These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Technically avoiding concord?

Author
Fek Mercer
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#1 - 2016-12-14 12:53:09 UTC
I came back from my first successful exploration run in a while, only to be oneshotted by a thrasher waiting by the common warp-in point outside jita. Now while that in itself is a massive blow to morale (Right through the jaws of sabres, cloaky relic/data site traps, tactical destroyers, gate camps, only to for this to happen? gimme a break already!), I noticed something else.


There was also a cargo ship waiting at the same location. It simply picked up whatever was left of the 80 million in my hold while the thrasher was concorded. The whole situation seemed.. not right. Is this not technically a form of evading concord? The killing ship was destroyed, but the same person picked up the loot without consequence.
Tisiphone Dira
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#2 - 2016-12-14 13:01:01 UTC
Using alts is allowed. Calm down

There once was a ganker named tisi

A stunningly beautiful missy

To gank a gross miner

There is nothing finer, cept when they get all pissy

Memphis Baas
#3 - 2016-12-14 13:02:35 UTC
The consequence to that person was losing the ship that shot you, plus losing some Sec. rating to his character, who will eventually get past -5 and become free-for-all / have trouble moving through high-sec.

Neutral alt with the industrial is neutral.

You're not safe in high-sec, people will shoot you for your loot or for the kill mail. In null, wh, and even low-sec, you know who your enemies are (everyone you see), in high-sec, you don't know until you get shot at, and by then it's too late.
Hrist Harkonnen
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#4 - 2016-12-14 13:03:16 UTC
Fek Mercer wrote:
I came back from my first successful exploration run in a while, only to be oneshotted by a thrasher waiting by the common warp-in point outside jita. Now while that in itself is a massive blow to morale (Right through the jaws of sabres, cloaky relic/data site traps, tactical destroyers, gate camps, only to for this to happen? gimme a break already!), I noticed something else.


There was also a cargo ship waiting at the same location. It simply picked up whatever was left of the 80 million in my hold while the thrasher was concorded. The whole situation seemed.. not right. Is this not technically a form of evading concord? The killing ship was destroyed, but the same person picked up the loot without consequence.



Thats why ganking is risk free. CCP had years to change the system but they like it.
Vigirr
#5 - 2016-12-14 13:12:15 UTC
Hrist Harkonnen wrote:
Fek Mercer wrote:
I came back from my first successful exploration run in a while, only to be oneshotted by a thrasher waiting by the common warp-in point outside jita. Now while that in itself is a massive blow to morale (Right through the jaws of sabres, cloaky relic/data site traps, tactical destroyers, gate camps, only to for this to happen? gimme a break already!), I noticed something else.


There was also a cargo ship waiting at the same location. It simply picked up whatever was left of the 80 million in my hold while the thrasher was concorded. The whole situation seemed.. not right. Is this not technically a form of evading concord? The killing ship was destroyed, but the same person picked up the loot without consequence.



Thats why ganking is risk free. CCP had years to change the system but they like it.


Ganking is Darwinism, and Darwinism is good & needed in EVE. If you get ganked you get the award.
mkint
#6 - 2016-12-14 13:49:32 UTC
Vigirr wrote:
Hrist Harkonnen wrote:
Fek Mercer wrote:
I came back from my first successful exploration run in a while, only to be oneshotted by a thrasher waiting by the common warp-in point outside jita. Now while that in itself is a massive blow to morale (Right through the jaws of sabres, cloaky relic/data site traps, tactical destroyers, gate camps, only to for this to happen? gimme a break already!), I noticed something else.


There was also a cargo ship waiting at the same location. It simply picked up whatever was left of the 80 million in my hold while the thrasher was concorded. The whole situation seemed.. not right. Is this not technically a form of evading concord? The killing ship was destroyed, but the same person picked up the loot without consequence.



Thats why ganking is risk free. CCP had years to change the system but they like it.


Ganking is Darwinism, and Darwinism is good & needed in EVE. If you get ganked you get the award.

Dwarvishism? Are you saying all gankers are really short?

Maxim 6. If violence wasn’t your last resort, you failed to resort to enough of it.

Tipa Riot
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#7 - 2016-12-14 13:53:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Tipa Riot
Vigirr wrote:

Ganking is Darwinism, and Darwinism is good & needed in EVE. If you get ganked you get the award.

Exactly this.

If you want to annoy gankers and profit, undock a shuttle with a scrap metal double-wrap package in Jita 4-4 and wait ... set the killright to 10-20M and enjoy the pay. Pick a new alpha account/char and repeat. Twisted

I'm my own NPC alt.

Princess Adhara
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#8 - 2016-12-14 14:02:57 UTC
Don't carry valuable cargo in a ship that can be 1-shot.

Create insta docks and undocks and use them.
Neuntausend
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#9 - 2016-12-14 14:07:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Neuntausend
Nobody is avoiding any consequences here. The consequence for illegally attacking a ship in HS is a sec status hit and CONCORD. The consequence for looting a wreck that isn't yours is a suspect timer. I would make a bet and say that both things have happened.

As for the poster that is claiming that ganking is "risk free": The risk involved with ganking is that your mark doesn't die, doesn't drop the loot or that someone snatches the can before you do, in which cases you'd lose your ship and sec status, but get nothing. There's also the risk of getting your loot ship bumped and caught. The tankier your target, the higher the risk and the bigger the loss. That people who specialize in a certain type of gameplay have learned to minimize the risk involved doesn't mean it's risk free, and this happens with all sorts of mechanics in Eve: If you know what you are doing, you are more likely to succeed. It would be rather silly if it was not like that.

In the same sense I could claim that flying into Jita is absolutely risk free, as people who know what they are doing can avoid ganks and wardecs. It doesn't really mean it's risk free at all, as OPs lossmail proves, but you can minimize that risk if you just l2p.

Take OPs Probe for example. Had he done two things, he would have lived with near certainty:

1. Fit a Cloak and MWD-cloak-warp after a gate jump.
2. Make an "insta-dock" bookmark on the jita 4-4 station, and while warping to it use the autopilot to instantly dock.

Doing that, he would at no point even even have been lockable.


Bottom line is, the ganker probably knew what he was doing, he knew where people would warp in from and where they would land, he had a ship fit for the task and a friend or an alt ready and he probably had gathered intel in the form of a cargo scan as well. He had a trap laid out, and OP walked right into it. Working as intended.
Fek Mercer
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#10 - 2016-12-14 14:35:56 UTC
what's the purpose of concord though? To stop an area of the game from becoming a free for all, and thus allowing different playstyles. Why then, create a rule that make concord avoidance a bannable offence? Clearly, we want to keep some measure of the peace.

Spin it how you like, someone can use an alt to destroy high value targets and then, in essence, avoid concord using their main. What have they lost? It's a net gain. It is a simple matter to create another sec status dumpster to continue destroying high value targets.


They are, for all intents and purposes, immune to concord and are in the free for all zone. There are many ways to make is in eve, but this one, for all it's ingenuity, is against the rules.
Paranoid Loyd
#11 - 2016-12-14 14:38:37 UTC
Yarr!


Pirate

"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix

Fix the Prospect!

Bargain Benny
Doomheim
#12 - 2016-12-14 15:07:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Bargain Benny
Fek Mercer wrote:
They are, for all intents and purposes, immune to concord and are in the free for all zone. There are many ways to make is in eve, but this one, for all it's ingenuity, is against the rules.


The character that shot you lost their ship, The character that looted your wreck gained suspect status and, had anyone decided to do so, could have been fired on without CONCORD intervention by any other player in the vicinity. CONCORD reacts to the actions of the character, not to the player behind multiple accounts. This type of activity has been going on for years without much of any intervention by the devs, despite innumerable forum threads complaining about this exact same thing. Do not try to space-lawyer the people who created the rules in the first place and have by their action (or lack thereof) have validated a particular playstyle, especially if you're not going to quote the specifics of the EULA that forbid it.

Just deal with it, learn from it, and develop ways to circumvent it. Perhaps next time you should transfer your loot to a less conspicuous ship one system over from the hub.
Nicolai Serkanner
Incredible.
Brave Collective
#13 - 2016-12-14 15:10:41 UTC
Fek Mercer wrote:
Is this not technically a form of evading concord?


No.
Estuary Algaert
Petulant Luddite GmbH
#14 - 2016-12-14 15:18:56 UTC
Fek Mercer wrote:
what's the purpose of concord though? To stop an area of the game from becoming a free for all, and thus allowing different playstyles. Why then, create a rule that make concord avoidance a bannable offence? Clearly, we want to keep some measure of the peace.

Spin it how you like, someone can use an alt to destroy high value targets and then, in essence, avoid concord using their main. What have they lost? It's a net gain. It is a simple matter to create another sec status dumpster to continue destroying high value targets.


They are, for all intents and purposes, immune to concord and are in the free for all zone. There are many ways to make is in eve, but this one, for all it's ingenuity, is against the rules.


You are thinking like a mortal, not a capsuleer. The behavior you are talking about is the full embrace of CONCORD and the rules, death is irrelevant only the exercise of your own will, and ships are replaceable. The ganker and the hauler are not avoiding anything, they are fully embracing it as their way of life. It is everyone else who is avoiding them, CONCORD permits you to take action, they wave the law for you to seek your own justice by making these people legal targets. The hauler gets flagged, but nothing happens, they are allowed to leave. The ganker has killrights granted to previous victims, yet there is no reprisal, their way of life can be disrupted, but it isn't. CONCORD has paved a way to mete out justice and then watches as nothing happens.
Beast of Revelations
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#15 - 2016-12-14 15:49:15 UTC
Fek Mercer wrote:

Spin it how you like, someone can use an alt to destroy high value targets and then, in essence, avoid concord using their main. What have they lost? It's a net gain. It is a simple matter to create another sec status dumpster to continue destroying high value targets.

They are, for all intents and purposes, immune to concord...


You seem to have a point to me, unless someone can explain how you don't. It's a garbage alt. He uses it as a sec-status dumpster. Once sec drops too much, he trashes the character, makes a new one, rinse, repeat. Doesn't seem like he's out anything.
Pix Severus
Empty You
#16 - 2016-12-14 15:58:43 UTC
Why does the myth of "highsec is safe" still perpetuate?

The major highsec trade routes are some of the most dangerous areas in the entire game.

Beast of Revelations wrote:
Fek Mercer wrote:

Spin it how you like, someone can use an alt to destroy high value targets and then, in essence, avoid concord using their main. What have they lost? It's a net gain. It is a simple matter to create another sec status dumpster to continue destroying high value targets.

They are, for all intents and purposes, immune to concord...


You seem to have a point to me, unless someone can explain how you don't. It's a garbage alt. He uses it as a sec-status dumpster. Once sec drops too much, he trashes the character, makes a new one, rinse, repeat. Doesn't seem like he's out anything.


Using alts in this fashion is against the rules, I believe. Most gankers I know operate as -10 in highsec.

MTU Hunter: Latest Entry - June 12 2017 - Vocal Local 5

MTU Hunting 101: Comprehensive Guide

mkint
#17 - 2016-12-14 15:59:28 UTC
Beast of Revelations wrote:
Fek Mercer wrote:

Spin it how you like, someone can use an alt to destroy high value targets and then, in essence, avoid concord using their main. What have they lost? It's a net gain. It is a simple matter to create another sec status dumpster to continue destroying high value targets.

They are, for all intents and purposes, immune to concord...


You seem to have a point to me, unless someone can explain how you don't. It's a garbage alt. He uses it as a sec-status dumpster. Once sec drops too much, he trashes the character, makes a new one, rinse, repeat. Doesn't seem like he's out anything.

Didn't I read somewhere at some point that this technically isn't allowed? Though whether or not it's enforced in any way, is a different matter.

Maxim 6. If violence wasn’t your last resort, you failed to resort to enough of it.

Elenahina
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#18 - 2016-12-14 16:22:04 UTC
Memphis Baas wrote:

You're not safe in high-sec, people will shoot you for your loot or for the kill mail. In null, wh, and even low-sec, you know who your enemies are (everyone you see), in high-sec, you don't know until you get shot at, and by then it's too late.


AFAIAC, the same rule applies in highsec as applies everywhere else. If you're not green, purple, or blue, you're red, and are considered hostile. Just because I choose not to engage you doesn't mean I don't consider you a threat.

Eve is like an addiction; you can't quit it until it quits you. Also, iderno

Salvos Rhoska
#19 - 2016-12-14 16:22:21 UTC
Everything is working as intended.

Yes, HS pirates have found a niche/crack in the system, but they also overall introduce risk andfar more importantly ship/asset destruction to HS.

CONCORD has very specific rules of engagement. The looting alt is only suspect, and CONCORD doesnt care, nor have any means of knowing, whether they are associated with the gankers.

It is an arrangement of mutual, symbiotic advantage. The more material they destroy, the greater your own margins.
Offset by the risk that you might be the next target yourself.

Ship and material destruction is fundamentally crucial ro the EVE economy.

If you want safe, informed transit of materials, go to NS.
But even NS deals with HS markets, eventually.
Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#20 - 2016-12-14 16:28:03 UTC
Fek Mercer wrote:
...the thrasher was concorded... Is this not technically a form of evading concord? ...

FFS

Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."

123Next pageLast page