Jita Park Speakers Corner

So this eems to be one of the hot topics at the moment, dividing people into several camps each supported heavily by their own "my way is the best way brigade".
What ever you view it is pretty obvious after a while that 90% of players remain ing their starting NPC corps in hisec, and either venture for a while into low/null sec and then retire to hisec or just never leave hisec because it's just too much hassle.
Much debate has been made over the "risk vs reward" issue but for a lot of players ie those not in the small number of low/null sec PVP corps/alliances is "All risk and no reward".
Why? Bacause pretty much as soon as you jump from high sec to low sec your in a camp or the pirate who was sitting 150k off the low sec side of the gate has just warped to 5k from your jump in point as his high sec alt saw you arrive at the high sec side of the gate.
Yes I know you can run camps, well 95% of the time in a shuttle, and 90% of the time in a covert ops or T3, and 85% of the time in a fast frigate, but what's the point? They're pretty much useless for mining or running low sec complexes, and as for hauling that 3000m3 of stuuf you just bought, they're as much use as a chocolate coffee pot (modern adapataion].
As this is pretty much goven, and all noobs are warned of this is it a wonder that most player spend their entire lives in hisec, and low and null sec has such a low player population. Not really.
So what can be done? Let me pose another question first. Why do a large portion of hisec PVPers insist on fighting 5km from the station exit, or more to the point why do stations do nothing about it?
Assuming players know the risks of entering low sec (and I'll ignore those alliances who think that anyone whose not blue is an enemy) or null sec for a moment how do you encourage more players to enter low sec/null sec .. and Concord/Faction police are not the answer .. well not directly.
A possible answer could be making all gates and stations enforce a non-aggression zone in a 200km radius around the gate/station. Any aggressive act (see Note 1 ) would result in the gate/station opening fire on the agressor (and agressee if they retaliate). Not only should the stations open fire with their guns but if the agressor is within 100km of the station they station should also jam, web, and scram them. (see Note 2)
This would kill lots of birds with a single stone, and provide a means by which traffic could transit into and through low/null sec areas. What you say where's the risk in that? Well there's plenty ... players outside the zone can still target those inside the zone, and if they've got the range fire on them, or if they're in an interdictor pull them out of warp. And If you're doing anything other than jumping gate to station or gate to gate all the other inherent risks are still there.
Comments?

Note 1 : Aggression:
In this context any of the following within the 200km non-aggression zone counts as aggression, performing any action currently deemed to be an act of agression, targeting any player outside the 200km non-aggression zone, launching scanning probes. These last two are specifically to stop players abusing the non-agression zone.

Note 2 : Standing :
In theory the exact actions of the gates/stations could be modified by the standing of both the agressor and the agressee to the faction/corporation controlling the gate/station. Each time a character commits and act of agression with in the zone they should lose standing with the faction and/or corporation. Of course for npc pirate corps there may be the option for this to work in reverse, those committing agressive acts against those with a bad stanidng for that npc pirate corp may see a rise in their standing with that npc pirate corp.

How would it render it impossible to control traffic in null sec?

In null sec interdictors can make full use of their bubbles so you can still bubble .. you just have to actually use them tactically and have sufficient players online to control traffic ..ie if you want to control traffic you have to actively control it not use a side effect of a game mechanic which installs artificial bottle necks..

However.. there is nothing to say that Sov status in a system cannot modify the way that stations or gates react to the corp/alliance that has that status .. after all if you have status you are in effect the controlling corp/faction.

But then again it sounds like you want to have your cake and eat it. Either low/null sec becomes more accessible to the whole player base or those in null/lowsec have to stop whining about the majority of players being in hisec and gainign advantages (or not depending on your perspective) by being there.

Any before anyone says "cyno" then activating a cyno within in the non-aggression zone would also caount as an act of agression in the context of my OP.

this post smells like a newbie or troll i cannot really figure it out yet

Suggestion made based on insufficient knowledge of how things work.

Result: No.

Next.