Player Features and Ideas Discussion

We don't hate new players, just game wrecking ones like yourself. You serve as a beacon for change to the wardec mechanics by your ability to bring out the worst in people. Only it won't be in the manner you hope for. It'll be those who want the war decs just to torment others and I fully endorse those players.

Most new players aren't worth corn filled poo piles. They haven't paid a month's sub yet and require extra rules written that destroy the entire nature of what EVE's meant to be. While I appreciate new players that join up and dive right in, the ones you mention, the effeminate coddle searching must have everything given to them or theyll pack up and leave types, screw em.

The community can't take serious suggestions by alt trolls. You could be a star trek dev trying to sabotage EVE's success.

en·deav·or (n-dvr)
n.
1. A conscientious or concerted effort toward an end; an earnest attempt.
2. Purposeful or industrious activity; enterprise.
v. en·deav·ored, en·deav·or·ing, en·deav·ors
v.tr.
To attempt (fulfillment of a responsibility or an obligation, for example) by employment or expenditure of effort: endeavored to improve the quality of life in the inner city.
v.intr.
To work with a set or specified goal or purpose.

Starfleet

And when they removed insurance they gave us mega damage cheap battlecruisers. =)

Boosting Concord isn't a nerf to PVP its assurance that a sneak attack in hisec is appropriately punished and not made to easy as its completely unpreventable in 99% of situations. If you have no idea who despises you , they will catch you and kill you if they really want to.

If they choose to be in a player run corp without skills to defend themselves then yes, screw them. They signed up for war and have to deal with that choice.

Tell me if CCP rejoices in the people who have paid subs in eve since its beginning start quitting because the game is starting to suck. As it would when people like you begin to be given undue credibility.

Dec Shield isn't allowed because its endorsed its allowed because it can't be prevented in current form. And when people report it they have no choice but to say there is nothing we can do about it. But now that its there it gives justification for development time to rework the wardecs into what they were supposed to be. Dire game altering consequences for being in a player run corp.


And while im free to say what i want under my main's name your cowering like a little girl on your alt.

The community can't take serious suggestions by alt trolls. You could be a star trek dev trying to sabotage EVE's success.

en·deav·or (n-dvr)
n.
1. A conscientious or concerted effort toward an end; an earnest attempt.
2. Purposeful or industrious activity; enterprise.
v. en·deav·ored, en·deav·or·ing, en·deav·ors
v.tr.
To attempt (fulfillment of a responsibility or an obligation, for example) by employment or expenditure of effort: endeavored to improve the quality of life in the inner city.
v.intr.
To work with a set or specified goal or purpose.

Starfleet

You will find that CCP does not mind bittervets quitting and wont be forced to do something that is wrong for EVE's future because someone threatens to quit. They have heard the "Ima takinG mah 30 accounts and going h0me!" bs for years and they still buffed concord.

They aren't going to make things 10x worse for newer players who are potential customers because you refuse to go to NPC nullsec or lowsec or fit out gank ships for your PVP.

BTW just in case you forgot them (You have in my opinion)

http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Forum_rules

I could care less about such tag as long as you post it as an opinion and don't violate the TOS doing it. Libel gets reported.

The topic where they allowed dec shielding in the GM topic in General. CCP allowed dec shielding because the current system is a broken mess and filled up GM backlogs.

You can pretend otherwise all you want. EVE has survived just fine without the absolute ability to force CONCORD free combat in hisec and will continue to do so in the future as FAR FAR FAR more important issues of Factional Warfare, Modular POS and Corp systems, And Sov warfare are addressed.

No terms violated just a troll being slapped around by the community. You have maybe 3 people that agree with you, one has all but jumped ship. The rest of the community have raped your face through 30 pages or so of threads.

You won't succeed in getting one post removed let alone manage a ban with your half ass attempt at satirically over applying the rules. You're clearly trolling. And you aren't intelligent enough to win this circumstance good sir.