These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Can we have ISBOX back ?

First post
Author
Serafiel
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#41 - 2016-12-02 15:15:11 UTC
Toobo wrote:
EVE, for a game that has such good multiboxing potentials, should really offer more flexible options to manage multiple accounts.


What you dont seem to understand, is that CCP does NOT want people to multibox, and does NOT want 60 thousand online, half of which are being run by 10 thousand guys like you.

And neither do we, legit players.
Jaxon Grylls
Institute of Archaeology
#42 - 2016-12-02 15:16:13 UTC
Jason Coralin wrote:
Anyway, is what it is. I just don't understand why CCP is so hostile to solo minded players.

They're not.

ISBox was an exploit in my opinion and I'm glad it's gone. I am a solo player and never saw the benefit in having a mining fleet able to clean out an asteroid belt by myself. Why bother? Just so you can earn enough plex to be able to subscribe to a multitude of account so that you can earn enough ISK to afford the plex? I play for enjoyment and I don't count my success in how much ISK I make in an hour, that just seems a sterile and blinkered way of playing EVE. If you want to brag about how easy making ISK is in EVE fair enough just don't use dubious shortcuts to do so.
Neuntausend
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#43 - 2016-12-02 15:26:53 UTC
I don't dislike the idea of key broadcasting. I used to play using different key broadcasters myself, although not Eve. So, I don't mind Isboxer key broadcasting in general, but I too think that it didn't do the game any favors. Of course it's a nice thing to be allowed to do for certain players, but overall I think we're better of with it being prohibited.
Sir BloodArgon Aulmais
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#44 - 2016-12-02 15:27:11 UTC
This is good, this is good.

Lets get all the dumbass ideas out of the way now, so the forums can be clean for next week.
Jason Coralin
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#45 - 2016-12-02 15:34:35 UTC
Jaxon Grylls wrote:
Jason Coralin wrote:
Anyway, is what it is. I just don't understand why CCP is so hostile to solo minded players.

They're not.

ISBox was an exploit in my opinion and I'm glad it's gone. I am a solo player and never saw the benefit in having a mining fleet able to clean out an asteroid belt by myself. Why bother? Just so you can earn enough plex to be able to subscribe to a multitude of account so that you can earn enough ISK to afford the plex? I play for enjoyment and I don't count my success in how much ISK I make in an hour, that just seems a sterile and blinkered way of playing EVE. If you want to brag about how easy making ISK is in EVE fair enough just don't use dubious shortcuts to do so.


It had nothing to do with making ISK, at least not for me.

It had everything to do with me as a solo player, being able to access end game content without a group.

Why should only groups be allowed to fly end game ships and have access to end game content? Why not let solo players also have a mechanism to access end game content?

But I get it, CCP just doesn't like solo players. Is what it is.
Gadget Helmsdottir
Gadget's Workshop
#46 - 2016-12-02 15:36:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Gadget Helmsdottir
Jason Coralin wrote:

Why are group players morally superior to solo players in your eyes?

Some people, for numerous and varied reasons, don't want to group up.

ISBoxer allowed the solo minded player to compete with the groups. Why is that a bad thing? Why leave the solo players out in the cold and not let them play in the sandbox?

Anyway, is what it is. I just don't understand why CCP is so hostile to solo minded players.

P.S. You probably don't really know how ISBoxer worked if you are saying it was with "infinite ease".



First, EvE is a game the centers on groups: gangs, corps, alliances... blocs.
Please Note, that the game isn't unplayable solo by any means, but choosing to do so indicates that the solo player is accepting this as a challenge.

Second. Any task that a single player can do with multiple accounts, a group can do better given the same tools. One player controlling 8 accounts will still lose out to 3 players controlling 8 account each while working in tandem.

I'm actually trying to think of anything that a solo player can do with only one character that can't be done better with two or more accounts, and I'm drawing a blank. That's the nature of EvE.

The only things that a player gains by being solo are security - unless your alts are someone's spies Shocked - and control over play-times and resources.

Solo players aren't being shown hostility or left out in the cold. They are knowingly engaging in a playstyle where they are prioritizing personal security and personal time over efficiency, camaraderie, and social engagement.

--Gadget

Work smarter, not harder. --Scrooge McDuck, an eminent old-Earth economist

Given an hour to save New Eden, how would respected scientist, Albertus Eisenstein compose his thoughts? "Fifty-five minutes to define the problem; save the galaxy in five."

Gadget Helmsdottir
Gadget's Workshop
#47 - 2016-12-02 15:37:48 UTC
Jason Coralin wrote:
Why not let solo players also have a mechanism to access end game content?



This is EvE... There is no end-game...

--Forever Gadget

Work smarter, not harder. --Scrooge McDuck, an eminent old-Earth economist

Given an hour to save New Eden, how would respected scientist, Albertus Eisenstein compose his thoughts? "Fifty-five minutes to define the problem; save the galaxy in five."

Rroff
Antagonistic Tendencies
#48 - 2016-12-02 16:25:17 UTC
Serafiel wrote:

What you dont seem to understand, is that CCP does NOT want people to multibox, and does NOT want 60 thousand online, half of which are being run by 10 thousand guys like you.

And neither do we, legit players.


I've never seen anything from CCP expressly saying they don't want people to multibox - I've seen some CCP employees air the opinion (and a general developer direction) that multi-boxing should not be a necessity in eve.

A game like eve benefits from having a lot of people logged in an active even if a percentage of that is one player with multiple characters aslong as they are doing something - these types of games die very quickly when player numbers drop below a certain threshold - even though eve is a little more resistant to that compared to some.
Aurelius Oshidashi
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#49 - 2016-12-02 16:36:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Aurelius Oshidashi
2Sonas1Cup wrote:
It's been awhile now and we could see the drastic decline in players numbers since ISBOX was banned.

I think it's time for CCP to reconsider the option to allow us key broadcasting and let us have fun in your game for once.

.


Having fun in the game for once you say........

I want to thank you so much for deciding yourself you could speak on everyone's behalf. Your status of great leader is quickly confirmed by your analysis pointing towards one main cause for player decline during a certain time. Oh the wisdom, I can only awe at it.

I think we indeed all agree eve should become a less co-operative game that relies more on apps taking care of teamwork.
Prince Kobol
#50 - 2016-12-02 18:05:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Prince Kobol
Jason Coralin wrote:
Jaxon Grylls wrote:
Jason Coralin wrote:
Anyway, is what it is. I just don't understand why CCP is so hostile to solo minded players.

They're not.

ISBox was an exploit in my opinion and I'm glad it's gone. I am a solo player and never saw the benefit in having a mining fleet able to clean out an asteroid belt by myself. Why bother? Just so you can earn enough plex to be able to subscribe to a multitude of account so that you can earn enough ISK to afford the plex? I play for enjoyment and I don't count my success in how much ISK I make in an hour, that just seems a sterile and blinkered way of playing EVE. If you want to brag about how easy making ISK is in EVE fair enough just don't use dubious shortcuts to do so.


It had nothing to do with making ISK, at least not for me.

It had everything to do with me as a solo player, being able to access end game content without a group.

Why should only groups be allowed to fly end game ships and have access to end game content? Why not let solo players also have a mechanism to access end game content?

But I get it, CCP just doesn't like solo players. Is what it is.



What end game content are we talking about here? It would to good know what you consider to be end game content.

For me there really isn't such a thing as End game content within Eve, just different play styles and environments.

Technically you can still do everything you could before ISboxer and such were banned, it is just now a hell of a lot harder which kind of proves the point.

If you find a task next to impossible without ISboxer then that shows how powerful of a tool it became.
Jason Coralin
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#51 - 2016-12-02 18:11:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Jason Coralin
Prince Kobol wrote:
Jason Coralin wrote:
Jaxon Grylls wrote:
Jason Coralin wrote:
Anyway, is what it is. I just don't understand why CCP is so hostile to solo minded players.

They're not.

ISBox was an exploit in my opinion and I'm glad it's gone. I am a solo player and never saw the benefit in having a mining fleet able to clean out an asteroid belt by myself. Why bother? Just so you can earn enough plex to be able to subscribe to a multitude of account so that you can earn enough ISK to afford the plex? I play for enjoyment and I don't count my success in how much ISK I make in an hour, that just seems a sterile and blinkered way of playing EVE. If you want to brag about how easy making ISK is in EVE fair enough just don't use dubious shortcuts to do so.


It had nothing to do with making ISK, at least not for me.

It had everything to do with me as a solo player, being able to access end game content without a group.

Why should only groups be allowed to fly end game ships and have access to end game content? Why not let solo players also have a mechanism to access end game content?

But I get it, CCP just doesn't like solo players. Is what it is.



What end game content are we talking about here? It would to good know what you consider to be end game content.

For me there really isn't such a thing as End game content within Eve, just different play styles and environments.

Technically you can still do everything you could before ISboxer and such were banned, it is just now a hell of a lot harder which kind of proves the point.

If you find a task next to impossible without ISboxer then that shows how powerful of a tool it became.


Well, how about for starters mining in Null sec and not having to run when enemy fleets showed up. As a solo player, the only way to defend yourself against roving nullsec gangs with your mining fleet was ISBoxer.

Without ISBoxer the only option for solo mining in null sec is running away. Well in my book, running away isn't fun game play.

But I get it, the null sec groups didn't like solo players standing up to them, which is why the petitioned hard to get rid of us unruly solo players.

Well job done. Congrats are in order I suppose.
Agondray
Avenger Mercenaries
VOID Intergalactic Forces
#52 - 2016-12-02 18:30:30 UTC
isbox wont matter when we are all forced to be limited to 1 account like the alphas as ccp have stated since they limited alphas for "balance" and have plans for omega accounts aswell

"Sarcasm is the Recourse of a weak mind." -Dr. Smith

Gadget Helmsdottir
Gadget's Workshop
#53 - 2016-12-02 18:40:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Gadget Helmsdottir
Jason Coralin wrote:

Why leave the solo players out in the cold and not let them play in the sandbox?

Anyway, is what it is. I just don't understand why CCP is so hostile to solo minded players.

We wouldn't want the solo players to be able to compete with the groups would we.

But I get it, CCP just doesn't like solo players. Is what it is.

But I get it, the null sec groups didn't like solo players standing up to them, which is why the petitioned hard to get rid of us unruly solo players.



Chief,
What kind of stuff are you smoking.
A bit of paranoia in the game is all well and good - and may even be useful.
Outside the game ... not so much.

Why would the game owners suddenly decide not to like it's players.
That makes no sense, at all.

The game was designed with groups in mind from day one.

There are valid reasons for that design, and while many might disagree with the design philosophy, it was made in pre-WoW days when games like EQ and FFXI absolutely required a group to accomplish anything of note. And while EvE needs to update parts of its outer design to remain viable even in a niche market, the core design needs to stay constant for the same reasons.

Solo play is not discouraged, but the solo player in EvE must understand that she is playing against the grain. And this is fine for those who appreciate a challange or prioritize personal security over effeciency.

--Bemused Gadget

Work smarter, not harder. --Scrooge McDuck, an eminent old-Earth economist

Given an hour to save New Eden, how would respected scientist, Albertus Eisenstein compose his thoughts? "Fifty-five minutes to define the problem; save the galaxy in five."

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#54 - 2016-12-02 18:40:47 UTC
Agondray wrote:
isbox wont matter when we are all forced to be limited to 1 account like the alphas as ccp have stated since they limited alphas for "balance" and have plans for omega accounts aswell
Alphas aren't limited to one account, they can have as many as they like; what they can't do is log them in concurrently.

As for the topic of input broadcasting, I'm joining the nays.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Gadget Helmsdottir
Gadget's Workshop
#55 - 2016-12-02 18:41:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Gadget Helmsdottir
Agondray wrote:
isbox wont matter when we are all forced to be limited to 1 account like the alphas as ccp have stated since they limited alphas for "balance" and have plans for omega accounts aswell


Citation Needed.

--Red-Pen Gadget (isn't touching the other errors)

Work smarter, not harder. --Scrooge McDuck, an eminent old-Earth economist

Given an hour to save New Eden, how would respected scientist, Albertus Eisenstein compose his thoughts? "Fifty-five minutes to define the problem; save the galaxy in five."

Prince Kobol
#56 - 2016-12-02 18:58:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Prince Kobol
Jason Coralin wrote:


Well, how about for starters mining in Null sec and not having to run when enemy fleets showed up. As a solo player, the only way to defend yourself against roving nullsec gangs with your mining fleet was ISBoxer.

Without ISBoxer the only option for solo mining in null sec is running away. Well in my book, running away isn't fun game play.

But I get it, the null sec groups didn't like solo players standing up to them, which is why the petitioned hard to get rid of us unruly solo players.

Well job done. Congrats are in order I suppose.



Solo mining using how many ships?

Most people definition of solo mining is with one ship. If you are using 5, 10, 15 etc ships then I am sorry you are going to get zero sympathy.

The advantage of being around for a long time is that you have done most things. I have mined in null sec using 4 accounts, 3 hulks + 1 orca all without ISboxer.

Did I run when hostiles came in system, you bet your ass I ran because I never had any expectations that I should be able to fight them off.

I docked up, changed ships, grabbed some corp mates and went hunting.

You are arguing that you want to be able to mine in null sec solo whilst in control of x number of ships and fight people off solo.

Anything else you want? Titan that has a billion HP points, can fit 10 strip miners, infinite cargo hold, deploy 1000 drones all at once and immune to all forms of ECM, Bubbles, bumping etc..

I know I am pushing it but you might as well be asking for it.
Galaxy Duck
Galaxy Farm Carebear Repurposing
#57 - 2016-12-02 19:36:47 UTC
The blood-thirsty ganker in me wants to multibox infinity thrashers on the Jita undock, the reasonable EVE player in me knows that input broadcasting is cheating.
Gadget Helmsdottir
Gadget's Workshop
#58 - 2016-12-02 19:38:01 UTC
Galaxy Duck wrote:
The blood-thirsty ganker in me wants to multibox infinity thrashers on the Jita undock, the reasonable EVE player in me knows that input broadcasting is cheating.



**cough,cough** stealthbombers **cough, cough**

--Coughing Gadget

Work smarter, not harder. --Scrooge McDuck, an eminent old-Earth economist

Given an hour to save New Eden, how would respected scientist, Albertus Eisenstein compose his thoughts? "Fifty-five minutes to define the problem; save the galaxy in five."

Jason Coralin
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#59 - 2016-12-02 20:01:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Jason Coralin
Prince Kobol wrote:
[quote=Jason Coralin]

Solo mining using how many ships?



I solo mined with 10 procurers and one command ship in Providence. It was a lot of fun and I could hold my own against many aggressors. I probably lost more than I won, but at least I didn't have to go run and hide

But the groups I was fighting didn't like the fact that one person had the audacity to think solo fighting was OK, so they whined to CCP and the rules were changed.

Is what it is. Life goes on. Yada yada yada.
Salvos Rhoska
#60 - 2016-12-02 20:15:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Key broadcasting has done incalculable damage to this games economy and player environment that will take years to recover from (arguably never)

CCPs reaction was very late, but atleast forceful and final.

Never again.