These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Forum Index

EVE Forums » EVE Technology and Research Center » Player Features and Ideas Discussion » tech 3 battle crusier

Topic is locked indefinitely.

tech 3 battle crusier
Author

Previous Topic Next Topic

palit690

NeoTech Holdings

Likes received: 1

#1 - 2017-05-20 10:36:51 UTC | Edited by: palit690

Tech 3 battle crusier
Can fit covert ops cloaking device and covert cynosural field generator
High slots 5
Can have 4 missles or 4 hybrid turret
Med slots 4
Low slots 5
Drone bay 500 mbit/sec
Structure hitpoints 6500 hp
Capacity 600 m3
Drone bandwidth 250m3
Mass 16,000,000kg
Volume 320,000m3 (20,000.0 m3 packed)
Inertia modifier 1.100 x
Inertia modifier 0.58x
ARMOR HIT POINTS
Armor hitpoints 2,500 hp
SHIELD
Shields capacity 1,500 hp
Shield recharge time 1250.00 s
CAPACITOR
Capacitor capacity 7000gj
Capacitor recharge time 1000.50 s
TARGETING
Maximum targeting range 70.00 km
Maximum locked tergets 6
Signature radius 170 m
Scan resolution 250 mm

3,997
Lugh Crow-Slave Likes received: 3,997	#2 - 2017-05-20 10:41:07 UTC sigh what role or niche is this needed to fill? why is T3 the best way to fill that niche? you seem to have at least put a bit of thought into this but have given no reasoning behind it BLOPS Hauler The 16.8km Bubble

School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State 72
Cervix Thumper School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State Likes received: 72	#3 - 2017-05-20 10:41:21 UTC nice idea, sounds like it would be a good front line recon / brawler. Get in there first with some punching power and then brin in the rest of the fleet.


Lugh Crow-Slave Likes received: 3,997	#4 - 2017-05-20 10:46:37 UTC 1 Cervix Thumper wrote: nice idea, sounds like it would be a good front line recon / brawler. Get in there first with some punching power and then brin in the rest of the fleet. already plenty of ships that can do this lol BLOPS Hauler The 16.8km Bubble

Hedion University Amarr Empire 142
JC Mieyli Hedion University Amarr Empire Likes received: 142	#5 - 2017-05-20 11:00:53 UTC loving that 250mb bandwidth +1 game definitely needs some more op ships getting bored of 5.6% damn hmls


Lugh Crow-Slave Likes received: 3,997	#6 - 2017-05-20 11:02:57 UTC lol i thought that was a typo and assumed 25mb BLOPS Hauler The 16.8km Bubble

Do Little

Bluenose Trading

Likes received: 1,372

#7 - 2017-05-20 12:11:50 UTC

250mb bandwidth = full squadron of Geckos. Who needs the rest of the fleet?

Seriously. T2 ships are specialists - focused on a single role. T3 ships are adaptable, configurable to different roles using subsystems (cruisers) or mode switching (destroyers). How do you extend this concept to battlecruisers?

CCP has been talking about a special ship for fleet commanders - I can see a T3 battlecruiser modeled after the USN Blue Ridge class that can be adapted to tactical (small fleet) or strategic (large fleet) roles. Well defended with all functionality focused on command, control and communications. I don't know how practical this is since client functionality i.e. tactical overlay, overview, etc..., would need to work differently if you were piloting this ship.


Lugh Crow-Slave Likes received: 3,997	#8 - 2017-05-20 12:19:21 UTC pretty sure the FC ship will just be a brick that can lock a lot of targets BLOPS Hauler The 16.8km Bubble


palit690 NeoTech Holdings Likes received: 1	#9 - 2017-05-20 12:24:54 UTC I was thinking of a ship that can get in and do cynoing when your emeny is trying to kill it and if you like u. I know that this is my frist time doing this but it can be modified to fit the role bounses for each race


Lugh Crow-Slave Likes received: 3,997	#10 - 2017-05-20 12:30:41 UTC wut? there are already a lot of good cyno ships. for covert cynos most of the force recons can tank more than enough to last the 30s cycle time BLOPS Hauler The 16.8km Bubble


JC Mieyli Hedion University Amarr Empire Likes received: 142	#11 - 2017-05-20 12:32:05 UTC yeah but none of them can field 5 geckos

Daichi Yamato

Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass

Likes received: 3,995

#12 - 2017-05-20 12:38:28 UTC

Forget about the stats (they are ridiculous anyways), if you want a new ship just think of the concept. What does it do? How does it do it? What is it's strengths/weaknesses? Why would it improve on the current line up of ships?

And when i say that last one i don't mean do existing jobs better, i mean how does it increase our options without making current ships obsolete?

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs

The Scope Gallente Federation 32
Rhaegon Aesir The Scope Gallente Federation Likes received: 32	#13 - 2017-05-20 13:13:17 UTC \| Edited by: Rhaegon Aesir Arguably, the racial bonuses are more important than raw stats, as the raw stats will surely be different for each racial version. The real question is, why is there a need for a high-damage, high tank, covops battlecruiser? This would be overpowered, and frankly we have enough overpowering ships in game already.


Lugh Crow-Slave Likes received: 3,997	#14 - 2017-05-20 13:30:18 UTC I don't thunk it is high damage pretty sure tv's bandwidth is a typo BLOPS Hauler The 16.8km Bubble


Rhaegon Aesir The Scope Gallente Federation Likes received: 32	#15 - 2017-05-20 15:10:13 UTC Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: I don't thunk it is high damage pretty sure tv's bandwidth is a typo I mean I want to believe it's a typo too, but 25 mb and a 500m3 drone bay seems a little...odd. More likely he actually intended it to be 250/500...for whatever reason.

Doomheim 48
Vokan Narkar Doomheim Likes received: 48	#16 - 2017-05-20 15:27:40 UTC no more t3 please, we still have balance issues with those in game already


JC Mieyli Hedion University Amarr Empire Likes received: 142	#17 - 2017-05-20 18:01:16 UTC \| Edited by: JC Mieyli Vokan Narkar wrote: no more t3 please, we still have balance issues with those in game already yeah they suck so much now even t1 bc is better than t3c in combat roles

Lauralite Anne Brezia

Wolf Brothers INC

United Neopian Federation

Likes received: 19

#18 - 2017-05-20 18:06:40 UTC

Why don't we wait and see how well CCP handles the current t3 balancing pass they're working on before adding more T3 classifications why don't we? Do appreciate you trying to put at least some level of effort and thought into this though.

Neopian Citizen

Capsuleer

Project: Salvo Co-Lead

Crazy Drunk Lady

"You want to know where I'm from huh? Well, it's a long way, and several Spacial Rifts removed, from this place."

GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 5,563
Danika Princip GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation Likes received: 5,563	#19 - 2017-05-20 18:28:10 UTC 1 JC Mieyli wrote: Vokan Narkar wrote: no more t3 please, we still have balance issues with those in game already yeah they suck so much now even t1 bc is better than t3c in combat roles reported for trolling