These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

NPC Hi Sec Blue Community

Author
Aaron
Eternal Frontier
#581 - 2017-07-11 15:28:09 UTC
Coralas wrote:


Those people should log on and find a defense fleet they can take part in, or an escape location they can mission in, with someone that can spring them appropriate level missions if they don't have the standing. What they should not log on to is a ghost town corp with all their friends gone.

If you intend on recommending to the individuals in a corporation that they leave said corporation and become some tenuous diaspora, then pretty much every ceo with any sense is going to ban your channel. Your actions will be seen as highly divisive and destructive, and I personally think more destructive than the wardec in the first place.

I'm completely cool that you have a different viewpoint, I just don't like your strategy.



So you're saying people should log on and do what they may not want to do? The reason why the systems near and around Jita are camped is because thats where the main market is. When will you understand that for some people it is wise not to impose a play style on them, the people of hi-sec need other options on play styles which is what I am offering.

In fact no, I'm pretty sure the CEO's understand what is going on, as I've said earlier in this thread if a CEO doesn't know how to fight a hi sec war dec then they can also benefit by leaving their corp on ice for a short while to join this venture. Hopefully they will meet other CEO's and become friends so that they can depend on each others corps when they fire up their corp after being NPC for a short period of time.

You seem to ignore the fact that an entire corp was on these forums saying they lost 500m in ships in one day, as I mentioned the CEO was also on the thread looking for answers because he was unsure about how to fight the wardec. Infact the CEO's of hi sec are crucial here and I would like to spend some time advising them on blue coalitions for their corp.

I'm not sure if it is actually Eve you are talking about but suggesting people put their corp on ice for say 2 months while the corp and the CEO's attempt to understand PVP defence fleets is a very positive thing, not destructive. I'm sure there are many dudes who can advise CEOs on how to network with other CEO's and then fight the good fight for the little guy.

I'm convinced you haven't read this thread, I also think your views are unrealistic for corps that want to stay in the popular areas of hi-sec like the systems around Jita.

Fear no one, live life, be free, accept the truth, do not judge others, defend yourself, fight hard till the end, meditate on problems and be prosperous. Things to exist by. -- RAIN Arthie

Coralas
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#582 - 2017-07-12 02:06:50 UTC
Aaron wrote:


So you're saying people should log on and do what they may not want to do? The reason why the systems near and around Jita are camped is because thats where the main market is. When will you understand that for some people it is wise not to impose a play style on them, the people of hi-sec need other options on play styles which is what I am offering.



I'm pointing out that destroying a corps membership to "save it" is really just destroying a corp more thoroughly than a deccers wildest dreams. The exact 2 things that people do not want to do most is (a) not log on for a week or (b) leave corp. Since those are completely standard things that people can do without you (and for which the forums will advise them in 10 minutes flat and forum search in 10 seconds), I do not see the point in offering it. Not only that, we already know that such events tend to strip non rl friend membership from corps permanently as well as make unsub events for rl friends, ie we already know your strategy sucks.

Quote:



In fact no, I'm pretty sure the CEO's understand what is going on, as I've said earlier in this thread if a CEO doesn't know how to fight a hi sec war dec then they can also benefit by leaving their corp on ice for a short while to join this venture. Hopefully they will meet other CEO's and become friends so that they can depend on each others corps when they fire up their corp after being NPC for a short period of time.



With half the membership and structures and initiative lost. Half of them are literally going to believe you are associated with the deccer when you are proposing such a destructive thing.

Quote:


You seem to ignore the fact that an entire corp was on these forums saying they lost 500m in ships in one day, as I mentioned the CEO was also on the thread looking for answers because he was unsure about how to fight the wardec. Infact the CEO's of hi sec are crucial here and I would like to spend some time advising them on blue coalitions for their corp.



honestly lol 500m is chump change for a 10 man corp. Its less than a single astrahus, its less than a single marauder. The simple advice for that problem is to courier your hauls during a war. and for a ceo to harden up and manage his players so that they do in fact courier whether it be internally through a player that has a hauling alt, by being a good ceo and having the necessary alt his/herself, or through public contracts or red frog. Which ever thing is necessary for the pecularities of that corp.

Quote:


I'm not sure if it is actually Eve you are talking about but suggesting people put their corp on ice for say 2 months while the corp and the CEO's attempt to understand PVP defence fleets is a very positive thing, not destructive. I'm sure there are many dudes who can advise CEOs on how to network with other CEO's and then fight the good fight for the little guy.

I'm convinced you haven't read this thread, I also think your views are unrealistic for corps that want to stay in the popular areas of hi-sec like the systems around Jita.


Yes because losing all their members, losing all their structures, and then not even being able to form up to kill 1 single exposed afk opponent in the wardec because they all dropped out of corp is sensible. No its not aaron.



To understand my position.

(a) in order for me to realistically want you to fc a roam I'm on.

- you'd need to have at least a positive isk ratio on your public killboard and a positive k/d since well the way killmails work stacks those stats in the favour of anyone getting any kills so hard that nobody should have neg stats unless they are hopeless at choosing engagements and prone to blundering into traps.

you don't have this, which means I'd probably decline a roam you fc'd, and I'm personally dubious of your ability to 'train ceos'.


(b) in order for me to realistically want you advise me on surviving wardecs as a ceo.

- you'd need to run a corporation with a visible public track record of fighting back in wardecs and getting kills on wardeccers, and having wardeccers drop decs because they were losing.

That is one reason why I suggest that step 1 is not handing out advice, its gathering up sufficient people, resources and experience from doing it yourself, and then use said corp as the service vehicle for others, with advice based specifically on how that corp can help the target group.

If we wanted to talk about specific advice on how to make money in highsec flying in space whilst decced, then I actually do know how to do that. I also do know how a corp that was capable of protecting its own highsec assets could easily help corp members of other corps to run content safely, but all those iterations of wardec strategy are outside of your thinking.
Aaron
Eternal Frontier
#583 - 2017-07-12 03:10:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Aaron
Coralas wrote:


honestly lol 500m is chump change for a 10 man corp. Its less than a single astrahus, its less than a single marauder. The simple advice for that problem is to courier your hauls during a war. and for a ceo to harden up and manage his players so that they do in fact courier whether it be internally through a player that has a hauling alt, by being a good ceo and having the necessary alt his/herself, or through public contracts or red frog. Which ever thing is necessary for the pecularities of that corp.



Well the corp members and CEO who created and commented on their thread obviously thought that 500m loss of ships in a single day was a lot otherwise they wouldn't have made the thread asking for advice. You shouldn't try too hard to get people over to your point of view because everyone will have different views from you.

Also a word of advice for you...It is actually good to listen to the content of peoples gripes and respond to what they have said and empathise. Its no use someone saying 500m loss is a lot and then you tell them it isn't, The difference of opinion will be plain to see and they won't bother talking to you. It may not be a lot to you but to the next person it maybe a lot, accept this.

Coralas wrote:


I'm pointing out that destroying a corps membership to "save it" is really just destroying a corp more thoroughly than a deccers wildest dreams. The exact 2 things that people do not want to do most is (a) not log on for a week or (b) leave corp. Since those are completely standard things that people can do without you (and for which the forums will advise them in 10 minutes flat and forum search in 10 seconds), I do not see the point in offering it. Not only that, we already know that such events tend to strip non rl friend membership from corps permanently as well as make unsub events for rl friends, ie we already know your strategy sucks.



Nobody is destroying a corps membership, we are infact respecting the corp mechanic by stepping away from it for a period of time while we expand our pvp knowledge then going back to it once we know how to be an integral part of a pvp fleet.

I can see what you're trying to do here and it wont work, people will still be interested in giving this a try.

Fear no one, live life, be free, accept the truth, do not judge others, defend yourself, fight hard till the end, meditate on problems and be prosperous. Things to exist by. -- RAIN Arthie

Coralas
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#584 - 2017-07-12 08:01:30 UTC
Aaron wrote:


I can see what you're trying to do here and it wont work, people will still be interested in giving this a try.


No aaron, I'm explaining to you patiently what would push your enterprise beyond at best duplicating the worst of the forum advice.

The fact that you find 500m losses in a day somehow remarkable is telling in itself. Wardecs usually open with a few big days and then kills fall away as the valuables are lost or no longer being flown. Individuals that have a lot of notifications can easily miss the wardec notification and undock into war targets as a result (I've missed the war notification myself).

Also a hyperion for example has a hull cost of nearly 200m, and many t2 modules are now well over 1m and large rigs can be non trivially costly even in t1 so a non bling t2 fitted hyperion mission runner is probably pushing towards a 300m lossmail by itself.

imo talking to a 20 person corp of non pvp experienced players will not solve any of their problems, nor will running them into lowsec with frigates, particularly given that a really good fc can accidently wipe a fleet of good players, so a meh fc with inexperienced players is basically a dice roll with a 50:50 chance of being a wipe, which will entirely erode the trust of your target group.

ie you seem to be oblivious to the fact that breaking up a corp and then getting them all killed in lowsec is a giant ugly diceroll strategy with total failure as at least a 25% outcome. The fact that you can't even see the dicerolls is a problem.

What you actually want to do to blood players into pvp is to get them to dogpile an example of their enemy. The weapon of choice is not the frigate its buffer fitted high dps cruisers (which even alphas can fly and preferred race doesn't matter), and the target of choice is not the enemies gangs, its their lone hunters, which any serious dec group has, and you have a whole week to find one, and one will eventually present on a trade route or come to you, and given its all you do, you should be able to identify the ones that have neutral reps or neutral jams or whatever else in advance.

As far as money making goes, you need to extract players from hubs and other camped locations (this means providing them with ceptors, corvettes and insta warp targets, since I expect they lack undock instas) - this is not a talkey task its a move op - a doing task, you need to have a location where they need to go to, which is a low pop local with mission agents and ore and you need to have people present who can pop missions for them there to build up standings.

Ideally you also need structures, in the whole constellation, you need to convince people to store mission ships in the structures, own spare mission ships and use corvettes or ceptors to hand in/get missions and gate. That vastly cuts down the opportunity for a lone hunter to snag one of your war decced targets on an undock or a gate, the locations where they die, and forces the hunter to combat probe in a low pop system to get a target, which will out their scout alts.

You can bowhead ships to move them during the move ops, and you can freight their other stuff for them all out of war.

Lastly you need a corp separate from your main dec management corp, with defensive pvpers - ie people like me. We go directly into the war by joining it (which we can do), we give them a standing defensive fleet, live advice in their fleet and we mission and mine with the decced group without exposing your structures unnecessarily to every war, and we make money whilst waiting, but because we are the kind of players that want to defensively pvp, we'll either be in bait ships or warping straight to dock for a pvp ship the moment a target shows in local.

Like I said the actual solution is a problem for lots of people and the first problem is not saving people in a channel, its getting sufficient people together to be able to protect infrastructure in the first place.
Aaron
Eternal Frontier
#585 - 2017-07-12 12:22:52 UTC
Coralas wrote:



The fact that you find 500m losses in a day somehow remarkable is telling in itself. Wardecs usually open with a few big days and then kills fall away as the valuables are lost or no longer being flown. Individuals that have a lot of notifications can easily miss the wardec notification and undock into war targets as a result (I've missed the war notification myself).




Correction, the corp and CEO and his members who made the thread thought 500m loss in ships in a day was a lot, and as I explained to you people will not have the same view as you which you don't seem to understand. You should accept 500m loss isn't much to you but to the next person it could be alot because they cant play as often as you can. No matter what I say I don't think you understand this.

I can see that you aspire to be an elitist, which again you should accept that not everyone will think like you. Perhaps you should start a thread and type in there so that the people interested in being an elitist can talk with you.

Accept that some people want an "Eve Lite" where they can be NPC and come and go as they please while earning money and chatting to a few friends and going on missions/pvp with them from time to time.

Reading your post just irritated me tbh, some people do not want that level of involvement within Eve, I know youll come back and imply everyone should have the same level of involvement as you. The difference between you and I is that I listen very carefully, i can empathise, and I can suggest a solution based the current situation.



Fear no one, live life, be free, accept the truth, do not judge others, defend yourself, fight hard till the end, meditate on problems and be prosperous. Things to exist by. -- RAIN Arthie

Aaron
Eternal Frontier
#586 - 2017-07-12 12:36:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Aaron
Coralas wrote:


ie you seem to be oblivious to the fact that breaking up a corp and then getting them all killed in lowsec is a giant ugly diceroll strategy with total failure as at least a 25% outcome. The fact that you can't even see the dicerolls is a problem.



1, The corps I help will probably already be broken with lots of losses, people arguing and leaving due to the relentless war dec. So I won't be breaking up anything.

2, It costs hardly anything to buy a t1 fitted frigate or destroyer, It is important to understand what happens in PVP if you are not used to it. It's interesting to see how people will try to bait you for example, if youre paying attention you will remember the type of bait method used against you and possibly use it against someone else or be in a position to identify the bait when someone is trying to use it against you.

3, Sure this is a diceroll. A controlled diceroll where you've limited your losses.

Fear no one, live life, be free, accept the truth, do not judge others, defend yourself, fight hard till the end, meditate on problems and be prosperous. Things to exist by. -- RAIN Arthie

Coralas
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#587 - 2017-07-12 15:09:24 UTC
Aaron wrote:
Coralas wrote:



The fact that you find 500m losses in a day somehow remarkable is telling in itself. Wardecs usually open with a few big days and then kills fall away as the valuables are lost or no longer being flown. Individuals that have a lot of notifications can easily miss the wardec notification and undock into war targets as a result (I've missed the war notification myself).




Correction, the corp and CEO and his members who made the thread thought 500m loss in ships in a day was a lot, and as I explained to you people will not have the same view as you which you don't seem to understand. You should accept 500m loss isn't much to you but to the next person it could be alot because they cant play as often as you can. No matter what I say I don't think you understand this.

I can see that you aspire to be an elitist, which again you should accept that not everyone will think like you. Perhaps you should start a thread and type in there so that the people interested in being an elitist can talk with you.



Lol aaron, the one person that actually gave a **** about what you wanted to do. Get the feeling you've burned every bridge before, but whatever. The 500m is an anecdote, and honestly, its not a lot for any collective of people. I'll point you the current delve economics if you want to see where the state of the art is at.

Quote:


Accept that some people want an "Eve Lite" where they can be NPC and come and go as they please while earning money and chatting to a few friends and going on missions/pvp with them from time to time.

Reading your post just irritated me tbh, some people do not want that level of involvement within Eve, I know youll come back and imply everyone should have the same level of involvement as you. The difference between you and I is that I listen very carefully, i can empathise, and I can suggest a solution based the current situation.



No. The very existence of the wardec corp implied that the players concerned wanted to play in a player corp. your solution is destroy that, tell them that they suck so bad they shouldn't have a corp (but ever so GENTLY because empathy yo!) and then go commit suicide in lowsec.

Having done the lowsec roam often enough, I can tell you what its like, its time consuming, it requires your casual (now ex corp who don't even share corp chat or a corp motd, or a corp mail anymore) to collect in the same place, not lose their ships on the way, synchronise their game play time (like elitists do) have good fleet behavior (like elitists do), be listening on comms (like elitists do) having good comms discipline (like elitists do) and you'll have to leave people behind when they straggle and get picked off (which they will because newbies will not get gate aggro mechanics right, or they'll tackle when you said no, or they'll jump when you said hold etc), otherwise each loss will probably cost you another half an hour of screwing about.

Furthermore you will have to deal with being wiped out, and we are talking about people who may well have not wanted to roam and chase pvp in the first place, going through the public event of having their ass handed to them collectively.

You heads up say you want them to do what they want, and have a 2 step plan that involves doing exactly the 2 things they don't want to do, and at the end you believe that they'll come out somehow qualified to fight wars themselves.

What I would want to on the other hand is teach them how to do what they wanted to do (presumed PVE), regardless of whether or not there is a wardec, and since they start from a default position of not being able to fight a wardec, I would make absolutely certain that the resources that were able to manage a wardec were there to support them. How much they contributed would be up to them, but I'd certainly not require synchronicity of play, losing their default comms channel, or committing to a roam session. synchronicity of location is a much easier ask (especially since help would be provided achieving it), as is simply joining a fleet.
Coralas
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#588 - 2017-07-12 15:23:13 UTC
Aaron wrote:
[

2, It costs hardly anything to buy a t1 fitted frigate or destroyer, It is important to understand what happens in PVP if you are not used to it. It's interesting to see how people will try to bait you for example, if youre paying attention you will remember the type of bait method used against you and possibly use it against someone else or be in a position to identify the bait when someone is trying to use it against you.



You want to take casual people who probably don't fully synchronise their game on tasks that require them to play for hours together in a way which requires a lot of discipline and time and accepting that well we are in frigates, the **** we found won't die to frigates (because things out of your target envelope is a particular problem for frigates) and we are being chased by actual talented pvpers who pick off individual frigates with ease but can't be caught.

Not only that, its got nothing to do with what they wanted to do. If they wanted to be a roaming pvp corp they'd have been there in the first place.

The cost of the gang is the least concern to the individuals because at least earning the money was the thing they wanted to do.

IMO you are just going to reinforce the notion that lead them to not being able to fight a dec in the first place - pvp is hard, other players are really good and they don't have the sp yet and the task was a ****** experience of doing what I was told and then losing anyway.
Aaron
Eternal Frontier
#589 - 2017-07-12 16:53:53 UTC
Coralas wrote:


No. The very existence of the wardec corp implied that the players concerned wanted to play in a player corp. your solution is destroy that, tell them that they suck so bad they shouldn't have a corp (but ever so GENTLY because empathy yo!) and then go commit suicide in lowsec.




Ok, this is what happens in a typical wardec. I know you're going to disagree with everything I say but i'll say it anyway.

A wardecced corp that isnt sure how to go about fighting back will lose members, and morale for the people who remain will be low, the people who remain will be docked up because there will be camps at mission locations and market hubs and general transit routes. The CEO may have stopped logging on at this point so the remaining people may not have a leader. Does this not sound like a broken corp to you? How exactly would my suggestions break the corp if it is already broken?

As I've said many times you are an elitist, where as I am a survivalist. I've still got a good method of playing the game, It isnt perfect but I've analysed the mechanics and the way people think and come up with this.

Just accept that you and I are never going to agree, You have the perspective that 500m isnt a lot, you've ignored how people feel and they will see that you think their view is irrelevant. There are many ways to play this game and I think you must accept that some people will not perceive the game as you do.

I've been playing this game since 2003 and I have met over 100 people that have had a similar attitude to yours regarding gameplay. Your focus only seems to be "the Game" where as my focus is actually the PEOPLE playing the game. All I have done is develop my knowledge of how people think and perceive and then applied it to my ventures. A non-imposing way of approaching the issues that people face in this game is to actually listen to them, empathise and suggest an action based on what they have said. So if the corp I mentioned says 500m is alot to lose in one day then that must be respected and understood simply because it is their perspective.

I noted that you ignored my point about people having limited time to play which is an error on your part. FYI, our time is precious and It is important to respect other peoples view otherwise you risk alienating them. I don't care what you say, a dude who only has an hour to play every few days wont want to spend it waiting for a war dec to end and be camped in a station for that hour.

I haven't got a bad word to say about anyones playstyle, I say do whatever suits you if the time you spend in this game is limited.

Also you seem to be from a SOV alliance background which I have determined from your posts. SOV is not the same as hi-sec and thats a fact. what works in SOV may not work in hi-sec and vice versa.

It's been good chatting but iim afraid I can't spend any more time responding to you. But feel free to keep posting and telling others this venture won't work as that is your right.

Fear no one, live life, be free, accept the truth, do not judge others, defend yourself, fight hard till the end, meditate on problems and be prosperous. Things to exist by. -- RAIN Arthie