These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Social regression in New Eden.

First post
Author
Mephiztopheleze
Laphroaig Inc.
#81 - 2016-10-15 08:31:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Mephiztopheleze
Toobo wrote:
As for Mephiz, I think it's already clear that I disagree with you on casino issue, but I can see your point.


I spent 12 years as a Barman in venues where there were poker machines and betting available on horses. I have seen families destroyed more than once. This has been followed by some 22 years, and counting, in commercial media where I have covered numerous stories of how problem gambling has devastated families, destroyed businesses and in some cases, dragged down entire communities.

I have no sympathy for casinos. I feel online betting agencies are a scourge on society as they profit from misery. At least before the internet, you had to get off your couch and leave the house to place a bet.

Today, you can lose your house with a couple of imprudent swipes on a mobile phone screen.

Very few online gambling agencies contribute anything back into the sports or events they offer odds on, I suppose in this regard the EVE casinos were a little better than many.

In any event, IRL gambling is usually heavily regulated by governments, for a variety of reasons. If CCP allowed it to continue, they could very easily find themselves dragged before the courts and asked to explain themselves. One simple rule of business is to try and avoid courts wherever possible.

CCP has made a straightforward business decision to simply remove that possibility. If you *hate* what they have done, I daresay you're in the minority.

Occasional Resident Newbie Correspondent for TMC: http://themittani.com/search/site/mephiztopheleze

This is my Forum Main. My Combat Alt is sambo Inkura

Toobo
Project Fruit House
#82 - 2016-10-15 08:59:10 UTC
Mephiz, thanks for your comments. Living in a community that was mostly on the wrong side of the law, yes I too have seen people and families destroyed by gambling and various other addictions, like substamce abuse I mentioned before. Yes I'm still against outright prohibition of gambling and drugs (that get you 'high'). People can see the same incident but have different opinions, which is fine by me. When it gets irritating is when people assume 'you must have not seen it' just because someone has a different opinion. Heck I've seen parents shooting up and falling into lala land while leaving their baby in a basket on a corridor crying. That was focked up, but I still maintain such drugs should be legal.

I respect your experience and opinions you've developed based on RL experience. But I think we can agree to differ on some issues.

Cheers Love! The cavalry's here!

Memphis Baas
#83 - 2016-10-15 11:56:58 UTC
Big Lynx wrote:
Reading this I am more and more shocked how much damage IWI caused to the game itself and the players, by not even playing the game. I have to admit that I am pretty disappointed that CCP observed this for years without any actions.


The thing is, ISK that sits in your wallet is out of the game, temporarily. So we have a huge ISK faucet in the bounties on NPC rats and in the mission rewards, and what tends to happen is, it moves around (helping the economy) until it collects in someone's wallet in the hundreds of billions / trillions.

Realistically, if you had trillions you wouldn't spend them all, or fast, so they just sit there as you lose interest in the game. But the possibility exists that you could re-activate one day and blow all your trillions on some new feature that CCP adds to the game, thereby preventing everyone else from enjoying that feature. The ISK in your wallet is out of the game, but only temporarily so.

Best thing that CCP can do for the game at that point is to ban you, thereby taking the ISK out of the game permanently. It helps that when people have so much ISK, the temptation to RMT is really high, and this gives CCP a reason to ban.

So I'm arguing that IWI helped the game by helping to make ISK circulate, until it accumulated in a few (easy to ban) wallets.

Look at the ISK Sinks and Faucets chart from the last economic report. Look at the Bounty Prizes faucet, and look at the total difference between Faucets and Sinks. CCP needs to ban, each month, approx. 30 trillion ISK to keep the game prices the way they are now. In this economic report, they only banned 18T, indicated by the Active ISK Delta number.


And now for speculation:

I think that, without gambling, ISK concentration dynamic will have to fall back to just scams, theft, market trading, and PLEX conversions, and in theory they're not as effective as gambling at concentrating the ISK. CCP will have to ban a lot more accounts (that are poorer) to achieve their 30T ISK delta. Possibly that's what the EULA change of the reduction from 6 months to 3 months for "if your account is inactive we can delete it" is all about.

Or, more reasonably, they can reduce the ISK faucets; however, the faucets are 74T, and to reduce them by 30T is a 40% reduction. Considering that Alphas CAN do (lower level) missions, possibly the faucets are going to be higher than 74T, so I'm strongly expecting a major nerf to rat bounties, mission payouts, and incursion rewards.
Big Lynx
#84 - 2016-10-15 12:05:51 UTC
Memphis Baas wrote:
Big Lynx wrote:
Reading this I am more and more shocked how much damage IWI caused to the game itself and the players, by not even playing the game. I have to admit that I am pretty disappointed that CCP observed this for years without any actions.


The thing is, ISK that sits in your wallet is out of the game, temporarily. So we have a huge ISK faucet in the bounties on NPC rats and in the mission rewards, and what tends to happen is, it moves around (helping the economy) until it collects in someone's wallet in the hundreds of billions / trillions.

Realistically, if you had trillions you wouldn't spend them all, or fast, so they just sit there as you lose interest in the game. But the possibility exists that you could re-activate one day and blow all your trillions on some new feature that CCP adds to the game, thereby preventing everyone else from enjoying that feature. The ISK in your wallet is out of the game, but only temporarily so.

Best thing that CCP can do for the game at that point is to ban you, thereby taking the ISK out of the game permanently. It helps that when people have so much ISK, the temptation to RMT is really high, and this gives CCP a reason to ban.

So I'm arguing that IWI helped the game by helping to make ISK circulate, until it accumulated in a few (easy to ban) wallets.

Look at the ISK Sinks and Faucets chart from the last economic report. Look at the Bounty Prizes faucet, and look at the total difference between Faucets and Sinks. CCP needs to ban, each month, approx. 30 trillion ISK to keep the game prices the way they are now. In this economic report, they only banned 18T, indicated by the Active ISK Delta number.


And now for speculation:

I think that, without gambling, ISK concentration dynamic will have to fall back to just scams, theft, market trading, and PLEX conversions, and in theory they're not as effective as gambling at concentrating the ISK. CCP will have to ban a lot more accounts (that are poorer) to achieve their 30T ISK delta. Possibly that's what the EULA change of the reduction from 6 months to 3 months for "if your account is inactive we can delete it" is all about.

Or, more reasonably, they can reduce the ISK faucets; however, the faucets are 74T, and to reduce them by 30T is a 40% reduction. Considering that Alphas CAN do (lower level) missions, possibly the faucets are going to be higher than 74T, so I'm strongly expecting a major nerf to rat bounties, mission payouts, and incursion rewards.


I am really sry mate, don't take it personally
Memphis Baas
#85 - 2016-10-15 12:13:25 UTC
Shrug.

I'm allowed to, every now and then, esp. in the General Discussion forum.

Toobo
Project Fruit House
#86 - 2016-10-15 12:20:50 UTC
Memphis saw it correctly IMO. Gambling didn't generate ISK out of the game neither has it removed ISK from the game. It circulated ISK and concentrated. Getting it banned and removed from the game was not its intention obviously, but that's what it achieved. The actual ISK removed will be higher than what was banned, as I know quite a few people are quitting EVE over this although they did not get banned. Also, the ISK confiscation was applied to even non banker toons, the alts and mains of the banker toons. Some of the loss that bankers suffered was actually higher on those toons than on the actual banker toons, like people who were banking but also had many other legit in game ops at alliance level.

And also consider all the ISK in IWI account that can no longer come back to the game. For me it was 120b but I know people who had much more than that in their account, and IWI had thousands of players. You are probably looking at minimum 10~20t removed from the players alone, not counting the bankers and IWI corp. Unlike big ISK sink that halpend with Citadel launch, this ISK is completely removed from the game, not converted to NPC sold BPOs, so the raw effect will hit harder IMO.

Cheers Love! The cavalry's here!

Big Lynx
#87 - 2016-10-15 12:30:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Big Lynx
Toobo wrote:


And also consider all the ISK in IWI account that can no longer come back to the game. For me it was 120b but I know people who had much more than that in their account, and IWI had thousands of players. You are probably looking at minimum 10~20t removed from the players alone, not counting the bankers and IWI corp. Unlike big ISK sink that halpend with Citadel launch, this ISK is completely removed from the game, not converted to NPC sold BPOs, so the raw effect will hit harder IMO.


That's so ridiculous. That shows that you know nothing about the game and its history. IWI isn't the first big ISK stakeholder banned in Eve's history... your buttmadness is ready for thread close
Toobo
Project Fruit House
#88 - 2016-10-15 13:39:59 UTC
Big Lynx wrote:
Toobo wrote:


And also consider all the ISK in IWI account that can no longer come back to the game. For me it was 120b but I know people who had much more than that in their account, and IWI had thousands of players. You are probably looking at minimum 10~20t removed from the players alone, not counting the bankers and IWI corp. Unlike big ISK sink that halpend with Citadel launch, this ISK is completely removed from the game, not converted to NPC sold BPOs, so the raw effect will hit harder IMO.


That's so ridiculous. That shows that you know nothing about the game and its history. IWI isn't the first big ISK stakeholder banned in Eve's history... your buttmadness is ready for thread close



When did I ever say that IWI was the first? O.o I mean I've been around see see EVE bank collapse and Sommer Blink gets closed and all that (I mention EVE Bank because IIRC that ended with the main dude RMT to pay bills).

Also while not third party site/gambling related, consider the scale of ISK that was involved with Bad Bobby's Titans 4 U feat.

Of course, PLEX were like in 200m regions so it's not directly proportional, but the scale of ISK lost at IWI is significant enough to notice.

I really don't get why you assume I must think IWI case is the first one, and on what basis you assume I know nothing about EVE history. I mean the comment I wrote to Memphis is just my estimation on how much ISK is removed via IWI ban, which I am probably better informed to estimate than someone who never played at IWI or talked to the bankers.

There was absolutely no mention of IWI being the first example of ISK being removed from the game. I'm only adding to Memphis estimation of ISK removed from the game. Does your knowledge of the history of the game help you make better estimate than I did? Then please use your experience and knowledge to estimate ISK removed from the game by ban of IWI. I would very much appreciate it.

Cheers Love! The cavalry's here!

Toobo
Project Fruit House
#89 - 2016-10-15 13:50:12 UTC
In addition, I'm pretty confident that you will feel the impact of such quantity of ISK removal from IWI ban in the economy. It will get mixed up with market changes due to November patches and changes, but it will contribute to movements in the market. Even for those who did not have their ISK confiscated, there will be plenty of multi trillionaires who look to use the ISK in game now that they can't gamble with them for lulz. Betwen my wallet and IWI wallet, the accumulated transaction value is around 200t since May. Of course, I do not have 200t in cash to pour into market, but for sure my ISK will rotate in EVE market now instead of rotating in a gambling site. I'm just a tiny little fish compared to EVE's old rich, and accumulated transaction value is not the same thing as ISK ready in wallet, but you get enough number of fish like me spinning that ISK on market instead of on slots, and consider the amount removed from the game, it will have impact.

Cheers Love! The cavalry's here!

Chopper Rollins
hahahlolspycorp
#90 - 2016-10-15 14:17:38 UTC
Toobo wrote:
.. Living in a community that was mostly on the wrong side of the law, yes I too have seen people and families destroyed by gambling and various other addictions...


Oh for rice cakes, calm the drama-queening. Everyone has seen that gambling is a vile and stupid waste that fosters crime and ruin.
It's removal is of no consequence, you're just blurting now.



Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good.

Toobo
Project Fruit House
#91 - 2016-10-15 14:52:39 UTC
That's funny Chopper. ;) Mephiz said he's seen gambling destroy people's lives IRL, no comments on that. I'm basicaly saying the same thing, yes I have seen it too. Suddenly I'm a drama queen. Lol.

Cheers Love! The cavalry's here!

Solonius Rex
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#92 - 2016-10-15 16:42:25 UTC
Toobo wrote:
In addition, I'm pretty confident that you will feel the impact of such quantity of ISK removal from IWI ban in the economy. It will get mixed up with market changes due to November patches and changes, but it will contribute to movements in the market. Even for those who did not have their ISK confiscated, there will be plenty of multi trillionaires who look to use the ISK in game now that they can't gamble with them for lulz. Betwen my wallet and IWI wallet, the accumulated transaction value is around 200t since May. Of course, I do not have 200t in cash to pour into market, but for sure my ISK will rotate in EVE market now instead of rotating in a gambling site. I'm just a tiny little fish compared to EVE's old rich, and accumulated transaction value is not the same thing as ISK ready in wallet, but you get enough number of fish like me spinning that ISK on market instead of on slots, and consider the amount removed from the game, it will have impact.


I have to disagree, I don't think it will impact as large as you claim it will.

The thing is, people didn't gamble on IWI just for the sake of gambling. People took their winnings and spent it. They redeemed ships. They spent the isk winnings on ships and modules. We even had a guy say how he started to get into station trading thanks to the start-up isk gained from IWI.

All the ISK that flows into IWI, also flowed out. So the Trillionaires who were pushing all that isk into IWI, just had it come out the other end where people spent it on other things.

It doesn't matter if one person with a trillion isk spends it in the market, or a hundred people with 10 billion isk spends it in the market. The net amount is going to stay reasonably the same.
Toobo
Project Fruit House
#93 - 2016-10-15 16:57:11 UTC
Interesting point Solunius, although I did not make any claim on how 'large' impact it will have, I only said it will have impact. The extent of its impact will be impossible to judge, as this incident is coinciding with other major game changes, so however the market turns out to be people will cite different reasons for it (as opposed to if we did not have any changes coming for a few months but notice difference in economy after the ISK removal).

Cheers Love! The cavalry's here!

Vortexo VonBrenner
Doomheim
#94 - 2016-10-15 17:11:11 UTC
IWI getting banned was coming. It's almost as if CCP would rather not expose themselves to the RL problems in-game gambling is causing for the game industry or something...

Personally, I see getting rid of IWI et al to be a good thing for EvE. Sorry, OP.




Chopper Rollins
hahahlolspycorp
#95 - 2016-10-15 17:34:50 UTC
Toobo wrote:
That's funny Chopper. ;) Mephiz said he's seen gambling destroy people's lives IRL, no comments on that. I'm basicaly saying the same thing, yes I have seen it too. Suddenly I'm a drama queen. Lol.


Yes, because of this
Toobo wrote:
Living in a community that was mostly on the wrong side of the law
bloody irrelevant nonsense.





Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good.

Toobo
Project Fruit House
#96 - 2016-10-15 17:37:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Toobo
Chopper, how's that different from this? I'm genuinely curious What?

Mephiztopheleze wrote:


I spent 12 years as a Barman in venues where there were poker machines and betting available on horses. I have seen families destroyed more than once. This has been followed by some 22 years, and counting, in commercial media where I have covered numerous stories of how problem gambling has devastated families, destroyed businesses and in some cases, dragged down entire communities.


Just realised somehow I remember you to be British, maybe you said so somewhere in some posts I read. In that case I think I'm pretty much set up as someone you will really hate IRL :p i learned my trade at the School that was headed by the brain behind Blair's Labour party, aka Anthony Giddens, and was taught by a person who got his PhD under supervision from Giddens. :p I fully accept that the School I went puked out generations of pompous failures that plagues UK in many agencies and corporations now. So I guess I will just leave it at that with you.

Cheers Love! The cavalry's here!

Igor Kozar
Doomheim
#97 - 2016-10-15 18:04:12 UTC
After reading thru some of the comments here, I think it's best Toobo to lay this topic to rest. What was done is done, and there is no point in continuing to ramble on with it.

I stand with CCP in their decision to remove the blight from their IP, and as such I'm glad they did.

Your saying that this is a regression in general, I do not believe that for once. All of your statements and comments points toward a person such as you who thinks you have to have life handed to you on a silver platter lined with gold and that your claims are as such unfounded.

As far as I know, after the next expansion goes live in November, I see a New Eden that will be far more than you'll ever know in every aspect of the game. I'm not going to be sorry for you since you won't look past your own selfishness. If all you want to do is gamble, then I have no sympathy for you in this regard.

I have yet to seen anyone such as you that trolled as much as you have over a change that was needed to be made in order to keep from falling afoul of the law.

I Have Spoken.
Toobo
Project Fruit House
#98 - 2016-10-15 18:12:45 UTC
Aye, Toobo signing out. Bowing out to majority feedbacks among GD population. I feel I got good feedback on how people think here, and I honestly didn't intend to troll, only saying what I genuinely think. I learned how some people think, and that is valuable so I thank you all for feedback.

Cheers Love! The cavalry's here!

Chopper Rollins
hahahlolspycorp
#99 - 2016-10-15 18:17:12 UTC
Toobo wrote:
Chopper, how's that different from this? I'm genuinely curious What?

Mephiztopheleze wrote:


I spent 12 years as a Barman in venues where there were poker machines and betting available on horses. I have seen families destroyed more than once. This has been followed by some 22 years, and counting, in commercial media where I have covered numerous stories of how problem gambling has devastated families, destroyed businesses and in some cases, dragged down entire communities.


Just realised somehow I remember you to be British, maybe you said so somewhere in some posts I read. In that case I think I'm pretty much set up as someone you will really hate IRL :p i learned my trade at the School that was headed by the brain behind Blair's Labour party, aka Anthony Giddens, and was taught by a person who got his PhD under supervision from Giddens. :p I fully accept that the School I went puked out generations of pompous failures that plagues UK in many agencies and corporations now. So I guess I will just leave it at that with you.



Meph is talking about his view of gambling as backed by experience in hospitality and media.
You mention living in a community "mostly on the wrong side of the law" which is just silly.
No i'm not British, you seem unable to see beyond yourself.



Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good.

Eternus8lux8lucis
Guardians of the Gate
RAZOR Alliance
#100 - 2016-10-15 18:20:02 UTC
Toobo wrote:
I'm hlad that the discussion is shifting to more about eve and game mechanic rather than on me as a formet IWI player.




Highlighted the parts of why Toobo is posting. This entire thread is about THEM and only THEM.Roll Its not about IWI or about game mechanics.

Have you heard anything I've said?

You said it's all circling the drain, the whole universe. Right?

That's right.

Had to end sometime.