These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

What if Aurum was called Micro-Plex?

Author
Solhild
Doomheim
#41 - 2012-01-02 09:30:15 UTC
Bischopt wrote:
I'd rather see NeX and aurum removed completely.


Completely agree, replace with 3 things:

1 player made and destructible - e.g. Monocle that enhances an attribute like an implant

2 player made and corp awardable - e.g. Clothing that is designed and awarded to individuals for a fee, like medals

3 items wearable on rank replaced automatically on death - uniform or tattoo items for standing with NPC corp above 8 etc.


As far as the PLEX liability argument goes, remove PLEX as a destructible item and start trading in months of game time from your subscription queue? I'm happy with the current system for PLEX but there are other options that don't require Aurum/NeX.
Ocih
Space Mermaids
#42 - 2012-01-02 09:37:49 UTC
If it did nothing else, it taught CCP how the portion of EVE that don't come here to **** on each others cornflakes feels.

So how does it feel to be held hostage, CCP? Sucks don't it?
Dbars Grinding
Dark Venture Corporation
Kitchen Sinkhole
#43 - 2012-01-02 09:50:09 UTC
Then it would be called micro plex?

I have more space likes than you. 

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#44 - 2012-01-02 11:44:52 UTC
What if cyanide was called chocolate would you eat it then?

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#45 - 2012-01-02 12:02:37 UTC
Cipher Jones wrote:
What NeX Store item isnt "gettable" by in game means?
All of them.
Without out-of-game means, they don't exist.
Jaroslav Unwanted wrote:
Otherwise scrap all loot, asteroids, everything .. because getting it is about the same as getting things in NeX.. you click, you click again and again.
No amount of click will create PLEX in-game, so no. They are not the same.
Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
#46 - 2012-01-02 13:09:03 UTC
Skydell wrote:
It must be really hard for you Anti-Aurum people to keep a straight face with that great big ******* elephant in the room named Plex.


You are falling to the same mistake that most pro-Aurum people make.

Its not about pay-to-win really. Ever since Eve online was launched there was advantage in paying extra to get an additional account and double the skill coverage, then add things that you need extra accounts for if you want to play "solo" / cyno, scouts, leadership characters etc etc. If any pay-to-win is your bag then frankly forget the PLEX elephant in the room - and rail against multiple accounts instead (but seeing as how these get ccp to double, treble and quad their income per veteran player - good luck with that.)

That PLEX enables pay to win isn't the point. It puts extra ISK into the sandbox that is used to buy things from other players and thereby potentially enrich their game. It benefits even players who do not isk/convert PLEX because it enables RL cash poor players to play and thus ensure a vibrant server population for everyone.

Say one of my wartargets blows $100 on PLEX and starts coming at my corp with a multi-billion isk officer-fit Bhaalgorn of doom that he has bought and assembled with parts bought with isk from other players. On one level you could say "omg pay to win its not fair rage quit!" but on the other - its content, its fun, its a huge ass pinata that we get to hunt and kill and once we blow it to hell it'll pay our war bills for the next couple of months. We'll be putting the bits on the market, other players get to bid for and compete against and the point is the whole deal is integrated with the sandbox.

This is why PLEX is acceptable.

NEX/AURUM does the opposite really. It removes player-led content from the game, cheapening industrial options - makes customization and detailing an "optional/vanity" thing rather than an intrinsic and interconnected part of the game, and additionally makes people question the value of their subscription payment since it no longer covers all eve content any more (reducing server population as we've seen). Subdividing the eve playing population between MT haves and have nots and excluding content we've long expected from the subscription model is not helping eve online survive.

So instead of PLEX my wartarget blows $100 on a monocle and pair of pants. He's now got a facial customization that wasn't made by players, that can't be destroyed by players, that didn't take any kind of industry to build and doesn't enrich anyone's eve experience at all really. The mook still can't afford ships, he's unlikely to fight and basically bought the stupid thing to troll on forums. And the irony is he hasn't really made ANY extra income for ccp because the aurum spend has replaced the PLEX/isk spend for a zero sum on ccp's copy book with a huge negative on fun and entertainment for other players.

And this is why NEX/AURUM is not acceptable.

The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom

Bischopt
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#47 - 2012-01-02 13:45:45 UTC
Jade Constantine wrote:
and additionally makes people question the value of their subscription payment since it no longer covers all eve content any more


^
CCP needs to read that.
Lauren Hellfury
Super Happy Awesome Fun Times
#48 - 2012-01-02 13:53:09 UTC
PLEX DOES NOT ADD ISK TO THE GAME.


This is what I don't get about all the aurum haters. First of all it was about "no pay to win" then, since PLEX enables pay to win in a form, it's about "no in-game affecting items without player driven actions" but since that isn't going to happen and already exists in the form of things like PI CCs it moves to "no items without player driven actions" which fails for the same reasons.


CCP have disconnected items in the NEX store as far as they can without removing them from the market and having them only appear in character customisation regardless of the characters location. If they had done that as well then all the haters would be going on about why can't we buy them for ISK from other players?


So what if someone "blows $100 on a monocle and pair of pants"? What difference does it make to anyone, except that person, what they do with a vanity item? Why shouldn't I be able to pay for something that changes the appearance of my avatar?


On the issue of clothing being player made from BPOs/BPCs, does nobody else have an issue with turning billion+ isk genetic creations into tailors and seamstresses?



Yes, I approve of the use of the NEX store for any and all vanity items and No, I do not approve of the use of the NEX store for anything that creates an in-game effecting items. So trade ship + Aurum for ship with different skin = ok. Trade Aurum for ship with different skin = bad.

Help rid New Eden of T2 BPOs: ** https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=62797 **The Full Pocket Aggro blog:  http://fullpocketaggro.blogspot.com/ **Now showing: **Margin Trading Scams

Lauren Hellfury
Super Happy Awesome Fun Times
#49 - 2012-01-02 13:55:33 UTC
Bischopt wrote:
Jade Constantine wrote:
and additionally makes people question the value of their subscription payment since it no longer covers all eve content any more


^
CCP needs to read that.


Except that since the items can be traded on the market you still have access to them. It just requires that someone has created them by the consumption of a PLEX. Just like PLEX can be traded on the market but you need someone to have purchased them first.

Help rid New Eden of T2 BPOs: ** https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=62797 **The Full Pocket Aggro blog:  http://fullpocketaggro.blogspot.com/ **Now showing: **Margin Trading Scams

Bischopt
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#50 - 2012-01-02 13:59:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Bischopt
Lauren Hellfury wrote:
Bischopt wrote:
Jade Constantine wrote:
and additionally makes people question the value of their subscription payment since it no longer covers all eve content any more


^
CCP needs to read that.


Except that since the items can be traded on the market you still have access to them. It just requires that someone has created them by the consumption of a PLEX. Just like PLEX can be traded on the market but you need someone to have purchased them first.


I'm well aware of this.

Someone is still required to pay for that content which lowers the value of subscription payments in general.

edit:
PLEX is not content, it's just game time. There's a difference.
Lauren Hellfury
Super Happy Awesome Fun Times
#51 - 2012-01-02 14:01:12 UTC
Or increases it since you gain access to the outside payment only options without outside payment.

Help rid New Eden of T2 BPOs: ** https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=62797 **The Full Pocket Aggro blog:  http://fullpocketaggro.blogspot.com/ **Now showing: **Margin Trading Scams

Hirana Yoshida
Behavioral Affront
#52 - 2012-01-02 14:04:04 UTC
You mean micro-plex like quite a few of us said would be a much better idea than introducing a 3rd currency, back when CCP first announced their intent?
You mean micro-plex like CCP has said they will look into replacing Aurum with somewhere down the line?

As for removing NeX: Why?

It is there now so won't require much more dev time, plus it does neither harm nor good (albeit some bling-junkies use it) so it is on the whole a bad idea to remove it out of hand .. all we have to do is keep an eye on CCP in case they try to sneak some gold ammo onto the shelves.

Besides, I am hopeful that we shall one day be able to buy plastic surgery (Char. customizer) in the Nex .. Goddess knows there are some around here who could use some work done! Smile
Bischopt
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#53 - 2012-01-02 14:15:20 UTC
Lauren Hellfury wrote:
Or increases it since you gain access to the outside payment only options without outside payment.


We are still left in a situation where subscription payments cannot purchase some content, no matter what. Somebody always has to pay separately for said content.
An individual being able to buy that content ingame from another player is still worse than having that content in the game without any outside payment in the first place.

The subscription payment should cover the entire game, not some of it.
Right now we have an area of content that we can only be accessed via payments that are not related to game time.

I could do a yo dawg joke about paying while you pay but I'm afraid that meme is overused already.
Lauren Hellfury
Super Happy Awesome Fun Times
#54 - 2012-01-02 14:42:33 UTC
They can purchase it, via market, but the content cannot be generated without additional money being paid somewhere at some point.

That is a big difference. Especially since even if no-one is buying and listing the NEX item you want on the market you can still access it through grinding the isk, purchasing a PLEX (or more depending on item) and creating it yourself.

So, yes, you do have access to all the content with a normal subscription payment.

Unless you believe that no-one should use anything that they don't create themselves and I'm sure that that is a view you don't hold.

Help rid New Eden of T2 BPOs: ** https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=62797 **The Full Pocket Aggro blog:  http://fullpocketaggro.blogspot.com/ **Now showing: **Margin Trading Scams

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
#55 - 2012-01-02 14:48:12 UTC
Lauren Hellfury wrote:
They can purchase it, via market, but the content cannot be generated without additional money being paid somewhere at some point.

That is a big difference. Especially since even if no-one is buying and listing the NEX item you want on the market you can still access it through grinding the isk, purchasing a PLEX (or more depending on item) and creating it yourself.

So, yes, you do have access to all the content with a normal subscription payment.

Unless you believe that no-one should use anything that they don't create themselves and I'm sure that that is a view you don't hold.


You are missing the point. I believe nobody should use anything that isn't created by player industry or openly sold for isk by appropriate ingame npc corporations. You conveniently seem to have skipped the meat of my earlier post talking about how NeX/Aurum removes player interaction from the sandbox also.

The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#56 - 2012-01-02 14:53:59 UTC
Lauren Hellfury wrote:
So, yes, you do have access to all the content with a normal subscription payment.
…except that some content still requires payments outside of the subscriptions to be made. So no matter how much you twist and turn, the game has content that the normal subscriptions don't give access to.
Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
#57 - 2012-01-02 14:55:17 UTC
Lauren Hellfury wrote:
Bischopt wrote:
Jade Constantine wrote:
and additionally makes people question the value of their subscription payment since it no longer covers all eve content any more


^
CCP needs to read that.


Except that since the items can be traded on the market you still have access to them. It just requires that someone has created them by the consumption of a PLEX. Just like PLEX can be traded on the market but you need someone to have purchased them first.


Your argument does nothing to counter the suggestion that the perception of getting less for our subscription payment means less subscriptions overall.

I said that subdividing content between MT and subscription means that people question the value of the subscription. And speaking personally since the introduction of the NeX/Aurum store I've dropped 2 extra accounts. Thats minus $30 dollars a month (every month) on the CCP balance sheet or around $150 to this date that they lost due to the cheapening of content I was interested in through the NeX/Aurum system that I perceive has removed content from the game.

I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one making this assessment.

At the end of the day I'm convinced that MT are a net negative to CCP's income. Of course until (and if) CCP take the extraordinary step of opening up and letting us see the figures for how much NeX stuff they sold (for actual $ rather than giveaways) against how the projected subscriptions developed we'll be arguing without much fact.

But I'm guessing we can agree a 180 turnaround on corporate direction added to absolute apparent terror of mentioning anything NeX/Aurum related by developers indicates the fiscal reality behind the scenes.

The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
#58 - 2012-01-02 14:58:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Jade Constantine
Lauren Hellfury wrote:
So, yes, you do have access to all the content with a normal subscription payment.


Simply untrue. We have absolutely no access to the industrial side of production behind these items. No players get to research bpos, access exploration content or get involved in business concepts involving this content. The only way this "content" enters the game is either by aurum giveaways or somebody needing to access the MT model for the virtual goods. This is new content that players cannot manufacture and thats poison to a player led economic sandbox game like Eve Online.

The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom

Lauren Hellfury
Super Happy Awesome Fun Times
#59 - 2012-01-02 15:02:11 UTC
It doesn't remove player interaction, it fails to add player interaction in certain areas which is massively different.

Pre NEX store there was no player interaction involved in player clothing. You just picked what you wanted from the character customization screen and were done.

Post NEX store there is no player interaction involved (necessarily) in the creation of certain items of player clothing but there is player interaction in the trading of those items.

That CCP didn't add as much interaction as was possible in all areas of a feature is correct. That they removed interaction by their implementation of this feature is plainly false.


I almost agree with your belief but my view on it is slightly different. I believe that nobody should use anything that has an in-game effect that isn't created by player industry. Hell, the only thing I find acceptable to be sold via NPC is skillbooks/BPOs.

PI CCs? Should have BPOs seeded instead of the actual item. For example.

Help rid New Eden of T2 BPOs: ** https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=62797 **The Full Pocket Aggro blog:  http://fullpocketaggro.blogspot.com/ **Now showing: **Margin Trading Scams

Cindy Marco
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#60 - 2012-01-02 15:05:16 UTC
Bischopt wrote:
I'd rather see NeX and aurum removed completely.


I agree, they need to just drop them.