These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

What happens to Eve.....

Author
Schalac
Apocalypse Reign
#41 - 2012-01-08 09:36:39 UTC
The goons will never own nullsec because they are too weak to even own themselves. Soon as the pie gets big enough every one of them will be going for the biggest piece and destroy the whole thing in the process.

SCHALAC HAS SPOKEN!! http://eveboard.com/pilot/Schalac

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#42 - 2012-01-08 09:57:46 UTC
I do like pie.
Large Collidable Object
morons.
#43 - 2012-01-08 09:59:00 UTC
met worst wrote:
When the Goons own it all?




No worries - they'll forget to pay their sov bill eventually.

Anyway - in case they should become the dominant force in 0.0 I'm less worried than if other alliances would.

Unlike Vuk's RMT empire which never did anything, they'll put the money to good use and mess up someones day - if they don't, they'll all become inactive due to boredom and - well - forget to pay their sov bill.

Also I doubt they'd hold the entire north even if they could conquer it all - maybe keep all the tech and install some horrendous renter pet, kinda like R.A.G.E. or ME who will eventually grow big-headed and do something incredibly stupid.
You know... [morons.](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gjOx65yD5A)
Hainnz
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#44 - 2012-01-08 10:24:41 UTC
I can't imagine too many people care about who controls null as long as they can afford ships and modules. I'd rather Goons own it all out there rather than some group of pretentious d-bags.
Treks Shadow
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#45 - 2012-01-08 10:58:52 UTC
met worst wrote:
When the Goons own it all?

Does a serious threat exist for all 0.0 alliances if Goons take the entire north region. They will have secured most of the wealth in game.

Whether you think CSM manipulation helped this along or not, will it be a threat to the game?



>>> Ctrl Lock, F1, F2, F3 your responses BEFORE the Goons get here...... QUICK!!!


Of course the csm has a lot to do with it. consider mittens has been on the csm for years. and they have ccp employees in the alliance as well. if you ask me i think that is a form of insider trading and shouldnt be allowed. that combination is just too much imho. try that anywhere else and your ass would be in a court of law so fast it wouldnt even be funny. and on the note of the csm members of the "elite" group should have term limits like for example mittens has been there 3-4 years straight. that needs to go. NO BACK TO BACK TERMS. and no csm members can serve more then twice in 5 years, eve if its on a alt. i reallt think you eve players need to wake up to what is going on with this csm it is a scam and is ruining eve
Tallianna Avenkarde
Pyre of Gods
#46 - 2012-01-08 15:19:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Tallianna Avenkarde
Treks Shadow wrote:


Of course the csm has a lot to do with it. consider mittens has been on the csm for years. and they have ccp employees in the alliance as well. if you ask me i think that is a form of insider trading and shouldnt be allowed. that combination is just too much imho. try that anywhere else and your ass would be in a court of law so fast it wouldnt even be funny. and on the note of the csm members of the "elite" group should have term limits like for example mittens has been there 3-4 years straight. that needs to go. NO BACK TO BACK TERMS. and no csm members can serve more then twice in 5 years, eve if its on a alt. i reallt think you eve players need to wake up to what is going on with this csm it is a scam and is ruining eve


congratulations, you win the award for most uninformed post in the thread!

And a sudden plunge in the sullen swell. Ten fathoms deep on the road to hell.

Morganta
The Greater Goon
#47 - 2012-01-08 15:23:55 UTC
what's a goon?

I only ever see groons
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#48 - 2012-01-08 15:25:52 UTC
Treks Shadow wrote:
Of course the csm has a lot to do with it. consider mittens has been on the csm for years. and they have ccp employees in the alliance as well. if you ask me i think that is a form of insider trading and shouldnt be allowed. that combination is just too much imho. try that anywhere else and your ass would be in a court of law so fast it wouldnt even be funny. and on the note of the csm members of the "elite" group should have term limits like for example mittens has been there 3-4 years straight. that needs to go. NO BACK TO BACK TERMS. and no csm members can serve more then twice in 5 years, eve if its on a alt. i reallt think you eve players need to wake up to what is going on with this csm it is a scam and is ruining eve

I have to ask: were you trying to get every single fact wrong, or was that just by accident?
Mikalia Sunstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
#49 - 2012-01-08 15:37:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Mikalia Sunstorm
They have the attention-spans of gnats, and brains to match, most of them. IOW, nothing will change except the names on the "sovereignty" thingy...for a while, anyway.

Until the next batch of herf-blerfing lemmings take over, and then the next, and then the next, ..., and the next.

That's how it is in the world of 1337-PvP!!!!111oneone!!11!

Pardon me, but I'm Caldari: What's "armour?"

KrakizBad
Section 8.
#50 - 2012-01-08 15:42:40 UTC
Treks Shadow wrote:
Of course the csm has a lot to do with it. consider mittens has been on the csm for years. and they have ccp employees in the alliance as well. if you ask me i think that is a form of insider trading and shouldnt be allowed. that combination is just too much imho. try that anywhere else and your ass would be in a court of law so fast it wouldnt even be funny. and on the note of the csm members of the "elite" group should have term limits like for example mittens has been there 3-4 years straight. that needs to go. NO BACK TO BACK TERMS. and no csm members can serve more then twice in 5 years, eve if its on a alt. i reallt think you eve players need to wake up to what is going on with this csm it is a scam and is ruining eve


With this level of badposting under your belt, you should really consider joining Goons yourself. Also, +1 for posting the dumbest thing I've seen since "my thrasher died to a broadsword and it's unfair."
Mikalia Sunstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
#51 - 2012-01-08 15:45:07 UTC
met worst wrote:
Elessa Enaka wrote:
CCP pushes the reset button on everything in 0.0 or watches as the sandbox withers and dies from stagnation

And I concur. I am deadly serious when I recall all the events leading up to this point.

From the fall of NC (by "ironically" a huge chunk of WN), to GSF letting NC fall, to cap nerfs to WN being the first to go (with some of the largest WN corps jumping to - GSF?). Too many co-incidences for a conspiracy theory although I will entertain that thought as well. It's a discussion point, not a fact sheet on Eve politics.

Why post this? What would be the Holy Grail? The ultimate Eve experience?

Please consider.


Who gives a **** about nullsec?

(And doesn't this thread belong in that cesspit known as CAOD?)

@CCP: Tin-foil BPO, we can haz, pls? Kthxbai.

Pardon me, but I'm Caldari: What's "armour?"

Ira Theos
#52 - 2012-01-08 15:46:47 UTC
Elessa Enaka wrote:
CCP pushes the reset button on everything in 0.0 or watches as the sandbox withers and dies from stagnation


What are you talking about? The sandbox is already withered and dead from stagnation, so are you asking where we go from here? Pesonally, I've already unsubbed and am just spending isk on PLEX to complain about it on the forums in the vain hope that CCP will correct things before Eve completely dries up and blows away. Not really expecting this to happen though.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#53 - 2012-01-08 15:49:47 UTC
Ira Theos wrote:
[Pesonally, I've already unsubbed and am just spending isk on PLEX to complain about it on the forums
Double win: they make more money and doesn't have to provide the actual service. You sure are hurting them there. Lol
Ira Theos
#54 - 2012-01-08 15:51:41 UTC
Vyl Vit wrote:
The point is, why were the Goons and Russkies the only ones to take advantage of the huge vacume left by BoB's disappearance. Seeing them fill that hole NOW is a bit too late. Where were you when it was time to get in on the party?

Maybe that's a bit vague. As long as nobody else attempts a serious run at them, they'll sit in the catbird seat, assuming they don't respond in kind. It's what wars are made from, contention. I remember when the Goons were barely squeaking by. But, they persisted, and it paid off. Why should they be criticized for being effective? Why should the game be criticized if its dynamics afford such an opportunity to those who dare take it?

The remedy is to be just as effective...or moreso if you wish to tip the scale. It's all there waiting to be done. Do it.


Keep smoking that loco weed and it will wither your brain. On the other hand, it has put you in such a fog that you still believe what you said is possible. So I guess stupified oblivion has it's upside.
Mikalia Sunstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
#55 - 2012-01-08 15:59:39 UTC
met worst wrote:
[...] Who's gonna give a crap?


Fixed.

Pardon me, but I'm Caldari: What's "armour?"

Ira Theos
#56 - 2012-01-08 16:06:05 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Ira Theos wrote:
[Pesonally, I've already unsubbed and am just spending isk on PLEX to complain about it on the forums
Double win: they make more money and doesn't have to provide the actual service. You sure are hurting them there. Lol


Was that a gnat I heard buzzing?? (Waives gnat away.)
Zimmy Zeta
Perkone
Caldari State
#57 - 2012-01-08 16:38:28 UTC
met worst wrote:
When the Goons own it all?



The game will be renamed into "Something Evful"

I'd like to apologize for the poor quality of the post above and sincerely hope you didn't waste your time reading it. Yes, I do feel bad about it.

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#58 - 2012-01-08 16:45:59 UTC
Ira Theos wrote:
Was that a gnat I heard buzzing??
No, that was CCP's cash register announcing the double profit they made by getting more money than they otherwise would and saving money by not having to give anything in return.
Lady Spank
Get Out Nasty Face
#59 - 2012-01-08 16:55:51 UTC
Empires won by conquest have always fallen either by revolt within or by defeat by a rival.

(ಠ_ృ) ~ It Takes a Million Years to Become Diamonds So Lets Just Burn Like Coal Until the Sky's Black ~ (ಠ_ృ)

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#60 - 2012-01-08 17:08:45 UTC
Schalac wrote:
The goons will never own nullsec because they are too weak to even own themselves. Soon as the pie gets big enough every one of them will be going for the biggest piece and destroy the whole thing in the process.


oh yes, everything about goonswarm is totally indicative of an alliance on the verge of disintegrating

why don't you headshot VFK about it lol

:pubbies:

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar