Test Server Feedback

I'm inclined to think that my suggestion of giving AFs (or all Frigates for that matter) an inbuilt Interdiction Nullifier as a role bonus would achieve your stated goal better than the MWD bonus.

Well I didn't say it was a guaranteed means to beat a BC. However, by being Bubble immune you somewhat create a low sec environment in Null for these ships., and they seem to be quite popular in Low Sec despite the presence of Battle cruisers.

This.

Time for a proper analysis.

Tranquility Enyo
1 mn MWD II
200mm RT plate
2226 m/s
222m sig radius

SiSi Enyo
1mn MWD II
200mm RT plate
2226 m/s
129m sig radius (this can be simulated in EFT with a fully skilled Claymore booster using a T2 Evasive Maneuvers link, and a full set of high grade Halo implants minus the Halo Gamma)

The opponents
A shield tanked Hurricane with 3x Gyro, 3x TE, full rack of 425mm ACs, shooting Barrage, burning away from the Enyos at 1311 m/s.
A armor buffered gank Harbinger with 3x HS, full rack of Heavy Pulses, shooting Scorch, burning away from the Enyos at 946 m/s.
Neither use drones.

The battle
The Enyos are skillfully approaching at an angle.

http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1201/rolebonus%5B1%5D.jpg


The role bonus definitely helps. Not as much against a 3x TE ship but still fairly noticeable. These are scenarios already in favor of BCs because they are already burning away from the Enyos at full speed. In reality it takes some time for them to speed up and a greater speed difference means more transversal.

On a side note, I noticed that the sig radius varies a LOT between AFs. A Vengeance has a sig radius of 48m, the Hawk 44m, everything else is blow 40m. The Wolf is the lowest with 33m. That's a 45% difference between the highest and lowest. That might explain why I was able to barbecue a Vengeance so easily in a Harbinger on SiSi.

1. Yea, drones put pressure on AFs. The bigger problem are the neuts. AF vs BC as a whole is in the BCs favor. The change helps AFs quite a bit though - a few of them will easily kill a BC without taking losses, unless the BC goes out of its way to counter frigates.
2. Hard to say since it's a spiral approach. The Enyo does 2226 m/s even with 200mm plate, while the unplated Hurricane does 1311 m/s.
3. An Enyo set up to hunt larger ships will carry a warp scrambler and a small nos to keep it running.
4. Narrowing the sig radius differences would be good I think. A 45% difference also means 45% more tracking - that's just too large of a difference.
5. The BC can maneuver yes and reduce the transversal. The AF can counter maneuver also but that's harder. See 1.

Also I'd like to add the following:

I know my above analysis was biased towards the Hurricane. Regardless, I think the problems frigates are having depend significantly on the Minmatar ease of fitting and versatility: a Hurricane can fit double webs and double neuts without making any real sacrifices. Double neuts is standard, double webs are common in Hurricanes not even specifically outfitted to combat frigates. The popularity of Tracking Enhancers and their 30% falloff bonus further adds to the problem.

Another thing which in my opinion also doesn't work as intended is the speed of certain cruiser hulls. A Cynabal with only a 10mn MWD II already goes 2496 m/s, that's faster than most AFs. A Stabber Fleet Issue goes 2272 m/s - about as fast as the slower AFs. The discrepancy grows after fitting because cruisers can devote more slots to speed enhancing modules. In my opinion, the fastest AFs should be able to catch the fastest cruisers in a reasonable time (a significant speed advantage is needed for that, which they lack). Interceptors are great for catching targets with a warp disruptor and holding the point, but cannot be relied upon to apply warp scramblers and webs.

You seem to be confused about the meaning of "sacrifice".

It is absolutely not a "very big sacrifice". An armor cane doesn't need anything special in its 4th mid slot and has sufficient cpu for two webs. It is trivial to fit a second web.

Making a sacrifice means having to choose between an injector and a second web on a Harbinger or Myrmidon or a shield tank mod on a Drake.

And yes, we're talking about armor canes here.

I have no problem with the nano cruisers being faster than AFs.
In regard to the current argument, if any AF gets web+scram on a larger hull, it is faster.
The only way a larger hull is going to be moving any quicker is if it were to have a AB or 2nd web.
Granted, a couple ships only have 2 mids, but they have other strengths to compensate.

The idea was to showcase a worst case scenario outside web range, with an attacker that can defend himself very well inside web range too.

There it is my opinion does not matter because I prefer to fight in low-sec, everyone plays the game differently and there are a lot of really good af pilots in low. You are choosing to ignore a very large subculture within the game, this is also the culture that will be affected the most by these changes for good or for bad. As it stands these people also have the most experience flying assault frigates so I would think twice before ignoring your low sec brothers.

I understand that assault frigs might have a few problems in fleet fighting and in 0.0 in general. I also admit that you understand these problems far better than me, if you and a host of other people with a similar background say the mwd boost is good then i will take your word for it.

Personally the mwd bonus has never been an issue for me, what is an issue is the massive secondary boosts these ships are getting. Every weakness these ships have is being filled by boosts and unnecessary slots. Even I will have trouble losing the new afs to other frigates and im a mediocre pilot at best.

The frequency and diversity of fights is what makes solo frigate pvp so fun. This is because any ship can be killed by almost any other ship even when flow by good pilots. This boost will ruin that diversity, because if im flying a rifter or any faction frig that costs less than 40 millon, I would rather fight a hurricane and pray that it doesn’t have neuts than fight any of these new assault frigates.

Will it kill solo frigate pvp? No, but it will be a serious blow to the one of the few thriving comunities left in lowsec.