These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Is the Alpha clone a problem?

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Maekchu
Doomheim
#361 - 2017-01-16 19:12:58 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:

Then your whining is irrelevant, misinformed and without concern.

Bye!

Narh, I just commented that law and psychology does not give you qualifications within statistics. It's basic knowledge, so I can still comment on that.

But someone else (hint hint: you) said that a PhD does not require the completion of a real study.

So who is the misinformed here? Anyway, at this point I'll give you the credit that you are a troll. I don't believe you can be this stupid.
Salvos Rhoska
#362 - 2017-01-16 19:13:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Maekchu wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:

Then your whining is irrelevant, misinformed and without concern.

Bye!

Narh, I just commented that law and psychology does not give you qualifications within statistics. It's basic knowledge, so I can still comment on that.

But someone else (hint hint: you) said that a PhD does not require the completion of a real study.

So who is the misinformed here? Anyway, at this point I'll give you the credit that you are a troll. I don't believe you can be this stupid.


Law and psychology are both scientific pursuits and follow the same basis of statistical analysis interms of the conduct and results of their studies.

You lack education, bro.

PS: Hint hint: Nowhere did I say that a PhD does not require completion of a real study. Infact attaining a PhD specifically requires conducting a study that is then reviewed by a panel and peers, inorder to achieve a PhD.

PvE v PvP <> Old School Exploration <> CODE Licenses <> CODE Special Agent
Maekchu
Doomheim
#363 - 2017-01-16 19:14:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Maekchu
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
[1) Lol, where did I say he has not completed a real study? Nowhere! :D


Salvos Rhoska wrote:
More than you. I have completed real studies, unlike you.

And my studies specifically involved scientific method and statistical methods/analysis.
Salvos Rhoska
#364 - 2017-01-16 19:21:08 UTC
Maekchu wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
[1) Lol, where did I say he has not completed a real study? Nowhere! :D


Salvos Rhoska wrote:
More than you. I have completed real studies, unlike you.

And my studies specifically involved scientific method and statistical methods/analysis.


That was before Shae claimed to have a PhD in chemistry.

You are conflating and misrepresenting the sequence in the discussion.

PvE v PvP <> Old School Exploration <> CODE Licenses <> CODE Special Agent
Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#365 - 2017-01-16 19:22:34 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
1) Lol, where did I say he has not completed a real study? Nowhere! :D

I found it quite funny. Nothing to worry about. It's here:

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=6798021#post6798021

More than you. I have completed real studies, unlike you.

Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."
Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#366 - 2017-01-16 19:23:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Shae Tadaruwa
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Maekchu wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
[1) Lol, where did I say he has not completed a real study? Nowhere! :D


Salvos Rhoska wrote:
More than you. I have completed real studies, unlike you.

And my studies specifically involved scientific method and statistical methods/analysis.


That was before Shae claimed to have a PhD in chemistry.

You are conflating and misrepresenting the sequence in the discussion.

Nope.

I outlined my background in post 344.

Your claim is in post 353.

There certainly seems to now be some misrepresentation, but I hope it's really just a lack of attention to detail and not deliberate lies.

Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."
Salvos Rhoska
#367 - 2017-01-16 19:24:28 UTC
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:
More than you. I have completed real studies, unlike you.


You haven't proven that.

You also haven't answered to my question regarding the relevance of Techos' conclusions on the study.
This corroborate that you are infact not a scientist.

PvE v PvP <> Old School Exploration <> CODE Licenses <> CODE Special Agent
Maekchu
Doomheim
#368 - 2017-01-16 19:25:54 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Maekchu wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
[1) Lol, where did I say he has not completed a real study? Nowhere! :D


Salvos Rhoska wrote:
More than you. I have completed real studies, unlike you.

And my studies specifically involved scientific method and statistical methods/analysis.


That was before Shae claimed to have a PhD in chemistry.

You are conflating and misrepresenting the sequence in the discussion.

Was just about to point out your failure, but Shae beat me to it.

I wonder who is misrepresenting the sequence in the discussion now. But it's funny to see you trying to dig yourself out of this hole :D
Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#369 - 2017-01-16 19:25:56 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:
More than you. I have completed real studies, unlike you.


You haven't proven that.

Haven't proven what?

If we want to both go to proof, I'm happy with that. It'll require us both to put our proof though, because so far I see no proof in anything you have said either.

Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."
Salvos Rhoska
#370 - 2017-01-16 19:26:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:
If we want to both go to proof, I'm happy with that. It'll require us both to put our proof though, because so far I see no proof in anything you have said either.


All the while ignoring my question.

As a claimed scientist, do you find Techos' conclusions from the study as valid?

PvE v PvP <> Old School Exploration <> CODE Licenses <> CODE Special Agent
Salvos Rhoska
#371 - 2017-01-16 19:28:59 UTC
Maekchu wrote:
Was just about to point out your failure, but Shae beat me to it.

I wonder who is misrepresenting the sequence in the discussion now. But it's funny to see you trying to dig yourself out of this hole :D


I know my studies are real.

I have seen no evidence of Shaes claims.

PvE v PvP <> Old School Exploration <> CODE Licenses <> CODE Special Agent
Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#372 - 2017-01-16 19:34:10 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Maekchu wrote:
Was just about to point out your failure, but Shae beat me to it.

I wonder who is misrepresenting the sequence in the discussion now. But it's funny to see you trying to dig yourself out of this hole :D


I know my studies are real.

Unfortunately your understanding of timelines seems lacking.

My evidence is coming. Just getting my PhD out now and scanning it.

Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."
Maekchu
Doomheim
#373 - 2017-01-16 19:34:39 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Maekchu wrote:
Was just about to point out your failure, but Shae beat me to it.

I wonder who is misrepresenting the sequence in the discussion now. But it's funny to see you trying to dig yourself out of this hole :D


I know my studies are real.

I have seen no evidence of Shaes claims.

You've presented the same amount of evidence as Shae. We don't know whether you actually have the background you claim, nor do we know whether Shae has the background he/she claims. Therefore your argument "I know my studies are real" is irrelevant. In general, the whole debate you guys are having is of little relevance, since it's the ******* internet.

What we do know, is that you've stated that a PhD does not constitute a real study. That is funny and worth pursuing further :D
Salvos Rhoska
#374 - 2017-01-16 19:38:03 UTC
Maekchu wrote:
What we do know, is that you've stated that a PhD does not constitute a real study. That is funny and worth pursuing further :D


Reading back through the thread, I see that it was intended to be addressed to you, not to Shea.

I failed the copy/paste and addressed my response to him, instead of you.

Its that simple.

PvE v PvP <> Old School Exploration <> CODE Licenses <> CODE Special Agent
Maekchu
Doomheim
#375 - 2017-01-16 19:45:42 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Maekchu wrote:
What we do know, is that you've stated that a PhD does not constitute a real study. That is funny and worth pursuing further :D


Reading back through the thread, I see that it was intended to be addressed to you, not to Shea.

I failed the copy/paste and addressed my response to him, instead of you.

Its that simple.

Of course you did Salvos :D

But if you want to bend it that way, then I'd say we have done approx. the same amount of research papers. You have a 3 years of law and 1 year of psychology. I have finished an economics bachelor (3 years) and finishing a bachelors in computer science (2 years).

So how is it, that you have done some "real" studies? That hole is getting deeper and deeper. :D
Salvos Rhoska
#376 - 2017-01-16 19:47:07 UTC
Maekchu wrote:

So how is it, that you have done some "real" studies? That hole is getting deeper and deeper. :D


I actually learned what was taught, whereas you apparently havent if you try to defend Techos' false conclusions from the study.

PvE v PvP <> Old School Exploration <> CODE Licenses <> CODE Special Agent
Maekchu
Doomheim
#377 - 2017-01-16 19:51:34 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Maekchu wrote:

So how is it, that you have done some "real" studies? That hole is getting deeper and deeper. :D


I actually learned what was taught, whereas you apparently havent if you try to defend Techos' false conclusions from the study.

Never defended anyone :D

If anything, then I've actually defended you, since I stated that you are arguing over opinions and you both reserve the rights to those.

What I did accuse you of, is that you maybe shouldn't consider your opinion facts.
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#378 - 2017-01-16 20:04:22 UTC
Handbags at dawn?

*settles in for some light entertainment*

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack
Jacques d'Orleans
#379 - 2017-01-16 20:08:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Jacques d'Orleans
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Handbags at dawn?

*settles in for some light entertainment*


Jonah, you owe me a beer, because mine just left mostly thru my nose!

Breakfast is the most important drink of the day.
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#380 - 2017-01-16 20:13:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Jacques d'Orleans wrote:
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Handbags at dawn?

*settles in for some light entertainment*


Jonah, you owe me a beer, because mine just left mostly thru my nose!
There's a Monty Python sketch for everything Twisted

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack