These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Just saying

Author
Anabella Rella
Gradient
Electus Matari
#81 - 2017-05-10 18:02:40 UTC
Pilot Ember I wasn't making an idle threat but stating a fact. MAD is what has kept the peace (mostly) between our nations for the last hundred or so years.

While the imperials would ultimately triumph in a direct conflict against the Republic (assuming the Federation didn't intervene on our behalf) the ensuing victory would be the very definition of Pyrrhic. The "win" would be so costly in terms of loss of lives and materiel that what was left of the empire would be vulnerable to attack from the remaining state actors or extra-state actors such as the Covenant, Nation, Cartel, EoM, etc. Also, unless they wiped out every last Minmatar, including those billions who live in the Federation, they would be facing an eternal guerilla war fought by the surviving Matari.

But hey, why let little details like that interfere with common sense? If you imperials are so sure of yourselves then by all means mount up your war armada and fly the 22 jumps between Amarr and Matar and do your damnedest. Just either do it or shut the hell up about it. I too am sick of the idle threats.

When the world is running down, you make the best of what's still around.

Jason Galente
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#82 - 2017-05-10 18:06:18 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
Charles Cambridge Schmidt wrote:

You'll take our relief money and you'll like it, missy!


Your money? Sure. Your dangerous ideas about cultural amalgamation and mob rule? Mmmmm.... let's just keep it at 'money', ok?


And this is the problem with the Fed's current policy.

"Yeah we'll take your free **** that you had to tax your citizens to get, but become a part of the civic polity and contribute something in return? Nah."

People will only put up with that for so long in a democracy.. just saying.

Only the liberty of the individual assures the prosperity of the whole. And this foundation must be defended.

At any cost

Anabella Rella
Gradient
Electus Matari
#83 - 2017-05-10 18:12:30 UTC
Not all of us are anti-Federation Pilot Galente. I'm a bit biased having been raised and educated on Luminaire but a great many of us Matari are thankful for all that your people have done and continue to do for us. Having said that, our complicated relationship is something that we struggle with and there is hardly a consensus as to what should be the way forward.

When the world is running down, you make the best of what's still around.

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#84 - 2017-05-10 18:14:57 UTC
Anabella Rella wrote:
Not all of us are anti-Federation Pilot Galente. I'm a bit biased having been raised and educated on Luminaire but a great many of us Matari are thankful for all that your people have done and continue to do for us. Having said that, our complicated relationship is something that we struggle with and there is hardly a consensus as to what should be the way forward.


I think there's definitely a consensus, currently, that gratitude is an ill-fitting garment that chafes if worn for too long. There also seems to be a strong-desire to abandon democratic republicanism in favour of a model of government that fits more comfortably with the Matari's tribal roots.

I, mean, we all have tribal roots - just that traditions stemming from that social model are still very relevant in Matari culture and society.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Ayallah
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#85 - 2017-05-10 18:22:33 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
There also seems to be a strong-desire to abandon democratic republicanism in favour of a model of government that fits more comfortably with the Matari's tribal roots.
It happened three years ago.

Goddess of the IGS

As strength goes.

Arrendis
TK Corp
#86 - 2017-05-10 19:57:47 UTC
Jason Galente wrote:

People will only put up with that for so long in a democracy.. just saying.


Yeah, about as long as the Fed needs us to offset the combined strength of the Empire and State.

Like I said: 4+3 = 5+2. Lose that 2, though...
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#87 - 2017-05-10 20:00:10 UTC
Ayallah wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
There also seems to be a strong-desire to abandon democratic republicanism in favour of a model of government that fits more comfortably with the Matari's tribal roots.
It happened three years ago.


I believe it's still current, isn't it? I've not heard of a 'back to the Republic' backlash, anyway...

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Arrendis
TK Corp
#88 - 2017-05-10 20:15:32 UTC
Ioannis Sepphiros wrote:

Regarding point (A) I believe you are far from the mark of what I stated. I will encourage you to give some reading on what I said. I will simply assume that there has been some mixup due to how things may seem by text and will say that if anything gave you that impression, its a wrong one.


That's fair, and I accept your apology for your failure to communicate more clearly.

Quote:

Regarding point (B) I will simply elaborate that no decision belongs to anyone but only to everyone following the laws of the Republic and the power that is granted by those laws. And us are part of the decisionmaking one way or another as well, since we all are to a degree affected by those laws or may place pressure on those laws.


I'm sorry, but are you actually saying that residents of the Federation should be able to influence the laws of the Republic based on some principle of 'because we can'?

Because that's how "And us are part of the decisionmaking one way or another as well, since we [. . .] may place pressure on those laws." reads. 'We may place pressure so we get to be part of the decision-making process." Pressure, after all, means either a carrot or a stick. That's how pressure works. Either 'If we do what you want, we get something.' or 'If we don't do what you want, you do something we won't like'.

And I have to say, that's pretty much tantamount to 'do what we say or else'. Is that really the statement you want to be making with no more justification than 'because we can do it'?
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#89 - 2017-05-10 20:33:32 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
Ioannis Sepphiros wrote:

Regarding point (B) I will simply elaborate that no decision belongs to anyone but only to everyone following the laws of the Republic and the power that is granted by those laws. And us are part of the decisionmaking one way or another as well, since we all are to a degree affected by those laws or may place pressure on those laws.


I'm sorry, but are you actually saying that residents of the Federation should be able to influence the laws of the Republic based on some principle of 'because we can'?

Because that's how "And us are part of the decisionmaking one way or another as well, since we [. . .] may place pressure on those laws." reads. 'We may place pressure so we get to be part of the decision-making process." Pressure, after all, means either a carrot or a stick. That's how pressure works. Either 'If we do what you want, we get something.' or 'If we don't do what you want, you do something we won't like'.

And I have to say, that's pretty much tantamount to 'do what we say or else'. Is that really the statement you want to be making with no more justification than 'because we can do it'?


I mean, I'd say "I told you so" but....

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Arrendis
TK Corp
#90 - 2017-05-10 20:59:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Arrendis
Valerie Valate wrote:

Well. Here's the thing. The Empire has been attacked on more than one occasion, by various parties, using weaponry that is in the same league as "glassing", by which I mean bioweaponry used on civilian populations.


Bioweaponry used on a civilian population is a terrible thing.

It is not, however, equivalent to an orbital bombardment of the entire planet that does not stop until the entire temperate world is a molten heap that will never again support any life in any significant amount.

So, let's not equate 'you attacked a city' with 'Starkman Prime / Arzad II doesn't even support microbial life a millennium later', ok?

I mean, you can spout 'I don't think X would happen unless Y', but I've got a decidedly non-theoretical counterexample of 1 man being murdered, so the Amarr eradicated all life on anentire planet. Last time I checked, I don't think any of the household pets on that planet were co-conspirators, but they all died, too!
Ioannis Sepphiros
Sapphire Interstellar Capital Holdings
#91 - 2017-05-10 21:22:18 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
Ioannis Sepphiros wrote:

Regarding point (A) I believe you are far from the mark of what I stated. I will encourage you to give some reading on what I said. I will simply assume that there has been some mixup due to how things may seem by text and will say that if anything gave you that impression, its a wrong one.


That's fair, and I accept your apology for your failure to communicate more clearly.

Quote:

Regarding point (B) I will simply elaborate that no decision belongs to anyone but only to everyone following the laws of the Republic and the power that is granted by those laws. And us are part of the decisionmaking one way or another as well, since we all are to a degree affected by those laws or may place pressure on those laws.


I'm sorry, but are you actually saying that residents of the Federation should be able to influence the laws of the Republic based on some principle of 'because we can'?

Because that's how "And us are part of the decisionmaking one way or another as well, since we [. . .] may place pressure on those laws." reads. 'We may place pressure so we get to be part of the decision-making process." Pressure, after all, means either a carrot or a stick. That's how pressure works. Either 'If we do what you want, we get something.' or 'If we don't do what you want, you do something we won't like'.

And I have to say, that's pretty much tantamount to 'do what we say or else'. Is that really the statement you want to be making with no more justification than 'because we can do it'?


I didnt apologise for anything so, there is nothing to accept I suppose.

Also, I may not look the part but I am of Minmatar descent so again thats off the mark.

In any rate, Miss Arrendis, just for the record I wont keep on derailing Captain Rhiannon's post by turning this about me from now on. I have been very rather clear on what I have stated and what I meant, even with providing some explanations about your first questions regarding my initial posts. In case you want any more clarification we can always have a private chat.

Also, interesting ideas/perceptions you seem to have of what pressure is under a democratic regime. I do hope we can keep on debating on the actual points raised by Captain Rhiannon at some point again however. Enjoy your evening.
Valerie Valate
Church of The Crimson Saviour
#92 - 2017-05-10 21:36:08 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
Valerie Valate wrote:

Well. Here's the thing. The Empire has been attacked on more than one occasion, by various parties, using weaponry that is in the same league as "glassing", by which I mean bioweaponry used on civilian populations.

So,


Fine then.

They're not in the same league.

But they're at least playing the same sport.

Are you happy now ?

Doctor V. Valate, Professor of Archaeology at Kaztropolis Imperial University.

Challis Drant
Gradient
Electus Matari
#93 - 2017-05-10 22:43:14 UTC
Valerie Valate wrote:


But the Empire can survive losing a Throne World.

Can the Minmatar survive losing Matar ?


We have already lost it once and we got it back - stands to reason on a historical basis we would get it back. Yeah it might be unable to support life for a very long time.... but for a period of time it was under Amarr control and not able to fully represent the Minmatar people. We have dealt with this before - we can do it again if needed.



The current four way standoff is far preferable to a three way standoff - it is so much easier to create a 2 on 1 in a three way system, getting a 3 vs 1 is a lot harder. And I am sure that even if a simple Brutor can work that out - so can a Caldari politician.

Combining EM and Ushra'Khan in the Great Wildlands would do nothing - it is already part of the Republic and therefore subject to Republic rule and laws - and trying to form a rump Matari state there or in any other region is Treason. "Someone" is going to have to come up with a very very good reason why a Corporation and Alliance that supports the Republic would be willing to head down a path that would lead to civil war - and that somehow we should be leading it rather than shooting at those who threaten the Republic.

Good luck with coming up with that reason.
Jason Galente
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#94 - 2017-05-10 22:49:04 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
Jason Galente wrote:

People will only put up with that for so long in a democracy.. just saying.


Yeah, about as long as the Fed needs us to offset the combined strength of the Empire and State.

Like I said: 4+3 = 5+2. Lose that 2, though...


I was talking more internally, but I see what you mean when it comes to international politics between the Fed and Republic. It's a mutually beneficial arrangement.

Only the liberty of the individual assures the prosperity of the whole. And this foundation must be defended.

At any cost

Arrendis
TK Corp
#95 - 2017-05-10 23:22:02 UTC
Valerie Valate wrote:

They're not in the same league.

But they're at least playing the same sport.

Are you happy now ?


Well, now that you've acknowledged your whole rationale for objecting to Miz's statement has fallen apart?

Yeah. I am.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#96 - 2017-05-10 23:36:26 UTC
Jason Galente wrote:
I was talking more internally, but I see what you mean when it comes to international politics between the Fed and Republic. It's a mutually beneficial arrangement.


Right, and that mutual benefit is why the upper echelons of the Federal government will continue to sell foreign aid to the people: because they need the Republic. And the Republic needs that foreign aid. But neither side benefits from the cultural pressure that breeds resentment within the Republic, and gets the Federation populace wondering why the Matari are 'so ungrateful'.
ValentinaDLM
SoE Roughriders
Electus Matari
#97 - 2017-05-11 08:41:48 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
As much as I don't want to get involved in the disputes between the Empire and the Republic on an unpaid basis, you should remember that the State traditionally invades other peoples space under very specific circumstances - and neither Athra nor Pator contain the Caldari homeworld.

I would, personally, not participate in an Empire attack on the Republic, unless said war were in the best interests of the State. As others have said, it really isn't in the best interests of the State for EITHER of the expansionist powers to get stronger. In order to maintain our independence, we have to maintain a military strong enough to fight off any invader.

I think this is elementary statecraft. I can't believe the CEP doesn't see this, themselves. Whilst the State would certainly aid the Empire against an invasion by the Republic, I don't see us getting involved in an Imperial attack on the Republic. If anything, it's in the interests of the State for the Republic to get a bit stronger - in trade and military strength.


It is no secret that I broadly agree with your assessment, and think that stronger ties between the State and the Republic could be helpful to everyone. I think beyond anything though what the State and the Republic have, are that they are survivors who have known true strife and became stronger in the face of it. I wonder how the Empire or the Federation would react to a truly existential threat?

I am certainly no expert in statecraft or diplomacy, but I do know that when Of Questionable Repute, and Multicultural F1 Brigade teamed up to fight Sansha's Nation (and a few Gallente) in Black Rise, despite the different militia flags being flown, we both had mutual benefit from it, and I am far more comfortable working towards mutual benefit as it encourages us to be strong, whereas the Federation always seems to want to solve our problems for us, keeping us weak and resenting us for it. Don't get me wrong, the Federation isn't just as bad as the Amarr, but they both think their way is the best way for everyone, and that is incredibly dangerous thinking.

As for a solution to the problem of the main topic at hand, getting stronger is the only thing we really can do till the Tribes and the Sanmatar provide us with a solution, participating in the militia conflict or elsewhere, could actually make us stronger via experience, so I don't consider it a waste of resources.
Victoria Grey
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#98 - 2017-05-11 21:21:41 UTC
Challis Drant wrote:

The current four way standoff is far preferable to a three way standoff - it is so much easier to create a 2 on 1 in a three way system, getting a 3 vs 1 is a lot harder. And I am sure that even if a simple Brutor can work that out - so can a Caldari politician.

Combining EM and Ushra'Khan in the Great Wildlands would do nothing - it is already part of the Republic and therefore subject to Republic rule and laws - and trying to form a rump Matari state there or in any other region is Treason. "Someone" is going to have to come up with a very very good reason why a Corporation and Alliance that supports the Republic would be willing to head down a path that would lead to civil war - and that somehow we should be leading it rather than shooting at those who threaten the Republic.

Good luck with coming up with that reason.


I definitely do not want a civil war or the creation of a different Matari state. I love the Republic, The Sanmatar, and especially how complete we, as a nation, have become with all seven tribes back in the fold. If the news (recently with the Kyonoke Crises if nothing else) is anything to go by our science, crises response, and national cohesiveness is among the best and most advanced in the cluster and I'm proud of that.

No I just feel a little disheartened at how the Toy War seems pointless and ineffectual. How its continued existence seems to be a trap for capsuleers locking them out of any way to effectively support the Republic. To the point that I doubt anything would happen if we pulled out of it all together.

The idea of combining forces of EM and U'K was an idea based on romanticism I'll be honest. I just thought if two giants such as those two were to talk to each other, something might happen. Something beneficial, whatever they decided.

I guess the heart of it all, I feel there is more we could do to support our Tribes and the greater Republic than to just put our heads down and go through the motions of of the Toy War.
Mizhara Del'thul
Kyn'aldrnari
#99 - 2017-05-11 21:59:15 UTC
Challis, what the hell kind of drugs are you on? Matari entities taking advantage of the industrial resources of Great Wildlands as loyalists is treason, now? Leading to Civil War? For that matter, exactly who is threatening the Republic that needs you shooting them? The Pendulum Participants can't do anything in our space, no different from how we can do sod all in theirs, so unless you're talking about wetwork for the corps I have to admit I'm curious what you're talking about. If it is the corp wetwork stuff, well I can assure you there's even more to shoot in Great Wildlands in that regard.

As for good reasons... well, perhaps you haven't noticed but there's not exactly a significant number of loyalists around our space anymore. One of the reasons for that is quite simple: There's sod all to do there that is very worthwhile for a lot of capsuleers. Why do you think so many of us has kept bleeding out of Republic highsec and into all kinds of other entities? Off the top of my head, I can think of examples having joined Goons, Brave, Test, Mercenary Coalition, Hard Knocks, Dyslexia Paradox, even Provibloc and so on. The one thing these places have in common is that they try to reach a bit further than you can ever climb in highsec.

Industrialists, combat pilots, wetwork specialists, researchers and developers and so on.

So many of us have had to leave home behind because there was no more growth and challenge to be had there. Want a reason to try to carve out a piece of nullsec for Tribal loyalists? It might very well be the only way to keep any but the most timid from leaving it all behind in order to grow past the limitations inherent in highsec living. Null, even the claimed space like Great Wildlands, offer far greater challenges and opportunities for capsuleer entities, be it in terms of industry and development, capsuleer combat and more. And it offers the opportunity to build something that can matter, long term.

Or apparently it's 'treason' and cause for 'civil war', somehow.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#100 - 2017-05-11 22:02:14 UTC
Victoria Grey wrote:

How its continued existence seems to be a trap for capsuleers locking them out of any way to effectively support the Republic.


Out of curiosity: how would you suggest capsuleers 'effectively support the Republic', and how does the Pendulum inhibit this?