These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

I blame CCP I guess?

Author
Maekchu
Doomheim
#41 - 2017-01-19 18:10:43 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
I know its hard for someone like you, due to your persuasion and cultural indoctrination to understand, but I can infact ask any question I want, of anyone I want.

What? :D

Also, are we still just skimming over the fact that I never said anything about you needing permission to say anything?
Salvos Rhoska
#42 - 2017-01-19 18:13:53 UTC
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:

Where did he say that you said it?


He claimed it wad in reference to what I had said in another thread.
Note "what I had said". Not, what I had infact not said.
walker Hanomaa
Kill'em all. Let Bob sort'em out.
Ushra'Khan
#43 - 2017-01-19 18:14:05 UTC
Well this joke thread sure went down the shitter i think its time for a ISD to lock this thread and let it sink to the bottom P
Maekchu
Doomheim
#44 - 2017-01-19 18:15:39 UTC
Noooo... Let us play some more :D
Salvos Rhoska
#45 - 2017-01-19 18:15:48 UTC
Maekchu wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
I know its hard for someone like you, due to your persuasion and cultural indoctrination to understand, but I can infact ask any question I want, of anyone I want.

What? :D

Also, are we still just skimming over the fact that I never said anything about you needing permission to say anything?


Then why do you presume to question, and raise false implications, when I simply ask "why", of someone else?
Maekchu
Doomheim
#46 - 2017-01-19 18:17:00 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Maekchu wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
I know its hard for someone like you, due to your persuasion and cultural indoctrination to understand, but I can infact ask any question I want, of anyone I want.

What? :D

Also, are we still just skimming over the fact that I never said anything about you needing permission to say anything?


Then why do you presume to question, and raise false implications, when I simply ask "why", of someone else?

But why did you ask in the first place? Now that is the real question!

Shouldn't good human intentions be enough for someone to buy someone else a new ship?
Salvos Rhoska
#47 - 2017-01-19 18:18:31 UTC
walker Hanomaa wrote:
Well this joke thread sure went down the shitter i think its time for a ISD to lock this thread and let it sink to the bottom P


What was the joke?

Misnaming a thread to blame CCP?
Salvos Rhoska
#48 - 2017-01-19 18:21:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Maekchu wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Maekchu wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
I know its hard for someone like you, due to your persuasion and cultural indoctrination to understand, but I can infact ask any question I want, of anyone I want.

What? :D

Also, are we still just skimming over the fact that I never said anything about you needing permission to say anything?


Then why do you presume to question, and raise false implications, when I simply ask "why", of someone else?

But why did you ask in the first place? Now that is the real question!

Shouldn't good human intentions be enough for someone to buy someone else a new ship?


How does compensation/donationto a player that lost a ship due to their own failure in EVE, constitute "good human intention"?
That would mean the act of destroying his ship by his aggressor was a "bad human intention".

Are you saying it was bad human intent to destroy his ship?
Maekchu
Doomheim
#49 - 2017-01-19 18:26:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Maekchu
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Maekchu wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Maekchu wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
I know its hard for someone like you, due to your persuasion and cultural indoctrination to understand, but I can infact ask any question I want, of anyone I want.

What? :D

Also, are we still just skimming over the fact that I never said anything about you needing permission to say anything?


Then why do you presume to question, and raise false implications, when I simply ask "why", of someone else?

But why did you ask in the first place? Now that is the real question!

Shouldn't good human intentions be enough for someone to buy someone else a new ship?


How does compensation/donationto a player that lost a ship due to their own failure in EVE, constitute "good human intention"?
That would mean the act of destroying his ship by his aggressor was a "bad human intention".

Are you saying it was bad human intent to destroy his ship?

Giving something to a stranger with no expectations of anything in return, I would classify as a charitable act. Charity, is something that could be boxed in with "good human intentions". You might see it differently, as you do with a lot of stuff. So let's not get caught in details here...

But Salvos... You still didn't answer why you asked him in the first place. So why did you do it Salvos? Why?
Tisiphone Dira
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#50 - 2017-01-19 18:37:07 UTC
Is it charity to give the person with a crippling quafe addition more quafe?

Is it good to enable a highsec miner to keep mining by covering his losses to CODE.?

There is such a thing as tough love, sometimes to gain we must first lose.

There once was a ganker named tisi

A stunningly beautiful missy

To gank a gross miner

There is nothing finer, cept when they get all pissy

Salvos Rhoska
#51 - 2017-01-19 18:45:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Maekchu wrote:

Giving something to a stranger with no expectations of anything in return, I would classify as a charitable act. Charity, is something that could be boxed in with "good human intentions".


So you are saying that destroying his ship was a bad human intent?

Furthermore, charity means giving to those who have not, by those that have.
How do we know that he doesnt have billions on his accounts?

Even a person giving charity, is satisfying their own needs, as a motivation to do so.
They give from the abundance they have, to those whom by exclusion, do not.
You are rich, because they are poor. You have excess to give as charity, because you are not them.
You give to avail yourself of guilt culpability and for personal gain in ego reconciliation, and call it a "good" act.

Why not instead send your money to the person that destroyed his ship?
Surely he was more needy, according to your ethics, or why else would he have destroyed someone else, if not out of desperation for resources?
Salvos Rhoska
#52 - 2017-01-19 18:49:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Maekchu wrote:


But Salvos... You still didn't answer why you asked him in the first place. So why did you do it Salvos? Why?


I asked so as to query for data I do not yet have.

That is the purpose of a question.
I dont expect someone of your persuasion to understand that, (you prefer implication, innuendo, sarcasm and other dishonest communication as a veil) but it is so.
March rabbit
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#53 - 2017-01-19 18:56:04 UTC
walker Hanomaa wrote:
Well this joke thread sure went down the shitter i think its time for a ISD to lock this thread and let it sink to the bottom P

I don't agree here. Salvos works very hard to bring some fun.... Lol

The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"

Maekchu
Doomheim
#54 - 2017-01-19 18:56:10 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Maekchu wrote:


But Salvos... You still didn't answer why you asked him in the first place. So why did you do it Salvos? Why?


I asked so as to query for data I do not yet have.

That is the purpose of a question.
I dont expect someone of your persuasion and cultural background to understand that, but it is so.

How funny, that was the exact same reason for my question. So tell me, how someone of my persuasion and cultural background doesn't understand that?

As you see, I seem to know exactly how questions work too! :D
Maekchu
Doomheim
#55 - 2017-01-19 18:59:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Maekchu
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
So you are saying that destroying his ship was a bad a bad human intent?

No, I'm not saying that. Your notion is falsely implicative.

Show me exactly where I said that destroying ships is bad human intent! You are imagining things that have never been said.
Mr Mieyli
Doomheim
#56 - 2017-01-19 19:03:36 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Lulu Lunette wrote:
Yeah it's been widely reported that the client has been running like garbage. With rubber banding effects, super long lag spikes/unresponsive client, UI bugs, and socket closures.


Are you drunk?


Maybe you should have a drink Salvos, take it easy. We're all space buddies / murderers here man.

Let's all get together and hug it out GD!

This post brought to you by CCP's alpha forum alt initiative. Playing the eve forums has never come cheaper.

Salvos Rhoska
#57 - 2017-01-19 19:15:27 UTC
Maekchu wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Maekchu wrote:


But Salvos... You still didn't answer why you asked him in the first place. So why did you do it Salvos? Why?


I asked so as to query for data I do not yet have.

That is the purpose of a question.
I dont expect someone of your persuasion and cultural background to understand that, but it is so.

How funny, that was the exact same reason for my question. So tell me, how someone of my persuasion and cultural background doesn't understand that?

As you see, I seem to know exactly how questions work too! :D


You ignored and edited outnmy questions, yet you expect me to answer yours?

That proves my point on the difference between persuasion and cultural background between us.
Persephone Alleile
Tartarus Covert Operations
#58 - 2017-01-19 19:16:55 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
That proves my point on the difference between persuasion and cultural background between us.


What does this even mean? Some low-key bigotry or something?
Maekchu
Doomheim
#59 - 2017-01-19 19:19:22 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
You ignored and edited outnmy questions, yet you expect me to answer yours?

That proves my point on the difference between persuasion and cultural background between us.

I did answer your question. You just didn't notice it.

Also what cultural background are we talking here? EvE culture or IRL culture?

Also, I don't expect anything, I'm merely asking. You are free to act however you choose :D
Salvos Rhoska
#60 - 2017-01-19 19:20:53 UTC
Maekchu wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
So you are saying that destroying his ship was a bad a bad human intent?

No, I'm not saying that. Your notion is falsely implicative.

Show me exactly where I said that destroying ships is bad human intent! You are imagining things that have never been said.


You stated that giving something to someone is a "good human intention".
Thus, logically, taking something from someone is a "bad human intention".

I dont need to demonstrate where you have said that to be the case.
It is simply a logical conclusion from what you have said.