These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Do you guys want to know what would finally fix this game?
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Brujo Loco
Brujeria Teologica
#41 - 2011-12-28 04:34:44 UTC
I PROPOSE A SOLUTION AND IN CAPS SO EVERYONE CAN HEAR ME!!!1



ALTS NEEED ALTS!!!

yes! We dont need less or more alts, what we need is ALTS that Have ALTS themselves!!!


So the Cyno/Scout/Capital alts can go do whatever alts do in their off hours and let their little midget alts do the dirty work!!!

YES!

And after that, ALTS that have ALTS that have ALTS of ALTS up to MAINS!

YEAH!

And we come full circle, all will be well.

Also I'm an Alt of a Main that has another Alt but changes skills on other alts but not his main.

Inner Sayings of BrujoLoco: http://eve-files.com/sig/brujoloco
Corina Jarr
en Welle Shipping Inc.
#42 - 2011-12-28 04:35:09 UTC
How would you go about banning an alt? For that matter, determining if the character is an alt rather than another person?

People will just use another email address for signup, and IP is useless because more than one user can easily share an IP, depending on their setup, and failing that, spoofing IPs is easy enough.


So not only is your idea a bad one (IMO), its one that most likely would be impossible to implement.
Selinate
#43 - 2011-12-28 04:37:03 UTC
Brujo Loco wrote:
I PROPOSE A SOLUTION AND IN CAPS SO EVERYONE CAN HEAR ME!!!1


Is this supposed to be a mockery of me? Because nowhere in this thread did I make a post in all caps....
Selinate
#44 - 2011-12-28 04:38:04 UTC
Corina Jarr wrote:
How would you go about banning an alt? For that matter, determining if the character is an alt rather than another person?

People will just use another email address for signup, and IP is useless because more than one user can easily share an IP, depending on their setup, and failing that, spoofing IPs is easy enough.


So not only is your idea a bad one (IMO), its one that most likely would be impossible to implement.


Well for the same computer, can't the client be made to check if another client is running and shut it down?

As for multiple computers, I do not know.
Professor Alphane
Les Corsaires Diable
#45 - 2011-12-28 04:38:46 UTC
And people giving CCP moar money is effecting you playing EVE how now?

(except for perhaps supporting it and making it possible)

[center]YOU MUST THINK FIRST....[/center] [center]"I sit with the broken angels clutching at straws and nursing our scars.." - Marillion [/center] [center]The wise man watches the rise and fall of fools from afar[/center]
Bad Messenger
Rehabilitation Clinic
#46 - 2011-12-28 04:40:01 UTC
Selinate wrote:
I do not know.


this Big smile
Selinate
#47 - 2011-12-28 04:41:22 UTC
Bad Messenger wrote:
Selinate wrote:
I do not know.


this Big smile


You failed in logical discussion so you resorted to taking words out of context? Shame on you!
Corina Jarr
en Welle Shipping Inc.
#48 - 2011-12-28 04:42:42 UTC
Selinate wrote:
Corina Jarr wrote:
How would you go about banning an alt? For that matter, determining if the character is an alt rather than another person?

People will just use another email address for signup, and IP is useless because more than one user can easily share an IP, depending on their setup, and failing that, spoofing IPs is easy enough.


So not only is your idea a bad one (IMO), its one that most likely would be impossible to implement.


Well for the same computer, can't the client be made to check if another client is running and shut it down?

As for multiple computers, I do not know.

In theory it could, but there are many ways to prevent the client from picking up the other client.

Such a venture would be even more pointless than a total all out war on botting. Waste of money, and eventually, CCP would lose.
Selinate
#49 - 2011-12-28 04:44:00 UTC
Corina Jarr wrote:
Selinate wrote:
Corina Jarr wrote:
How would you go about banning an alt? For that matter, determining if the character is an alt rather than another person?

People will just use another email address for signup, and IP is useless because more than one user can easily share an IP, depending on their setup, and failing that, spoofing IPs is easy enough.


So not only is your idea a bad one (IMO), its one that most likely would be impossible to implement.


Well for the same computer, can't the client be made to check if another client is running and shut it down?

As for multiple computers, I do not know.

In theory it could, but there are many ways to prevent the client from picking up the other client.

Such a venture would be even more pointless than a total all out war on botting. Waste of money, and eventually, CCP would lose.


I thought companies that produced MMO's had a way of checking the programming client side, making sure that no illegal mods were in place so that they could keep track of this. Is this wrong?
Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#50 - 2011-12-28 04:47:08 UTC
VM.. enough said.. if needed..

Anyway the reasoning beyond "no alts" is weak as i see it.
There are people who like to play "solo"
And there is a lot of people who group up / corporations / alliances / incursion runners

Dont see an reason to cut it. It would certainly not help anyone, since they already can have what they want, it will just restrict those who dont want to rely on others for every single move.
Brujo Loco
Brujeria Teologica
#51 - 2011-12-28 05:08:38 UTC
Selinate wrote:
Brujo Loco wrote:
I PROPOSE A SOLUTION AND IN CAPS SO EVERYONE CAN HEAR ME!!!1


Is this supposed to be a mockery of me? Because nowhere in this thread did I make a post in all caps....


Seli , my belove Seli, as much as you know I love you with all my prideful Amarrian heart, sometimes, you know, sometimes, I'm NOT talking about you. But I still love you, and you know it.

Inner Sayings of BrujoLoco: http://eve-files.com/sig/brujoloco
Bad Messenger
Rehabilitation Clinic
#52 - 2011-12-28 05:20:17 UTC
Selinate wrote:
Bad Messenger wrote:
Selinate wrote:
I do not know.


this Big smile


You failed in logical discussion so you resorted to taking words out of context? Shame on you!


logical discussion, no you already showed that your opinion about this issue is based on false claims and will not change so no point to discuss.

If i continue discussion i have to start to repeat my lines because you ended to forget earlier post Sad
Selinate
#53 - 2011-12-28 05:23:12 UTC
Bad Messenger wrote:
Selinate wrote:
Bad Messenger wrote:
Selinate wrote:
I do not know.


this Big smile


You failed in logical discussion so you resorted to taking words out of context? Shame on you!


logical discussion, no you already showed that your opinion about this issue is based on false claims and will not change so no point to discuss.

If i continue discussion i have to start to repeat my lines because you ended to forget earlier post Sad

"ended to forget earlier post"....

You haven't pointed out any false claims (because I haven't made any), and if I made any arguments about something you didn't say, it's probably because I didn't understand you because... well.. see above quotes.
Selinate
#54 - 2011-12-28 05:24:49 UTC
Brujo Loco wrote:
Selinate wrote:
Brujo Loco wrote:
I PROPOSE A SOLUTION AND IN CAPS SO EVERYONE CAN HEAR ME!!!1


Is this supposed to be a mockery of me? Because nowhere in this thread did I make a post in all caps....


Seli , my belove Seli, as much as you know I love you with all my prideful Amarrian heart, sometimes, you know, sometimes, I'm NOT talking about you. But I still love you, and you know it.


Such a jokester...
Mina Sebiestar
Minmatar Inner Space Conglomerate
#55 - 2011-12-28 06:02:21 UTC
I don't think that from 30.000 online log on to 5.000 online log on would be such good idea also what an waste of thread space.

You choke behind a smile a fake behind the fear

Because >>I is too hard
Bad Messenger
Rehabilitation Clinic
#56 - 2011-12-28 06:11:19 UTC
Selinate wrote:
Bad Messenger wrote:
Selinate wrote:
Bad Messenger wrote:
Selinate wrote:
I do not know.


this Big smile


You failed in logical discussion so you resorted to taking words out of context? Shame on you!


logical discussion, no you already showed that your opinion about this issue is based on false claims and will not change so no point to discuss.

If i continue discussion i have to start to repeat my lines because you ended to forget earlier post Sad

"ended to forget earlier post"....

You haven't pointed out any false claims (because I haven't made any), and if I made any arguments about something you didn't say, it's probably because I didn't understand you because... well.. see above quotes.


Yea, that is the problem, you do not understand.
Selinate
#57 - 2011-12-28 06:13:02 UTC
Bad Messenger wrote:


Yea, that is the problem, you do not understand.


I was trying to be at least somewhat polite, but what I was trying to say is your english sucks and it's hard to understand. Try learning english first before you insult someone in it...
Selinate
#58 - 2011-12-28 06:13:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Selinate
*double post*
Selinate
#59 - 2011-12-28 06:14:20 UTC
Mina Sebiestar wrote:
I don't think that from 30.000 online log on to 5.000 online log on would be such good idea also what an waste of thread space.


If that much of the players online are alts, then this game has truly failed as an online game.

Also, your post is a waste of posting space :P
Onictus
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#60 - 2011-12-28 06:19:48 UTC
Selinate wrote:
I Love Boobies wrote:
Sure, OP, ban the alts. How long would it be before you'd be here on the forums starting posts that EVE is dying, or perhaps maybe you whining that you don't have any more easy kills because a majority of your kills were killing peoples' alts. Blink


solo PvP in Eve is already pretty much dead and broken, so this is kind of a moot point...

Oddly some of us enjoy playing the mass multiplayer online game with


Unmmm


People