These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Is CCP helping or hurting Industry players with the latest changes?

Author
Mark Marconi
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#21 - 2016-11-16 07:47:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Mark Marconi
baltec1 wrote:
Cowards never win.

Actually CODE win quite often. Big smile

Against defenseless targets.

The CSM gets in the way of CCP communicating properly with the players of this game.

After all we are not just players, we are customers.

Time for the CSM to be disbanded.

Katucha
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#22 - 2016-11-16 15:53:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Katucha
May Arethusa wrote:
[quote] If you can't defend your Rorqual, why should you expect the same results as someone who can, and will?

Won't take that risk? Won't get the reward. It's that simple.



With the same logic, why don't they force carrier to siege while ratting to let only people that are able to defend it the posibility of making money with pve carrier? That would be more fair for rorqual pilots.
Keaden Aemar
4 Marketeers
Rura-Penthe
#23 - 2016-11-16 16:58:13 UTC
I'm fine with risk, I just wish it wasn't so inconvenient to boost. The range for mining boosters needs to be at least doubled (have you seen some of the ore sites in wormholes?), and micro managing charges seems like an unnecessary chore (just give us scripts like every other module that isn't a gun in the game).
Previous page12