2012-01-16 01:54:51 UTC
and it's not like Gallente ships can kite or anything What? so why the drastically lower dps on rails? cant fit tank, cant kite (with the exception of shield Deimos lol Oops), cant dps. why rail at all?
Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#11 - 2012-01-16 04:58:09 UTC
At least Gallente ships usually get a damage bonus for hybrids. Caldari hybrid ships don't even get that.

Katrina Oniseki

Naomi Knight
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#12 - 2012-01-16 07:26:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Naomi Knight
add in large ones too , both need a huge buff
eft should require some kind of in game experience , maybe it would lower the number of noobs like X Gallentius :P
Kyoko Sakoda
Achura-Waschi Exchange
Monyusaiya Industry Trade Group
#13 - 2012-01-16 07:42:26 UTC
Katrina Oniseki wrote:
At least Gallente ships usually get a damage bonus for hybrids. Caldari hybrid ships don't even get that.


This is actually fair. The offset for longer range should be lower damage. Using un-bonused AM at a range 50% farther than bonused AM is fine.

The problem is with base damage.
Lord FunkyMunky
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#14 - 2012-01-16 12:42:21 UTC
+1 to this Blasters with the null changes are starting to look somewhat viable, but rails especially medium rails are still horrible, please take this into mind in the coming crucible 1.1, some fitting adjustments and either a slight ROF buff or Damage buff is really needed.
Fon Revedhort
Monks of War
#15 - 2012-01-16 13:18:52 UTC
Ever seen what medium beams are? Lol

"Being supporters of free speech and free and open [CSM] elections... we removed Fon Revedhort from eligibility". CCP, April 2013.

X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#16 - 2012-01-16 14:07:59 UTC
I get similar numbers comparing Thorax and Moa to Rupture. (slightly modified fits than posted above)
Moa to Rupture: 0.77 dps , 1.5 tank, 1.17 ratio of dps*EHP
Thorax to Rupture: 1.07 dps, 1.07 tank, 1.12 ratio dps*EHP

Naomi Knight
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#17 - 2012-01-16 17:44:23 UTC
X Gallentius wrote:
I get similar numbers comparing Thorax and Moa to Rupture. (slightly modified fits than posted above)
Moa to Rupture: 0.77 dps , 1.5 tank, 1.17 ratio of dps*EHP
Thorax to Rupture: 1.07 dps, 1.07 tank, 1.12 ratio dps*EHP


speed ,cap need etc?????? huh???? dumb liang follower go fly ctower those have the best dps*ehp , oh no speed , looks like it is no problem for u
X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#18 - 2012-01-16 18:56:59 UTC  |  Edited by: X Gallentius
Naomi Knight wrote:
X Gallentius wrote:
I get similar numbers comparing Thorax and Moa to Rupture. (slightly modified fits than posted above)
Moa to Rupture: 0.77 dps , 1.5 tank, 1.17 ratio of dps*EHP
Thorax to Rupture: 1.07 dps, 1.07 tank, 1.12 ratio dps*EHP


speed ,cap need etc?????? huh???? dumb liang follower go fly ctower those have the best dps*ehp , oh no speed , looks like it is no problem for u


The original post was:
1) "Fitting requirements suck" - Answer - "Fitting requirements are really no worse than Winmatar and Arties"
2) "Need moar dps" - Answer - DPS for Gallente is more than Winmatar, DPS for Caldari is lower by almost a quarter, but Caldari tank is 50% bigger.

As a 95% Gallente pilot (have to fly Drakes, Tempest, and Scimis in some more organized fleets) I have no problems with rail Thorax. Will let Caldari cruiser pilots speak to Moa.

I've been flying Rail Brutix (and Rail Myrms - *gasp*) in nano-BC gangs lately and have loved it. Fitting 250s is not so hard in either case. Been close to top in dps in many killmails too. But in all fairness I need to fly them a bit more to make a final conclusion. Still not up to "Drake OP", but I think they do well versus Hurricanes so far.

Edit: (Not a medium railguns..) Spec'd out a 425mm rail Hyperion, Rokh, and arty Maelstrom (same tier BSs) this morning with similar results as above.
Hungry Eyes
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#19 - 2012-01-17 00:04:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Hungry Eyes
yea i tried the rail Myrm. 425mm AC's outperform both rails and blasters on the Myrm (even with the null buff). im glad you had fun with the rail Brutix, but you cant really nano this beast (or the Astarte). the nano Cane does way more damage up close, is faster, same EHP, and projects damage almost as well.

my main issue is that medium rail fits really are not viable on armour-tanked boats other than the Proteus. Astarte and Brutix do just OK with paper-thin tanks and subpar speeds, but both are greatly outperformed by the Cane.

X Gallentius wrote:

1) "Fitting requirements suck" - Answer - "Fitting requirements are really no worse than Winmatar and Arties"


sure, but arties are way better. there's a REASON people fly arty Canes, arty Machariels, arty Nadoes, etc.

X Gallentius wrote:

2) "Need moar dps" - Answer - DPS for Gallente is more than Winmatar, DPS for Caldari is lower by almost a quarter, but Caldari tank is 50% bigger.


arties: superior alpha, heavy pulse with scorch: superior dps and damage projection, medium rails: ??


i wouldnt complain if large rails got a buff, but ive had really good experiences with the Mega and Domi in armour fleets. a 100EHP Mega projects almost 1K dps at around 50km, which is way more than a Baddon would at that range. and i hear the Rokh is a beast in nullsec.
X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#20 - 2012-01-17 00:45:21 UTC  |  Edited by: X Gallentius
Hungry Eyes wrote:
arties: superior alpha, heavy pulse with scorch: superior dps and damage projection, medium rails: ??


Not going to disagree with arties and their OP alpha, but the Rail Brutix and Myrm are now definitely viable, especially in a fleet support type role with Drakes. Better dps, ample room for e-war in midslots (rsd's, td's, etc..) to mitigate opposing force damage projection.

I think the buff has carved out a bigger engagement envelope for all Hybrid hulls. Don't know if it is large enough to make them common again, but it's definitely much larger than before the buff. The only question is how much.

Edit: Longer range weapons for nano-fleets. 250mm rails > 425mm autos.
123Next page