These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

I blame CCP I guess?

Author
Lulu Lunette
Savage Moon Society
#21 - 2017-01-19 17:49:20 UTC
I'll buy his next Heron and name it 'Semantics Salvos'

@lunettelulu7

Salvos Rhoska
#22 - 2017-01-19 17:50:55 UTC
Lulu Lunette wrote:
I'll buy his next Heron and name it 'Semantics Salvos'


Go ahead.
But you didnt answer why.
walker Hanomaa
Kill'em all. Let Bob sort'em out.
Ushra'Khan
#23 - 2017-01-19 17:51:08 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
walker Hanomaa wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
This thread is cancer.

Maybe thats the point?

I dont really know i just wanted to have a little fun thats all Lol


You lost a cheap ship, with no cargo, didnt even tell an interesting story, took no effort in that, and then named the thread that you blame CCP.

Whats funny?



You forgot the I guess part of it Lol
Lulu Lunette
Savage Moon Society
#24 - 2017-01-19 17:51:34 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Lulu Lunette wrote:
I'll buy his next Heron and name it 'Semantics Salvos'


Go ahead.
But you didnt answer why.


I did though. Maybe you missed it?

@lunettelulu7

Maekchu
Doomheim
#25 - 2017-01-19 17:52:38 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
What?

Where have I said you cant blow up newbies, or you cant be nice to them?

It was just a reference to the other thread, where you asked what the profit was in killing noobs.

Now you question the good intentions of Lulu.

I suppose, I read too much into this. Maybe you just question a lot of stuff in general.
Salvos Rhoska
#26 - 2017-01-19 17:54:24 UTC
walker Hanomaa wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
walker Hanomaa wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
This thread is cancer.

Maybe thats the point?

I dont really know i just wanted to have a little fun thats all Lol


You lost a cheap ship, with no cargo, didnt even tell an interesting story, took no effort in that, and then named the thread that you blame CCP.

Whats funny?



You forgot the I guess part of it Lol


So the "I blame CCP I guess?" part as a thread name for your uninteresting loss story, supposed to be the funny part?
Salvos Rhoska
#27 - 2017-01-19 17:55:23 UTC
Lulu Lunette wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Lulu Lunette wrote:
I'll buy his next Heron and name it 'Semantics Salvos'


Go ahead.
But you didnt answer why.


I did though. Maybe you missed it?


Maybe I did.
Can you quote it?
Lulu Lunette
Savage Moon Society
#28 - 2017-01-19 17:55:44 UTC
Yeah it's been widely reported that the client has been running like garbage. With rubber banding effects, super long lag spikes/unresponsive client, UI bugs, and socket closures.

@lunettelulu7

Salvos Rhoska
#29 - 2017-01-19 17:58:20 UTC
Maekchu wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
What?

Where have I said you cant blow up newbies, or you cant be nice to them?

It was just a reference to the other thread, where you asked what the profit was in killing noobs.

Now you question the good intentions of Lulu.

I suppose, I read too much into this. Maybe you just question a lot of stuff in general.


1) There is no profit in killing newbies, regardless of thread.
2) Your reference was falsely implicative.
3) Nowhere have I said you cant blow up newbies, or be nice to them.
4) Yes, you are imagining things that have never been said.
5) I can ask any question I want. I dont need your permission.
Jacques d'Orleans
#30 - 2017-01-19 17:59:16 UTC
Tisiphone Dira wrote:
how do I rank?


*hands you glass of 2016 Chateau de pleurer* You're the one and only, ma chère!
Salvos Rhoska
#31 - 2017-01-19 17:59:57 UTC
Lulu Lunette wrote:
Yeah it's been widely reported that the client has been running like garbage. With rubber banding effects, super long lag spikes/unresponsive client, UI bugs, and socket closures.


Are you drunk?
Lulu Lunette
Savage Moon Society
#32 - 2017-01-19 18:01:11 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Lulu Lunette wrote:
Yeah it's been widely reported that the client has been running like garbage. With rubber banding effects, super long lag spikes/unresponsive client, UI bugs, and socket closures.


Are you drunk?


No.

@lunettelulu7

Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#33 - 2017-01-19 18:01:21 UTC
walker Hanomaa wrote:
Its your favorite **** poster here, story time kiddos

You're not Unsuccessful At Everything.
Maekchu
Doomheim
#34 - 2017-01-19 18:02:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Maekchu
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Yes, you are imagining things that have never been said.

...

I dont need your permission.

I'm pretty sure I never mentioned anything about you needing my permission :D Is this what projection feels like?

Entertaining as always... You remind me of the good old days with Dinsdale.
Salvos Rhoska
#35 - 2017-01-19 18:02:42 UTC
Lulu Lunette wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Lulu Lunette wrote:
Yeah it's been widely reported that the client has been running like garbage. With rubber banding effects, super long lag spikes/unresponsive client, UI bugs, and socket closures.


Are you drunk?


No.


What is the relevance of client latency and rubber-banding to this thread with a title where OP claims to blame CCP for his loss?
Lulu Lunette
Savage Moon Society
#36 - 2017-01-19 18:03:20 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Lulu Lunette wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Lulu Lunette wrote:
Yeah it's been widely reported that the client has been running like garbage. With rubber banding effects, super long lag spikes/unresponsive client, UI bugs, and socket closures.


Are you drunk?


No.


What is the relevance of client latency and rubber-banding to this thread with a title where OP claims to blame CCP for his loss?


That was the joke that clearly sailed over your head. Try to get all three of your brain cells to talk to each other.

@lunettelulu7

Salvos Rhoska
#37 - 2017-01-19 18:07:02 UTC
Maekchu wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Yes, you are imagining things that have never been said.

...

I dont need your permission.

I'm pretty sure I never mentioned anything about you needing my permission :D Is this what projection feels like?

Entertaining as always... You remind me of the good old days with Dinsdale.


You made the false implications. Not me.

I know its hard for someone like you, due to your persuasion and cultural indoctrination to understand, but I can infact ask any question I want, of anyone I want.
Salvos Rhoska
#38 - 2017-01-19 18:08:14 UTC
Lulu Lunette wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Lulu Lunette wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Lulu Lunette wrote:
Yeah it's been widely reported that the client has been running like garbage. With rubber banding effects, super long lag spikes/unresponsive client, UI bugs, and socket closures.


Are you drunk?


No.


What is the relevance of client latency and rubber-banding to this thread with a title where OP claims to blame CCP for his loss?


That was the joke that clearly sailed over your head. Try to get all three of your brain cells to talk to each other.


Ok.
So what is the joke?
Akane Togenada
Doomheim
#39 - 2017-01-19 18:10:08 UTC
If you get ganked at a Relic Site the lack of a cloaking device doesn´t make any difference. Also what difference does a T1 exploration frigate loss do in the long (or even short run), complete one Ruin with decent success and average loot and you will be able to buy several replacements.
Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#40 - 2017-01-19 18:10:42 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Maekchu wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Lulu Lunette wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:


Why?


Because it's nice to be nice. Smile


Why?

We can't blow up newbies... We can't be nice to them either. Wtf can we do? :D


What?

Where have I said you cant blow up newbies, or you cant be nice to them?

Where did he say that you said it?

Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."