These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The Internet Tough Guy - à la EVE Online

Author
Zander Moreau
Poor Fellow-Soldiers of James 315 and of Hek.
CODE.
#21 - 2017-03-22 20:10:36 UTC
Sasha Nemtsov wrote:


These observations reflect your ability to make good comparisons. I'm grateful. Unfortunately, Brian doesn't begin with what we all must agree upon in order to have a meaningful discussion: Definitions. He has used words which may mean very different things to different people. I was disappointed by that.


True. However, he has taken the first step towards enlightenment, IMO. Some pilots go YEARS in this game without even sparking meaningful discussion and debate such as this.

"We will bring you love... and by love, I mean lasers."

Pope Maximillian Singularity VI, First of His Name

Kaely Tanniss
Black Lotus Society.
#22 - 2017-03-23 07:45:16 UTC
Dom Arkaral wrote:
There's something hypnotic in your vids...
Idk what it is, maybe all them pics? Blink

On a serious note, awesome vid, keep 'em coming :D


It's his voice..sexehBlink

If I had a nickel for every time someone said women don't play eve, I'd have a bag of nickels to whack the next person who said it..

Brian Paone
Doomheim
#23 - 2017-03-23 12:48:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Brian Paone
Sasha Nemtsov wrote:
Brian Paone wrote:

You know, the game isn't real. But you and I are.

Your actions, my actions, they don't exist in game. They can't. The game isn't real. We both know this. So in the end, what's left are our actions as they pertain to one another.

Would you agree or disagree with that assertation? And why?

Thank you in advance for your time.

You've caught me there Brian, I wasn't expecting a philosopher to land in the thread!

I can only say that it seems to me that whatever engages our senses and our emotions appears to us to be 'real' in some way. This is likely to be true in what some people call 'real life' and in video games. So there is a sense in which 'EVE is real' - is true!

When we speak of our 'actions' we really can't consider them without describing what they are, how they are generated, and their effect upon others..

What if I shoot a random miner's Retriever, and he experiences a sense of loss? We both know that the Retriever - as an object, as a 'thing' - never existed to begin with. Nevertheless, his sense of loss is real enough, as page upon page of his expletive-laden tears will attest.

I'm afraid I can't explore the nature of Reality with you, for I'm prone to headaches if discussions become too abstract. It was ok in the 60s, when everyone was gobbling hash-cakes like there was no tomorrow and the problems of the world could be solved with one wave of a joss-stick....

I probably haven't answered your question, but I'm not 100% sure I know what it was.... Blink



...what? No, the game isn't real. It's pixels, artfully arranged to create the visual impression of a design team's reckoning of what a fictional spacescape looks and acts like. It's not real, I assure you. Neither are our characters.

Now, the sense of loss one experiences when "losing" a "ship" here is actually quite real, in that the individual's time is lost. Granted, it was lost anyway due to passage never to return, but in order to restore balance - to be right back at the level of productivity this person was at - they're going to need to spend more time. That's where their loss comes in.

I realize it's an uncomfortable discussion for you to have, and that people respond to such in some cases with attempts at humor. It is what it is. But you're a hypocrite when you speak of "internet tough guys" because that's exactly what you're positing yourself to be. Someone who has to be placated in order to ensure loss doesn't occur. Loss you're not exactly forced to inflict. You CHOSE to do this to others.

You could choose to be just about anything you want in this fictional universe. You chose consciously to be a bully, to attempt to take from others one of their most valuable resources (if not THE most valuable).

Don't be surprised if people don't respect that.

(I'm not sure you were even alive for the Sixties. Were you?)
Brian Paone
Doomheim
#24 - 2017-03-23 12:55:22 UTC
Zander Moreau wrote:
I think it gets more into a question of game reality vs real life (yay! Philosophy!)

Whereas: we play within a game's reality (EVE). Our real self interacts with EVE. Therefore you have a bit of RL mechanics, expectations, et al that comes with it.

EVE is also a game like no other in which you can experience very real loss and it can be put into terms of RL monetary terms. To simplify; you spend a week grinding out 1Bil in ISK. That can be monitized in terms of PLEX that runs for about $20.00 in USD. You invest that ISK into a ship. That ship subsequently gets destroyed. You are now out that 1Bil ISK/$20/1 week of work.

The real sense of loss comes in because unlike other games where all of your stuff is still there when you respawn, you do not get all of that back when you come back to life. It is now gone for good and you can quantify it.

It also gets a player into interesting situations of what would we do in game vs what would we do in real life if presented with this situation. In some cases we are scammed, shook down for ISK, charged for mining or exploration permits, or whatever. Part of us says "ain't no way I'd pay that in real life and so I'm not going to pay it in a game." But the thing that people don't realize is that they do pay for similar things in real life. Imagine if you will a group of people who establish a town, build roads, have a police force, and everything. Now they're charging you, say, $10.00 for the privilege of driving your vehicle on their roads. You pay for your license and go on your merry way. If you don't pay, and happen to be pulled over by the police, your car is confiscated and you're walking home. It's not extortion. It's the law of your town, state, providence, region, country, or whatever.


Ah, the other common defense. I honesty find this to be a bit distasteful, your comparing CODE's "fee" to municipal fees. The latter go toward maintaining a common social network for the benefit of as many people as possible (to varying degrees of success). The former's just being a jerk for the sake of being a jerk.

If you think you're offering a service to the players of New Eden, I would like to inform you that your services simply aren't necessary. But you know this. It's not about providing a service. It's about the perception of power. You and your friends believe you have the right to exercise it over others, simply because you've been given the option to do so.

Now, I'd sincerely appreciate it if you spared me the usual rigmarole about "content", because I've heard it and frankly, you don't want to hear the counterargument. Let's just call a spade a spade here - CODE is nothing more than a collection of tribalists.
Sasha Nemtsov
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#25 - 2017-03-23 13:18:32 UTC
Brian Paone wrote:

...what? No, the game isn't real. It's pixels

But the pixels are real....

Brian Paone wrote:
I realize it's an uncomfortable discussion for you to have, and that people respond to such in some cases with attempts at humor.

The discomfort is physical. I experience no intellectual discomfort in exploring these matters with you Brian.

Brian Paone wrote:
But you're a hypocrite when you speak of "internet tough guys" because that's exactly what you're positing yourself to be. Someone who has to be placated in order to ensure loss doesn't occur. Loss you're not exactly forced to inflict. You CHOSE to do this to others.

My 'tough guy' character evolved in-game, and doesn't travel beyond the EVE client or internet locations bound to it. That is why his name is Sasha, and not Rob. I'd look silly attempting to sell you a Mining Permit outside Oxford Circus Station...

Brian Paone wrote:
You chose consciously to be a bully, to attempt to take from others one of their most valuable resources (if not THE most valuable).

...and now the tears. Here, have a tissue.... You remind me so much of that guy - what's his name? Ah yes, rswfire in a past minerbumping blog. Have a read, or listen. It's my most popular SoundCloud recording to date, with over 400 plays. That's quite a lot for a plain voice recording. All down to James' writing, of course.

Brian Paone wrote:
(I'm not sure you were even alive for the Sixties. Were you?)

I'm in my sixties, Brian.

I hope you can come to an understanding about toughness as it pertains to Reality. I understand toughness to be resilience, not an aptitude for violence. I understand Reality to be completely incapable of definition, in any language. Your attempt rather underlines my point.

Be Well!
Yebo Lakatosh
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#26 - 2017-03-23 13:56:49 UTC
I wonder why Mr Panoe tries to devalue his opinion with the premiss that the whole context of what he is saying is not 'real'. Even if I saw his point in comparing someone who threathens with real life violence to someone who shoots spaceships in a game, I'd feel it's still pointless after stating that one of those is not -real-.

Though at the end of the day, it's just the best justification for any malevolent action in any game. For it's not real. It's so simple and evident that the so called 'fun-vamipres' barely even bring it up in a discussion, or even debate it if the other party throws it in.


Though I would have skimmed over the post with an irrelevant premiss if I found the conclusion at the end. But since I didn't, I join in to provoke a response with the second part of the thought process - it may be revealing!

Elite F1 pilot since YC119, incarnate of honor, integrity and tidi.

Sasha Nemtsov
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#27 - 2017-03-23 14:25:16 UTC
Yebo Lakatosh wrote:
if I found the conclusion at the end.


Yebo, your post is a very reasonable response to Brian's doubtless heartfelt but rather unconvincing contribution.

His initial post positioned itself as an invitation to explore certain themes, in a comradely atmosphere of mutual investigation.

In his most recent response to me, however, he abandons any pretence of civilised discussion and roundly accuses me of being 'a bully'. What is one to make of such a character?

His amateurish attempt to draw me into joining some kind of discursive merry-go-round, has failed. Forlorn, he's reduced to hurling a schoolyard epithet at someone likely several decades his senior and nobody's fool, to boot.

As you implied, it's all been said before, and better.
Zander Moreau
Poor Fellow-Soldiers of James 315 and of Hek.
CODE.
#28 - 2017-03-23 15:59:05 UTC
Brian Paone wrote:


Ah, the other common defense. I honesty find this to be a bit distasteful, your comparing CODE's "fee" to municipal fees. The latter go toward maintaining a common social network for the benefit of as many people as possible (to varying degrees of success). The former's just being a jerk for the sake of being a jerk.

If you think you're offering a service to the players of New Eden, I would like to inform you that your services simply aren't necessary. But you know this. It's not about providing a service. It's about the perception of power. You and your friends believe you have the right to exercise it over others, simply because you've been given the option to do so.

Now, I'd sincerely appreciate it if you spared me the usual rigmarole about "content", because I've heard it and frankly, you don't want to hear the counterargument. Let's just call a spade a spade here - CODE is nothing more than a collection of tribalists.


Ahhhh Brian, Brian, Brian... I was just starting to like you. Even defended you. But now you've gone and disappointed me with your Ad Hominem attacks on both me and the Alliance that I now call home. I just don't like it when people disappoint me in a debate like this because now I take the gloves off.

Now, in my analogy I never once mentioned the CODE, did I? Go ahead, scroll back up and re-read what I posted. You can do it. I was speaking broadly as to ALL of New Eden, not just High, Low, or Null Sec in particular. You might not remember the old days of EVE but way back in the day before Sov could be claimed, people would just lay claim to a star system or two, or three, or whatever, it was announced in the forums, and you had to abide by whatever rules they imposed.

That concept has not changed. Even today we have alliances and corporations that carve out their own little sections of space that is not null and they police them. This is what CODE. has done to High Sec and CODE. publicly announces this and enforces this.

You want to call a spade a spade? Then how about this (and this is how you REALLY do an Ad Hominem attack); you are a carebear and free roaming furries are not permitted in CODE Space. If I were to blast you or your ilk, I'd be enforcing the local health code.

"We will bring you love... and by love, I mean lasers."

Pope Maximillian Singularity VI, First of His Name

Brian Paone
Doomheim
#29 - 2017-03-23 16:12:19 UTC
Sasha Nemtsov wrote:
snip


Your character isn't real, "Sasha". It never was. It can't be. It's just a pile of pixels, incapable of doing any more than directed.

YOU control "Sasha". "Sasha" is you. There's no escaping from that.

"Sasha" isn't a willful detriment to society. You are. And you shouldn't be upset with this label, as you chose to go down this road.

There's nothing valid about what you do here. All you're doing is opposing your own species. Granted, the game rules DO allow you to do that, which is why it'd be silly to file a report on it, wouldn't it.

But it's certainly not silly to call a spade a spade, spade. If you're going to willfully oppose your own species, it's certainly disingenuous to act like you deserve RESPECT for it.
Brian Paone
Doomheim
#30 - 2017-03-23 16:13:07 UTC
Zander Moreau wrote:
Brian Paone wrote:


Ah, the other common defense. I honesty find this to be a bit distasteful, your comparing CODE's "fee" to municipal fees. The latter go toward maintaining a common social network for the benefit of as many people as possible (to varying degrees of success). The former's just being a jerk for the sake of being a jerk.

If you think you're offering a service to the players of New Eden, I would like to inform you that your services simply aren't necessary. But you know this. It's not about providing a service. It's about the perception of power. You and your friends believe you have the right to exercise it over others, simply because you've been given the option to do so.

Now, I'd sincerely appreciate it if you spared me the usual rigmarole about "content", because I've heard it and frankly, you don't want to hear the counterargument. Let's just call a spade a spade here - CODE is nothing more than a collection of tribalists.


Ahhhh Brian, Brian, Brian... I was just starting to like you. Even defended you. But now you've gone and disappointed me with your Ad Hominem attacks on both me and the Alliance that I now call home. I just don't like it when people disappoint me in a debate like this because now I take the gloves off.

Now, in my analogy I never once mentioned the CODE, did I? Go ahead, scroll back up and re-read what I posted. You can do it. I was speaking broadly as to ALL of New Eden, not just High, Low, or Null Sec in particular. You might not remember the old days of EVE but way back in the day before Sov could be claimed, people would just lay claim to a star system or two, or three, or whatever, it was announced in the forums, and you had to abide by whatever rules they imposed.

That concept has not changed. Even today we have alliances and corporations that carve out their own little sections of space that is not null and they police them. This is what CODE. has done to High Sec and CODE. publicly announces this and enforces this.

You want to call a spade a spade? Then how about this (and this is how you REALLY do an Ad Hominem attack); you are a carebear and free roaming furries are not permitted in CODE Space. If I were to blast you or your ilk, I'd be enforcing the local health code.


...yeah, listen, if this is how you want to behave, I'll just talk with the other person. Thanks. :-)
Kaely Tanniss
Black Lotus Society.
#31 - 2017-03-23 16:47:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Kaely Tanniss
Brian Paone wrote:
Sasha Nemtsov wrote:
snip


Your character isn't real, "Sasha". It never was. It can't be. It's just a pile of pixels, incapable of doing any more than directed.

YOU control "Sasha". "Sasha" is you. There's no escaping from that.

"Sasha" isn't a willful detriment to society. You are. And you shouldn't be upset with this label, as you chose to go down this road.

There's nothing valid about what you do here. All you're doing is opposing your own species. Granted, the game rules DO allow you to do that, which is why it'd be silly to file a report on it, wouldn't it.

But it's certainly not silly to call a spade a spade, spade. If you're going to willfully oppose your own species, it's certainly disingenuous to act like you deserve RESPECT for it.


..Because in rl I fly around in my spaceship blapping innocents for the lulz. IRL I shoot others without recourse and with impunity. Because arrrrrg..I'm a pirate and because I play one in a game, I MUST be like that irl. ...ludicrous. You can argue your Psychology 101 all you want but until you actually know a player irl and what they are, who they are, what they're like, and what they stand for..your opinions are nothing but conjecture and placing the blame on someone else for your own lack of knowledge and awareness to your surroundings and/or game mechanics. Your first year, undergraduate, pseudo psycho-analysis means nothing and just because you believe it, doesn't make it fact. It's no secret what Eve is and what it's about. It's you that chooses to play it. As such, you take full responsibility for both your actions and lack thereof.

But, I suspect nothing anyone says will change your stance on the matter. After all, it's easier to blame others for ones shortcomings than to accept responsibility for ones self. I guess we're all just a bunch of meanies. Shame on us for playing a game the way it's meant to be played. SHAME! Roll

If I had a nickel for every time someone said women don't play eve, I'd have a bag of nickels to whack the next person who said it..

Brian Paone
Doomheim
#32 - 2017-03-23 16:53:47 UTC
Kaely Tanniss wrote:
Brian Paone wrote:
Sasha Nemtsov wrote:
snip


Your character isn't real, "Sasha". It never was. It can't be. It's just a pile of pixels, incapable of doing any more than directed.

YOU control "Sasha". "Sasha" is you. There's no escaping from that.

"Sasha" isn't a willful detriment to society. You are. And you shouldn't be upset with this label, as you chose to go down this road.

There's nothing valid about what you do here. All you're doing is opposing your own species. Granted, the game rules DO allow you to do that, which is why it'd be silly to file a report on it, wouldn't it.

But it's certainly not silly to call a spade a spade, spade. If you're going to willfully oppose your own species, it's certainly disingenuous to act like you deserve RESPECT for it.


..Because in rl I fly around in my spaceship blapping innocents for the lulz. IRL I shoot others without recourse and with impunity. Because arrrrrg..I'm a pirate and because I play one in a game, I MUST be like that irl. ...ludicrous. You can argue your Psychology 101 all you want but until you actually know a player irl and what they are, who they are, what they're like, and what they stand for..your opinions are nothing but conjecture and placing the blame on someone else for your own lack of knowledge and awareness to your surroundings and/or game mechanics. It's no secret what Eve is and what it's about. It's you that chooses to play it. As such, you take full responsibility for both your actions and lack thereof.

But, I suspect nothing anyone says will change your stance on the matter. After all, it's easier to blame others for ones shortcomings than to accept responsibility for ones self. I guess we're all just a bunch of meanies. Shame on us for playing a game the way it's meant to be played. SHAME! Roll


Sarcasm aside, reality is what it is. Why are you offended at being properly labeled? I'm not the one who decided your actions were unsavory. Society did, long before either of us were even concepts, let alone born.

I find your second paragraph to be awfully telling, however. Aren't you trying to transfer the blame for your negative interactions with your own species on a pile of pixels that doesn't actually exist?

Physician, you're on line one with rectal pain. Might wanna tend to that. ;-)

Now, if you'd like to have an ACTUAL discussion, I'm more than happy. But if this is just going to be a back-and-forth attempt at wit, well, I think we both have better things to do with our time. Thanks for your comments. :-)
Kaely Tanniss
Black Lotus Society.
#33 - 2017-03-23 16:56:48 UTC
Brian Paone wrote:
Kaely Tanniss wrote:
Brian Paone wrote:
Sasha Nemtsov wrote:
snip


Your character isn't real, "Sasha". It never was. It can't be. It's just a pile of pixels, incapable of doing any more than directed.

YOU control "Sasha". "Sasha" is you. There's no escaping from that.

"Sasha" isn't a willful detriment to society. You are. And you shouldn't be upset with this label, as you chose to go down this road.

There's nothing valid about what you do here. All you're doing is opposing your own species. Granted, the game rules DO allow you to do that, which is why it'd be silly to file a report on it, wouldn't it.

But it's certainly not silly to call a spade a spade, spade. If you're going to willfully oppose your own species, it's certainly disingenuous to act like you deserve RESPECT for it.


..Because in rl I fly around in my spaceship blapping innocents for the lulz. IRL I shoot others without recourse and with impunity. Because arrrrrg..I'm a pirate and because I play one in a game, I MUST be like that irl. ...ludicrous. You can argue your Psychology 101 all you want but until you actually know a player irl and what they are, who they are, what they're like, and what they stand for..your opinions are nothing but conjecture and placing the blame on someone else for your own lack of knowledge and awareness to your surroundings and/or game mechanics. It's no secret what Eve is and what it's about. It's you that chooses to play it. As such, you take full responsibility for both your actions and lack thereof.

But, I suspect nothing anyone says will change your stance on the matter. After all, it's easier to blame others for ones shortcomings than to accept responsibility for ones self. I guess we're all just a bunch of meanies. Shame on us for playing a game the way it's meant to be played. SHAME! Roll


Sarcasm aside, reality is what it is. Why are you offended at being properly labeled? I'm not the one who decided your actions were unsavory. Society did, long before either of us were even concepts, let alone born.

I find your second paragraph to be awfully telling, however. Aren't you trying to transfer the blame for your negative interactions with your own species on a pile of pixels that doesn't actually exist?

Physician, you're on line one with rectal pain. Might wanna tend to that. ;-)

Now, if you'd like to have an ACTUAL discussion, I'm more than happy. But if this is just going to be a back-and-forth attempt at wit, well, I think we both have better things to do with our time. Thanks for your comments. :-)


Oh I'm not offended sweetheart. You mistake me for someone who gives a crap what you think. You don't know me irl, nor I you. To place such judgements on someone you know nothing about is not only wrong, but foolish. But, after all, does the fool know he's a fool? Blink

If I had a nickel for every time someone said women don't play eve, I'd have a bag of nickels to whack the next person who said it..

Dom Arkaral
Bannheim
Cuttlefish Collective
#34 - 2017-03-23 17:03:39 UTC
Brian Paone wrote:
Kaely Tanniss wrote:
Brian Paone wrote:
Sasha Nemtsov wrote:
snip


Your character isn't real, "Sasha". It never was. It can't be. It's just a pile of pixels, incapable of doing any more than directed.

YOU control "Sasha". "Sasha" is you. There's no escaping from that.

"Sasha" isn't a willful detriment to society. You are. And you shouldn't be upset with this label, as you chose to go down this road.

There's nothing valid about what you do here. All you're doing is opposing your own species. Granted, the game rules DO allow you to do that, which is why it'd be silly to file a report on it, wouldn't it.

But it's certainly not silly to call a spade a spade, spade. If you're going to willfully oppose your own species, it's certainly disingenuous to act like you deserve RESPECT for it.


..Because in rl I fly around in my spaceship blapping innocents for the lulz. IRL I shoot others without recourse and with impunity. Because arrrrrg..I'm a pirate and because I play one in a game, I MUST be like that irl. ...ludicrous. You can argue your Psychology 101 all you want but until you actually know a player irl and what they are, who they are, what they're like, and what they stand for..your opinions are nothing but conjecture and placing the blame on someone else for your own lack of knowledge and awareness to your surroundings and/or game mechanics. It's no secret what Eve is and what it's about. It's you that chooses to play it. As such, you take full responsibility for both your actions and lack thereof.

But, I suspect nothing anyone says will change your stance on the matter. After all, it's easier to blame others for ones shortcomings than to accept responsibility for ones self. I guess we're all just a bunch of meanies. Shame on us for playing a game the way it's meant to be played. SHAME! Roll


Sarcasm aside, reality is what it is. Why are you offended at being properly labeled? I'm not the one who decided your actions were unsavory. Society did, long before either of us were even concepts, let alone born.

I find your second paragraph to be awfully telling, however. Aren't you trying to transfer the blame for your negative interactions with your own species on a pile of pixels that doesn't actually exist?

Physician, you're on line one with rectal pain. Might wanna tend to that. ;-)

Now, if you'd like to have an ACTUAL discussion, I'm more than happy. But if this is just going to be a back-and-forth attempt at wit, well, I think we both have better things to do with our time. Thanks for your comments. :-)

see
EVE is not RL
so.. EVE can't be compared with RL

it's like trying to compare Call of Duty with what was happening in the Middle-East
it just doesn't compute

Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester.

Broadcast 4 Reps -- YOU ARE NOT ALONE, EVER

Instigator of the First ISD Thunderdome

CCL Loyalist

Zander Moreau
Poor Fellow-Soldiers of James 315 and of Hek.
CODE.
#35 - 2017-03-23 17:07:01 UTC
Brian, you might want to consider the age-old (and often paraphrased) line from Hollywood: "I'm not a *****, I just play one on TV."

That's the point that we are trying to make and one that we constantly have to defend. I could sit here and tell you all about my details of RL and what my mannerisms actually are and then point out how they're different from my In-Game persona. But I'm not going to because A: Just like work, I believe in keeping things in game IN the game and RL stuff out of the game. B: You don't need to know what I do in RL, and C: You probably wouldn't believe me even if I did tell you.

You, like most carebears, believe that just because I do the "dishonorable pirate thing" in EVE that I must be the same kind of person in real life. By that same logic, we have a ton of mass-murderers playing GTA Online. Or we have a bunch of disgruntled ex-NFL players playing Blood Bowl. Or we have a ton of cosplaying D&D nerds playing World of Warcraft (well, that last one MIGHT be true...).

Do you get the point now? We play MMORPGs as a release. We play games just so that we CAN do something that we otherwise wouldn't do in RL. In this case, we play EVE so that we can blow up pixilated starships. If you can't handle the Risk/Reward that comes with the territory, then perhaps this is not the game for you.

"We will bring you love... and by love, I mean lasers."

Pope Maximillian Singularity VI, First of His Name

Kaely Tanniss
Black Lotus Society.
#36 - 2017-03-23 17:37:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Kaely Tanniss
Zander Moreau wrote:
Brian, you might want to consider the age-old (and often paraphrased) line from Hollywood: "I'm not a *****, I just play one on TV."

That's the point that we are trying to make and one that we constantly have to defend. I could sit here and tell you all about my details of RL and what my mannerisms actually are and then point out how they're different from my In-Game persona. But I'm not going to because A: Just like work, I believe in keeping things in game IN the game and RL stuff out of the game. B: You don't need to know what I do in RL, and C: You probably wouldn't believe me even if I did tell you.

You, like most carebears, believe that just because I do the "dishonorable pirate thing" in EVE that I must be the same kind of person in real life. By that same logic, we have a ton of mass-murderers playing GTA Online. Or we have a bunch of disgruntled ex-NFL players playing Blood Bowl. Or we have a ton of cosplaying D&D nerds playing World of Warcraft (well, that last one MIGHT be true...).

Do you get the point now? We play MMORPGs as a release. We play games just so that we CAN do something that we otherwise wouldn't do in RL. In this case, we play EVE so that we can blow up pixilated starships. If you can't handle the Risk/Reward that comes with the territory, then perhaps this is not the game for you.


I'll play along just to humor Brian and show his assumptions are dead wrong. I'm sure he will choose to be in denial and refuse to believe it, but I don't really care what he believes. It's just a point I'm making.

Brian, irl I am a professor at a college. I hold 3 degrees, have a family, am a mother of 2 children. I spend my time helping others learn and furthering their prospective futures. Part of my work is outreach to schools and students from K-12 to organize and further STEM programs throughout the districts. I am an Interior Architect and designer by trade and a teacher by profession.

When I play Eve, I play it to "live" an alternate reality. To do the things I would never do irl. Therefore, by definition, my Eve persona is opposite of my rl persona. I'm sure this applies to many other players. Of course there are always exceptions to the rule, but that can be said about either side. To make the argument that everyone emulates their rl personalities in the game is just ridiculous. Why would one play a game just to be the same thing they are irl. Isn't the purpose to be more, or less, or different?

SO there's your exercise in humoring you..take it or leave it. I don't care if you deny it or believe it, but you should take it to heart as it discredits your argument completely.

If I had a nickel for every time someone said women don't play eve, I'd have a bag of nickels to whack the next person who said it..

Mike Adoulin
Happys Happy Hamster Hunting Club
#37 - 2017-03-23 19:09:17 UTC
*munches popcorn*

I see another garden variety sociopath/millennial has arrived.

Yeah, 'Brian' I'm talking about you.

I suggest you go play Star Trek Online, its free and has ZERO pvp.

Otherwise quit polluting my game with your mental issues.

EVE is a pvp game. It's advertised as a pvp game. Deal with it or leave.

Oh, and if you actually mistake Sasha of all people as an 'internet tough guy', you are even more mentally screwed up than I figure.

But then again people like you have a hard time distinguishing fact from fiction, it seems.

PS.

Post on your main or GTFO.

Everything in EVE is a trap.

And if it isn't, it's your job to make it a trap...:)

You want to know what immorality in EVE Online looks like? Look no further than Ripard "Jester" Teg.

Chribba is the Chuck Norris of EVE.

Sasha Nemtsov
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#38 - 2017-03-23 19:17:13 UTC
The real-life Kaely's achievements don't surprise me. EVE seems to attract and retain a good number of professional people leading ordinary and generally helplful lives.

Even the Internet Tough Guy's façade might be masking such an individual - although his tendency to volatility is surely incapable of misinterpretation. He's unlikely to be role-playing a quick-tempered foul-mouthed bigot.

Brian has simply resurrected the old argument about the coincidence of in-game and out-of-game personalities. I suppose it was bound to rear its weary head at some point.

Should the 'CODE.' part of my character information set off a red flag out-of-game too? For the record, then; although I'm a jobbing professional Voice Actor now that I've reached my 60th decade, I have only had 2 other jobs in my entire working life, and both were professions. Quite a record these days. Neither of them involved selling Mining Permits or ganking Retrievers.

Because I'm capable of conducting myself as I do in-game, means nothing more than that. Do I care about the reactions I provoke in the carebears? Generally, no, if those reactions are within what I determine to be reasonable bounds. CCP clearly holds to the same belief.

Brian really should avoid playing video games which are likely to get so reliably under his skin. Or at least he should avoid attempting to discuss them within a forum populated by people who find it embarrassingly easy to kick over his sandcastles.

He also needs to express himself coherently if folks are to be able properly to consider his 'ideas'.

That said, I wish him well in trying to assert the unsupportable...

Kaely Tanniss
Black Lotus Society.
#39 - 2017-03-23 19:46:41 UTC
Sasha Nemtsov wrote:
The real-life Kaely's achievements don't surprise me. EVE seems to attract and retain a good number of professional people leading ordinary and generally helplful lives.

Even the Internet Tough Guy's façade might be masking such an individual - although his tendency to volatility is surely incapable of misinterpretation. He's unlikely to be role-playing a quick-tempered foul-mouthed bigot.

Brian has simply resurrected the old argument about the coincidence of in-game and out-of-game personalities. I suppose it was bound to rear its weary head at some point.

Should the 'CODE.' part of my character information set off a red flag out-of-game too? For the record, then; although I'm a jobbing professional Voice Actor now that I've reached my 60th decade, I have only had 2 other jobs in my entire working life, and both were professions. Quite a record these days. Neither of them involved selling Mining Permits or ganking Retrievers.

Because I'm capable of conducting myself as I do in-game, means nothing more than that. Do I care about the reactions I provoke in the carebears? Generally, no, if those reactions are within what I determine to be reasonable bounds. CCP clearly holds to the same belief.

Brian really should avoid playing video games which are likely to get so reliably under his skin. Or at least he should avoid attempting to discuss them within a forum populated by people who find it embarrassingly easy to kick over his sandcastles.

He also needs to express himself coherently if folks are to be able properly to consider his 'ideas'.

That said, I wish him well in trying to assert the unsupportable...



Sasha is correct.. though it has been my experience that the majority of the "Quick tempered, foul mouthed bigots" are typically the ones complaining about how the game is played.

If I had a nickel for every time someone said women don't play eve, I'd have a bag of nickels to whack the next person who said it..

Black Pedro
Mine.
#40 - 2017-03-23 20:49:29 UTC
Brian Paone wrote:
Sasha Nemtsov wrote:
snip


Your character isn't real, "Sasha". It never was. It can't be. It's just a pile of pixels, incapable of doing any more than directed.

YOU control "Sasha". "Sasha" is you. There's no escaping from that.

"Sasha" isn't a willful detriment to society. You are. And you shouldn't be upset with this label, as you chose to go down this road.

There's nothing valid about what you do here. All you're doing is opposing your own species. Granted, the game rules DO allow you to do that, which is why it'd be silly to file a report on it, wouldn't it.

But it's certainly not silly to call a spade a spade, spade. If you're going to willfully oppose your own species, it's certainly disingenuous to act like you deserve RESPECT for it.

You seem to be missing a key point here. "Sasha" isn't a real, but neither is "Brian Paone" or any of the fictional characters or ships he might shoot. The constructs Sasha or the rest of us explode aren't real. They are imaginary characters or ships or whatever that have no tangible existence, worth or feelings. This is a game and you are not an immortal spaceship pilot.

My full house beating your pair of jacks doesn't make me a "detriment to society". That just makes me a better poker player than you (ok, perhaps just luckier). My gorilla sideswiping your Italian plumber off the road doesn't make me a sociopath - it just marks me as a better MarioKart player than you. If my golf score is lower than yours that... well you get the idea. Choosing to "oppose your own species" in a game or sport isn't something someone should be called out for. Competition and play is fundamental to the human spirit and it is something that should be celebrated.

Eve Online is a competitive PvP game where we control imaginary characters that do both good and bad things to each other. It is a completely self-contained and safe space were there are no real-world consequences to ourselves, other than what choose to let affect us. Open your mind Brian. There is no spoon just like there is no Retriever. You can only be hurt by losing something imaginary if you agree to let it hurt you. Yes, those losses are in fact real in the sense some numbers in CCP's database associated with you might tick down, but they are still just imaginary 'points' in a pretend game. If losing imaginary things or having your scorecard go down instead of up like you would prefer ever gets too intense for you, you can click the 'logout' button and all that self-inflicted angst and pain will immediately go away.

Rob is not Sasha. Rob is a consenting adult playing an immersive video game (as well as a top drawer content creator). He sometimes logs in and shoots imaginary things controlled by other consenting human beings in a single-universe and persistent Battle Royale as is intended by the game designers. There is nothing approaching immoral or depraved about this activity - it is literally the point of this video game. If you are unable to separate yourself from the imaginary space personas you control, it is you that has the issue, not Rob.